Upload
aravind-n-nair
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
1/12
CARMEL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
ALAPPUZHA
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING
SEMINAR REPORT
ON
PEBBLE BED REACTORS:-
A FUTURE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY
SUBMITTED BY :
PRASANTH.K.P
Reg No : 11030175
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
2/12
CARMEL POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
ALAPPUZHA
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the seminar report entitled PEBBLE BED
REACTOR:- A FUTURE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY presented by
PRASANTH.K.P of fifth and sixth semester diploma in Electrical and
Electronics Engineering, Carmel polytechnic college, Punnapra, Alappuzha in
partially fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Diploma in Electrical
and Electronics engineering under the Board of technical Education, during the
year 2013-2014
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
3/12
ABSTRACT
Pebble Bed Reactors offer a future for new nuclear energy plants. They are small,
modular, inherently safe, flexible in design and operation, use a demonstrated nuclear
technology and can be competitive with fossil fuels. Pebble bed reactors are helium
cooled reactors that use small tennis ball size fuel balls consisting of only 9 grams of
uranium per pebble to provide a low power density reactor. The low power density and
large graphite core provide inherent safety features such that the peak temperature
reached even under the complete loss of coolant accident without any active emergency
core cooling system is 2 significantly below the temperature that the fuel melts. This
feature should enhance public confidence in this nuclear technology. With advanced
modularity principles as described, a new way of thinking and building nuclear plants is
proposed that would improve quality by factory fabrication of space frame modules and
site assembly similar to legos would speed the time to operation. It is expected that
this type of design and assembly could lower the cost of new nuclear plants such that the
biggest impediment to new nuclear construction namely the capital cost of new nuclear
plants is removed. This would allow nuclear plants to support the goal of reducing global
climate change in an energy hungry world.
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
4/12
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
5/12
INTRODUCTION
One of the major challenges of the reintroduction of nuclear energy into
the world energy mix is the development of a nuclear power plant that is competitive
with other energy alternatives, such as natural gas, oil or coal. The environmental
imperative of nuclear energy is obvious. No greenhouse gases emitted, small amounts of
fuel required and small quantities of waste to be disposed of. Unfortunately, the capital
costs of new nuclear plants are quite large relative to the fossil alternatives. Despite the
fact that nuclear energys operating costs in terms of operations and maintenance and,
most importantly, fuel are much lower than fossil alternatives, the barrier of high initial
investment is a significant one for utilities around the world.
Definitive resolution of the numerous open technical issues is likely
to take quite some time. This is time that Exelon --- which hopes to obtain a license from
NRC in only two-and-a-half years --- is not inclined to expend. The increased flexibility
that utilities need to compete in a deregulated market limits their timelines for decision-
making, and may well be incompatible with the caution and rigor that advanced nuclear
reactor development requires.
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
6/12
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
7/12
PEBBLE-BED REACTOR (PBR)
The pebble-bed reactor(PBR) is a graphite-moderated, gas-
cooled,nuclear reactor.It is a type ofvery-high-temperature reactor(VHTR), one of the
six classes of nuclear reactors in theGeneration IV initiative.The basic design of pebble-
bed reactors features spherical fuel elements called pebbles. These tennis ball-sized
pebbles are made ofpyrolytic graphite(which acts as the moderator), and they contain
thousands of micro-fuel particles calledTRISOparticles. These TRISO fuel particles
consist of a fissile material (such as235
U)surrounded by a coated ceramic layer ofsilicon
carbidefor structural integrity and fission product containment. In the PBR, thousands of
pebbles are amassed to create a reactor core, and are cooled by a gas, such
ashelium,nitrogenorcarbon dioxide, which does not react chemically with the fuel
elements.
This type of reactor is claimed to be passively safe;[1]
that is, it removes the
need for redundant, active safety systems. Because the reactor is designed to handle high
temperatures, it can cool by natural circulation and still survive in accident scenarios,
which may raise the temperature of the reactor to 1,600 C. Because of its design, its
high temperatures allow higher thermal efficiencies than possible in traditionalnuclear
power plants(up to 50%) and has the additional feature that the gases do not dissolve
contaminants or absorb neutrons as water does, so the core has less in the way of
radioactivefluids.
The concept was first suggested byFarrington Danielsin the 1940s, butcommercial development did not take place until the 1960s in theGermanAVR
reactorbyRudolf Schulten.[2]
but this system was plagued with problems and political
and economic decisions were made to abandon the technology.[3]
The AVR design was
licensed toSouth Africaas thePBMRandChinaas theHTR-10,the latter currently the
only such design operational. In various forms, other designs are under development
byMIT,University of California at Berkeley,General Atomics(U.S.),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California_at_Berkeleyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTR-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMRhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Schultenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrington_Danielshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Powerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble-bed_reactor#cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_carbidehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium-235http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRISOhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-high-temperature_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_reactorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_moderator8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
8/12
theDutchcompany Romawa B.V.,Adams Atomic Engines, andIdaho National
Laboratory.
Pebble bed reactors were developed in Germany over 20 years ago. At the
Juelich Research Center, the AVR pebble bed research reactor rated at 40 MWth and 15
MWe operated for 22 years demonstrating that this technology works. The reactor
produced heat by passing helium gas through the reactor core consisting of uranium
fuelled pebbles. A steam generator was used to generate electricity through a
conventional steam electric plant. Germany also built a 300 MWe version of the pebble
bed reactor but it suffered some early mechanical and political problems that eventually -
-led to its shutdown. In December 2000, the Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology of
the Tsinghua University in Beijing, China, achieved first criticality of their 10 MWth
pebble bed research reactor. In the Netherlands, the Petten Research Institute is
developing pebble bed reactors for industrial applications in the range of 15 MWth. The
attraction to this technology is its safety, simplicity in operation, modularity and
economics. Advances in basic reactor and helium gas turbine technology have produced
a new version of the pebble bed reactor concepts. Instead of using less efficient steam
cycles to produce electricity, new designs as going to direct or indirect cycle helium gas
turbines to produce electricity. These designs have target thermal efficiencies in the
range of 45% compared to 32% for steam cycles. By avoiding the use of high
temperature water, all the difficulties associated with maintaining high temperature water
systems are eliminated. The optimum size for a pebble bed was concluded to be about
250 MWth thermal to allow for rapid and modular construction as well as maintaining its
inherent safety features. These designs do not require expensive and complicated
emergency core cooling systems since the core cannot melt. These advances have led the
ESKOM and the MIT team to independently conclude that the modular pebble bed
reactor can meet the safety and economic requirements for new generation. Currently,
the South African design has been upgraded to 400 MWth and 165 MWe electric. It is in
the final design stage with construction to begin in 2007 and commercial operation in
2010.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlandshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_National_Laboratoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_Atomic_Engineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
9/12
SCHEMATIC OF A PEBBLE BED REACTOR
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
10/12
COMPONENTS OF PBR
The components of PBR are :-
The reactor unit system The fuel handling The reactor control system The heat transfer system The Generator and Compressors The fuel pebbles
The Reactor Unit
The reactor unit consists of the 3 meter diameter core filled with fuel spheres and
surrounded by the graphite reflector. The functions of the reflector are to: Reflect
escaping neutrons back into the core, to keep the neutron losses as low as possible;
Provide paths for the control rods and the reserve shutdown system absorbers to
enter the core region to shut down the reactor, and To provide a heat transport path
for the decay heat from the fuel to the Reactor Pressure Vessel so that passive
cooling of the core is possible by radiating this heat to a suitable heat sink called
the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). Provide the volume in which the fuel
spheres can move through the core but remain in a well defined geometry. Provide
a flow path for the cold gas to be returned to the top of the core.
The reactor core contains approximately 360,000 uranium fuelled
pebbles about the size of tennis balls. Each pebble contains about 9 gm of low
enriched uranium in 10,00015,000 (depending on the design) tiny grains of sand-
like microsphere coated particles each with its own a hard silicon carbide shell..
The unique feature of pebble bed reactors is the online refuelling capability in
which the pebbles are recirculated with checks on integrity and consumption of
uranium.
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
11/12
REACTOR CROSS SECTION
8/13/2019 PRASANTH KP SEMINAR REPORT
12/12