12
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

Presented to:

By:

Date:

Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

ICAO

FAA Fire Safety

09-11-2014

Page 2: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

2Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results: Over-Pack Box

2

Page 3: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

3Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results: Steel Drum

3

Page 4: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

4Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results: Density Reduction

4

Page 5: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

5Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Separation Distance Tests

5

State of Charge Two sheets of cardboard (.3” thick)

Three sheets of cardboard (.45” thick)

Five sheets of cardboard (.75” thick)

60%      

Page 6: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

6Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results (Separation Distance)

6

•Larger separation distances were not very effective at reducing cell temperatures.

•Separation distance did however have a significant impact on the rate of propagation.

Page 7: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

7Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results (Material & SOC): Temperature

• The average maximum temperature of the cells increased as state-of-charge increased.

• Insulative materials decreased the temperatures.

7

Page 8: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

8Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

8

Results (Material & SOC): propagation time

• The time required for the entire package to burn increased as state-of-charge decreased.

• Insulative divider materials increased the propagation time of the package.

Page 9: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

9Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Results: Packet of Water

• A Packet of water placed above the cells stopped propagation.

9

Page 10: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

10Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Effect of Dividers on the Propagation of Thermal Runaway

10

Page 11: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

11Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

8 cell ICAO Packaging Regulation

11

Page 12: Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments ICAO FAA Fire Safety 09-11-2014

12Federal AviationAdministration

Passive Fire Protection for Lithium Battery Shipments

09-11-14

Summary

• An O2 overpack box didn’t contain a battery fire.• A steel drum didn’t contain a battery fire.• A 50% reduction in packaging density didn’t stop

propagation.• Extra cardboard between cells reduces the rate of

propagation but failed to prevent it.• Insulative materials between the cells reduced the rate of

propagation.• A decrease in SOC decreased propagation rate and

temperature.– Thermal Runaway didn’t propagate at 30% SOC.

• A water packet above the cells prevented propagation.• Battery dividers painted with intumescent paint failed to

prevent propagation.• 8 cell ICAO packaging regulation failed to prevent

propagation.

12