Upload
amberlynn-lilian-waters
View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presented by:
Dawn C. Merrill
December 9, 2009
Development of a colorimetric test kit to determine enzymatically
produced pyruvic acid in sweet onions
• Allium cepa
• Many varietals, types
• Manufacturing• Grown in ≈175 countries• US production
• Consumption• Medicinal properties
• Heart • Gastrointestinal • Anti-cancer
• Flavor
History of Onions
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 2
• Originated in 1898• Varietals include:
• Walla Walla• Vidalia• Texas 1015
• Higher price in the market• Sweetness is inversely
proportional to pungency • Indicators
• Sulfur compounds, sugars, pyruvic acid
What is a Sweet Onion?
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 3
• Many sources for flavor development• Plant metabolic pathways• Cellular disruption
• Enzymatic process
• Thermal processing• Fermentation
• Enzymatic• Bacterial
Flavor Development
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 4
• Derived from the uptake of SO42- from soil
SO42-
Photosynthesis
Cysteine
Glutathione
1-Propenyl cysteine sulfoxide
Methyl cysteine sulfoxide
Propyl cysteine sulfoxide
The Source of Flavor
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 5
• Enzymatic activity by alliinase • Hydrolysis of alk(en)yl cysteine sulfoxides (ACSOs) • Products:
• Thiopropanol S-oxide • Pyruvic acid • Ammonia
O (Alliinase)
RSCH2-CH(NH2)COOH RSOH + CH3COCOOH + NH3
O
CH2CH2C=S=O R-S-S-R
Once an onion is cut…
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 6
Relationship between flavor perception and onion pungency1
Four studies:
1 Wall, M. and Corgan, J. 1992.HortScience. 27(9):1029-1030.
Sensory Correlation
r = 0.92, 0.84, 0.95, and 0.79
R2 = 0.84, 0.71, 0.91, and 0.62
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 7
Analyzing Pyruvic Acid
• Standard industry practice
• Definition of pungency determined by [pyruvic acid]• According to the following table:
1 – 4 μmol/g Very mild pungency (sweet)
5 – 7 μmol/g Mild pungency
8 – 10 μmol/g Intermediate pungency
> 15 μmol/g Strong pungency (sharp)
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 8
• Current industry method:• Texas AgriLife Research & Extension
• $60/sample analysis• Must have cooperative membership
• Results take 1 week or longer
• Shipping cost• Samples sent to Texas
Method of Analysis
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 9
• Objective 1
• Determine a colorimetric method for the determination of pyruvic acid in onions
• Objective 2
• Develop a fast, field applicable, test kit for analyzing sweetness in onions
Purpose of Research
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 10
• Method designed based on Schwimmer & Weston (1961)• 2, 4 – dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) produces
colored adduct• Measured spectrophotometrically• Wavelength at 420 nm
• Standard in all rapid onion analyses
Literature Review
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 11
• 2, 4 – dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)
• Used to chemically bind to ketone or aldehyde
• Pyruvic acid is a ketone
• DNPH-Pyruvic acid adduct is detected by spectrophotometry
DNPH Reaction
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 12
• Employed to measure the amount of light that a sample absorbs• Based on wavelength (λ)
• Visible range: 350 – 750 nm
• Data is used to calculate two quantities• Transmittance (T)
• T = P/Po
• Absorbance (A)• A = -log10(T)
Spectrophotometer
Po P
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 13
• Beer-Lambert Law:• Measure of energy a
sample absorbs• A = εbC
• Back calculate [pyruvic acid] in sample
• If Beer’s Law applies:• A plot of A vs. C will
indicate a linear fit
Spectrophotometry
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 14
Pyruvic Acid Standard Curve
Concentration (umol/mL)
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0
Absorb
ance
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
Linear Fit, R2 = 0.9999
Beer’s Law: A = εbC
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 15
• Based on absorbance spectra of Anthon & Barrett (2003) • Reagent concentrations• Wavelength at 515 nm
• Wavelength selection• Three wavelengths investigated
• 420 nm, 445 nm, 515 nm
• Ran standard curves at each wavelength
• Based on sensitivity to adduct
Identifying Wavelength
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 16
Standard Curve at 420 nm
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 17
Concentration (umol/mL)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Abs
orba
nce
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
420 nm R2 = 0.9625
Standard Curve at 445 nm
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 18
Concentration (umol/mL)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Abs
orba
nce
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
420 nm445 nm
R2 = 0.9625R2 = 0.9924
Standard Curve at 515 nm
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 19
Concentration (umol/mL)
0 2 4 6 8 10
Abs
orba
nce
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
420 nm445 nm515 nm
R2 = 0.9625R2 = 0.9924R2 = 0.9998
Reaction Time• Preliminary Data
• Variability between onion samples
• Hypothesis: • Formation of pyruvic acid product from
ACSOs requires a specific amount of time
• Test for optimum concentration• Expectation
• Bell shaped curve showing formation and degradation of pyruvic acid
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 20
Reaction Time
Time (minutes)
0 10 20 30 40 50
Concentr
ation P
yruvi
c a
cid
(um
ol/g)
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 21
• Observation• Not a sensory
experiment
• Expectation• Replication of Wall
& Corgan (1992)
• Disadvantages• Based on aroma• One analyst vs.
trained panel• Bias
Score: Evaluation:
6 Extremely strong
5 Very strong
4 Strong
3 Distinct
2 Slight
1 Very slight
0Neutral (no intensity present)
Onion Sensory Scale
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 22
Concentration P.A. (umol/g)
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Inte
nsity
Sco
re
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
SweetWhiteYellowBoiler
Intensity vs. Concentration
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 23
• 25 μL filtered onion juice
• Add reagents• 1 mL 18 mΩ H2O
• 1 mL 2, 4-DNPH in 1 N HCl
• Water Bath• 10 minutes at 37˚C ± 2˚C
• Add reagent• 1 mL 1.5 N NaOH
• Absorbance • 515 nm
Laboratory Procedure
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 24
• Heat denaturation of alliinase• Microwave (W = 1450)
• Procedure • Processed exactly the same as
the uncooked sample
• Absorbance at 515 nm
• Data provides:• TPA – BPA = EPA
Background Levels
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 25
Varietal Average TPA
(μmol/g)Average BPA
(μmol/g)Average EPA
(μmol/g)
Sweet 5.90 ± 0.24 1.88 ± 0.43 4.03 ± 0.49
White 6.59 ± 0.39 1.77 ± 0.35 4.83 ± 0.35
Yellow 7.44 ± 0.31 1.58 ± 0.38 5.86 ± 0.08
Boiler 6.46 ± 0.32 1.58 ± 0.29 4.88 ± 0.39
Onion Results Table• Triplicate analysis
• n = 5
Key:TPA: Total Pyruvic AcidBPA: Background Pyruvic AcidEPA: Enzymatically Produced Pyruvic Acid
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 26
• Average all three trials• n = 15
• Percent recovery • Over-spiked with known concentration P.A.
Varietal Average Pyruvic acid
(umol/g)
Sweet 4.05 ± 0.48
White 4.85 ± 0.09
Yellow 5.85 ± 0.06
Boiler 5.02 ± 0.09
Onion Results (continued)
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 27
Average (3 replicates) 104%
S.D. (3 replicates) 10.4%
Literature Results (TPA)1
Varietal
Schwimmer & Weston (1961)
(μmol/g)
Anthon & Barrett (2003)
(μmol/g)
Merrill, et. al. (2009)*
(μmol/g)
Sweet (Vidalia) 4.47 ± 0.24 3.61 ± 0.24 -
Sweet (Melody) 4.30 ± 0.15 3.43 ± 0.14 -
Sweet** - - 5.90 ± 0.24
White 6.54 ± 0.65 6.98 ± 0.69 6.59 ± 0.39
Yellow 12.34 ± 1.17 10.81 ± 1.11 7.44 ± 0.31
Boiler - - 6.46 ± 0.32
* Results not published** Unknown origin
1 Anthon & Barrett (2003) J Sci Food Agric 83:1213
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 28
Literature Results (BPA)1
Varietal
Schwimmer & Weston
(1961)(μmol/g)
Anthon & Barrett (2003)
(μmol/g)
Merrill, et. al. (2009)*
(μmol/g)
Sweet (Vidalia) 0.76 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.01 -
Sweet (Melody) 0.78 ± 0.06 0.16 ± 0.02 -
Sweet** - - 1.88 ± 0.43
White 0.26 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.01 1.77 ± 0.35
Yellow 1.27 ± 0.27 0.32 ± 0.13 1.58 ± 0.38
Boiler - - 1.58 ± 0.29
1 Anthon & Barrett (2003) J Sci Food Agric 83:1213 * Results not published** Unknown origin
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 29
Objective 1: Summary
• Method determination• Combined Schwimmer & Weston
(1961) & Anthon & Barrett (2003)• 515 nm wavelength
• 20 minutes for full formation of
pyruvic acid• Color = [pyruvic acid] • Results compare to previous
literature
• Method appropriate for test kit
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 30
Objective 2: Test Kit• Criteria
• Materials• Ease of preparation• Stability
• Temperature• Reactivity
• Non-hazardous• Disposal down the drain
• Method• Detection in the visible range• % Recovery
• 80 – 120
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 31
• Materials for onion processing facility• No spectrophotometer
• Reduce time• Current wait time: >1 week for results
• Reduce cost• Current cost is approximately $60 p/ sample• Co-op membership required for this price• Shipping expense• Labor
Criteria (continued)
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 32
• Test kit formulation:• Use data from objective 1
• Pyruvic acid indicator• Color denotes concentration
• Reduced total turn around time• Time of analysis is reduced to ≈ 66 minutes
• Video instruction of method
Results: Test Kit
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 33
Video Demonstration
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 34
Materials• Onion Processor needs:
• Knife• Test tubes• Analytical balance • Cheese cloth• Water bath
• Capable of sustaining37˚C temperature
• Blender/Homogenizer• Distilled water• Pipettes
• 25 μL & 1 mL
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 35
Materials (continued)
• Provided in test kit :• 1 - 20 mL vial 2, 4-DNPH in 1 N HCl • 1 - 20 mL vial 1.5 N NaOH• 1 - Color chart with reference concentrations• Instruction manual & video demo
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 36
Color Chart
• Included in test kit
• Compares color in sample to varying concentrations of pyruvic acid
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Concentration of Pyruvic acid: in μmol/g
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 37
Prototype – Test Kit
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 38
Cost AnalysisCost Per Sample
Current Industry
Analysis $60.00
Shipping $4.90 - $25.15
Labor -
Total: $75.00
Test Kit
Analysis $0.34
Shipping -
Labor $1.13
Total: $1.47
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 39
Results: CriteriaCriteria Expectation Goal Met?
Ease of Prep Quick (< 1 day)
StabilityStable at T, mp, bp, vp, reactivity
Non-Hazardous Disposal in general waste
Temperature 25˚C
Visible Range 420 – 515
% Recovery 80 – 120
Lab Materials No Spectrophotometer needed
Time Same day analysis
CostLess than or same as current method
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 40
• Method validation• Robustness studies• Reduction of background pyruvic acid• More replications for greater statistical
analysis
• Development of the final test kit• Market and sell to onion industry
Future Research
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 41
• Objective 1• Established laboratory
method• SOP in progress
• Objective 2• Create a prototype for a
field test kit• Proof-of-concept
Conclusions
Dawn C. Merrill Oregon State University 12/9/2009 42
• Kim Anderson • Lab Crew
• Michael Penner
• Bioresource Research:• Kate Field• Wanda Crannell• Margaret Corvi
• FS&T Department:• Faculty • Students (“FSTers”)
• Additional Support • Holli Kalaleh• Nicolle Merrill• Anne Ryan
Acknowledgements
Questions?