Printed: 06/03/2015 Page€1€of€29 UNCONTROLLED COPY … dct/jun_2015/4.0 aircraft technical... · 8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1; D301 € 4.6.1€(AW) Avionics Special Emphasis Programs,€Performance

Unscoped DCT Report (Standard DCT) MLF Label: 4.6.1 (AW) Avionics Special Emphasis Programs (Released) DCT Type: EP DCT Specialty: Airworthiness Peer Group: A - Part 121 Air Operators DCT Revision: 5.0 on 06/03/2015 (Released)

Summary Information

Purpose (Certificate Holder Responsibility): To provide aircraft maintenance program standards for avionics special emphasis programs.

Objective (FAA Responsibility):Determine; (1) If the CH followed the accepted or approved process; (2) If the CH provided aircraft maintenance program standards for avionics special emphasis programs.

Questions Answers References

4.6.1 (AW) Avionics Special Emphasis Programs

1. Best describe how the LLM procedures were followed when performing maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations on the Operator's aircraft, appliances, and parts.

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016811, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Consistently followed the procedures

Some steps were missed or not followed

Procedures were not consistently followed or adequate

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.367; 121.369(b)

2. Best describe how the procedures were followed to ensure that personnel were fully informed of:

#1 LLM procedures; and

#2 New LLM equipment.


Some steps were missed or not

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.375

4.6.1 (AW) Avionics Special Emphasis Programs, Performance Assessment, AW, Peer Group A - Part 121 Air Operators, Revision: 5.0 on 06/03/2015

Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 29

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED – Check Data Repository to verify that this data is current prior to use


followed


Not Observable

Not Applicable

3. Best describe how the procedures were followed when the LLM maintenance program was revised and updated.





Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.367

4. Best describe how the procedures were followed for the identification, monitoring, and reporting of lower minimum system and component discrepancies for the purpose of quality control and analysis.





Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

5. Best describe how the procedures were followed for defining, monitoring, and reporting chronic and repetitive LLM system discrepancies.

NOTE:




Not Observable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10




Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016834, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Not Applicable

6. Best describe how the procedures were followed for the aircraft LLM system status coordination with:


#1 Maintenance control;

#2 Engineering;

#3 Flight operations; and

#4 Dispatch/Flight Following.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

7. Best describe how the procedures were followed to upgrade or downgrade LLM system status for low visibility operations and to ensure that the following were aware of aircraft and system status:


#1 Flight crews;

#2 Maintenance department;

#3 Inspection department;

#4 Dispatch; and

#5 Other administrative personnel as necessary.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

8. Verify the records show that the Operator followed LLM program procedures for flight guidance and autoland periodic assessments on satisfactory and unsatisfactory performance.


Some steps were missed or not

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10




NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C061" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016912, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

followed


Not Observable

Not Applicable

9. Best describe how the procedures were followed to prevent modifications to systems and components that could adversely affect LLM operations when incorporating:

NOTE: Changes to system components should be consistent with the aircraft manufacturer’s, avionics manufacturer’s, industry, or FAA-accepted criteria or processes. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016923, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Software changes;

#2 Service bulletins;

#3 Hardware additions; or

#4 Hardware modifications.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

10. Best describe how maintenance personnel followed procedures that ensured an aircraft's conformance to the RVSM maintenance requirements.

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "B046") AND (OPSPEC = "D092") , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016941, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 10 Sec 1; AC-91-85; 91 Appendix G

11. Best describe how the operator's ANSP was used to identify, assess and mitigate security threats?


8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1; D301




NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "D301" ) , Rev. 1.0 09/20/2012, QID: 00016958, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released



Not Observable

Not Applicable

12. Best describe how the procedures were followed for the maintenance of the EFB system?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Process Observation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" OR "135") AND (OPSPEC = "A061") , Rev. 1.0 04/27/2015, QID: 00048742, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 15 Sec 1; A061; AC-120-76

13. Did the person with responsibility effectively manage the planning, organizing, directing, and control of this element?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Management Responsibility, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010687, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes, as documented to the FAA

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

14. Did the person with authority effectively direct, control, or change procedures, and make key determinations including safety risk acceptance decisions?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Management Authority, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010688, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable




15. Did the certificate holder monitor and measure the safety performance of this element, including audits, evaluations, employee reports, and investigation of events; and implement necessary action(s)?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Process Measurement, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010685, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

16. Did the certificate holder collect data to continuously monitor and measure the safety performance of the processes associated with this Element, to identify performance deficiencies or potential new or unmitigated hazards?

NOTE: Data collection may include audits, evaluations, investigations, employee feedback, and other sources. Safety Attribute: Process Measurement, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010690, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

17. Did the certificate holder follow policies, procedures, instructions, and information for this Element?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010682, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

18. Did the certificate holder's procedures generate outputs that met regulatory, guidance, and safety performance objectives?

NOTE:

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable




Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010683, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

19. If the certificate holder became aware of a new hazard or introduced a new procedure for this element, did the certificate holder conduct Safety Risk Management by:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010689, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Assessing the risk;

#2 Analyzing the risk; and

#3 Controlling the risk?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

20. Verify the records show that for each channel the audio was:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "CVR INSTALLED" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016768, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Recorded properly;

#2 Intelligible; and

#3 Free from electrical noise or other interference.

The records showed compliance had been met

The records did not show that compliance had been met

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 9; 121.359

21. Verify the records show datalink messages were checked for proper recording.



121.359(k)




NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "CVR INSTALLED" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "A056" ) , Rev. 1.0 09/20/2012, QID: 00016772, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Not Observable

Not Applicable

22. Verify the records show that the CVR was checked to record at least 2 hours of information.

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "CVR INSTALLED" ) AND ( PROPULSION = "TURBINE" ) , Rev. 1.0 09/20/2012, QID: 00016773, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released



Not Observable

Not Applicable

121.359(i)

23. Did the Operator retain 60 days of information, or longer if requested by the Administrator or Board, for an accident or NTSB reportable occurrence?


Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

121.359(h)

24. Verify that the records show a CVR's associated underwater acoustic beacon was functionally tested before replacing the old battery.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 9




25. Verify the records show that a CVR's acoustic beacon was operationally tested per the recommended procedures and within its scheduled interval.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 9

26. Verify the records show that FDR parameters:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "FDR INSTALLED" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016777, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Were identified, recorded, and stored for rapid retrieval;

#2 Were within required accuracy ranges;

#3 Were within required sampling rates; and

#4 Had required resolutions.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.344

27. Verify the records show that when the reasonableness check of the FDR data found deficiencies, the deficiencies were corrected.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141




28. Verify the records show that functional checks of dedicated sensors to the DFDR system were performed.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141

29. Did the Operator maintain a document that was used to convert FDR recorded values to corresponding engineering units or discrete states?


Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.344; 121.344a; 121.343

30. Verify the records show that the recorded FDR correlation data met the sampling rate, range, resolution, and accuracy for each parameter listed in 14 CFR Part 121 Appendix B or M, as required.


The correlation document showed that compliance had been met

The correlation document did not show that compliance had been met

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.344; 121.344a; 121.343

31. Verify the records show that, for each airplane, whether the flight data recorder parameters listed in 121.346(c) were filtered or not filtered.



Not Observable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.346


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 10 of 29



Not Applicable

32. Verify the records show that procedures were followed to accurately and repeatedly reconstruct the original sensor signal, for each airplane, of any filtered parameter listed in 121.346(c).


The records showed procedures were followed

The records did not show that one or more procedures were not followed

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.346

33. Did the Operator retain:


#1 A minimum of 25 hours of FDR recorded data; and

#2 FDR data and recording media for 60 days in the event of an accident or NTSB reportable occurrence?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141; 121.344; 121.344a; 121.343

34. Verify the records show that the Operator performed FDR:

NOTE:

#1 Operational checks;

#2 Reasonableness checks; and

#3 System functional checks.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 11 of 29


Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "FDR INSTALLED" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016791, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

35. Verify that FDR system ICAs were performed to ensure the airworthiness of the FDR:


#1 Data stream;

#2 Dedicated sources;

#3 Removal and replacement; and

#4 Software.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141

36. Verify the records show that the FDR's associated underwater acoustic beacon was functionally tested before replacing the old battery.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141

37. Verify the records show that the FDR acoustic beacon was operationally tested per the recommended procedures and within its scheduled interval.

NOTE:



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 14 Sec 8; AC-20-141


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 12 of 29


Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( A/C EQUIPMENT = "FDR INSTALLED" ) , Rev. 1.0 09/20/2012, QID: 00016801, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

38. Verify that the records show the ATC transponder was tested and inspected and found to comply with 14 CFR Part 43 Appendix F within the preceding 24 calendar months.

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) , Rev. 1.0 09/20/2012, QID: 00016810, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released



Not Observable

Not Applicable

91.413(a)

39. Verify that the records show personnel were trained and qualified for LLM maintenance and inspection of:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016812, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Aircraft;

#2 Appliances; and

#3 Systems.

The records were accurate

The records contained discrepancies

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.375

40. Were there adequate facilities and equipment for LLM:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059"

#1 Maintenance;

#2 Preventive maintenance; and

#3 Alterations?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.367


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 13 of 29


OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016819, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

41. Were the maintenance personnel familiar with the Operator's approved LLM program and their individual responsibilities in accomplishing that program?


Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.367

42. Were the personnel who were assigned LLM responsibility in the following roles identified, recorded, or designated:

NOTE: This includes identification of any contractor or subcontractor organization or, where applicable, their personnel. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016825, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Managing the program;

#2 Performing the program;

#3 Maintaining the program; or

#4 Performing quality assurance for the program?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 121.367

43. Did the Operator verify the certification and configuration status of each aircraft brought into the LLM maintenance program?

NOTE: Each aircraft should meet relevant criteria specified by the applicable aircraft manufacturer or avionics manufacturer for associated systems and equipment (e.g., valid U.S. TC, appropriate STC records and compliance, assessment of status of any engineering orders, AD’s, service bulletins, or other compliance). Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016830, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 14 of 29


44. Verify the records show that the procedures were followed for the identification of maintenance requirements and log entries necessary when making changes to LLM minima status.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

45. Did the Operator identify modifications, additions, and changes, which were made to qualify aircraft systems for CAT II or CAT III operations or minima, if other than as specified in the AFM, TC, or STC?


Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

46. Verify the records show that aircraft remained out of lower minimum status until successful corrective action was verified for chronic and repetitive discrepancies.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

47. Was the aircraft LLM system status:

NOTE:

#1 Placarded properly; and

#2 Clearly documented in the aircraft log book?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 15 of 29


Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/13/2014, QID: 00016836, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

48. Verify the records show that a downgrade to an aircraft's low visibility capability status occurred when maintenance was performed by people other than those:


#1 Trained;

#2 Qualified; and

#3 Authorized.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

49. Verify that the records show system ground checks and system flight checks, as applicable, were performed following periodic maintenance.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

50. Verify that the records show at least one satisfactory CAT II landing:

NOTE: Maintenance programs that meet the requirements for and that have been approved for CAT III are typically also considered acceptable for CAT II. Aircraft low visibility systems status, however, must be clearly identified for pilots, maintenance, and dispatch, when combined programs are used.

#1 Operation within 6 months;

#2 Satisfactory systems ground check within 6 months; or

#3 Within the period specified by the aircraft or avionics manufacturer for an aircraft to remain in CAT II status.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 16 of 29


Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016849, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

51. Verify that the records show at least one satisfactory CAT III landing:

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016853, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Operation within 30 days;

#2 Satisfactory systems ground check within 30 days; or

#3 Within the time period approved for the Operator.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

52. Verify that the records show the following maintenance personnel received initial and recurrent LLM training:


#1 Mechanics;

#2 Maintenance controllers;

#3 Avionics technicians;

#4 Personnel performing maintenance inspection;

#5 Personnel performing quality assurance; or

#6 Engineering personnel.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

53. Verify that the records show the recurrent LLM training was accomplished:

#1 At least annually;

#2 When a person had not been involved in the maintenance of the specified aircraft (e.g., greater than 6 months); or

#3 When a person had not been involved in LLM systems for an extended period (e.g., greater than 6 months).



Not Observable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 17 of 29



Not Applicable

54. Verify that the records show the LLM systems training included the following subject areas:


#1 Operational concepts;

#2 Aircraft types and systems affected;

#3 Aircraft variants and differences where applicable;

#4 LLM procedures;

#5 Manuals and technical reference availability and use;

#6 Processes, tools, or test equipment to be used;

#7 Quality control; and

#8 Methods for testing and return to service and sign-offs required.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

55. Verify the records show that LLM systems training included the following subject areas:

NOTE:

#1 MEL application;

#2 General information for obtaining technical assistance when necessary;

#3 Coordination with other parts of the organization (e.g., flight operations, dispatch); and

#4 Other program requirements unique to the Operator or aircraft types or variants flown (e.g., human factors considerations, problem reporting).



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 18 of 29


Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016877, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

56. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for the use of outside vendors or vendor's parts that:


#1 Ensured compatibility to program requirements; and

#2 Established measures to control and account for parts overall quality assurance.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

57. Verify the records show that LLM training covered company procedures for:


#1 Tracking and control of components that are "swapped" between systems for troubleshooting; and

#2 Total system testing and removal of aircraft from lower minimum status when "swapping" for troubleshooting.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

58. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for assessment, tracking, and controlling the accomplishment of changes to components or systems pertinent to low visibility operations.

NOTE: This includes AD’s, service bulletins, engineering orders, and FAR requirements. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016888, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 19 of 29


59. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for recording and reporting lower minimum operation(s) that were discontinued or interrupted because of system(s) malfunction.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

60. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for the following items related to system and component software changes, updates, or periodic updates:


#1 Installation;

#2 Evaluation;

#3 Control; and

#4 Testing.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

61. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for the MEL remarks section that identifies low-visibility-related:


#1 Systems and components;

#2 Limitations; and

#3 Requirements for upgrading or downgrading.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 20 of 29


62. Verify the records show that LLM training included company procedures for identifying and addressing performance assurance to include any necessary low-visibility-related components and systems, such as:


#1 Using "built-in test" features;

#2 Identifying RII; and

#3 Providing quality assurance.



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

63. Verify the records show that LLM test equipment was periodically re-evaluated using a list of primary and secondary standards traceable to the national standard or the manufacturer's calibration standards.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10; 8900.1 Vol 6 Ch 11 Sec 17

64. Verify that the records show contract facilities or personnel followed the LLM FAA-approved maintenance program when approving an aircraft for return to service.




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

65. Verify the records show that periodic flight guidance system and autoland system checks were conducted per LLM procedures.



8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 21 of 29


NOTE: A reliable record such as a logbook entry or computer ACARS record showing satisfactory performance within the previous 6 months for CAT II or 30 days for CAT III. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C061" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016911, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Not Observable

Not Applicable

66. Did the Operator submit a LLM monthly summary, for 1 year after LLM operations were authorized, to the CHDO that included:


#1 Total number of approaches tracked;

#2 The number of satisfactory approached tracked;

#3 Aircraft type;

#4 System type;

#5 RVR (if known);

#6 Total number of unsatisfactory approaches;

#7 Reasons for unsatisfactory performance by category; and

#8 Total number of unscheduled component removals for the related avionics systems?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

67. Were the LLM reliability reports submitted by the Operator per the procedures?

NOTE: Reports are submitted after the initial LLM operations authorization period. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016922, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 22 of 29


68. Verify the records show that the Operator followed procedures to retain LLM records necessary to determine the appropriate airworthiness configuration and status of each aircraft intended for LLM operation.

NOTE: This includes both the Operator's and any applicable contract maintenance organization's records. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "C059" OR "C060" ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016928, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released



Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 2 Sec 10

69. Verify that the records show that the RVSM maintenance program procedures were followed to ensure continued compliance of RVSM aircraft, including:

NOTE: The need for functional flight tests may be limited to repairs or modifications that are deemed to warrant such testing and may be accomplished through height-keeping performance. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "B046") AND (OPSPEC = "D092") , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016929, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Periodic inspections;

#2 Functional flight tests; and

#3 Maintenance and inspection procedures with acceptable maintenance practices.



Not Observable

Not Applicable


70. Did the RVSM maintenance program include a quality assurance program that ensured the continued accuracy and reliability of the test equipment used to test aircraft for compliance with the RVSM aircraft requirements?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "B046") AND (OPSPEC = "D092") , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016933, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable


71. Verify that the records show that RVSM quality control procedures were followed, including: The records were accurate 8900.1 Vol 4 Ch 10 Sec 1; AC-91-85; 91


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 23 of 29



#1 Required test equipment accuracy;

#2 Test calibrations traceable to an approved standard on a regular basis;

#3 Audits performed on a regular basis of in-house and external calibration facilities;

#4 Shop and line maintenance practices compliance with requirements; and

#5 Operator errors and unusual environmental conditions that may have affected calibration accuracy were controlled.


Not Observable

Not Applicable

Appendix G

72. Verify the RVSM non-compliant aircraft were returned to service per the procedures.




Not Observable

Not Applicable


73. Did the maintenance training program include the following curriculum segments for personnel who perform RVSM-related maintenance, preventive maintenance, and required inspection functions:


#1 Aircraft geometric inspection techniques;

#2 Test equipment calibration and usage techniques; and

#3 Any special documentation or procedures introduced by RVSM approval?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable



Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 24 of 29


74. Verify the RVSM avionics units:

NOTE: This applies to aircraft within a group of aircraft, approved as a group by the Administrator. Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") AND (OPSPEC = "B046") AND (OPSPEC = "D092") , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016946, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

#1 Were manufactured to the same manufacturer specification and had the same part number; or

#2 If of a different manufacturer or part number, the applicant demonstrated that the equipment provided equivalent system performance.



Not Observable

Not Applicable


75. Verify the installed TCAS equipment was compatible with RVSM operations.




Not Observable

Not Applicable


76. Verify that the Operator reported each event to the FAA when an aircraft demonstrated any of the following altitude-keeping performance errors:


#1 Total vertical error of 300 feet or more;

#2 Altimetry system error of 245 feet or more; or

#3 Assigned altitude deviation of 300 feet or more.



Not Observable

Not Applicable



Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 25 of 29


77. Verify that the Operator reported altitude-keeping performance error events to the FAA within 72 hours with initial analysis of causal factors and measures to prevent further events.




Not Observable

Not Applicable


78. Verify that the Operator performed scheduled tests and/or inspections in combination with the CAMP to ensure altitude-keeping systems continued to meet RVSM standards.




Not Observable

Not Applicable


79. Veriffy the LLM program complies with the maintenance program for the EFVS equipment and aircraft listed in Table 1 of this operations specification?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") AND ((OPSPEC = "C048") ) , Rev. 2.0 05/14/2014, QID: 00016956, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 18 Sec 5; C048

80. Did the operator revise their Aircraft Network Security Program (ANSP) to incorporate, within five days, any changes to the manufacturer's current security document?

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1; D301


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 26 of 29


NOTE: Safety Attribute: Procedures, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121" ) AND ( OPSPEC = "D301" ) , Rev. 3.0 05/28/2015, QID: 00016957, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

81. Were ASNP procedures for parts pooling, parts borrowing and part exchanges followed?


Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1

82. Verify Loadable Software Airplane Part (LSAP) was controlled?




Not Observable

Not Applicable

8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1

83. Were the certificate holder's controls for this element effective in achieving the desired results?

NOTE: Safety Attribute: Controls, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010684, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Yes

No

Not Observable

Not Applicable

84. Were the certificate holder's interfaces effective in identifying, documenting, and evaluating changes relating to this element?

Yes

No

Not Observable


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 27 of 29


NOTE: Safety Attribute: Interfaces, Question Type: Output Validation, Scoping Attribute: (FAR PART = "121") OR (FAR PART = "135") OR (FAR PART = "145") , Rev. 3.0 06/30/2014, QID: 00010686, Response Details: EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW), Status: Released

Not Applicable

EP & ED DCTs (Both OP and AW) Response Details List (Released , 1.0)

1. Unclear procedure(s)

2. Conflicting procedure(s)

3. Used workaround(s)

4. Skipped process step(s)

5. Personnel failed to follow process (procedures, guidance, etc)

6. Procedures/guidance not available

7. Procedures/guidance not current

8. Inconsistent procedure(s)

9. Undocumented procedure(s)

10. Minor typographical error(s) (i.e. record entries)

11. Information missing

12. Communication failure(s)

13. Personnel failed to perform task

14. Process failed to meet desired outcome

15. Process oversight failure

16. Equipment/tools not available

17. Equipment/tools not adequate

18. Equipment/tools not calibrated


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 28 of 29


19. Facilities not adequate

20. Other

Not Observable (N/O) Response Details List (Released , 1.0)

1. Personnel (i.e. key certificate holder personnel not present/available)

2. Equipment (i.e. equipment not present/available/in serviceable condition)

3. Event did not occur (i.e. the drunk passenger did not show up for the flight...)

4. Time Constraints (i.e. resources/workload)

5. Weather (i.e. weather needed for observation not present or weather made observation impossible)

6. Other

Not Applicable (N/A) Response Details List (Released , 1.0)

1. Operator not authorized by OpSpecs

2. Equipment not equipped/authorized

3. Not applicable due to exemption, deviation, or exception

4. Not authorized by regulation

5. Not authorized by Order

6. Not authorized by Notice

7. Not authorized/recommended by Advisory Circular

8. Not authorized by Policy Letter, Legal Interpretation, or other guidance

9. Other


Printed: 06/03/2015 Page 29 of 29


Documents

Printed: 06/03/2015 Page€1€of€29 UNCONTROLLED COPY … dct/jun_2015/4.0 aircraft technical... · 8900.1 Vol 3 Ch 61 Sec 1; D301 € 4.6.1€(AW) Avionics Special Emphasis Programs,€Performance