Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    1/13

    Effects of

    animals on

    children's

    development

    and on their

    perception ofanimals

    http://www.deshow.net/baby/children-how-to-get-along-with-animals-40.html#pic

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    2/13

    Biophilia

    hypothesis

    by Edward O. Wilson,

    1929

    Biophilia (love of live,love for living systems)

    = the innate tendencyto focus on life andlifelike processes

    Wilson, 1929, p. 1

    http://www.deshow.net/baby/children-how-to-get-along-with-animals-40.html#pic

    http://weheartit.com/entry/6111014

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    3/13

    Companion animals

    (seem to) influence children's emotional,

    social, cognitive developmentpositively

    (moststudies say so), BUT:

    Causality dilemma

    Validity problemsfurther research/longitudinal

    studies needed

    Effects on animals?

    Endenburg/van Lith 2011

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    4/13

    Children and animals

    Regulated contactwithanimals in therapy or as

    companions positive effect is proven

    Some scientist also

    claim non-regulated

    contactbetween

    animals and children in

    wilderness areas (Louv2008, Kahn/Kellert 2002)

    http://www.susanne-fischer-rizzi.de/fs_sem-wildnis.html

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    5/13

    Nature Deficit Disorder

    How today's children perceive nature is characterizedby trends like:

    Severance from food's origins

    Machines = humans = animals

    Romanticizing

    Contact with the wild

    BUT: research on the impact of nature experiences on

    attention disorders (...) is in its infancyLouv, "Last Child in the Woods", 2008, p. 19/p. 110

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    6/13

    www.heimbach-eifel.de

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    7/13

    Contemporary test of the Biophilia hypothesis

    Humans have an innate desire to catalog, understand,and spend time with other life-forms.

    but what happens, if there is hardly any natural

    contact any more with other life-forms?

    Balmford et al. (2002) surveyed 109 UK children aged 4-11 yrs.

    by showing them flashcards of

    10 types of British wildlife species and

    10 Pokmon species

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    8/13

    Brown hare

    vs. ...

    http://www.countryfile.com/tips-

    techniques/best-places-

    photograph-wildlife-uk

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    9/13

    vs. Pikachu

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    10/13

    Results Balmford et al. (2002)

    mean idenitfication success of wildlife:

    32% at age 4, 53% at age 8, then fell slightly.

    mean idenitfication success of Pokmon:

    7% at age 4, 78% at age 8, older children

    typically identifying Pokmon species

    substantially better than organisms such as oak

    trees or badgers.

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    11/13

    The farm as a pedagogical resource

    Agricultural University of Norway, 1995: create pedagogical spaces in

    which committed, caring and continuous work with nature could go on,

    enabling an experience of connection and belonging

    Start of the project1995-2000: LivingschoolsTeachers and farmers worktogether, develop a 1-year-plan.

    Jolly et al. 2004

    http://www.livinglearning.org/

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    12/13

    The farm as a pedagogical resource

    Time spent at farms in order to meet

    defined subject goals(e.g. observe lifecycles of animals & plants),

    but also

    general curriculum goals(awareness of environmental questions,

    man's role in relationship to domestic animals etc.).

    e.g. 3rdgrade class, farm inAurland: sheep-shearing inautumn, collecting, sorting,cleaning, combing, weaving of wool;

    winter/spring: birth of lambs, followsheep to pasture, set out saltstones, milking.Jolly et al. 2004

  • 8/12/2019 Prae s 090413 Ka Efer

    13/13

    LiteraturBalmford, A./Clegg, L./Coulson, T./Taylor, J., 2002: Why Conservationists Should Heed Pokmon, In: Science 29

    March 2002: Vol. 295 no. 5564 p. 2367.

    Douglas, Mary, 2010 [1966]: Purity and Danger. An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo, Routledge

    Classics, London/New York.

    Endenburg, N./van Lith, H.A., 2011: The influence of animals on the development of children, In: The Veterinary

    Journal 190 (2011), p. 208-214.

    Jolly, L./Krogh, E./Nergaard, T./Parow, K./Verstad, B., 2004: The Farm as a Pedagogical Resource: Background

    for and evaluation of the co-operation between agriculture and primary school in the county of Nord-Trondelag, Norway, In: Cristvao, Artur (ed.): Farming and rural systems research and extension.

    Proceedings of the 6thEuropean Symposium of the International Farming Systems Association, Vila Real. p.

    633-643. http://home.utad.pt/~des/ifsa/ifsa_6th_eu_proceed.pdf

    Kahn, Peter H. Jr./Kellert, St. R. (eds.), 2002: Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary

    investigations, MIT Press, Boston.

    Louv, Richard, 2008: Last Child in the Woods. Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder, Algonquin

    Books of Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

    Wilson, E. O., 1984 [1929]: Biophilia. The human bond with other species, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.