Presentations

Requirements & Grading

1st: An Advertisement

• Faculty Candidate: Jiangtao Li– Purdue’s CERIAS

• Job Talk– Friday 11:00 AM– NH 229

• Automated Trust Negotiation (ATN)• Why come?

– Good overview to ATN ideas– High quality, recent research

Presentations

• Requirements– schedule– preparation– presentation

• Grading– criteria– method

Scheduling

• Getting on the schedule– Look over the topics– Pick some papers of

interest– Briefly scan– Email me your top 5

choices, in order– FIFO-ish

Preparation

• Read the paper– Looking for:

• Key contributions• Main idea(s) of solution/attack• Attacker Model & Assumptions (a.k.a. System Model)• Evaluation methods• Results• Conclusions

• Read other material– Background– References of note

Preparation (2)

• Make Slides– Explain what you read– Background info often needed

• Put the work in context• Understand significance• Do conclusions make sense?

– Evaluate (5 min.)• Significance/Originality of ideas• Quality of Evaluation

Preparation (3)

• Send (draft) Slides– To Dr. Wright– 48 hrs. before presentation

• I will send comments by 24 hrs. before• Send earlier if you need more time to edit

– Focus on structure & ideas• Can add graphics/animation later• Just add a note to suggest what you will do

Presentation

• Show up– on time, w/slides

• Present– Aim for 40-45 min.

• Max 50 min. allowed• Typically 2-3 min./slide

– Be ready for content questions

Evaluation Criteria (1)

• Clarity (50%)– Use of visuals

• Many tech. ideas best expressed visually

– Organized ideas• Flow of presentation makes sense• Key points highlighted

– Audience• Interaction, as appropriate• Jokes, visual liveliness, etc.

Evaluation Criteria (2)

• Technical Coverage (50%)– Explained the key ideas well– Explained contributions

• and context

– Models are clear– Complex/Difficult material

• Well handled: examples, high-level, or skipped

Evalation Method

• Student Eval– 50%

• Dr. Wright– 50%