43
PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS Anastasia L. Maukar 1

PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

  • Upload
    wilton

  • View
    95

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS. Anastasia L. Maukar. Formulating Mutually Exclusive Alternatives. One of the important functions of financial management and engineering is the creation of “alternatives” If there are no alternatives to consider then there really is no problem to solve! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

1

PRESENT WORTH ANALYSISAnastasia L. Maukar

Page 2: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

2

Formulating Mutually Exclusive Alternatives

• One of the important functions of financial management and engineering is the creation of “alternatives”

• If there are no alternatives to consider then there really is no problem to solve!

• Given a set of “feasible” alternatives, engineering economy attempts to identify the “best” economic approach to a given problem

Page 3: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

3

Types of Economic Projects• Mutually exclusive alternatives

– From a set of feasible alternatives, pick one and only one to execute

– Mutually exclusive alternatives compete against each other

• Independent projects– From a set of feasible alternatives select as many as can be

funded in the current period

• The “Do Nothing” (DN) alternative should always be considered

Page 4: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

4

Economic Criteria

• The decision process requires that the outcomes of feasible alternatives be arranged so that they may be judged for economic efficiency in terms of the selection criterion.

• Equivalence provides the logic by which we may adjust the cash flow for a given alternative into some equivalent sum or series

• How should they be compared?• Learn how analysis can resolve alternatives into equivalent

present consequences, referred to simply as present worth analysis.

Page 5: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

5

APPLYING PRESENT WORTH TECHNIQUES

• One of the easiest ways to compare mutually exclusive alternatives is to resolve their consequences to the present time

• The three criteria for economic efficiency are restated in terms of present worth analysis :

Page 6: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

6

Chapter Opening Story – GE’s Healthymagination Project

GE Unveils $6 Billion Health-Unit Plan:• Goal: Increase the market share in the healthcare sector.• Strategies: Develop products that will lower costs, increase access and improve health-care quality.• Investment required: $6 billion over six years• Desired project outcome: Would help GE’s health-care unit grow at least twice as fast as the broader economy.

Page 7: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

7

Ultimate Questions

• GE’ s Point of View:– Would there be enough demand for their

products to justify the investment required in new facilities and marketing?

– What would be the potential financial risk if the actual demand is far less than its forecast or adoption of technology is too slow?

– If everything goes as planned, how long does it take to recover the initial investment?

Page 8: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

8

Bank Loan vs. Project Cash Flows

Page 9: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

9

Example 3.1 Describing Project Cash Flows – A Computer-Process Control Project

Year(n)

Cash Inflows(Benefits)

Cash Outflows(Costs)

NetCash Flows

0 0 $650,000 -$650,000

1 215,500 53,000 162,500

2 215,500 53,000 162,500

… … … …

8 215,500 53,000 162,500

Page 10: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

10

Cash Flow Diagram for the Computer Process Control Project

Page 11: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

11

Net Present Worth Measure Principle: Compute the equivalent net surplus at n = 0 for a given

interest rate of i. Decision Rule for Single Project Evaluation: Accept the project if the

net surplus is positive. Decision Rule for Comparing Multiple Alternatives: Select the

alternative with the largest net present worth.

2 3 4 50 1

Inflow

Outflow

0PW(i) inflow

PW(i) outflow

Net surplus

PW(i) > 0

0

Page 12: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

12

Example 3.2 - Tiger Machine Tool Company

inflow

outflow

(12%) $35,560( / ,12%,1) $37,360( / ,12%,2)$31,850( / ,12%,3) $34,400( / ,12%,4)$

(12%) $76,000(12%) $106,065 $76,000

$30,065 0, Accept

PW P F P FP F P F

PWPW

$76,000

$35,560 $37,360$34,400

01 2 3

outflow

inflow

$31,850

Page 13: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

13

Present Worth Amounts at Varying Interest Rates

Page 14: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

14

Can you explain what $30,065 really means?

1. Project Balance Concept

2. Investment Pool Concept

Page 15: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

15

Project Balance Concept

• Suppose that the firm has no internal funds to finance the project, so will borrow the entire investment from a bank at an interest rate of 12%.

• Then, any proceeds from the project will be used to pay off the bank loan.

• Then, our interest is to see if how much money would be left over at the end of the project period.

Page 16: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

16

Calculating Project Balances

End of Year (n ) 0 1 2 3 4

Beginning Project Balance (76,000)$ (49,560)$ (18,147)$ 11,525$

Interest Charged (12%) (9,120)$ (5,947)$ (2,178)$ 1,383$

Payment (76,000)$ 35,560$ 37,360$ 31,850$ 34,400$

Ending Project Balance (76,000)$ (49,560)$ (18,147)$ 11,525$ 47,308$

Page 17: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

17

Project Balance Diagram – Four Pieces of Information

The exposure to financial risk

The discounted payback period

The profit potential

The net future worth

Page 18: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

18

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

Examples 3.3:

• A firm is considering which of two mechanical devices to

install to reduce costs in a particular situation. Both devices

cost $1000 and have useful lives of 5 years and no salvage

value. Device A can be expected to result in $300 savings

annually. Device B will provide cost savings of $400 the first

year but will decline $50 annually, making the second-year

savings $350, the third-year savings $300, and so forth. With

interest at 7%, which device should the firm purchase?

Page 19: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

19

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

• Answer:

Page 20: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

20

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

Examples 3.4:• A purchasing agent is considering the purchase of some new

equipment for the mail room. Two different manufacturers have provided quotations. An analysis of the quotations indicates the following:

• The equipment of both manufacturers is expected to perform at the desired level of (fixed)output. For a 5-year analysis period, which manufacturer's equipment should be selected? Assume 7% interest and equal maintenance costs

Page 21: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

21

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

• answer

Page 22: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

22

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

• A firm is trying to decide which of two weighing scales it should install to check a package-filling operation in the plant. The ideal scale would allow better control of the filling operation and result in less overfilling. If both scales have lives equal to the 6-year analysis period, which one should be selected? Assume an 8% interest rate

Page 23: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

23

Useful Lives Equal the Analysis Period

• answer

Page 24: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

24

Useful Lives Different from the Analysis Period

• A diesel manufacturer is considering the two alternative production machines which are specific data are as follows:

• The manufacturer uses an interest rate of 8% and wants to use the PW method to compare these alternatives over an analysis period of 10 years.

Page 25: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

25

Useful Lives Different from the Analysis Period

Page 26: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

26

Useful Lives Different from the Analysis Period

Page 27: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

27

Infinite Analysis Period: Capitalized Cost

• Another difficulty in present worth analysis arises when we encounter an infinite analysis period (n= ~)

Page 28: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

28

Infinite Analysis Period: Capitalized Cost

Example:• A city plans a pipeline to transport water from a

distant watershed area to the city. The pipeline will cost $8 million and will have an expected life of 70 years. The city anticipates it will need to keep the water line in service indefinitely. Compute the capitalized cost, assuming7% interest

Page 29: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

29

Infinite Analysis Period: Capitalized Cost

Page 30: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

30

Infinite Analysis Period: Capitalized Cost

Page 31: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

31

Multiple Alternatives

• The minimum required interest rate for invested money is called the minimum attractive rate of return, or MARR

Page 32: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

32

Investment Pool Concept• Suppose the company has $76,000. It has two options.

(1)Take the money out and invest it in the project or (2) leave the money in the pool and continue to earn a 12% interest.

• If you take Option 1, any proceeds from the project will be returned to the investment pool and earn 12% interest yearly until the end of the project period.

• Let’s see what the consequences are for each option.

Page 33: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

33

If $76,000 were left in the investment poolfor 4 years

$76,000(F/P,12%,4) $119,587

If $76,000 withdrawalfrom the investmentpool were invested inthe project

• AmountYear• $35,6501• $37,3602

• $31,8503• $34,4004

$35,650(F/P,12%,3)

$37,360(F/P,12%,2)

$31,850(F/P,12%,1)

$34,400(F/P,12%,0)

1 • $49,959

2 • $46,864

3 • $35,672

4• $34,400

$166,896

$166,896

$119,587

$47,309

Option A

Option B

The net benefit of investing in the project

Investment Pool

PW(12%) = $47,309(P/F,12%,4) = $30.065

Page 34: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

34

What Factors Should the Company Consider in Selecting a MARR in Project Evaluation?

• Cost of capital– The required return necessary to

make an investment project worthwhile.

– Viewed as the rate of return that a firm would receive if it invested its money someplace else with a similar risk

• Risk premium– The additional risk associated with

the project if you are dealing with a project with higher risk than normal project

MA

RR

Cos

t of c

apita

lR

isk

prem

ium

Page 35: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

35

WEEK 4

Page 36: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

36

Practice Problem• An electrical motor rated at 15HP needs to be

purchased for $1,000. • The service life of the motor is known to be 10 years

with negligible salvage value.• Its full load efficiency is 85%.• The cost of energy is $0.08 per Kwh.• The intended use of the motor is 4,000 hours per

year.• Find the total present worth cost of owning and

operating the motor at 10% interest.

Page 37: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

37

Solution

1HP=0.7457kW 15HP = 15 0.7457 = 11.1855kW Required input power at 85% efficiency rating:

11.1855 13.15940.85

Required total kWh per year 13.1594kW 4,000 hours/year =52,638

kW kW

kWh/yr Total annual energy cost to operate the motor

52,638kWh $0.08/kWh =$4,211/yr The total present worth cost of owning and operating the motor

(10%) $1,000 $4,211( / ,10PW P A %,10) = $26,875

Page 38: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

38

Exercise 1

• A piece of land may be purchased for $610,000 to be strip-mined for the underlying coal. Annual net income will be $200,000 per year for 10 years. At the end of the 10 years, the surface of the land will be restored as required by a federal law on strip mining. The reclamation will cost $1.5 million more than the resale value of the land after it is restored. Using a 10%interest rate, determine whether the project is desirable

Page 39: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

39

Exercise

Page 40: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

40

Exercise 2

Page 41: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

41

Exercise 3

Page 42: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

42

Exercise 4

Page 43: PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

43

Exercise 5