Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Precision Forward Measurements at LHCb withVector Bosons
Philip Iltenon behalf of the LHCb Collaboration
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Radcor-Loopfest
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 1 / 37
Introduction
Detector JINST 3 (2008) S08005
VELO
RICH1
TT
magnet
OT
IT
T1
T2
T3
RICH2
M1
M2 M3 M4 M5
HCAL
ECALmuon system5 m
5 m 15 mz-axis →
y-ax
is→
SPD/PRS
• fully instrumented between 2 < η < 5• performance documented in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 07• momentum resolution between 0.4% at 5 GeV to 1% at 200 GeV• impact parameter resolution of 15 + 29/pT µm• secondary vertex precision of 0.01− 0.05(0.1− 0.3) mm in xy(z)
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 2 / 37
Introduction
Trigger JINST 8 (2013) P04022
• movable L0 thresholds andsoftware HLT
• low pT leptons/photons andtracks (IP > 0.1 mm)
L0
µ: pT > 1.5 GeV
340 kHz
µµ:√
p1Tp2
T > 1.3 GeV
75 kHz
h: ET > 3.5 GeV
405 kHz
e: ET > 2.5 GeV
160 kHz
γ: ET > 2.5 GeV
80 kHz
µ: pT > 4.8(1) GeV
0.7(5) kHz
µµ: m > 2.7(1)GeV
1.2(1.3) kHz
track: pT > 1.7 GeV
33 kHz
e: pT > 10 GeV
. . .
µ: pT > 10(4.8) GeV
µµ: m > 4.8(3) GeV
displaced vertex
inclusive topological
beauty BBDT
inclusive and
exclusive charm
. . .
15 MHz 5 kHz
HLT1 HLT2
1 MHz 50 kHz
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 3 / 37
Introduction
Datasets JINST 9 (2014) 12,P12005
• 1 fb−1 pp collisions at√
s = 7 TeV(2011)
• 2 fb−1 pp collisions at√
s = 8 TeV(2012)
• 1.1 nb−1 pPb collisions at√s = 5 TeV (2013)
• 0.5 nb−1 Pbp collisions at√s = 5 TeV (2013)
• excellent luminosity uncertainty• 1.71% for 7 TeV dataset• 1.16% for 8 TeV dataset
date [day/month]28/02 09/04 19/05 29/06 08/08 18/09 28/10
L[ fb−
1]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6LHCbATLASCMS
√s = 7 TeV
(2011)
date [day/month]28/02 18/04 05/06 23/07 09/09 27/10 14/12
L[ fb−
1]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30LHCbATLASCMS
√s = 8 TeV
(2012)
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 4 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W /Z Measurements
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 5 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W arXiv:1505.07024
• 1.0 fb−1 7 TeV dataset• W [µν] final state• signal fiducial definition
• 2.0 < η(µ) < 4.5• pT(µ) > 20 GeV
• purity of ≈ 77% IP [mm]0 0.5 1 1.5
Eve
nts
per
0.02
mm
10
210
310
410
510
610LHCb
DataFit
(data)WPseudo- (simulation)ντ →W
(simulation)µ X→ c+cbb
JHEP 1404 (2014) 091
]c [GeV/T
p
cE
vent
s pe
r 1
GeV
/
10000
20000
30000LHCb +µ -µ < 4.5η2.0 <
Data νµ → πK/
Fit Electroweak
νµ →W Heavy flavour
]c [GeV/T
p
Pull
-5
0
5
20 30 40 50 60 70 20 30 40 50 60 70
JHEP 1404 (2014) 091
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 6 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W : Systematics arXiv:1505.07024
source δσ(W +) [%] δσ(W−) [%] δRW [%]
template shape 0.28 0.39 0.59template normalization 0.10 0.10 0.06reconstruction efficiency 0.60 0.56 0.21selection efficiency 0.33 0.32 0.18acceptance and FSR 0.18 0.12 0.21systematic 0.76 0.77 0.69statistical 0.23 0.28 0.39luminosity 1.71 1.71
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 7 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W : Integrated σ arXiv:1505.07024
• compared with fixed order FEWZ using MSTW08, NNPDF 2.3,CT10, ABM12, HERA15, JR09
σ(W +) = 878.0± 2.1± 6.7 ± 15.0 pbσ(W−) = 689.5± 2.0± 5.3± 11.8 pbRW = 1.274± 0.005± 0.009
=575TeVsLHCb:5
statData
totData
MSTW+8
NNPDF3+
CT-+
ABM-2
HERA-5
JR+9
>52+5GeV]cµ
Tp
<54[5µη2[+5<52<5-2+5GeV]cµµZ:56+5<5M
8++ 82+ 84+ 86+ 88+ 9++ 92+ 94+[pb]νZµ→ZWσ
64+ 66+ 68+ 7++ 72+ 74+[pb]
ν6µ→6Wσ
-[2 -[25 -[3 -[35 ν6µ→6Wσ
νZµ→ZWσ
[pb]νRµ→RWσ
8rc 9cc 9rc
[pb]
ν>µ
→>
Wσ
6rc
7cc
7rc
8cc=M7MTeVsLHCbJM
Data
syst⊕statMData
lumi⊕beamM⊕systM⊕statMDataMSTWc8NNPDF.cCT<cABM<4HERA<rJRc9
>M4cMGeV/cµ
Tp
<M%Grµη4GcM<M
68G.3MCLMellipseMarea
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 8 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W : Differential σ arXiv:1505.07024
µη
[pb
]µ η
/d νµ →
W
σd
200
400
600
800 = 7 TeVsLHCb,
)+ (WstatData MSTW08
)+ (WtotData NNPDF30
)- (WstatData CT10
)- (WtotData ABM12
HERA15
JR09
> 20 GeV/cµT
p
µη2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5T
heor
y/D
ata
µη
0.91
1.1
µη
0.91
1.1
µηW
R
0.5
1
1.5
2 = 7 TeVsLHCb,
statData MSTW08
totData NNPDF30
CT10
ABM12
HERA15
JR09
> 20 GeV/cµT
p
µη2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5T
heor
y/D
ata
0.81
1.2
η
µA
0.4−
0.2−
0
0.2
0.4 = 7 TeVsLHCb,
statData MSTW08
totData NNPDF30
CT10
ABM12
HERA15
JR09
> 20 GeV/cT
p
η2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5T
heor
y-D
ata
0.05−0
0.05
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 9 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive W : Comparison arXiv:1505.07024
µη0 1 2 3 4
[pb
]µ η
/d νµ →
W
σd
0
200
400
600
= 7 TeVsν+µ → +LHCb (2011 extrapolated) W
ν-µ → -LHCb (2011 extrapolated) Wν+µ → +ATLAS (2010) W
ν-µ → -ATLAS (2010) W
> 20 GeV/cµT
p2 > 40 GeV/cTM
> 25 GeVmissE
lη0 1 2 3 4
lA
0.6−
0.4−
0.2−
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
= 7 TeVsνµ →LHCb (2011 extrapolated) W
ν e→ and W νµ →ATLAS (2010) W
> 20 GeV/clT
p2 > 40 GeV/cTM
> 25 GeVmissE
µη0 1 2 3 4
µA
0.6−
0.4−
0.2−
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
= 7 TeVsνµ →LHCb (2011 extrapolated) W
νµ →CMS (2011) W
> 20 GeV/cµT
p
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 10 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive Z [µµ] arXiv:1505.07024
• 1.0 fb−1 7 TeV dataset• signal fiducial definition
• 2.0 < η(µ) < 4.5, pT(µ) > 20 GeV• 60 < M (µµ) < 120 GeV
• purity of ≈ 99.3%• beam energy
uncertainty of 1.3%
source δσ(Z) [%] δRWZ [%] δRW+Z[%] δRW−Z
[%]
trigger efficiency 0.07 0.15 0.16 0.13ID efficiency 0.23 0.12 0.12 0.12tracking efficiency 0.53 0.24 0.23 0.26final state radiation 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.17purity 0.22 0.41 0.49 0.55GEC efficiency 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29systematic 0.68 0.60 0.67 0.72statistical 0.39 0.45 0.48 0.50luminosity 1.72
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 11 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive Z [µµ]: Integrated σ arXiv:1505.07024
• compared with fixed orderFEWZ using MSTW08,NNPDF 2.3, CT10, ABM12,HERA15, JR09
=575TeVsLHCb:5
statData
totData
MSTW[8
NNPDF3[
CT][
ABM]2
HERA]5
JR[9
>52[5GeV+cµ
Tp
<54-5µη2-[5<52<5]2[5GeV+cµµZ:56[5<5M
][-8 ]] ]]-2 ]]-4 ]]-6 ]]-8 ]2 ]2-2 6µZµ→Z5σνZµ→ZW
σ
8-6 8-8 9 9-2 9-4 9-6 6µZµ→Z5σν6µ→6W
σ
]9-5 2[ 2[-5 2] 2]-5 22 6µZµ→Z5σνµ→W5σ
7[ 72 74 76 78 8[ 82[pb]6µZµ→Zσ
[pb]>µRµ→Ziσ
rc r6 8c
[pb]
νRµ
→R
Wσ
86c
9cc
96c
<ccc
<c6c=iriTeVsLHCbJi
Data
syst⊕statiData
lumi⊕beami⊕systi⊕statiDataMSTWc8NNPDF.cCT<cABM<4HERA<6JRc9
>i4ciGeV/cµ
Tp
<i:G6µη4Gci<i
4<i<4ciGeV/cµµZ:i%ci<iM
%8G.FiCLiellipseiarea
[pb]9µRµ→Zσ
r/ r: 8/
[pb]
ν9µ
→9
Wσ
%:/
r//
r:/
8//=MrMTeVsLHCbJ
Data
syst⊕statData
lumi⊕beam⊕syst⊕statDataMSTW/8NNPDF4/CTc/ABMc<HERAc:JR/9
>M</MGeVGcµ
Tp
<M.>:µη<>/M<
<<Mc</MGeVGcµµZ:M%/M<MM
%8>43MCLMellipseMarea
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 12 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive Z [µµ]: Differential σ arXiv:1505.07024
Zy
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Z/d
yσd
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
totData
statData
MSTW08
NNPDF30
CT10
ABM12
HERAPDF1.5
JR09
= 7 TeVsLHCb,
Zy
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Zdy
σd σ1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1totData
statData
RESBOS
POWHEG+HERWIG
= 7 TeVsLHCb,
[GeV/c]T,Z
p1 10 210
]-1
[(G
eV/c
)T,
Zdp
σdσ1
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1totData
statData
RESBOS
POWHEG+HERWIG
= 7 TeVsLHCb,
[GeV/c]T,Z
p1 10 210
]-1
[(G
eV/c
)T,
Zdp
σdσ1
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1totData
statData
HERWIRI
= 0 GeV/c>2T<kHW:
= 2.2 GeV/c>2T<kHW:
= 7 TeVsLHCb,
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 13 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive Z [ee] JHEP 1505 (2015) 109
• 2.0 fb−1 8 TeV dataset (7 TeV JHEP 1302 (2013) 106)• signal fiducial definition same as inclusive Z [µµ]• purity of ≈ 93%
source δσ(Z) [%]
track efficiency 1.0kinematic efficiency 0.6ID efficiency 0.7global event cut 0.6trigger efficiency 0.1background 0.4systematic 1.6statistical 0.4luminosity 1.2
• comparison with fixed orderFEWZ
BC[pb]-e+e→Z→Appσ70 75 80 85 90 95
-e+e→8CTeVCZC
DataCAstat.B
DataCAtot.BNNLO/MSTW08
NNLO/CTEQ10
NNLO/NNPDF23
NNLO/NNPDF30
NNLO/ABM12
LHCb
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 14 / 37
Inclusive W/Z Measurements
Inclusive Z [ee]: Differential σ JHEP 1505 (2015) 109
Z
y 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
[pb
]Zy
/dσ d
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
-e+ e→8 TeV Z
Data (stat.)
Data (tot.)
NNLO/MSTW08
NNLO/CT10
NNLO/NNPDF23
NNLO/NNPDF30
NNLO/ABM12
LHCb
Z
y 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Zy/dσ
)dσ (
1/
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.40.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.91
-e+ e→8 TeV Z
Data (stat.)
Data (tot.)
Pythia8.1
Resbos
Powheg
LHCb
* φ -210 -110 1
*φ/dσ
)dσ (
1/
-310
-210
-110
1
10
-e+ e→8 TeV Z
Data (stat.)Data (tot.)Pythia8.1ResbosPowheg
LHCb
* φ -210 -110 1
Pre
dict
ion/
data
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.81
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.82
-e+ e→8 TeV Z Data (stat.)Data (tot.)Pythia8.1ResbosPowheg
LHCb
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 15 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + X Measurements
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 16 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + j JHEP 1401 (2014) 033
• 1.0 fb−1 7 TeV dataset• Z [µµ] + j final state• signal fiducial definition
• same as inclusive Z [µµ]• ∆R(µ, j) > 0.4
• jet definition• anti-kT with R = 0.5• pT(j) > 10, 20 GeV• 2.0 < η(j) < 4.5
• purity of ≈ 99.6%• Z + b analysis in JHEP 1412
(2014) 079
ZT
p / jetT
p0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Frac
tion
of e
vent
s
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Data
Simulation
LHCb
source δσ [%]
unfolding 1.5Z reconstruction 3.5jet scale, resolution, rec. 7.8final state radiation 0.2
systematic 8.6statistical 1.6luminosity 3.5
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 17 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + j : Integrated σ JHEP 1401 (2014) 033
• comparison with fixed order FEWZ and showered POWHEG• MSTW08, CTEQ10, and NNPDF 2.3 PDF sets used
min pT(j) [GeV] σ(Z + j)/σ(Z) [pb] σ(Z + j) [pb]
10 0.209± 0.002± 0.015 16.0± 0.2± 1.2± 0.620 0.083± 0.001± 0.007 6.3± 0.1± 0.5± 0.2
(Z)
σ(Z+
jet)
σ
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14 Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, MSTW08, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, MSTW08, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, CTEQ10, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, NNPDF 2.3, )2
sα(OFEWZ, MSTW08,
= 7 TeV Datas
> 20 GeVjet
Tp
LHCb
(Z)
σ(Z+
jet)
σ
0.16
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.30
0.32 Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, MSTW08, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, MSTW08, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, CTEQ10, )2
sα(OPOWHEG + PYTHIA, NNPDF 2.3, )2
sα(OFEWZ, MSTW08,
LHCb
= 7 TeV Datas
> 10 GeVjet
Tp
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 18 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + j : Differential σ JHEP 1401 (2014) 033
[GeV]ZT
p0 20 40 60 80 100
[1
/GeV
]Z T
pdσd σ1
-210
-110
Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OCTEQ10, )2
sα(ONNPDF 2.3,
POWHEG + PYTHIA: = 7 TeV Datas
> 20 GeVjetT
p
LHCb
φ∆0 1 2 3
φ∆dσd σ1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OCTEQ10, )2
sα(ONNPDF 2.3,
POWHEG + PYTHIA:
= 7 TeV Datas
> 20 GeVjet
Tp
LHCb
[GeV]jetT
p20 40 60 80 100 120 140
[1
/GeV
]je
tT
pdσd
σ1
-410
-310
-210
-110Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OCTEQ10, )2
sα(ONNPDF 2.3,
POWHEG + PYTHIA:
= 7 TeV Datas
> 10 GeVjet
Tp
LHCb
y∆-2 -1 0 1 2
y∆dσd
σ1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2Data (stat.)Data (tot.)
)sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OMSTW08, )2
sα(OCTEQ10, )2
sα(ONNPDF 2.3,
POWHEG + PYTHIA: = 7 TeV Datas
> 20 GeVjet
Tp
LHCb
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 19 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + D JHEP 1404 (2014) 091
• 1.0 fb−1 7 TeV dataset• Z [µµ] + c-hadron final state
• D0[K−π+], D+[K−π+π+]• D+
s [π+φ[K+K−]],Λ+
c [pK−π+]• signal fiducial definition
• same as inclusive Z [µµ]• 3.2 < p(K , π) < 100 GeV• pT(K , π) > 250 MeV• 2 < y(D)• 2 < pT(D) < 12 GeV
• 7 D0 and 4 D+ observed• purity of ≈ 95.6%
• feed-down from simulation• combinatorial from 2D mass• pile-up from χ2 vertex fit
[GeV]−µ+µm60 70 80 90 100 110 120
[G
eV]
+ π−K
m
1.83
1.84
1.85
1.86
1.87
1.88
1.89
1.9
1.91
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310LHCb
0Z + D
source δσ(D0) [%] δσ(D+) [%]
efficiency 6.8 5.0pile-up 0.6 0.6feed-down 3.9 1.1BD 1.3 2.1
systematic 8.0 5.6statistical 44.8 52.3luminosity 3.5 3.5
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 20 / 37
Z + X Measurements
Z + D: Cross-section JHEP 1404 (2014) 091
• single parton scattering (SPS)from fixed order MCFM usingMSTW08
• corrected for fragmentation• double parton scattering (DPS)
using pocket formula
σ(AB) = σ(A)σ(B)/σeff
• Z and D cross-sections fromLHCb
σ(Z + D0) = 2.50± 1.12± 0.22 pb
σ(Z + D+) = 0.44± 0.23± 0.03 pb 0D+D s
+D c+Λ
cros
smse
ctio
nm[fb
]210
310
410
=7mTeVsLHCbmdatam
SPSmmassive
SPSmmassless
DPS
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 21 / 37
W + j Measurements
W + j Measurements
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 22 / 37
W + j Measurements
Q-tagging arXiv:1504.07670
• build 2-body SVs• n-body SVs from linking 2-body SVs with
shared tracks• require vertex flight direction within jet,
∆R(SV, j) < 0.5• two BDTs
• BDT(bc|udsg): udsg-jet from b, c-jet• BDT(b|c): b-jet from c-jet
SV
jet
PV
variable separation variable separationM (SV) udsgc b Mcor(SV) udsgb cmin(FDT(SV)) udsg cb pT(SV)/pT(j) udsg cb∆R(SV, j) udsg cb N (trk) udsgc bN (trk ∈ j) udsgc b |Q(SV)| udsgb clog(χ2
FD(SV)) all log(χ2IP(SV)) all
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 23 / 37
W + j Measurements
Q-tagging: Flavor arXiv:1504.07670
• fit 2-dimensional BDT(bc|udsg) versus BDT(b|c) distributions
)udsg|bcBDT(-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
)c|bB
DT
(
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
LHCb simulation
-jetsudsg
)udsg|bcBDT(-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
)c|bB
DT
(
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
LHCb simulation
-jetsc
)udsg|bcBDT(-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
)c|bB
DT
(
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
LHCb simulation
-jetsb
)udsg|bcBDT(-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
cand
idat
es
0
2000
4000
6000
8000 LHCbdatabc
udsg
)c|bBDT(-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
cand
idat
es
0
2000
4000
6000 LHCbdatabc
udsg
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 24 / 37
W + j Measurements
Q-tagging: Efficiency arXiv:1504.07670
• determine efficiency with: Nx(SV)Nx(χ2
IP) , x ∈ udsg, c, b
c-enhanced (D + j) b-enhanced (B + j)
χ2IP of hardest-pT
track (large initialudsg-background)
)IP2χlog(
-5 0 5 10 15
cand
idat
es
0
50000
100000
150000 LHCbdatabc
udsg
+jetD
)IP2χlog(
-5 0 5 10 15
cand
idat
es
0
10000
20000
LHCbdatabc
udsg
+jetB
χ2IP of hardest-pT
muon (only O(10%)of jets)
)IP2χmuon log(
-5 0 5 10 15
cand
idat
es
0
500
1000
1500
2000
LHCbdatabc
udsg
+jetD
)IP2χmuon log(
-5 0 5 10 15
cand
idat
es
0
1000
2000
LHCbdatabc
udsg
+jetB
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 25 / 37
W + j Measurements
Q-tagging: Results arXiv:1504.07670
light-parton mistag probability0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005
(b,c
)-je
t tag
eff
icie
ncy
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-jetb-jetc
LHCb simulation
(jet) < 4.2η2.2 <
(jet) < 100 GeVT
20 < p
(jet) [GeV]T
p20 40 60 80 100
SV-t
ag e
ffic
ienc
y0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1LHCb
-jetb
-jetc
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 26 / 37
W + j Measurements
Q-tagging: Systematics arXiv:1504.07670
source b-jets c-jetsBDT templates∗ ≈ 2% ≈ 2%udsg-jet large IP component∗ ≈ 5% ≈ 10− 30%IP resolution − −hadron-as-muon (hardest-µ only) 5% 20%out-of-jet (b, c)-hadron decay − −gluon splitting 1% 1%pile up − −
systematic (combined fit) ≈ 10% ≈ 10%∗dependent on jet type and pT
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 27 / 37
W + j Measurements
W + b, c arXiv:1505.04051
• 7 TeV and 8TeV datasets• fiducial definition:
• same as inclusive W• pT(j) > 20 GeV• 2.2 < η(j) < 4.2• ∆R(µ, j) > 0.5• pT(µ+ j) > 20 GeV
• W + j content from isolation fit• BDT(bc|udsg) and BDT(b|c) fit• W + b-jet: top extrapolated
from side-band• W + c-jet: Z [ττ ] from
pT(SV)/pT(j) fit
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Can
dida
tes/
0.05
20000
40000 Data
W
Z
Jets
= 8 TeVs, +µ
) µj(T
p)/µ(T
p0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
cand
idat
es
20000
40000 = 8 TeVs, −µ LHCb
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 28 / 37
W + j Measurements
W + b, c: Systematics (5) arXiv:1505.04051
source δσ(Wb)σ(Wj)
[%] δσ(Wc)σ(Wj)
[%] δσ(Wj)σ(Zj)
[%] δA(Wb) δA(Wc)
(b, c)-tag efficiency 10 10 − −isolation templates 10 5 4 0.08 0.03top 13 − − 0.02SV-tag BDT templates 5 5 0.02 0.02Z [ττ ] − 3 − − −jet reconstruction 2 2 − − −jet energy 2 2 1 0.02 0.02trigger and selection 1 1 2 − −W [τν] − − 1 − −other electroweak − − − − −
systematic 20 13 5 0.09 0.04statistical (7 TeV) 20 8 2 0.20 0.08statistical (8 TeV) 10 5 1 0.13 0.05
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 29 / 37
W + j Measurements
W + b, c: Ratios arXiv:1505.04051 1
00×
(Wj)
σ(W
x)/
σ
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 = 7 TeV LHCb datas = 8 TeV LHCb datas
(Zj)
σ(W
j)/σ
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 = 7 TeV LHCb datas = 8 TeV LHCb datas
A(W
x)
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8 = 7 TeV LHCb datas = 8 TeV LHCb datas points data (total, stat)fills MCFM NLO theory
CT10 (scale + PDF)green W + c-jetred W + b-jetblue W + + jmagenta W− + j
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 30 / 37
W + j Measurements
Top arXiv:1506.00903
• tightened fiducial region• pT(µ) > 25 GeV reduces di-jet background• 50 < pT(b) < 100 GeV reduces W + b
• similar analysis strategy to W + b, c ratios• fit pT(µ+ b) and A distributions to determine significance• use excess from W + b prediction to calculate cross-section
)µ
j(T
p)/µ(T
p0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Can
dida
tes/
0.05
5000
10000
Data
W
Z
Jets
LHCb+jetµ
)µ
j(T
p)/µ(T
p0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Can
dida
tes/
0.1
100
200
300
Data
W
Z
Jets
LHCb-tag+bµ
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 31 / 37
W + j Measurements
Top: Background arXiv:1506.00903
) [GeV]j+µ(T
p
+je
t)W(
N
0
2000
4000
6000
8000 LHCb
Data
SM
20 45 70 95 ∞) [GeV]j+µ(
Tp
Cha
rge
Asy
mm
etry
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
20 45 70 95 ∞
LHCb
Data
SM
• constrain W + b backgroundusing W + j from data andW + b/W + j from theory
• theory and experimentaluncertainties partiallycancel
• validate against W + c ) [GeV]c+µ(T
p
)c+
W(N
0
50
100
150
200
Data
SM
LHCb
20 45 70 95 ∞
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 32 / 37
W + j Measurements
Top: Significance arXiv:1506.00903
• profile likelihood used tocompare W + b hypothesis withW + b + top
• uncertainties treated asGaussian nuisanceparameters
• 5.4σ significance observed
source δσ [%]
GEC 2pT(µ)/pT(jµ) templates 5–10jet reconstruction 2SV-tag BDT templates 5b-tag efficiency 10
trigger & µ selection 2jet energy 5W [τ [µνν]ν] 1
luminosity 1–2
) [GeV]b+µ(T
p
)W
+b
(N
0
100
200
Data+topWb
Wb
LHCb
20 45 70 95 ∞) [GeV]b+µ(
Tp
Cha
rge
Asy
mm
etry
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
Data
+topWb
Wb
LHCb
20 45 70 95 ∞
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 33 / 37
W + j Measurements
Top: Cross-section arXiv:1506.00903
• cross-section determined from subtracting W + b background fromdata
) [fb
]t
+ t
+
t(tσ
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
= 7 TeV LHCb datas = 8 TeV LHCb datas
σ(tt̄ + t + t̄)points data (total, stat)fills MCFM NLO theory
CT10 (scale + PDF)
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 34 / 37
Conclusions
Conclusions
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 35 / 37
Conclusions
Run 2 and Beyond
• projected luminosity
LHC era HL-LHC era
Run 1(a) Run 1(b) Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 52011 2012 2015 - 2018 2020 - 2022 2025 - 2028 2030 - ?
1 fb−1 2 fb−1 5 fb−1 15 fb−1 25 fb−1 50 fb−1
• LHCb upgrade during LS 2, see LHCb-PUB-2014-040• replacement of RICH and tracking• full software trigger, see LHCb-TDR-016
• current hardware readout at 1 MHz, upgrade at 40 MHz
• significantly more top statistics in the future• double vector boson measurements possible• Higgs in the not-so-near future?
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 36 / 37
Conclusions
Final Thoughts
• LHCb has a diverse physics program, far beyond original design• what would others like to see from LHCb?• some (probably unreasonable) technical requests
• keep in mind fiducial definition for LHCb• prefer tools that don’t require file interfaces (i.e. LHEF)
• looking forward to Run 2 data
Thank you!
Ilten Measurements with LHCb June 18, 2015 37 / 37