Upload
nadine
View
28
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Information Society Technologies (IST). Programme Procedures and Information. A flexible and integrated IST programme yearly updated WP, regular Calls cross-programme actions, clusters, co-ordination Common procedures in FP5 when appropriate Application Rules, Evaluation manual - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Programme Procedures and InformationProgramme Procedures and InformationProgramme Procedures and InformationProgramme Procedures and Information
Information Society Information Society Technologies (IST)Technologies (IST)Information Society Information Society Technologies (IST)Technologies (IST)
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
BasicsBasicsBasicsBasics
A flexible and integrated IST programmeA flexible and integrated IST programme – yearly updated WP, regular Callsyearly updated WP, regular Calls– cross-programme actions, clusters, co-ordinationcross-programme actions, clusters, co-ordination
Common procedures in FP5Common procedures in FP5 when appropriate when appropriate– Application Rules, Evaluation manualApplication Rules, Evaluation manual
FP5-wide electronic submissionFP5-wide electronic submission– Protool, digital signature via Certification ServiceProtool, digital signature via Certification Service
Cost simplificationCost simplification– e.g. flat rate overheade.g. flat rate overhead
Take-up fundingTake-up funding– specific categories of eligible costspecific categories of eligible cost
A flexible and integrated IST programmeA flexible and integrated IST programme – yearly updated WP, regular Callsyearly updated WP, regular Calls– cross-programme actions, clusters, co-ordinationcross-programme actions, clusters, co-ordination
Common procedures in FP5Common procedures in FP5 when appropriate when appropriate– Application Rules, Evaluation manualApplication Rules, Evaluation manual
FP5-wide electronic submissionFP5-wide electronic submission– Protool, digital signature via Certification ServiceProtool, digital signature via Certification Service
Cost simplificationCost simplification– e.g. flat rate overheade.g. flat rate overhead
Take-up fundingTake-up funding– specific categories of eligible costspecific categories of eligible cost
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
FP 5 FP 5 Documentation PrinciplesDocumentation Principles
FP 5 FP 5 Documentation PrinciplesDocumentation Principles
Simplification of information for proposersSimplification of information for proposers
Internal harmonisation across FP5 programmesInternal harmonisation across FP5 programmes(where possible)(where possible)
Modular approachModular approach(allows customised web publishing)(allows customised web publishing)
Simplification of information for proposersSimplification of information for proposers
Internal harmonisation across FP5 programmesInternal harmonisation across FP5 programmes(where possible)(where possible)
Modular approachModular approach(allows customised web publishing)(allows customised web publishing)
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Content of Information Content of Information PackagePackage
Content of Information Content of Information PackagePackage
Workprogramme 2000
CALL Text OJ(exp: Feb, Jun, Sep 2000)
CALL Text OJ(exp: Feb, Jun, Sep 2000)
Evaluation ManualGeneral FP 5IST specific Annex
Guide for ProposersGuide for Proposers
Evaluators’ GuidelinesEvaluators’ Guidelines
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
How to make a proposal Step 1
How to make a proposal Step 1
Check that your idea is covered by the WORK-PROGRAMME Identify the ACTION LINE which covers your idea Check in the ROADMAP in the Work-programme when the action line is
open for call for proposals Check in the Action line description which TYPE OF ACTION is called for. Check in the CALL TEXT that the action line is actually called for, and the
DEADLINE Contact Commission CONTACT Person for action line to check that your
idea really is in the scope of the call Identify consortium Partners using CORDIS or IDEAL-IST Check that the consortium is eligible for the type of action (Guide for
Proposers, PART 1, Section III)
Check that your idea is covered by the WORK-PROGRAMME Identify the ACTION LINE which covers your idea Check in the ROADMAP in the Work-programme when the action line is
open for call for proposals Check in the Action line description which TYPE OF ACTION is called for. Check in the CALL TEXT that the action line is actually called for, and the
DEADLINE Contact Commission CONTACT Person for action line to check that your
idea really is in the scope of the call Identify consortium Partners using CORDIS or IDEAL-IST Check that the consortium is eligible for the type of action (Guide for
Proposers, PART 1, Section III)
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Identify the relevant PART 2 of the Guide for Proposers for the type of Identify the relevant PART 2 of the Guide for Proposers for the type of action you submit foraction you submit for
Follow the instructions for PART B & C for the proposals in PART 2Follow the instructions for PART B & C for the proposals in PART 2 Use GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATORS to check your proposal against Use GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATORS to check your proposal against
the Evaluation Criteriathe Evaluation Criteria Download PROTOOL from CORDISDownload PROTOOL from CORDIS Fill in the Proposal submission forms (PART A of Your Proposal) from Fill in the Proposal submission forms (PART A of Your Proposal) from
ProtoolProtool Pack the three parts A, B and C together and SUBMIT the proposal Pack the three parts A, B and C together and SUBMIT the proposal
either Electronically or on Paper (See Guide for Proposers, PART 2 or either Electronically or on Paper (See Guide for Proposers, PART 2 or Protool for instructions)Protool for instructions)
SUBMIT BEFORE DEADLINE
Identify the relevant PART 2 of the Guide for Proposers for the type of Identify the relevant PART 2 of the Guide for Proposers for the type of action you submit foraction you submit for
Follow the instructions for PART B & C for the proposals in PART 2Follow the instructions for PART B & C for the proposals in PART 2 Use GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATORS to check your proposal against Use GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATORS to check your proposal against
the Evaluation Criteriathe Evaluation Criteria Download PROTOOL from CORDISDownload PROTOOL from CORDIS Fill in the Proposal submission forms (PART A of Your Proposal) from Fill in the Proposal submission forms (PART A of Your Proposal) from
ProtoolProtool Pack the three parts A, B and C together and SUBMIT the proposal Pack the three parts A, B and C together and SUBMIT the proposal
either Electronically or on Paper (See Guide for Proposers, PART 2 or either Electronically or on Paper (See Guide for Proposers, PART 2 or Protool for instructions)Protool for instructions)
SUBMIT BEFORE DEADLINE
How to make a proposal How to make a proposal Step 2Step 2
How to make a proposal How to make a proposal Step 2Step 2
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
IST Guide to ProposersIST Guide to ProposersIST Guide to ProposersIST Guide to Proposers
Guide to Proposers has 2 partsGuide to Proposers has 2 parts::
Part 1Part 1: Common sections: Common sections
1. FP5 - general presentation1. FP5 - general presentation - FP5 common- FP5 common
2. IST programme presentation2. IST programme presentation - IST Programme specific- IST Programme specific
3. Rules of participation3. Rules of participation - FP5 common- FP5 common
* NOTE: Changed from year 99* NOTE: Changed from year 99
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
IST Guide to Proposers: IST Guide to Proposers: IST Guide to Proposers: IST Guide to Proposers:
ACTION TYPE TITLE PART
RTD, Demonstration, and
combined RTD/Demonstration
projects
Fixed deadline proposals - for RTD 2A
Take-up (assessment, best practice trials)
Fixed deadline proposals - for Take-up Actions 2B
Accompanying Measures,Concerted Actions and Thematic Networks
Fixed deadline proposals - for Support MeasuresOR
2C
Continuous Submission Scheme - for SupportMeasures
2E
FET Open Actions (short and full proposals)
Continuous Submission Scheme - for FET Open 2D
Grants (conferences, seminars,exhibitions and workshops)
Applications for Grants 2F
PART PART 2: Six versions (yes 6!)2: Six versions (yes 6!)PART PART 2: Six versions (yes 6!)2: Six versions (yes 6!)
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Who can participateWho can participate Normally (RTD):
- At least 2 EU partners or 1 EU + 1 Associated State Under normal funding conditions/obligations
- EU (+JRC) and associated countries Self financing - conform with Community interests
- Non-associated European and Mediterranean partner countries
- Countries with S&T agreement
- International organisations Self financing - conform with Community interest & substantial added value for
programme - Other countries
Accompanying Measures and most Take-UP:
- One Contractor (EU or Associated State) possible- One Contractor (EU or Associated State) possible
Normally (RTD): - At least 2 EU partners or 1 EU + 1 Associated State
Under normal funding conditions/obligations - EU (+JRC) and associated countries
Self financing - conform with Community interests
- Non-associated European and Mediterranean partner countries
- Countries with S&T agreement
- International organisations Self financing - conform with Community interest & substantial added value for
programme - Other countries
Accompanying Measures and most Take-UP:
- One Contractor (EU or Associated State) possible- One Contractor (EU or Associated State) possible
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Associated statesAssociated statesAssociated statesAssociated states
EEA:EEA:Iceland, Liechtenstein, NorwayIceland, Liechtenstein, Norway
EU candidate member states:EU candidate member states:
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Rep, Estonia, Hungary, LatviaBulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Rep, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia
Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, SloveniaLithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia
Other:Other: IsraelIsrael
Not yet (15.02.2000) ratified:Not yet (15.02.2000) ratified:Switzerland (in force 2001)Switzerland (in force 2001)
EEA:EEA:Iceland, Liechtenstein, NorwayIceland, Liechtenstein, Norway
EU candidate member states:EU candidate member states:
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Rep, Estonia, Hungary, LatviaBulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Rep, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia
Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, SloveniaLithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia
Other:Other: IsraelIsrael
Not yet (15.02.2000) ratified:Not yet (15.02.2000) ratified:Switzerland (in force 2001)Switzerland (in force 2001)
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
RTD Proposal: RTD Proposal: Submission FormsSubmission Forms
RTD Proposal: RTD Proposal: Submission FormsSubmission Forms
Three parts:Three parts: A. A. Administrative, budgetary informationAdministrative, budgetary information
– (Forms A0-A4)(Forms A0-A4)
B. B. Scientific/technical contentScientific/technical content– Relates to 1st block evaluation criteriaRelates to 1st block evaluation criteria
– Anonymous.Anonymous.
C. C. EU added value, contribution to community policies, EU added value, contribution to community policies, dissemination, exploitation and managementdissemination, exploitation and management– Relates to the 2 to 5th evaluation blockRelates to the 2 to 5th evaluation block
– Non anonymousNon anonymous
Three parts:Three parts: A. A. Administrative, budgetary informationAdministrative, budgetary information
– (Forms A0-A4)(Forms A0-A4)
B. B. Scientific/technical contentScientific/technical content– Relates to 1st block evaluation criteriaRelates to 1st block evaluation criteria
– Anonymous.Anonymous.
C. C. EU added value, contribution to community policies, EU added value, contribution to community policies, dissemination, exploitation and managementdissemination, exploitation and management– Relates to the 2 to 5th evaluation blockRelates to the 2 to 5th evaluation block
– Non anonymousNon anonymous
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
SubmissionSubmissionSubmissionSubmission
Preparation of Part A of proposals by coordinator using Preparation of Part A of proposals by coordinator using PROTOOL software tool available on CORDISPROTOOL software tool available on CORDIS– Electronic communication of administrative and financial dataElectronic communication of administrative and financial data
between partners possiblebetween partners possible
THEN Full Proposal (parts A, B and C)THEN Full Proposal (parts A, B and C)– SubmittedSubmitted electronically (digital certificate) OR(digital certificate) OR– Submitted bySubmitted by print out on paper.on paper.– Paper forms from guides allowed, but not recommendedPaper forms from guides allowed, but not recommended
(difficult to use OCR)(difficult to use OCR)
Ensure that the proposal is sent before the deadline!
Preparation of Part A of proposals by coordinator using Preparation of Part A of proposals by coordinator using PROTOOL software tool available on CORDISPROTOOL software tool available on CORDIS– Electronic communication of administrative and financial dataElectronic communication of administrative and financial data
between partners possiblebetween partners possible
THEN Full Proposal (parts A, B and C)THEN Full Proposal (parts A, B and C)– SubmittedSubmitted electronically (digital certificate) OR(digital certificate) OR– Submitted bySubmitted by print out on paper.on paper.– Paper forms from guides allowed, but not recommendedPaper forms from guides allowed, but not recommended
(difficult to use OCR)(difficult to use OCR)
Ensure that the proposal is sent before the deadline!
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
FP 5 Evaluation manualFP 5 Evaluation manualFP 5 Evaluation manualFP 5 Evaluation manual
Defines General Eligibility and Evaluation Criteria,Defines General Eligibility and Evaluation Criteria,Operating procedures and ReportingOperating procedures and Reporting
Five Blocks of evaluation criteriaFive Blocks of evaluation criteria::
- Scientific/Technological Quality and Innovation- Scientific/Technological Quality and Innovation
- Community added value and contribution to EU policies- Community added value and contribution to EU policies
- Contribution to Community social objectives- Contribution to Community social objectives
- Economic development and S&T prospects- Economic development and S&T prospects
- Resources, Partnership and management- Resources, Partnership and management
Scores on a scale from 0 to 5
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
IST Annex to Evaluation ManualIST Annex to Evaluation ManualIST Annex to Evaluation ManualIST Annex to Evaluation Manual
Defines the application of the general evaluation rules for the Defines the application of the general evaluation rules for the IST programme.IST programme.
Explains how the general Evaluation criteria will be applied in Explains how the general Evaluation criteria will be applied in the IST context for the different types of actions and adds the IST context for the different types of actions and adds criteria defined in the IST decision.criteria defined in the IST decision.- Appropriate Industrial involvement in industry related projects- Appropriate Industrial involvement in industry related projects
Defines thresholds for specific criteria and relative weighting Defines thresholds for specific criteria and relative weighting of evaluation criteria blocksof evaluation criteria blocks
Defines the application of the general evaluation rules for the Defines the application of the general evaluation rules for the IST programme.IST programme.
Explains how the general Evaluation criteria will be applied in Explains how the general Evaluation criteria will be applied in the IST context for the different types of actions and adds the IST context for the different types of actions and adds criteria defined in the IST decision.criteria defined in the IST decision.- Appropriate Industrial involvement in industry related projects- Appropriate Industrial involvement in industry related projects
Defines thresholds for specific criteria and relative weighting Defines thresholds for specific criteria and relative weighting of evaluation criteria blocksof evaluation criteria blocks
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Evaluation in ISTEvaluation in ISTEvaluation in ISTEvaluation in IST
Anonymity for “Scientific & Technological Quality”Anonymity for “Scientific & Technological Quality”(RTD and FET Open only!)(RTD and FET Open only!)
Relevant Questions related to eligibilityRelevant Questions related to eligibility- Within scope of WP and CallWithin scope of WP and Call- Respect of ethical principlesRespect of ethical principles- Appropriate industrial participationAppropriate industrial participation- At least two non-affiliated partnersAt least two non-affiliated partners
from different Member States (or MS + AS)from different Member States (or MS + AS)- Format requirementsFormat requirements
May lead to exclusion from further evaluation
Anonymity for “Scientific & Technological Quality”Anonymity for “Scientific & Technological Quality”(RTD and FET Open only!)(RTD and FET Open only!)
Relevant Questions related to eligibilityRelevant Questions related to eligibility- Within scope of WP and CallWithin scope of WP and Call- Respect of ethical principlesRespect of ethical principles- Appropriate industrial participationAppropriate industrial participation- At least two non-affiliated partnersAt least two non-affiliated partners
from different Member States (or MS + AS)from different Member States (or MS + AS)- Format requirementsFormat requirements
May lead to exclusion from further evaluation
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Evaluation in IST Evaluation in IST Example for R&D projectsExample for R&D projects
Evaluation in IST Evaluation in IST Example for R&D projectsExample for R&D projects
Criteria Weight (1) Threshold (2)
Scientific/Technological Qualityand innovation 4 >= 3Community Added Valueand contribution to EU policy 1 >= 2Contribution to Comm. Social objectives 1 -Economic Dev; S&T prospects(range of applications, exploitation, strategic impact, dissemination) 2 >= 3Resources, Partnership, Management 2 >= 2
1) Weight on a scale of 10 (sum 10) 2) Threshold with respect to score 0-5
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Evaluation in ISTEvaluation in ISTEvaluation in ISTEvaluation in IST
1. 1. Individual evaluation by at least 3 expertsIndividual evaluation by at least 3 expertsFirst criterion 1 (anonymous for RTD and FET Open), then criteria 2-5First criterion 1 (anonymous for RTD and FET Open), then criteria 2-5
2. 2. Consensus between 3 experts on draft summaryConsensus between 3 experts on draft summaryScores for 5 criteria + commentsScores for 5 criteria + comments
3. 3. Discussion in panel for ranking and overall mark to proposalsDiscussion in panel for ranking and overall mark to proposals
4. 4. Final ranking and recommendationsFinal ranking and recommendationsDecisions documented in Evaluation reportDecisions documented in Evaluation report
1. 1. Individual evaluation by at least 3 expertsIndividual evaluation by at least 3 expertsFirst criterion 1 (anonymous for RTD and FET Open), then criteria 2-5First criterion 1 (anonymous for RTD and FET Open), then criteria 2-5
2. 2. Consensus between 3 experts on draft summaryConsensus between 3 experts on draft summaryScores for 5 criteria + commentsScores for 5 criteria + comments
3. 3. Discussion in panel for ranking and overall mark to proposalsDiscussion in panel for ranking and overall mark to proposals
4. 4. Final ranking and recommendationsFinal ranking and recommendationsDecisions documented in Evaluation reportDecisions documented in Evaluation report
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
ContractsContractsContractsContracts
Main types of ContractsMain types of Contracts(with “derived” versions (with “derived” versions each):each):
– Shared cost RTD (Research, Demonstration, Combined Shared cost RTD (Research, Demonstration, Combined R&D)R&D)
– Coordination (Concerted Actions, Thematic Networks)Coordination (Concerted Actions, Thematic Networks)
– Accompanying Measures (Take-up)Accompanying Measures (Take-up)
– Fellowships (Marie Curie)Fellowships (Marie Curie)
– SME Awards / Cooperative ResearchSME Awards / Cooperative Research
Main types of ContractsMain types of Contracts(with “derived” versions (with “derived” versions each):each):
– Shared cost RTD (Research, Demonstration, Combined Shared cost RTD (Research, Demonstration, Combined R&D)R&D)
– Coordination (Concerted Actions, Thematic Networks)Coordination (Concerted Actions, Thematic Networks)
– Accompanying Measures (Take-up)Accompanying Measures (Take-up)
– Fellowships (Marie Curie)Fellowships (Marie Curie)
– SME Awards / Cooperative ResearchSME Awards / Cooperative Research
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Cost Reimbursement Contract Cost Reimbursement Contract for RTD Projectsfor RTD Projects
Cost Reimbursement Contract Cost Reimbursement Contract for RTD Projectsfor RTD Projects
MAIN NOVELTIES (compared to FP4)MAIN NOVELTIES (compared to FP4)
– Principal and assistant contractorsPrincipal and assistant contractors
– Tasks of the coordinator reinforcedTasks of the coordinator reinforced
– Split of scientific coordination and financial/administrative Split of scientific coordination and financial/administrative
coordination possible in exceptional casescoordination possible in exceptional cases
– Introduction of penaltiesIntroduction of penalties
– Percentage of Community funding specified in a tablePercentage of Community funding specified in a table
– Periodic reports and cost statements cover the same periodPeriodic reports and cost statements cover the same period
– Applicable law - law of competent authorising officerApplicable law - law of competent authorising officer(i.e. Belgian or Luxembourg law)(i.e. Belgian or Luxembourg law)
– Deadline for amendment requestsDeadline for amendment requests
MAIN NOVELTIES (compared to FP4)MAIN NOVELTIES (compared to FP4)
– Principal and assistant contractorsPrincipal and assistant contractors
– Tasks of the coordinator reinforcedTasks of the coordinator reinforced
– Split of scientific coordination and financial/administrative Split of scientific coordination and financial/administrative
coordination possible in exceptional casescoordination possible in exceptional cases
– Introduction of penaltiesIntroduction of penalties
– Percentage of Community funding specified in a tablePercentage of Community funding specified in a table
– Periodic reports and cost statements cover the same periodPeriodic reports and cost statements cover the same period
– Applicable law - law of competent authorising officerApplicable law - law of competent authorising officer(i.e. Belgian or Luxembourg law)(i.e. Belgian or Luxembourg law)
– Deadline for amendment requestsDeadline for amendment requests
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
PartnershipPartnershipPartnershipPartnership
Coordinator-contractorCoordinator-contractor– signs contract; liaison to Programmesigns contract; liaison to Programme
Principal ContractorPrincipal Contractor– signs contract - jointly and severally liablesigns contract - jointly and severally liable
Assistant Contractor (in R&D + demo)Assistant Contractor (in R&D + demo)– signs contract - restricted liability and rightssigns contract - restricted liability and rights
Member (in Thematic Network, Take-Up only)Member (in Thematic Network, Take-Up only)– signs membership agreement with Coordinator - in networks and Take-up signs membership agreement with Coordinator - in networks and Take-up
measuresmeasures
SubcontractorSubcontractor– Rights to contractor - competitive pricesRights to contractor - competitive prices
Coordinator-contractorCoordinator-contractor– signs contract; liaison to Programmesigns contract; liaison to Programme
Principal ContractorPrincipal Contractor– signs contract - jointly and severally liablesigns contract - jointly and severally liable
Assistant Contractor (in R&D + demo)Assistant Contractor (in R&D + demo)– signs contract - restricted liability and rightssigns contract - restricted liability and rights
Member (in Thematic Network, Take-Up only)Member (in Thematic Network, Take-Up only)– signs membership agreement with Coordinator - in networks and Take-up signs membership agreement with Coordinator - in networks and Take-up
measuresmeasures
SubcontractorSubcontractor– Rights to contractor - competitive pricesRights to contractor - competitive prices
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
1111 Full cost, actual overheadFull cost, actual overhead (funded at 50 %)(funded at 50 %)
2222Full cost, flat overhead rateFull cost, flat overhead rate (funded at 50 %). (funded at 50 %). Under this model overheads are fixed at 80 % Under this model overheads are fixed at 80 % of the labour cost claimed.of the labour cost claimed.
3333Additional costsAdditional costs (funded at 100 %). This model (funded at 100 %). This model is limited to those organisations whose accounting is limited to those organisations whose accounting system is based on disbursals and not on costs system is based on disbursals and not on costs (universities, governmental organisations, etc.)(universities, governmental organisations, etc.)
Models of Funding - Models of Funding - RTDRTD
Models of Funding - Models of Funding - RTDRTD
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Eligible Cost categories RTD/AMEligible Cost categories RTD/AMEligible Cost categories RTD/AMEligible Cost categories RTD/AM
Personnel Personnel Durable equipment Durable equipment ConsumablesConsumables Travel and SubsistenceTravel and Subsistence ComputingComputing SubcontractingSubcontracting IPR protectionIPR protection Other specific costsOther specific costs OverheadsOverheads Coordination costsCoordination costs
Personnel Personnel Durable equipment Durable equipment ConsumablesConsumables Travel and SubsistenceTravel and Subsistence ComputingComputing SubcontractingSubcontracting IPR protectionIPR protection Other specific costsOther specific costs OverheadsOverheads Coordination costsCoordination costs
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Models of FundingModels of FundingOther ActionsOther Actions
Models of FundingModels of FundingOther ActionsOther Actions
Accompanying Measures (NOT Take-Up):– All participants calculate overhead as percentage of All participants calculate overhead as percentage of
personnel costs, max. 80%personnel costs, max. 80% Take-Up Actions
– Only certain eligible cost categories allowed for each action. Only certain eligible cost categories allowed for each action. Overhead not allowed. See: Guide for Proposers, Part 2 BOverhead not allowed. See: Guide for Proposers, Part 2 B
Accompanying Measures (NOT Take-Up):– All participants calculate overhead as percentage of All participants calculate overhead as percentage of
personnel costs, max. 80%personnel costs, max. 80% Take-Up Actions
– Only certain eligible cost categories allowed for each action. Only certain eligible cost categories allowed for each action. Overhead not allowed. See: Guide for Proposers, Part 2 BOverhead not allowed. See: Guide for Proposers, Part 2 B
Cost categoriesTake upmeasure
Person-nel
Durableequip-ment
Consu-mables
TravelandSubsis-tence
Compu-ting
Subcon-tracting
IPRprotec-tion
Othercosts
Over-heads
Co-ordination
Assessment 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Best Practice 100% 50% 50% 50% *50% 50% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Trials 100% 50% 50% 50% *50% 50% 0% 100% 0% 100%
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Models of FundingModels of FundingOther ActionsOther Actions
Models of FundingModels of FundingOther ActionsOther Actions
Concerted Actions/Thematic Networks:
– All participants use Additional Cost Model, i. e. 20% All participants use Additional Cost Model, i. e. 20% Overhead on all costs except subcontracting. Permanent Overhead on all costs except subcontracting. Permanent staff can be used if time records are kept. staff can be used if time records are kept.
– Personnel, – Travel and Subsistence, – Computing, – Subcontracting, – Other specific costs, – Overheads.
Concerted Actions/Thematic Networks:
– All participants use Additional Cost Model, i. e. 20% All participants use Additional Cost Model, i. e. 20% Overhead on all costs except subcontracting. Permanent Overhead on all costs except subcontracting. Permanent staff can be used if time records are kept. staff can be used if time records are kept.
– Personnel, – Travel and Subsistence, – Computing, – Subcontracting, – Other specific costs, – Overheads.
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Intellectual Property Rights(IPR)Intellectual Property Rights(IPR)Intellectual Property Rights(IPR)Intellectual Property Rights(IPR)
EU Funding 50% or lessEU Funding 50% or less: :
IPR belongs to the contractorsIPR belongs to the contractors
EU Funding between 50% and 100%:EU Funding between 50% and 100%:
IPR negotiated between Commission and contractorsIPR negotiated between Commission and contractors
EU Funding 100% of total eligible costEU Funding 100% of total eligible cost
IPR belongs to the Commission as general ruleIPR belongs to the Commission as general rule
EU Funding 50% or lessEU Funding 50% or less: :
IPR belongs to the contractorsIPR belongs to the contractors
EU Funding between 50% and 100%:EU Funding between 50% and 100%:
IPR negotiated between Commission and contractorsIPR negotiated between Commission and contractors
EU Funding 100% of total eligible costEU Funding 100% of total eligible cost
IPR belongs to the Commission as general ruleIPR belongs to the Commission as general rule
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Financial ViabilityFinancial ViabilityFinancial ViabilityFinancial Viability
Check on legal existence and financial viability of Check on legal existence and financial viability of partnerspartners
will be done by EC before contract signaturewill be done by EC before contract signature
Takes all other participations in FP into accountTakes all other participations in FP into account
Results may lead to reduction of participation or Results may lead to reduction of participation or exclusionexclusion
If reasonable, proper solutions with partners to be foundIf reasonable, proper solutions with partners to be found case by casecase by case
Check on legal existence and financial viability of Check on legal existence and financial viability of partnerspartners
will be done by EC before contract signaturewill be done by EC before contract signature
Takes all other participations in FP into accountTakes all other participations in FP into account
Results may lead to reduction of participation or Results may lead to reduction of participation or exclusionexclusion
If reasonable, proper solutions with partners to be foundIf reasonable, proper solutions with partners to be found case by casecase by case
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Planning and OperationsPlanning and OperationsPlanning and OperationsPlanning and Operations
Framework programmeFramework programmeSpecific programmesSpecific programmes
Work programmeWork programmeCall for proposalsCall for proposalsProject SelectionProject SelectionLaunchLaunch
Project operationsProject operations- specification- specification- development- development- prototype evaluation- prototype evaluation
Project reviewsProject reviews- management- management- technology- technology- costs- costs
Framework programmeFramework programmeSpecific programmesSpecific programmes
Work programmeWork programmeCall for proposalsCall for proposalsProject SelectionProject SelectionLaunchLaunch
Project operationsProject operations- specification- specification- development- development- prototype evaluation- prototype evaluation
Project reviewsProject reviews- management- management- technology- technology- costs- costs
IMPLEMENTATIONCYCLE
IMPLEMENTATIONCYCLE
PLANNINGCYCLE
PLANNINGCYCLE
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Results of the first callResults of the first callResults of the first callResults of the first call
BudgetBudget for the first call: 800 MEUROS for the first call: 800 MEUROS
OpenedOpened: 19 March 1999 : 19 March 1999 ClosedClosed: 16 June 1999: 16 June 1999
InputInput: 2341 proposals: 2341 proposals
EvaluationEvaluation done by 600 experts done by 600 experts
418 retained for 418 retained for negociationnegociation
BudgetBudget for the first call: 800 MEUROS for the first call: 800 MEUROS
OpenedOpened: 19 March 1999 : 19 March 1999 ClosedClosed: 16 June 1999: 16 June 1999
InputInput: 2341 proposals: 2341 proposals
EvaluationEvaluation done by 600 experts done by 600 experts
418 retained for 418 retained for negociationnegociation
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
First call – who First call – who participatedparticipated
First call – who First call – who participatedparticipated
University & Research
Centres41%
Small business
22%
Large business
24%
Others13%
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Acceptance Rates: OverallAcceptance Rates: OverallAcceptance Rates: OverallAcceptance Rates: Overall
Call 1 Call 2 Call 1+2
Proposals 21.0% 22.0% 21.3%
Funding 17.0% 18.2% 17.3%
Call 1 Call 2 Call 1+2
Proposals 21.0% 22.0% 21.3%
Funding 17.0% 18.2% 17.3%
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
For further information...For further information...For further information...For further information...
IST helpdeskFax: +32 2 296 83 88E-Mail: [email protected]
IST helpdeskFax: +32 2 296 83 88E-Mail: [email protected]
http://www.cordis.lu/isthttp://www.cordis.lu/ist
Official JournalGuide to Future CallsWork ProgrammeIntroduction for ProposersSpecific Guides for Proposers
Official JournalGuide to Future CallsWork ProgrammeIntroduction for ProposersSpecific Guides for Proposers
Jean-Yves ROGER European Commission DG INFSO IST programme
Jean-Yves ROGEREuropean Commission
DG INFSO-F4BU-9 0/187
200 Rue de la LoiB-1049 Brussels
Phone: +32.2.2993886Fax: +32.2.2996192E-mail: [email protected]
Jean-Yves ROGEREuropean Commission
DG INFSO-F4BU-9 0/187
200 Rue de la LoiB-1049 Brussels
Phone: +32.2.2993886Fax: +32.2.2996192E-mail: [email protected]
Buenos-AiresBuenos-Aires
June 26th 2000June 26th 2000
Buenos-AiresBuenos-Aires
June 26th 2000June 26th 2000