33
Pragmatics By The Sixth Group: Agil Abdur Rohim(D75212075) Ainun Chamidah (D05212003) Ainun Munfadhila(D35212047) Diah Wahyuni (D95212082) Nikmayukhah (D05212023) Siti Nur Fidiawati (D55212060) Ulil Fauziyah (D05212045)

Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Pragmatics

By The Sixth Group:

Agil Abdur Rohim(D75212075)Ainun Chamidah (D05212003)Ainun Munfadhila (D35212047)Diah Wahyuni (D95212082)Nikmayukhah (D05212023)Siti Nur Fidiawati (D55212060)Ulil Fauziyah (D05212045)

Page 2: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Introduction of pragmaticsPragmatics as a field of linguistic inquiry

was initiated in the 1930s by Morris, Carnap, and Peirce, for whom syntax addressed the formal relations of signs to one another, semantics the relation of signs to what they denote, and pragmatics the relation of signs to their users and interpreters (Morris 1938).

In this program, pragmatics is the study of those context-dependent aspects of meaning which are systematically abstracted away from in the construction of content or logical form.

Page 3: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

What is Pragmatics?Pragmatics is the study of the ways people use language in actual conversation.

Pragmatics is the study of meaning of words, phrases and full sentences, but unlike semantics which deals with the objective meanings of words that can be found in dictionaries, pragmatics is more concerned with the meanings that words in fact convey when they are used, or with intended speaker meaning as it is sometimes referred to.

Page 4: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

DefinitionLongman:Technical the study of how words and phrases are used with special meanings in particular situations.Oxford:The branch of linguistics dealing with language in use and the contexts in which it is used, including such matters as Deixis, the taking of turns in conversation, text organization, presupposition, and implicative.

Page 5: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

DEIXISDefinitionDeixis is “pointing language”. We use deictic expressions or indexical to signal a referent and relate that referent to common ground shared by the speaker and the addressee. They situate the speaker and the addressee in relation to each other and the world around them.In other words, deixis helps us to identify things in time and space

Page 6: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Person deixis• a) Terms referring to speaker and addressee: I, me, my,

mine, you, your ,yours

• Is there a difference between these:• - I want to see you, • - you can never tell if they are boys

• b) Terms not referring to speaker or addressee

• he, him, his, she, her, hers, it, its, they, them, their, theirs

• c) Honorifics - Your Majesty, sir,

• These terms of social deixis indicate social status

Page 7: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Time DeixisExpressions referring to time:

five minutes ago tomorrow last week next Monday

Choice of tense:- present tense - he doesn’t know

this is proximal

- past tense yesterday I slept for 10 hoursthis communicates distance

from current time

- conditionals if I won the lottery I would …this communicates distance

from current reality

Page 8: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Spatial deixisSpatial deixis refers to proximity to or

distance from the speaker.

These can be single words …herethere this that

… or expressions two kilometres from the school

500 meters away

… and words/expressions referring to direction and/or movement

to my leftunder the carpetfetch, take, bringshe came home she went home

Page 9: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Interpretation of deictic termsWe interpret deictic terms by looking at

aspects of context such as

- who is speaking

- the time of speaking

- the location of the speaker

- gestures or body

language of the speaker

- the topic of the discourse

Page 10: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

REFERENCE

An act by which a speaker (or writer) uses language to enable a listener (or reader) to identify something.

Page 11: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

REFERENCE

Page 12: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Inference

additional information used by the listener to create a connection between what is said and what must be meant

ExampleA :“where’s the spinach salad sitting?”B :“He’s sitting by the door”

Page 13: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Anaphora

subsequent reference to an already introduced entity

OR

The use of a linguistic unit, such as a pronoun, to refer back to another unit

Page 14: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Example

We found a house to rent, but the kitchen was very small.

1st = antecedent 2nd= anaphor

Page 15: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Presupposition

What a speaker (or writer) assumes is true or known by a listener (or reader)

Page 16: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

example

My car is a wreck (there’s presupposition that the speaker has a car)

Your brother is waiting outside (there’s an presupposition that you have a brother)

Why did you arrive late? (there’s a presupposition that you did arrive late)

Page 17: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Idiom model of Pragmatic

Idiom is group of words with a

meaning that is different from the

meaning of all the individual words.

Each individual has different meaning

of words.

Page 18: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Examples

A : “Crack the window”B : “Yes, I do”

A : “Its raining cats and dogs”B : “I think so”

Page 19: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

POLITENESSIn the study of linguistic politeness, the

most relevant concept is “face.” Your face, in pragmatics, is your public self-image. This is the emotional and social sense of self that everyone has and expects everyone else to recognize. Politeness can be defined as showing awareness and consideration of another person’s face. If you say something that represents a threat to another person’s self-image, that is called a face-threatening act.

Page 20: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Example•If you use a direct speech act to get someone to do something

Give me that paper!

•An indirect speech act, in the form associated with a question (Could you pass me that paper?), removes the assumption of social power

Page 21: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Example……..• A: Hello.•B: Hi Rodney. Can you guess who this is?

•‘Wow, you look awful today! Is there anything wrong? •To you best friend? •To your boss?

Page 22: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Speech Acts Theory

Founded By:J.L Austin 1930’s

John R. Searle 1950’s

Page 23: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

J.L Austin

• Oxford philosopher J.L. Austin is foremost attributed to developing this theory.

• Austin formulated his ideas on speech act theory in the 1930’s and lectured on them at both Oxford and Harvard.

Page 24: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

John R. Searle

• After Austin’s death one of his former students, John R. Searle, took many of Austin’s ideas and concepts on speech act theory and further elaborated and refined them in 1950’s

Page 25: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

•1. Performative •2. Constantive•3. Explicit Performative•4. Implicit Performative

Theory

•1.Prepositional Content•2.Preparatory Condition•3.Sincerity Condition•4.Essential Condition

Felicity Condition

•DefinitionIndirect Speech

Speech Acts

Page 26: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Speech Act Theory

• Basic concept of Speech Act Theory is “Saying is part of doing” or “Words are connected to actions”

• A speech act in linguistics and the philosophy of language is an utterance that has performative function in language and communication (Wikipedia

Page 27: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Speech Act Theory

1. PerformativeUtterances that are used to do things or

perform acts.Ex: “Kholik promises Unya to treat her in KFC.”

2. ConstativesUtterances that can be verified as true or

false. Ex: “Rizky is beautiful and stylish.”

Page 28: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Speech Act Theory

3. Explicit Performative

Sentence that contains a performative verb that makes explicit what kind of act is being performed.

Ex: The court hereby forbids you to enter your former wife’s house.

4. Implicit PerformativeSentence that does not contain explicit

meaning. Ex: “Do it yourself!”.

Page 29: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Felicity Condition of Speech Acts

1. Propositional Content: Concerned with what the speech act is about (the “core” of utterances)

• Ex: “I do want to pay that, unfortunately, I don’t have money”.

• Meaning: I don’t pay that.• Ex: “I love you too, but I already have a

boyfriend.• Meaning: She rejects the boy’s love

Page 30: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Felicity Condition of Speech Acts

2. Preparatory Condition: Real-world prerequisites for the speech acts.

3. Sincerity Condition: Must be satisfied if the act is performed sincerely ( if it isn’t satisfied, the act is still performed, but there is an abuse)

• Ex: Teacher: Submit your 3 day lesson plan now! Ainun : But, we haven’t finish it mom Teacher: No reason! Ainun : *submit it with crying*

Page 31: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Felicity Condition of Speech Acts

4. Essential Condition: Speaker's intention that his utterance will count as the identifiable act and that this intention is recognized by the addresse.

• Ex: Act: Agil : Ulil’s husband Ulil : Agil’s wife

Ni’mayucha : Agil and Ulil’s baby.

• Ni’mayucha: *cry out loud* Agil : Dear, you know what to do Ulil : Okay honey *throws the baby out*

Page 32: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Indirect Speech Acts

• Indirect speech is a written text of about what was said by someone.

• Ex: “Dila, would you please throw the durian to Dyah?”, said Vidia. <- Example of interrogative indirect speech.

Page 33: Pragmatics intro to linguistic

Thnak yuo