11
The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Constitutions of Self in Immune System Discourse Donna Haraway Donna Haraway Student Edition Student Edition Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Constitutions of Self in Immune System Discourse Donna Haraway Student Edition. Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart. Guide Questions. What is Haraway’s thesis statement? Why does she contend that scientific discourses are “lumpy”?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies: Constitutions of Self in Immune System DiscourseDonna HarawayDonna HarawayStudent EditionStudent Edition

Prepared by:

Dr. Kay Picart

Page 2: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Guide Questions

What is Haraway’s thesis statement?

Why does she contend that scientific discourses are “lumpy”?

Page 3: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The Evolution of Gershon’s Immunological Orchestra (1968):

cooperation

Page 4: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The Evolution of Gershon’s Immunological Orchestra (1974): T

cell conductor; thymus as helper

Page 5: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The Evolution of Gershon’s Immunological Orchestra (1977): T cells Ly1; Ly2,3-joint conductors; Ly

1,2,3-prompter

Page 6: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The Evolution of Gershon’s Immunological Orchestra (1982): T cells-conductor; Lyt 1&2-prompters:

G.O.D. resigned to conflict

Page 7: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Guide Question

Why does Haraway say bodies have become cyborgs?

Page 8: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

The problem of the Individual

How has the “individual” been defined scientifically (e.g., Huxley, Dawkins)?

Page 9: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Guide Question

How does Haraway form an analogy between astronomical and immunological representations?

Page 10: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Guide Question

According to Haraway, how does colonial discourse persist in Immunology discourse?

Page 11: Prepared by: Dr. Kay Picart

Final Question

Why does Haraway conclude with a section on science fiction?