Upload
kairos
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Competitive Strategies in Wholesale Financial Markets and Proposals to Restructure the U.S. Regulatory System. Presentation to the Institute of International Bankers Charles Roxburgh. Three topics. Scenarios for future of global capital markets Competitive strategies in response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CONFIDENTIAL
Washington D.C., March 2008
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company. This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
Competitive Strategies in Wholesale Financial Markets and Proposals to Restructure the U.S. Regulatory System
Presentation to the Institute of International Bankers
Charles Roxburgh
McKinsey & Company | 2
Scenarios for future of global capital markets
Competitive strategies in response
Possible directions for regulatory reform
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 3
2007 was set to be another record year – but then it all went wrong . . .
Global capital markets revenues*
*Sales and trading, ECM, DCM, loan origination and syndication, and M&A revenues**Estimates based on results of ten Global players, which may over-state total industry growth in first half given relative out-performance by leading firms, plus third quarter actual results and mix of actual and estimated fourth quarter results for leading firms scaled up to give industry totals
315
209
2004
244
2005 2006
25**(4Q)
46**(3Q)
198**(1H)
267**
Post-write-downs – 2007
+17%
+29%-15%
$Millions
Source: McKinsey Global Capital Markets Revenue Pools; Company reports, McKinsey estimates
McKinsey & Company | 4
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
2,600
2,800
U.S. securities industry financial results* End Q1 1980 value indexed to 100 (quarterly figures)
Before looking forward, let’s look back . . .
*Extracted from aggregated income statement, selected balance sheet, and employment data on the U.S. domestic broker-dealer operations of all NASD and NYSE member firms doing a public business derived from their Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single (FOCUS) Report filings
Q1 1980 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20071982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19991981
Securities firms revenue
Absolute revenues below corresponding quarter in previous year
Q1 2001 – Q2 2005“9/11 and TMT collapse”
Duration of decline – 9 quarters% max. fall – 43.0%Time to recovery – 19 quarters
Q2 1987 – Q1 1989“Black Monday”
Duration of decline – 3 quarters% max. fall – 33.5%Time to recovery – 8 quarters
Q1 1994 – Q4 1994“U.S. interest rate hike”
Duration of decline – 2 quarters% max. fall – 15.8%Time to recovery – 4 quarters
Q3 1998 – Q3 1999“Emerging markets crisis”
Duration of decline – 1 quarter% max. fall– 15.2%Time to recovery – 5 quarters
Source: SIFMA; McKinsey analysis
McKinsey & Company | 5
Last September, we defined four possible scenarios for the future . . .
Description
Bounce Back The credit and liquidity crunches turn out to be a short-term blip 2007 H2 is tough but 2007 remains a record year, revenue growth reverts to long
term trend from Q1 2008 onwards
Steady Recovery Some players keep struggling in credit in the remaining of 2007, but no major downturn in economy
After identifying all effects and losses due to the current turmoil, capital market revenues growth picks up in 2008H2
The Long Chill Weakened consumers confidence due to the US housing market downturn leads to a mild dip of economy in early 2008; slight up-tick in default rates hits credit markets
Further interest rate cut in mid-2008 rescues markets, but it takes one year for growth revival
Late Tackle Liquidity support by central banks and continued consumer confidence maintain markets’ stability and growth until around mid-2008
Inflationary pressures accelerate given loose monetary policy. Fed reverses policy and triggers 2-3 quarters of recession from mid to end 2008
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 6
. . . which we have now narrowed down to two main scenarios
402360315267315244
2005 06 07 08 09 2010
+6%
300285256315244
2005 06
267
07 08 09 2010
-1%
Steady Recovery
Benign "soft landing" and quick economic recovery in 2008
Deal pipelines temporarily dry out creating 3-4 quarters of negative growth in credit, but recover in H2 2008
Europe and Emerging markets remain strong
The Long Chill
Early, mild recession in 2008 Structural change in credit markets Continued growth in selected asset classesStrong growth ex-US
Total & CIB revenues
Note: 2007, 2008, 2009 results include estimated write-downs & write backs
Source: McKinsey Global Capital Markets Revenue Pools; McKinsey estimate
$Millions
McKinsey & Company | 7
What will be the next shoe to drop?
Monolines?
Commercial Real Estate?
Leveraged Loans?
Sub-prime “Round 2”?
Litigation?
Regulatory over-reaction?
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 8
There are common trends across all scenarios
Source: McKinsey
Regional balance
Product trends
Emerging markets likely to outgrow developed markets
Western Europe likely to extend lead over North America in terms to total capital markets revenues
North America lags behind
Commodities and Equity Derivatives with strong prospects under all scenarios
FX, Rates & Cash Equities as winners in "lighter crisis" scenarios and still relatively resilient in steeper crisis
Permanent loss of some revenue pools (esp. structured credit)
Continued attractiveness of annuity-like transactional products
McKinsey & Company | 9
Global revenue pools are likely to shift away from the US
Estimated revenue mix by regionPercent
40 40
4031
610
9 15
5
2005
4
2010 possible scenario
Japan
Non-Japan Asia
Other emerging markets
North America
Western Europe
100%
Source: McKinsey Corporate and Investment Banking Practice Industry Scenarios
McKinsey & Company | 10
Scenarios for future of global capital markets
Competitive strategies in response
Possible directions for regulatory reform
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 11
Three priorities for maximizing value through a potential downturn
Remain committed to clients and talentDeepen client relationships, forged through adversityRe-structure compensation to reward commitment of top talent and
strengthen link to long term value creationMaintain active recruiting strategy at all levelsReinforce meritocracy
Reconfirm & recommit to long term strategyContinue investment throughout the cycle in strategic prioritiesBuild emerging markets franchisesUndertake 'no regret' reviews of risk process, capital allocation and non-
compensation costs
Invest in the next waves of innovationDrive product innovation, e.g., insurance securitization, carbon trading, Capture convergence opportunities e.g., with asset management Improve “R&D” and streamline new product development processes Innovate business and operational models for productivity and efficiency
McKinsey & Company | 12
Scenarios for future of global capital markets
Competitive strategies in response
Possible directions for regulatory reform
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 13
In 2006 there was growing pessimism about the prospects for New York City as a financial center relative to London
Do you believe this city will become more or less attractive over the next 3 years?
More attractive
About the same
Less attractive
New York City
44
15
41
London
38
8
54
Ranking by responsePercent
Source: McKinsey Financial Services CEO Survey
McKinsey & Company | 14
Regulation was an area of particular concern
Source: McKinsey Financial Services CEO Survey
Which regulatory environment is more business-friendly?
U.S. is much better
U.S. is somewhat better
About the same
U.K. is somewhat better
U.K. is much better
Rules InspireInvestorConfidence
Clarity of Rules
Fairnessof Rules
Uniformityof RegulatoryEnforcement
Simplicity ofRegulatorySystem
Cost ofOngoingCompliance
45
23
2
26
4
31
35
19
13
2
42
32
12
131
45
32
8
13
2
43
31
7
14
5
Ranking by responsePercent
33
34
14
16
3
McKinsey & Company | 15
Several reports helped created a consensus on the diagnosis….
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 16
. . . and a consensus is emerging on some issues . . . Supports
Drafting+
Principles-based regulations
Better regulatory coordination
Prudential supervision
Securities litigation reform
Accounting reforms/IFRS
SOX reforms
CCMRBloomberg-Schumer Chamber Roundtable Treasury
+
+
+
Source: McKinsey
???
?
McKinsey & Company | 17
. . . and a consensus is emerging on some issues . . . Supports
Drafting+
CCMRBloomberg-Schumer Chamber Roundtable Treasury
New & modernized charters
National Commission to study further
+
Regulatory structure rationalization/ consolidation
Immigration reforms for skilled talent, business travellers
Source: McKinsey
National Commission to study further
?
?
?
McKinsey & Company | 18
U.S. now faces a clear choice – bold reforms
Clarify financial market objectives
Move to principles-based and prudential regulation
Enhance regulatory coordination
Reform securities litigation
Modernize charters
Streamline and consolidate agencies
Continue accounting and auditing reforms
Improve immigration policies to ensure needed skills
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 19
U.S. now faces a clear choice – bold reforms . . . or just muddle through
Clarify financial market objectives
Move to principles-based regulation & prudential supervision
Enhance regulatory coordination
Reform securities litigation
Modernize charters
Streamline and consolidate agencies
Continue accounting and auditing reforms
Improve immigration policies to ensure needed skills
No clear national objectives
Continue rules-based regulation with emphasis on enforcement
Rely on ad hoc, reactive coordination among agencies
Keep litigious legal environment
Leave charters unchanged
Maintain current complexity and overlap at national and state level
No further accounting or auditing reforms
Leave immigration unchanged
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 20
Some predictions . . .
Source: McKinsey
Current market environment will dominate Congressional and regulatory debates in near term, understandably postponing needed reforms even where there may be growing consensus
More evidence of eroding US competitiveness could drive some consensus reforms this year as a “regulatory stimulus” response before the 2008 elections – e.g.▢Principles-based regulation and national standards▢Better regulatory coordination…..but need to avoid risk of regulatory over-reaction to current issues
Longer-term reforms – new charters, streamlined and consolidated agencies, securities litigation reforms, immigration reforms – will likely await new Administration and new Congress in 2009-2010 and beyond.
CONFIDENTIAL
Washington D.C., March 2008
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company. This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
Competitive Strategies in Wholesale Financial Markets and Proposals to Restructure the U.S. Regulatory System
Presentation to the Institute of International Bankers