38
Predictive Analytics Reporting (PAR) Framework: Overview, Applications, Results Ellen Wagner Chief Research and Strategy Officer June 18, 2014 @edwsonoma

Predictive Analytics Reporting (PAR) Framework: Overview, Applications, Results Ellen Wagner Chief Research and Strategy Officer June 18, 2014 @edwsonoma

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Predictive Analytics Reporting (PAR) Framework:

Overview, Applications, Results

Ellen WagnerChief Research and Strategy Officer

June 18, 2014@edwsonoma

Are You “Scorecard-Ready”?

http://collegecost.ed.gov/

Performance Based Funding andUS Post-Secondary Institutions

http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx

A Stronger Nation Through Higher Education: Lumina Foundation, April

2014

http://strongernation.luminafoundation.org/report/

While “Big Data” raise expectations,student data drive big decisions in .edu

How Do Institutions Deal With the “Apples to Zebras” Problem?

Collaborative

National

Multi-institutional Non-profit

Institutional Effectiveness +

Student Success

PAR: “standard, equal, normal”

The Predictive Analytics Reporting (PAR) Framework

• PAR is a “massive data” analysis effort using predictive analytics to identify drivers related to loss and momentum and to inform student loss prevention

• PAR member institutions voluntarily contribute de-identified student records to create a single federated database.

• Descriptive, inferential and predictive analyses have been used to create benchmarks, institutional predictive models and to map student success interventions to predictor behaviors

PAR Framework video introduction

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ll6qmo9fru869un/PAR_1080p_storyeyed.mp4

PAR distributes efforts associated with analysis and modeling processes

• Analysis and model building is an iterative process

• Around 70-80% efforts are spent on data exploration and understanding.

PAR’s Common Data Definitions Enable Shared Understandings and Results.

PAR uses structured, readily available data from all of its members for generalizability• Common data

definitions = reusable predictive models and meaningful comparisons.

• Openly published via a cc license @ https://public.datacookbook.com/public/institutions/par

PAR Input data are available for ALL students from ALL US institutions

Student Demographics &

DescriptiveGender

RacePrior Credits

Perm Res Zip CodeHS Information

Transfer GPAStudent Type

Student Course Information

Course LocationSubject

Course NumberSection

Start/End DatesInitial/Final Grade

Delivery ModeInstructor Status

Course Credit

Student Academic Progress

Curent Major/CIPEarned Credential/CIP

Student Financial

InformationFAFSA on File – Date

Pell Received/Awarded – Date

Course CatalogSubject

Course NumberSubject LongCourse Title

Course DescriptionCredit Range

** Future

Lookup TablesCredential Types Offered

Course Enrollment PeriodsStudent Types

Instructor StatusDelivery Modes

Grade CodesInstitution Characteristics

Possible Additional **Placement TestsNSC InformationSES Information

Satisfaction SurveysCollege Readiness Surveys

Intervention Measures

PAR’s Actionable Benefits/Outcomes

IDENTIFY: Benchmarks

Show how institutions compare to their peers in student outcomes, by scaling a multi-institutional database for benchmarking and research purposes.

TARGET:Predictive models

Identify which students need assistance, by using in-depth, institutional specific predictive models. Models are unique to the needs and priorities of our member institutions based on their specific data.

Determine best ways to address weaknesses identified in benchmarks and models by scaling and leveraging a member, data and literature validated framework for examining interventions within and across institutions (SSMx).

TREAT:Intervention measures

Feedback loops for enabling institutional performance improvements

Performance Benchmarks

Intervention Benchmarks

Predictive Models Action

Measurable Results

Common Data

Definitions and Data

Warehouse

Scalable cross institutional improvements enabled by Collaboration via PAR

Descriptive and Predictive Insight

Cross Institutional Student/degree/major level insight into: 1. What did the retention look like for

students entering in the same cohort

2. How does your institution compare to peer institutions / institutions in other sectors

3. How did performance vary by student attributes

Institutional Specific insight into: 1. What students are being retained

over time? 2. Which students are currently at risk

for completing and why?3. Which factors are directly correlated

to student success?4. What is the predicted course

completion rate for a particular program?

PAR Benchmarks Descriptive Analytics

PAR Models Predictive Analytics

Collaborative Benchmarking

Student-level data +

common data definitions =

deeply drillable comparative reports

Partners determine measures and content

INSTITUTIONAL SPECIFIC PREDICTIVE MODELS

Institution X

Predicting retention aimed at taking action -

finding the most important factors

Actionable information at the student level

PAR anonymized ID

1st, 2nd and 3rd most important factors contributing to risk

Risk they will not be retained

Student Success Matrix (SSMX) Review

• Inventorying & categorizing student success interventions/ supports using a common framework– Based on known predictors of risk and success– In the context of the academic life cycle

• Addresses “Now What?” by linking predictions to action– Enables cross institutional benchmarking – Supports local and cross institutional cost/ benefit

analyses.

©PAR Framework 2013

From this

©PAR Framework 2013

Launched June 2013 Student Success Matrix (SSMx) Publically available, 1,400+ downloads https://public.datacookbook.com/public/institutions/par

Launched April 22, 2014Members only, managed environment

To this

SSMX Progress

Comprehensive view – completed SSMx

©PAR Framework 2013

©PAR Framework 2013

Examine interventions by predictor category

©PAR Framework 2013

©PAR Framework 2013

©PAR Framework 2013

Isolate interventions

Find gaps

Applying Interventions at the Greatest point of Need/Value

• A fundamental objective for developing common language and frameworks for reviewing student interventions is so that the most effective interventions can be applied at the points of greatest need to effectively remediate risk at the student level.

• PAR has paved the way for creating common understanding of student risk and common tools for diagnosing risk, but the road to developing consistent and applied measurement to student impact of intervention will take time and vigilance.

From Hindsight to Foresight

PAR Futures

• PAR, Inc., a 501.c.3 non-profit educational organization launching Dec 9, 2014 as an Analytics-As-A-Service (AAAS) provider.

• PAR will focus on benchmarks, predictive models, the student success intervention mapping and measurement, “Rosetta Stone” cross-walks to other data projects and platform providers.

• New reports that emphasize pathways to achieving outcomes (e.g. Adult learners, PLAs, CBE).

• New reports that consider “big issues” impact on learning outcomes, e.g., online-blended-onground programs; for-profit-public-private institutions.

• Support/resources/services for community of research and practice.

Thank you!

http://parframework.org@PARFRamework