Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 1
Presenter Disclosures
15th Annual Conference on Advancing School Mental Health
The following personal financial relationships with
Scaling up School‐Wide Positive Behavior Support: Pennsylvania's Community of Practice Approach
commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past 12 months: NOT APPLICABLE
There are no financial interest to disclose
15th Annual Conference on
Scaling up School‐Wide Positive Behavior Support: Pennsylvania's Community of Practice Approach
Advancing School Mental Health
October 8, 2010
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 2
Presented by:
Marie Bozelli
Scaling up School‐Wide Positive Behavior Support: Pennsylvania's Community of Practice Approach
Myrna Delgado
Dr. Judith Dogin
James Palmiero
Session Overview
• Part 1: Where Pennsylvania’s Community f P ti (COP) SBBH h bof Practice (COP) on SBBH has been:
Our Evolution
• Part 2: Where our COP is now: 4 Stories, 4 Perspectives
• Part 3: Where our COP is going:Part 3: Where our COP is going:
Successes
Barriers
Lessons Learned
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 3
Session Overview
• Part 1: Where Pennsylvania’s Community f P ti (COP) SBBH h bof Practice (COP) on SBBH has been:
Our Evolution
Where Have We Been? ‐ Abbreviated Timeline Part I ‐
2004
2004 ‐ PA COP on SBBH was established as a result of 2004 Natl. COP C it B ildi F
Aug 05
August 05 ‐ PA COP began to meet, planned for 06 SBBH conference d li d f f d l h l/ t l h lth i t ti t
May 06
May 06 ‐ PA Statewide SBBH Conference: Creating Partnerships
Aug 06
August 06 ‐ 13 grants awarded to develop or enhance SBBH services to t d t PA
Sept 06
September 06 ‐ IDEA Partnership Seed Grant awarded to PANovember 06 – Dr. Lucille Eber met with PA’s SBBH Committee & t bli h d PA PBIS SLTCommunity Building Forumand applied for federal school/mental health integration grantstudents across PAestablished PA PBIS SLT
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 4
Where Have We Been? ‐ Abbreviated Timeline Part I ‐
November 06 – PaTTAN/IU Interagency Consultant Overview of PBIS I t ti SWPBS ith SBBH
2004 Aug 05 May 06 Aug 06 Sept 06 Nov 06 Spring 07
Spring 07 – SWPBS 33 pilot sites identified
June 07
June 07 – SWPBS pilot sites and PaTTAN / IU consultants training b M l D hi t d St R Illi i PBIS N t k
Sept 07
September 07 – SWPBS pilot site implementation & IDEA P hi S d G
June 08
June 08 – SWPBS pilot site follow‐up training with Marla Dewhirst d St R
June 08 – PA PBS SLT Retreat – identify capacity building strategiesPBIS: Integrating SWPBS with SBBHby Marla Dewhirst and Steve Romano, Illinois PBIS NetworkPartnership Seed Grantand Steve Romano
Where Have We Been? ‐ Abbreviated Timeline Part I ‐
2004 Aug 05 May 06 Aug 06 Sept 06 Nov 06 Spring 07 June 07 Sept 07 June 08
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 5
Where Have We Been? ‐ Abbreviated Timeline Part I ‐
2004 Aug 05 May 06 Aug 06 Sept 06 Nov 06 Spring 07 June 07 Sept 07 June 08
Sept 08
September 08 – Second Set of SBBH Performance Grants funded & IDEA S d G t A d d
Fall 08
Fall 08 – Initial SWPBS pilot sites expanded from 33 to 35Fall 08 – Contract with IUP for SWPBS program evaluation
Dec 08
December 08 – SWPBS Awareness Building Summit
Spring 09
Spring 09 – SBBH SLT proposed an affiliated network approach to li SWPBS
May 09
May 09 – Affiliated network approach presented to PAIU Special Ed ti Di t
June 09
June 09 – Follow‐up SWPBS training by Steve Romano and Marla D hi t f th 35 il t it
Aug 09
October 09 – Establishment of the PAPBS website: www.papbs.orgOctober 09 – Additional round of SBBH Performance Grants d d
August 09 – SLT retreat facilitated by Joanne Cashman – PAPBS Network codified with Co Directors and Coordinators named
Oct 09
November 09 – PAPBS Network Facilitators’ applications disseminated
Jan 10Nov 09
January 10 – PAPBS Network Facilitators’ applications acceptedOctober 09 – Contract with IUP for SWPBS program evaluation, 2& IDEA Seed Grant Awardedscaling up SWPBSEducation DirectorsDewhirst for the 35 pilot sitesawarded Network codified with Co‐Directors and Coordinators nameddisseminatedyear 2
Where Have We Been? ‐ Abbreviated Timeline Part II ‐
2004 Aug 05 May 06 Aug 06 Sept 06 Nov 06 Spring 07 June 07 Sept 07 June 08
Sept 08 Fall 08 Dec 08 Spring 09 May 09 June 09 Aug 09 Oct 09 Jan 10Nov 09
‐ Feb 10 – PAPBS Network Facilitators’ Training
‐ June 10 – Tier 2/Tier 3 training by Dr. Lucille Eber for SWPBS Pilot Sites
‐ September 10 – PAPBS Network Facilitators’ Training
‐ October 10 – SBBH Performance Grants Awarded & Contract with IUP for SWPSB program evaluation, 3rd annual
‐ June 11 – PBIS Implementers’ Forum – 1st Annual
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 6
• Part 1: Where Pennsylvania’s Community f P ti (COP) SBBH h bof Practice (COP) on SBBH has been:
Our Evolution
• Part 2: Where our COP is now: 4 Stories, 4 Perspectives
• Part 3: Where our COP is going:Part 3: Where our COP is going:
Successes
Barriers
Lessons Learned
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 7
Story #1: Community Care Behavioral Health
N fi BHMCO i UPMC I Di i i• Non‐profit BHMCO in UPMC Insurance Division• Partnering with 35 PA counties• Serving Medicaid eligible children, adults,
families with MH and SA needs• Implementing community‐based clinical home
model through school‐based mental health via CASSP principles
Story #1: Community Care Behavioral Health
C i d bli h l h h i h•Committed to a public health approach with strong partnership with educational colleagues
• Our commitment to PA CoP and PA PBS Network• Co‐Director • State Coordinator• Facilitation of SWPBS• 3 national demo sites for SMH and SWPBS
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 8
Story #2: PA Department of Public Welfare
• OMHSAS Commitment
‐ To promote joint initiatives
‐ Fund and manage website
‐ Full time staff person to Coordinators level
‐ Participation on SLT and Co‐directors
• Committed to cross training SAP AND SWPBS
Story #3: PA Department of Education / BCSS
• Transition grant and invitation not to be f drefused
• PNSAS‐DPW/DOH/PDE
• PNSAS Infrastructure/Interagency
• Resiliency Initiative/Bullying/Parents
/ /• Prevention/Prevention /Prevention
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 9
Story #4: PA Department of Education / BSE
• Commitment to SBBH and Social Emotional Learning
– Convene SLT for SBBH
– Fund & support initial 35 SWPBS pilot sites
– Administer SBBH Performance Grants
– Propose standards for Interpersonal Skills & School ClimateSchool Climate
• Limited capacity to scale up SWPBS beyond
Story #4: PA Department of Education / BSE
• Commitment to SBBH and Social Emotional Learning
– Convene SLT for SBBH
– Fund & support initial 35 SWPBS pilot sites
– Administer SBBH Performance Grants
– Propose standards for Interpersonal Skills & School ClimateSchool Climate
• Limited capacity to scale up SWPBS beyond
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 10
Story #4: PA Department of Education / BSE
• Commitment to SBBH and Social Emotional Learning
– Convene SLT for SBBH
– Fund & support initial 35 SWPBS pilot sites
– Administer SBBH Performance Grants
– Propose standards for Interpersonal Skills & School ClimateSchool Climate
• Limited capacity to scale up SWPBS beyond
• Part 1: Where Pennsylvania’s Community f P ti (COP) SBBH h bof Practice (COP) on SBBH has been:
Our Evolution
• Part 3: Where our COP is going:
Successes
BarriersBarriers
Lessons Learned
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 11
Successes: SWPBS Program Effect
2nd Annual Summary Report of Implementation Fidelity and Impact of School‐
Wide Positive Behavior Support
Prepared By:Timothy J. Runge, Ph.D., NCSPMark J Staszkiewicz Ed DMark J. Staszkiewicz, Ed.D.
Melissa Gilroy, M.Ed.
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
•Participating Buildings / LEAs / IUs by Region
•Number of Participating Buildings by Grade Level
West Central East Total
Schools 12 4 17 33
LEAs 7 4 12 23
Collaborating IUs
4 4 7 15
Elementary (K‐5) Middle (6‐8) High School (9‐12)
Number of Schools
23 9 5
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 12
• Three measures used to assess fidelity of implementation:p
–School‐wide evaluation tool (SET; Sugai, Lewis‐Palmer, Todd, & Horner, 2005)
–The School‐wide Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ; Kincaid, Childs, & George, 2005)
The Effective Behavior Support: Team–The Effective Behavior Support: Team Implementation Checklist (TIC; Sugai, Horner, & Lewis‐Palmer, 2002, 2009)
Finding – Some schools fully implemented in a few months, others took a year post initial training; many were fully implementing two years after initial training
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 13
Finding – Three years post initial training, most are implementing elements of SWPBS
•Finding– Once fully implementing SWPBS, schools maintained full implementation status
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 14
Finding ‐ Although not statistically significant, upward trend in protective factors is noted.
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 15
Finding ‐ Although not statistically significant, downward trend in risk factors is noted.
PRIMARY FINDINGS – Schools that fully yimplement SWPBS report lower risk factors and higher protective factors compared to schools that partially implement SWPBS.
So implementation DOES matter!So implementation DOES matter!
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 16
Finding – Downward trend in number of OSS days served, but not statistically significant.
Finding– Initial increase, then decrease over two years post initial training; NOT statistically significant.
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 17
• Reading PSSA Performance
Trends in SWPBS schools’* average percentage of Basic & Below Basic and Proficient & Advanced paralleled trends in state average
• Math PSSA Performance
Trends in SWPBS schools’* average percentage of Basic & Below Basic and Proficient & Advanced paralleled trends in state average
* 26 of 33 participating schools had PSSA data available
PSSA Reading PerformanceFull vs. Partial Implementing
Year 1
No statistically significant differences were found between Partial and Full Implementing schools
Year 2
Schools designated as fully implementing SWPBS had i ifi tl f t d t i B l B i B isignificantly fewer students in Below Basic +Basic ranges compared to schools partially implementing SWPBS
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 18
PSSA Math PerformanceFull vs. Partial Implementing
Year 1
No statistically significant differences were found between Partial and Full Implementing schools
Year 2
Schools designated as fully implementing SWPBS had i ifi tl t d t i P fi i t Ad dsignificantly more students in Proficient + Advanced ranges compared to schools partially implementing SWPBS
Successes: PAPBS Network Data
• Taking the project to scale
‐ 141 schools ( 49 districts)
‐ limited resources
• Cross system facilitators
‐ 70 + facilitators
‐ Education , IU’s, MCO, MH and D&A Community
Agencies
10/26/2010
Scaling Up SWPBS: PA COP's Approach 19
Barriers
• Becoming a Leadership Team• Understanding motives and establishing trust• Establishing a common vision and language• Sharing and respecting expertise • Homelessness ‐ Distributed management and shared ownership
• Absence of state level legislation and designated funding streamu d g st ea
• Serving different masters
Lessons Learned
• It takes time.• There’s always a way and maybe it’s just not your way or the old wayE h hi ib• Everyone has something to contribute
• Leverage can be better than money• It’s OK to let go of …• Working with dedicated and committed people can be challenging but results in magnificent outcomes
• You can accomplish much without a law and targeted p gfunding if the vision is clear and owned by all
