PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    1/12

    CARMEL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

    ALAPPUZHA

    DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS

    ENGINEERING

    SEMINAR REPORT

    ON

    PEBBLE BED REACTORS:-

    A FUTURE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY

    SUBMITTED BY :

    PRASANTH.K.P

    Reg No : 11030175

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    2/12

    CARMEL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE

    ALAPPUZHA

    DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS

    ENGINEERING

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that the seminar report entitled PEBBLE BED

    REACTOR:- A FUTURE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY presented by

    PRASANTH.K.P of fifth and sixth semester diploma in Electrical and

    Electronics Engineering, Carmel polytechnic college, Punnapra, Alappuzha in

    partially fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Diploma in Electrical

    and Electronics engineering under the Board of technical Education, during the

    year 2013-2014

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    3/12

    ABSTRACT

    Pebble Bed Reactors offer a future for new nuclear energy plants. They are small,

    modular, inherently safe, flexible in design and operation, use a demonstrated nuclear

    technology and can be competitive with fossil fuels. Pebble bed reactors are helium

    cooled reactors that use small tennis ball size fuel balls consisting of only 9 grams of

    uranium per pebble to provide a low power density reactor. The low power density and

    large graphite core provide inherent safety features such that the peak temperature

    reached even under the complete loss of coolant accident without any active emergency

    core cooling system is 2 significantly below the temperature that the fuel melts. This

    feature should enhance public confidence in this nuclear technology. With advanced

    modularity principles as described, a new way of thinking and building nuclear plants is

    proposed that would improve quality by factory fabrication of space frame modules and

    site assembly similar to legos would speed the time to operation. It is expected that

    this type of design and assembly could lower the cost of new nuclear plants such that the

    biggest impediment to new nuclear construction namely the capital cost of new nuclear

    plants is removed. This would allow nuclear plants to support the goal of reducing global

    climate change in an energy hungry world.

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    4/12

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    5/12

    INTRODUCTION

    One of the major challenges of the reintroduction of nuclear energy into

    the world energy mix is the development of a nuclear power plant that is competitive

    with other energy alternatives, such as natural gas, oil or coal. The environmental

    imperative of nuclear energy is obvious. No greenhouse gases emitted, small amounts of

    fuel required and small quantities of waste to be disposed of. Unfortunately, the capital

    costs of new nuclear plants are quite large relative to the fossil alternatives. Despite the

    fact that nuclear energys operating costs in terms of operations and maintenance and,

    most importantly, fuel are much lower than fossil alternatives, the barrier of high initial

    investment is a significant one for utilities around the world.

    Definitive resolution of the numerous open technical issues is likely

    to take quite some time. This is time that Exelon --- which hopes to obtain a license from

    NRC in only two-and-a-half years --- is not inclined to expend. The increased flexibility

    that utilities need to compete in a deregulated market limits their timelines for decision-

    making, and may well be incompatible with the caution and rigor that advanced nuclear

    reactor development requires.

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    6/12

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    7/12

    PEBBLE-BED REACTOR (PBR)

    The pebble-bed reactor(PBR) is a graphite-moderated, gas-

    cooled,nuclear reactor.It is a type ofvery-high-temperature reactor(VHTR), one of the

    six classes of nuclear reactors in theGeneration IV initiative.The basic design of pebble-

    bed reactors features spherical fuel elements called pebbles. These tennis ball-sized

    pebbles are made ofpyrolytic graphite(which acts as the moderator), and they contain

    thousands of micro-fuel particles calledTRISOparticles. These TRISO fuel particles

    consist of a fissile material (such as235

    U)surrounded by a coated ceramic layer ofsilicon

    carbidefor structural integrity and fission product containment. In the PBR, thousands of

    pebbles are amassed to create a reactor core, and are cooled by a gas, such

    ashelium,nitrogenorcarbon dioxide, which does not react chemically with the fuel

    elements.

    This type of reactor is claimed to be passively safe;[1]

    that is, it removes the

    need for redundant, active safety systems. Because the reactor is designed to handle high

    temperatures, it can cool by natural circulation and still survive in accident scenarios,

    which may raise the temperature of the reactor to 1,600 C. Because of its design, its

    high temperatures allow higher thermal efficiencies than possible in traditionalnuclear

    power plants(up to 50%) and has the additional feature that the gases do not dissolve

    contaminants or absorb neutrons as water does, so the core has less in the way of

    radioactivefluids.

    The concept was first suggested byFarrington Danielsin the 1940s, butcommercial development did not take place until the 1960s in theGermanAVR

    reactorbyRudolf Schulten.[2]

    but this system was plagued with problems and political

    and economic decisions were made to abandon the technology.[3]

    The AVR design was

    licensed toSouth Africaas thePBMRandChinaas theHTR-10,the latter currently the

    only such design operational. In various forms, other designs are under development

    byMIT,University of California at Berkeley,General Atomics(U.S.),

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderator
  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    8/12

    theDutchcompany Romawa B.V.,Adams Atomic Engines, andIdaho National

    Laboratory.

    Pebble bed reactors were developed in Germany over 20 years ago. At the

    Juelich Research Center, the AVR pebble bed research reactor rated at 40 MWth and 15

    MWe operated for 22 years demonstrating that this technology works. The reactor

    produced heat by passing helium gas through the reactor core consisting of uranium

    fuelled pebbles. A steam generator was used to generate electricity through a

    conventional steam electric plant. Germany also built a 300 MWe version of the pebble

    bed reactor but it suffered some early mechanical and political problems that eventually -

    -led to its shutdown. In December 2000, the Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology of

    the Tsinghua University in Beijing, China, achieved first criticality of their 10 MWth

    pebble bed research reactor. In the Netherlands, the Petten Research Institute is

    developing pebble bed reactors for industrial applications in the range of 15 MWth. The

    attraction to this technology is its safety, simplicity in operation, modularity and

    economics. Advances in basic reactor and helium gas turbine technology have produced

    a new version of the pebble bed reactor concepts. Instead of using less efficient steam

    cycles to produce electricity, new designs as going to direct or indirect cycle helium gas

    turbines to produce electricity. These designs have target thermal efficiencies in the

    range of 45% compared to 32% for steam cycles. By avoiding the use of high

    temperature water, all the difficulties associated with maintaining high temperature water

    systems are eliminated. The optimum size for a pebble bed was concluded to be about

    250 MWth thermal to allow for rapid and modular construction as well as maintaining its

    inherent safety features. These designs do not require expensive and complicated

    emergency core cooling systems since the core cannot melt. These advances have led the

    ESKOM and the MIT team to independently conclude that the modular pebble bed

    reactor can meet the safety and economic requirements for new generation. Currently,

    the South African design has been upgraded to 400 MWth and 165 MWe electric. It is in

    the final design stage with construction to begin in 2007 and commercial operation in

    2010.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands
  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    9/12

    SCHEMATIC OF A PEBBLE BED REACTOR

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    10/12

    COMPONENTS OF PBR

    The components of PBR are :-

    The reactor unit system The fuel handling The reactor control system The heat transfer system The Generator and Compressors The fuel pebbles

    The Reactor Unit

    The reactor unit consists of the 3 meter diameter core filled with fuel spheres and

    surrounded by the graphite reflector. The functions of the reflector are to: Reflect

    escaping neutrons back into the core, to keep the neutron losses as low as possible;

    Provide paths for the control rods and the reserve shutdown system absorbers to

    enter the core region to shut down the reactor, and To provide a heat transport path

    for the decay heat from the fuel to the Reactor Pressure Vessel so that passive

    cooling of the core is possible by radiating this heat to a suitable heat sink called

    the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). Provide the volume in which the fuel

    spheres can move through the core but remain in a well defined geometry. Provide

    a flow path for the cold gas to be returned to the top of the core.

    The reactor core contains approximately 360,000 uranium fuelled

    pebbles about the size of tennis balls. Each pebble contains about 9 gm of low

    enriched uranium in 10,00015,000 (depending on the design) tiny grains of sand-

    like microsphere coated particles each with its own a hard silicon carbide shell..

    The unique feature of pebble bed reactors is the online refuelling capability in

    which the pebbles are recirculated with checks on integrity and consumption of

    uranium.

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    11/12

    REACTOR CROSS SECTION

  • 8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT

    12/12