Upload
carmel-jenkins
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
LEADERSHIP
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
leadership
“leadership is the process whereby one individual influences, othergroup members toward the attainment of defined group or
organizational goals”Jerald Greenberg
“leadership is the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals”
Stephen p. robins.
“leadership is both a process and a property; as a process leadershipinvolves the use of non coercive influence: as a property, leadershipis the set of characteristics attributed to someone who is perceived
to use influence successfully”griffin
“an interaction between members of a group. leaders are agents of change, person whose acts affect other people more than otherpeople’s acts affect them. leadership occurs when one group
member modifies the motivation or competencies of others in the group”
bernard.m.bass
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
LEADERSHIP
“LEADERSHIP IS THE PROCESS WHEREBY ONE INDIVIDUAL INFLUENCES
OTHER GROUP MEMBERS TOWARD THE ATTAINMENT OF DEFINED GROUP
OR ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS”
JERALD GREENBERG
LEADERSHIP INVOLVES THE EXERCISE OF INFLUENCE FOR A PURPOSE-TO ATTAIN DEFINED GROUP OR ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS
CENTRAL ROLE OF INFLUENCE, IMPLIES THAT LEADERSHIPIS REALLYSOMETHING OF A TWO-WAY STREET
LEADERSHIP IS PRIMARILY A PROCESS INVOLVING INFLUENCE-ONE IN WHICH A LEADER CHANGES THE ACTIONS OR ATTITUDESOF SEVERAL GROUP MEMBERS OR SUBORDINATES
B
C
A
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
MANAGERS AND LEADERS:NOT NECESSARILY IDENTICALALTHOUGH SOME MANAGERS ACT AS LEADERS, OTHERS DO NOT.
FURTHER; NOT ALL LEADERS ARE MANAGERS.FOR THESE IS ISUSEFUL TO DISTINGUISH CLEARLY BETWEEN THE TWO TERMS
LEADERSWHO ARE NOT
MANAGERS
LEADERSWHO ARE NOT
MANAGERS
MANAGERSWHO ARE NOT
LEADERS
MANAGERSWHO ARE NOT
LEADERS
LEADERSMANAGERS
MANAGERSWHO ARE ALOS
LEADERS
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
MANAGERS VERSUS LEADERS
MANAGEMENT IS ABOUT COPING WITH COMPLEXITY.GOOD MANAGEMENT BRINGS ABOUT ORDER AND CONSISTENCY BY DRAWING UP FORMAL PLANS, DESIGINING RIGID ORGANIZATION STRUCTURES, AND MONITORING RESULTS AGAINST THE PLANS.
LEADERSHIP, IN CONTRAST IS ABOUT COPING WITH THECHANGE. LEADERS ESTABLISH DIRECTION BY DEVELOPING A VISION OF THE FUTURE; THEN THEY ALIGN PEOPLE BY COMMUNICATING THIS VISION AND INSPIRING THEM TO OVERCOME HURDLES
JOHN KOTTER OF HARWARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
MANAGERS VERSUS LEADERS
MANAGERS USE THE AUTHORITY INHERENT IN THEIRDESIGNATED FORMAL RANK TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCEFROM ORGANIZATION MEMBERS.
MANAGEMENT CONSISTS OF IMPLEMENTING THE VISIONAND STRATEGY PROVIDED BY LEADERS, COORDINATINGAND STAFFING THE ORGANIZATION, AND HANDLING DAYTO DAY PROBLEMS
ROBERT HOOSE OF THE WHARTON SCHOOL
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEADERS AND MANAGERS
LEADERLEADERMANAGERMANAGER
AN ORIGINAL
DEVELOPS
FOCUS ON PEOPLE
INSPIRES TRUST
ORIGINATES
CHANLLENGES THE STATUS QUO
DOES THE RIGHT THING
INNOVATES
LONG RANGE PERSPECTIVE
ASKS WHAT AND WHY
EYE ON THE HORIZON
A COPY
MAINTAINS
FOCUS ON SYSTEM
RELIES ON CONTROL
IMITATES
ACCEPTS THE STATUS QUO
DOES THINGS RIGHT
ADMINISTER
SHORT RANGE VIEW
ASKS HOW AND WHEN
EYE ON THE BOTTOM LINE
CLASSIC GOOD SOLDIER OWN PERSON
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
EDWIN GHISELLI’S PERSONAL TRAITS
VERY IMPORTANT• DECISIVENESS• INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY• JOB ACHIEVEMENT ORIENTATION• SELF-ACTUALIZATION FEELINGS• SELF-CONFIDENCE• MANAGEMENT ABILITY ----TEAM BUILDERMODERATELY IMPORTANT• AFFINITY FOR WORKING CLASS• DRIVE AND INITIATIVE• NEED FOR A LOT OF MONEY• NEED FOR JOB SECURITY• PERSONAL MATURITYALMOST NO IMPORTANCE• MASCULINITY VERSUS FEMININITY
RALPH STOGDILL’S TRAIT FACTORS
1. INTELLIGENCE AND SCHOLARSHIP
2. PHYSICAL TRAITS
3. PERSONALITY
4. SOCIAL STATUS AND EXPERIENCE
5. TASK OREINTATION
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
CRITICISM OF TRAIT APPROACHPEOPLE WHO FAIL AS LEADERS AND PEOPLE WHO NEVER ACHIEVE POSITIONS OF LEADERSHIP OFTEN POSSESS SOME OF THE SAME TRAITSAS SUCCESSFUL LEADERS.
BOTH PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES(HEIGHT, WEIGHT, APPEARANCE ETC) ANDPSYCHOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES (PERSERVERANCE, INTELLIGENCE,INITIATIVE ETC) HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED “TRAITS”
THE TRAITS POSSESSED BY SUCCESSFUL LEADERS ARE INVARIABLYVALUE-JUDGED AS POSITIVE.
THERE IS LITTLE CONSENSUS ON WHAT WORDS MEAN THAT ARE USEDTO LABEL TRAITS.
IT IS OFTEN DIFFICULT TO MEASURE TRAITS.
EVEN IF A TRAIT CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED AND ACCURATELY MEASURED (TILL ORDER), IT IS MUST ACHIEVE ON A GIVEN TRAIT TOMAKE IT EFFECTIVE.
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
LOWA UNIVERSITY LEADERSHIP STUDIES(RONALD LIPPIT, RALPH K WHITE & LEWIN)
PARTICIPATIVE FREE REINAUTOCRATIC
EMPLOYEES
LEADER
EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEES
LEADER
EMPLOYEES
WHOLE GROUP EMPHASIS
EMPLOYEESLEADER
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
MUCZYK AND REIMAN LEADERSHIP STYLES
PERMISSIVE AUTOCRATPERMISSIVE AUTOCRAT
DIRECTIVE DEMOCRATDIRECTIVE DEMOCRAT
PERMISSIVE AUTOCRATPERMISSIVE AUTOCRAT
DIRECTIVE AUTOCRATDIRECTIVE AUTOCRAT
‣MAKES DECISIONS UNILATERILLY;‣ALLOWS SUBORDINATES CONSIDERABLE LATITUDE IN CARRYING OUT ASSIGNED TASKS
‣MAKES DECISIONS PARTICIPATIVELY;‣CLOSELY SUPERVISES ACTIVITIES OF SUBORDINATES
‣MAKES DECISIONS PARTICIPATIVELY;‣ALLOWS SUBORDINATES CONSIDERABLE LATITUDE IN CARRYING OUT ASSIGNED TASKS
‣MAKES DECISIONS UNILATERILLY;‣CLOSELY SUPERVISES ACTIVITIES OF SUBORDINATES
DESCRIPTIONLEADERSHIP STYLE
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
“MY EFFECTIVE BOSSES SEEMED TO CARE ABOUT ME AS
PERSON.
THEY WERE FRIENDLY, LISTENED TO ME WHEN I HAD
PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS, AND SEEMED TO HELP ME TOWARD
MY PERSONAL GOALS.
MY INEFFECTIVE BOSSES DID’T DO THIS”
“MY EFFECTIVE BOSSES HELPED ME TO GET THE JOB DONE.
THEY GIVE ME ADVICE, ANSWERED MY QUESTIONS, AND LET
ME KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WAS EXPECTED OF ME. MY
INEFFECTIVE BOSSES DIDN’T DO THIS”
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
OHIO STATE STUDIES
HIGH STRUCTURELOW CONSIDERATION
HIGH STRUCTURELOW CONSIDERATION
PRIMARY EMPHASIS IS PLACED ON STRUCTURING EMPLOYEE TASKSWHILE THE LEADER DEMONSTRATELITTLE FOR EMPLOYEE NEEDS &WANTS
HIGH STRUCTUREHIGH CONSIDERATION
HIGH STRUCTUREHIGH CONSIDERATION
THE LEADER PROVIDES A LOT OF GUIDANCE ABOUT HOW TAKS CAN BE COMPLETED WHILE BEING HIGHLY CONSIDERATE OF EMPLOYEE NEEDS & WANTS
LOW STRUCTURELOW CONSIDERATION
LOW STRUCTURELOW CONSIDERATION
THE LEADER FAILS TO PROVIDE NECESSARY STRUCTURE AND DEMONSTRATES LITTLE CONSIDERATION FOR EMPLOYEE NEEDS AND WANTS
LOW STRUCTUREHIGH CONSIDERATION
LOW STRUCTUREHIGH CONSIDERATION
LESS EMPHASIS IS PLACED ON STRUCTURING EMPLOYEE TASKWHILE THE LEADER CONCENTRATEON SATISFYING EMPLOYEE NEEDSAND WANTS
CO
NSI
DE
RA
TIO
N
INITIATING STRUCTURE
LOW
HIGH
LOW HIGH
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
BLAKE & MOUTON’S LEADERSHIP GRID
EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS RESULTSFROM ARRANGING CONDITIONS OFWORK IN SUCH A WAY THAT HUMANELEMENTS INTERFERE TO A MINIMUM DEGREE
EXERTION OF MINIMUM EFFORT TO GET REQIRED WORK DONE ISAPPROPRIATE TO SUSTAIN ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIIP
ADEQUATE ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCEIS POSSIBLE THROUGH BALANCINGTHE NECESSITY OF GET OUT WORKWITH MAINTAINING MORALE OF PEOPLE AT A SATISFACTORY LEVEL
THOUGHTFUL ATTENTION TO NEEDS OF PEOPLE FOR SATISFYING RELATIONSHIPS LEADS TO A COMFORTABLE FRIENDLY ORGANIZATION ATMOSPHERE & WORK TEMPO.
WORK ACCOMPLISHMENT IS FROMCOMMITTED PEOPLE; INTERDEPENDENCE THROUGH A COMMON STAKE IN ORGANIZATIONPURPOSE LEADS TO RELATIONSHIP OFTRUST AND RESPECT
(5,5) MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
(1,1) IMPOVERISHED
(9,9) TEAM
(9,1) AUTHORITY COMPLIANCE
(1,9) COUNTRY CLUB
5
6
4
8
9
7
2
3
4 5 6
1
7 8 91 2 3
CO
NC
ER
N F
OR
PE
OP
L
CONCERN FOR PRODUCTION
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
BLAKE AND MOUTON 5 LEADERSHIP STYLES
STYLE OFLEADER
GRID POSITION
CHARACTERISTICS EFFECTIVENESS
PEOPLE-ORIENTEDSTYLE1,91,9
LOWEST CONCERN FOR PRODUCTION AND HIGHEST FOR
PEOPLE
COUTNRY-CLUBTYPE
PRODUCTION-ORIENTED STYLE9,19,1
HIGHEST CONCERN FORPRODUCTION AND LOWEST
FOR PEOPLE
AUTOCRATTYPE
MAINTAIN PRESENTBALANCE STYLE5,55,5
COMFORTABLE CONCERNFOR BOTH PEOPLE AND
PRODUCTION
MIDDLE OF ROADTYPE
PEAK OFLEADERSHIP STYLE9,99,9 HIGHEST CONCERN FOR BOTH
PRODUCTION AND PEOPLETEAMTYPE
WORST LEADERSHIP STYLE1,11,1 LITTLE CONCERN FOR EITHER
PEOPLE OR PRODUCTIONIMPOVERISHED
TYPE
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
THE TANNENBAUM AND SCHMIDT CONTINUM OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR
MANAGERPRESENTSPROBLEM,GETSSUGGES_TIONSMAKES DECISION
MANAGERPRESENTSIDEASANDINVITESQUERRIES
MANAGERPERMITSSUBORDI-NATESTOFUNCTIONWITHINDEFINEDLIMITS
MANAGERDEFINESLIMITS;ASKSGROUPTO MAKEDECISION
MANAGERSELLSDECISION
MANAGERMAKES DECISION ANDANNOUNCESIT
MANAGERPRESENTSTENTATIVEDECISIONSUBJECTTO CHANGE
BOSS CENTEREDLEADERSHIP
SUBORDINATE CENTEREDLEADERSHIP
RANGE OF BEHAVIOR
Presented by: Jehanwash kareem
Noman Saleem
LEADERSHIP STYLES DRAWN FROM THE CLASSIC STUDIES AND THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
DEMOCRATIC
EMPLOYEE-CENTERED
GENERAL
CONSIDERATION
HUMAN RELATIONS
SUPPORTIVE
PARTICIPATIVE
THEORY Y
AUTOCRATIC
PRODUCTION CENTERED
CLOSE
INITIATING STRUCTURE
TASK DIRECTED
DIRECTIVE
DIRECTIVE
THEORY X
EMPLOYEE CENTEREDBOSS CENTERED