Upload
tranminh
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Aalto UniversitySchool of Engineering
A2.1 Presentation in CPBL 2012 Friday 13 April – Competence and ProblemBased Learning
Problem-based Learning in the Teaching of Environmental Technology in Collaboration between Students and Working life
Adjunct Professor, Senior University LectorPetri Peltonen Aalto UniversityFinland
Background of Project and Article
• EcoMill Environment Efficiency Workshop Project • Years 2010 – 2013• Project co-operators
– Main coordinator & Management: Lahti University of Applied Sciences, M.Sci (Tech) Reetta Jänis - Other Main partners- Aalto University, PhD Petri Peltonen and M.Sci (Tech Lic.)
Helena Mälkki- Lahti Town & Regional Enterprises
Courses involved in Development of PBL in Environmental Teaching
• Master's Degree Program in Environmental Engineering • Master's courses which exploit PBL exercise
– Course (1): Natural Resources and Environmental Impacts, 7 ECTS
– Course (2): Management of Environmental Risks of Substances and Chemicals, 5 ECTS
– Course (3): Experimental Methods of Environmental Technology, 5 ECTS
Workshops in EcoMill
– 1st Workshop in Bioenergy Wastes• Arranged, Autumn 2011• Results based on this article are based on 1st
workshop
– 2nd in Building Materials Wastes• March, 2012
– 3rd in Natural Resources and Energy • Late Autumn, 2012
– 4th coming in PBL & Environmental Teaching• Concluding workshop after end of project, July 2013
Profile of Participants in 1st Workshop
Profile of participants No. in PBL session
Type of company
Environmental waste management companies
2 From waste landfill and from waste logistics
Food consulting companies 1 Consulting company from school food service
Adult students (from their own companies)
19 Adult students from Master´s Degree Program working in many environmental companies & from communities
Project staff 2 From EcoMill project in Lahti University of Applied Sciences
University teachers 2 Aalto University & LAMKPBL education expert 1 EDUTA Oy
Total amount 27
Objectives of PBL Workshops in Environmental Teaching
To improveSubject-specific
Skills inEnvironmental
Learning
Via PBL Strategy
To develop and exploite PBL for Environmental
Teaching
To connect PBL into firmer
Enterprise –Student
CollaborationGenerate ideas for new Development Projectsand for Thesis Topics
To improve communication skills
PBL Tutorials in Environmental Marster´s Course
• As exercise of environmental knowledge learning
• As exercise of solving working life problems
PBL-startingEnvironmental
Waste Technology: Table 1: Bioand energy
wastesTable 2: School
food wastesTopics oriented
pre-lecturesPBL Strategy
was explainedbefore
brainstorm
1st TutorialSteps 1–5 Ended to finalizing
own studywork
Step 6Ownstudyperiod
2nd TutorialStep 7
Feedback via Moodle
Visualizationof own
learningOwn diary
Step 8 Teacherreport
Follow-upmeeting
Content of Feedback in EcoMill Workshop
• Active Moodle learning platform feedback– Students learning diaries
• Students answered to special learning questions and discussed inside Moodle learning platform
– Feedback via responsible teacher• From each learning diary to students on Moodle
• Active collaboration with follow-up group of EcoMill– Summarizing report
• From responsible teacher via Moodle to each student and follow-upgroup members
– Follow-up meeting• Handling of results• Information transfer
– Article writing• Rovaniemi PBL Conference
Bioenergy wastes under environmental learningBiowastes
• Overleft food rest, fish, eggshells etc.
• Solid fat• Shales of fruits and
vegetables• Coffee grounds and filter
paper bags• Household papers• Garden vegetable wastes
etc.
Energy wastes• Wood (not impregnated),
paper, carton etc.• Plastics coatings,
products (not PVC) & packages in households
• Yoghourt, cheese and butter boxes
• Plastic shopping bags• Styrofoam• Camera negatives• Textiles (not leather)
Table 1: Bioenergy wastes
Participants concluded final case task for students´ s own learningperiod
• A lot of ideas was generated• Actual learning task was presented finally in a form
of question:
Do we need a responsible person for households in department houses for bioenergy waste management?
- In competition with this subject was an idea:Can symbol markings of packaging materials improve the system?
Examples from key ideas in Table 1
1 Development of household technical composting
Composting is not yet sufficiently controlled. Freezing and heating can be done by electric power
2 Development of information system for bio-and energy wastes
Newspapers, calendars, corporate webpage, campaigns etc.
3 Development of waste-separation points in kitchens and laundry rooms.Development of tube sorting systems for wastes for department houses, e.g. Stockholm
Washing and sorting opportunity of waste, including also textile waste
Ideas from students learning diaries (Table 1)
No. Actions Comments
1 Biowaste needs its own regulation
Engaging of properties should be launched, but before it should be possible to find out the obstacles imposed by the law. Similarly, the regional municipality and administrative involvement should be investigated.
2 Selection of waste responsible persons
A majority of the students considered that the selected waste responsible persons could be a good and effective tool for improving the quality and collection of energy waste.Waste responsible person's education and training must be arranged.
Visualization of an in-place separation of bio and energy wastes
WasteAllocatedinforming
(driver of awaste lorry)
Waste
fees
Waste management
fees
Cooperationbetween waste
disposalcompanies
Easyness and clarity
BetterBetterseparation of
wastes in placeis enough
Recycling and end using
The improvementof hygiene and safety at work
Preprocessing and the developement
of processingWaste co-ordinator in
houses is notneeded?
Table 2: Problems in school food wastes
– Developed case task based on main idea:• Removal of law barriers in food regulations makes the
system more rational
Final task was fixed in question form as follows:– Means and barriers in utilization of surplus food
and promotion of use of food from the localfarms?
Examples from main ideas in Table 2
Idea no. Item Comments1 Improvement of recycling of
food by using local food Surpluses are exported to home. Near-area (local)food origin is exploited. Business good for farming.Students are offered frozen prepared dishes from food-machine. Students do their food themselves.
2 Styling the space of school canteen
More attractive, comfortable, lighter, not too noisy.
3 Removal of law barriers in food regulations makes the system more rational
Do we need a separate bio-waste regulations?Pollution prevention. Renewing the cold machines and development of them. Ensure hygiene chain.
4 Manner education. Rewarding good practice. Forbid candy & soft drink automats.
Incentives, competitions, increase information via computers. Rewards to chefs.
Ideas from students learning diaries (Table 2)1 New food legislation
& use of surplus food is needed
Life cycle of food in school without wastes, shouldallow also the use of surplus food because eatable food cannot end up to the early waste.
2 Establish a communication network between food service and school
Food server screens to corridors of schools.Food sale foresight planning on a weekly basis so that
students must order food in advance.
3 Food-selling machines Variety of semi-finished and frozen dishes to schools. Biggest minus is the cost of the system.
4 Activating the school-based working groups
Kitchen staff guides and informs students and parents. School food attractiveness campaigns. Manner education. Noise away from dining rooms.
Students´ diary conclusions on PBL Benefits Opposite opinions- PBL is useful in any creative field of research & development- PBL's application depends on company sector and workplace atmosphere (attitude)- PBL approach would help to transfer old workers' "tacit knowledge“ to new ones before the older employees retire- PBL's scope could be suited in procedures for environmental impact assessment- Team work and knowledge skills improvements for teaching- Sharing of information in group by creation of new ideas is good- PBL makes a lot of project and Thesis ideas- PBL approach can be used as inspiration sauce behind the project pre-planning stage
- PBL can increase workload- Business world is too busy, and calls onlyfor cost-efficiency- PBL as teaching tool and interactive way of working is not as effective as traditional teaching- At first it was difficult to understand PBLtutorials and their purpose, because all group members were unfamiliar with PBL in beforehand. Must be well-instructed.- Brainstorming duration in Tutorial can´t be too long because it is a little bit frustrating to sit in table without any new “saying”- A smaller group might have produce more participative discussion
Working life & Universities in Enterprise ProblemSolving