Upload
kameko-best
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Precarisation of work for youth in Sweden. Sweden – the Myth. Strong employment protection legislation. Trade union influence over restructuring and dismissals. Generous unemployment insurance system. Active labour market policy programmes helping the unemployed get back to work. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Precarisation of work for
youth in Sweden
Sweden – the Myth
• Strong employment protection legislation.
• Trade union influence over restructuring and
dismissals.
• Generous unemployment insurance system.
• Active labour market policy programmes helping the
unemployed get back to work.
Sweden – the Truth
• Few obstacles to dismissals for economic or organisational
reasons.
• Trade union influence concentrated on dividing the social cost, not
the dismissals as such.
• Unemployment insurance system on average European level.
• Spending on active labour market policy programmes on historical
low.
• Employers virtually free to use fixed-term instead of indefinite term
contracts – no objective ground needed.
Youth unemployment – risks
• Youth unemployment, age 18-24 year – 24 %
• Low or no education – long time unemployment
• Education or work experience - employment
The way forward?
• Intern- and traineeships
• Guidens to the labour market
• Link between school and working life
• Bridge between generations
Sweden – the Current Debate
• Employment protection legislation (EPL) temporarily off the
political agenda.
- Centre-right government does not consider EPL an obstacle to
growth and employment.
- Centre-left opposition does not believe that stricter EPL could ave
jobs.
- Social partners have not been able to reach agreement over
reforms of last-in-first-out order of priority.
• Political debate centered on the unemployment insurance and
active labour market policies.
Tack!
Thank you for your attention!
Legislation is semi-mandatory
• Most key provisions in the Swedish Employment
Protection Act are semi-mandatory - the law can be
deviated from by means of collective agreements, also
to insert provisions less favourable to the workers.
To have this effect, the collective agreement must have been
- entered into or approved by a trade union federation, or
- the local union and the employer already be bound by a
collective agreement regulating other subjects, entered into or
approved by a federation.