Upload
gary-eaton
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Precision Agriculture
What terraces have to do with variability of improved grazed pastures?
Jesús Santillano-Cázares, Spring 2006.
Among the causes of variability in pastures that have received the most attention are:Patterns of deposition of animal excretaGrazing methods and stocking ratesTopographyAspectWeatherLong-term fertilizer management.
The many sources that cause variability to increase in pastures seem to be almost case specific, or at least, region specific.
In eastern Oklahoma the existence of man-made microreliefs (terraces)
that were built to control soil erosion and water conservation around 1930 and afterwards (Carberry, 1934; Cox et al., 1951); may be contributing to the, already, typically high variability of pastures. We believe close attention needs to be paid to identify local or regional causes that may be further increasing the naturally high variability of grazed pastures.
One objective (of several in the study)
To determine how fertilizer applications and microrelief points affect soil nutrients in terraced pastures.
Research is being conducted at the Eastern Research Station located near Haskell OK. The station consists of 298 acres and is located 14 miles west of Muskogee at the intersection of Highways 16 and 72.
Materials and MethodsLocation
Data collection site description
Four exclosures (30 X 100 m) located in mixed grass-legume pastures were constructed to help control grazing and to fix our sites of data collection (plots).
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Distance from reference point (m)
Dep
th in
rel
atio
n t
o r
efer
ence
po
int
(m)
Exclosure No. 1
Exclosure No. 4
Exclosure No. 3
Exclosure No. 2Slopes of exclosures
No. 1 = 1.5 % No. 2 = 1.8 %No. 3 = 2.8 %No. 4 = 3.7 %
Slope
Site DescriptionEach exclosure was oriented to include most of the
variability of the pastures. Each exclosure was relatively long and laid out parallel with the natural slope of the land and perpendicular to water retention terraces.
Two way factorial in a RCBD with four reps.
10 treatments and 2 sampling seasons/year repeated in 4 pastures (during 2 years).
Treatments: Fertilizer applications of: N, P, K, NPK + lime, and a control (no fertilizer applied). Microrelief points: top of terrace on the channel side, top of terrace opposite to the channel, back of terrace, channel of terrace, and flat interval between terraces.
Sampling seasons: Winter and Spring.
Treatments & Design Structure
N NPK+L Control K P
FlatTops of terraceChannel Back side of terrace
Microrelief profile
Patterns of soil sampling to test soil fertility parameters among fertilizer treatments (left) and microrelief points (right)
Response Variable Source DF SignificanceTreatment 9 NSSeason 1 ***Treat. X Season 9 NSTreatment 9 ***Season 1 ***Treat. X Season 9 NSTreatment 9 ***Season 1 ***Treat. X Season 9 NS
NS, Not significant at P < 0.05.* Significant at P < 0.05.** Significant at P < 0.01.*** Significant at P < 0.001.
Soil N
Soil P
Soil K
Neither fertilizer treatments nor microrelief points influence soil N. Because plant beneficiated from N-fertilizer to increase forage yield and a redistribution effect of animal deposition across the exclosures, no differences from N-fertilized to no N-fertilized treatments were found at the end of the grazing season in soil N content.
Season of sampling was significant; more soil N in winter samples that in early spring.
Soil Nitrogen
Soil Phosphorus
89 Winter
69 Spring
Mean (P Index)
Season
89 Winter
69 Spring
Mean (P Index)
Season
125P69Top Terr. “a”75Top Terr. “b”78Back Terr.
105Channel Terr.
52Control
69Flat interval
104NPK + L54N58 K
Mean Treatment
125P69Top Terr. “a”75Top Terr. “b”78Back Terr.
105Channel Terr.
52Control
69Flat interval
104NPK + L54N58 K
Mean Treatment
Again Winter higher than Spring.
Terrace channels have the same high soil P concentration as P- fertilized treatments!
Soil phosphorus (P) concentration as function of microrelief and time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Nov-04 Feb-05 May-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06
P in
de
x (
lb/a
c)
top terrace a top terrace b tip terrace
channel of terrace flat undisturbed soil
Soil Potassium
And again, Winter higher than Spring.
Terrace channels have more soil K than K- fertilized treatments!
387 Winter
326 Spring
Mean (K Index)
Season
387 Winter
326 Spring
Mean (K Index)
Season
306P265Top Terr. “a”
271Top Terr. “b”
325Back Terr.
545Channel Terr.
331Control
349Flat interval
382NPK + L
303N
485 K
Mean Treatment
306P265Top Terr. “a”
271Top Terr. “b”
325Back Terr.
545Channel Terr.
331Control
349Flat interval
382NPK + L
303N
485 K
Mean Treatment
Soil potassium (K) concentration as function of microrelief and time
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Nov-04 Feb-05 May-05 Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06
K i
nd
ex (
lb/a
c)
top terrace a top terrace b tip terrace
channel of terrace flat undisturbed soil
As additional information…Forage yield
Fertilizer treatments and microrelief highly significant (P<0.0001). Interaction, not significant.
2679 Control
2506 P
2746K
4199 NPK+L
4104 N
Mean (kg/ha)
Treatment
2679 Control
2506 P
2746K
4199 NPK+L
4104 N
Mean (kg/ha)
Treatment
3568 Channel Terr.
2348 Flat interval
3229Back Terr.
3765 Top Terr. “b”
3326 Top Terr. “a”
Mean (kg/ha)
Treatment
3568 Channel Terr.
2348 Flat interval
3229Back Terr.
3765 Top Terr. “b”
3326 Top Terr. “a”
Mean (kg/ha)
Treatment
1. Season of sampling was significant for all three soil nutrients analyzed. Soil nutrients contents (N, P , or K), were consistently higher in samples collected during the winter; although, we need to check the results of this spring to make sure this is consistent.
If consistent, this may be explained by a possible dilution of nutrients from dung and urine spots caused by an extended time of weathering in the spring soil samples, compared to the ones collected during the winter; the latter possibly including highly nutrient concentrated soil cores from relatively fresh urine spots.
Conclusions
2. More reliable soil samples would be obtained if avoided collecting soil cores from the terrace channels. Terrace channels appear to catch nutrients from higher elevations of the microrelief. Being this pastures densely covered with grass, this accumulation in the terrace channels is suggested to occur as a result of runoff water enriched with nutrients from dung and diluted applied fertilizers over a long period of time.
Conclusions…
In general: For more reliable soil test results in terraced pastures, some considerations seems to be important to take into consideration:
1. Sample in a fixed area of the pasture throughout the years, as we have done using our exclosures, would help reduce variability.
2. Sample during a time where enough time and rain has occurred after cattle has been removed from the pasture to allow dung and urine patches to disperse.
3. If decided to fertilize only terraces, don’t sample flats (fertilizing flats doesn’t pay!), and sample anywhere in the terraces, except the channels.
Take home message