16
Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003) Presented by Alice Ying M. Abdou, N. Morley, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M. Narula April 7, 2003 APEX Meeting Grand Canyon, AZ

Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

  • Upload
    merton

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003). Presented by Alice Ying M. Abdou, N. Morley, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M. Narula April 7, 2003 APEX Meeting Grand Canyon, AZ. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST

(Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Presented by Alice Ying

M. Abdou, N. Morley, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M. NarulaApril 7, 2003APEX Meeting

Grand Canyon, AZ

Page 2: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Experimental Investigation now Focused on Film Flow Characteristics with Conducting Walls

Most likely the electrical insulator coating would not be available in the next few years.

In addition, Film in insulated chute appeared feasible passing through the NSTX-like steady state 2-D field gradients (toroidal and surface normal), except additional MHD pressure drop

There was a need to add the 3rd component field (poloidal field) to complete the exploratory assessment (steady state). However, the field magnitude is relatively low (thus its effect may not be significant)

Would revisit this effect if the result of the conducting chute film flow shows unfavorable.

Page 3: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Initial exploration: Ga flows upwardly from inboard (high field) to outboard (low field)

Page 4: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Experimental Investigation Tailored for

Concept Evaluation

The concept: NSTX Lithium Free Surface Module (ORNL)

MTOR experimental set-up for NSTX

film flow concept evaluation

Page 5: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Electrically Conducting Walls Test Article Fabricated from Stainless Steel

Stainless steel walls conducting channel (5 cm wide/45 cm long) steel wall thickness: 0.5 mm

0067.0a

tc

f

ww

‘c’ is the conductance ratio;

a = channel half-width

Inlet nozzle assembly

Y

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Y

The entry nozzle profile

Outlet assembly with cover plate to prevent Ga overshoot

Inlet manifold with perforated plate for uniform

flow distribution

Nozzle

Page 6: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Achieving prototypical NSXT magnetic fields

configuration using GaInSn for Li simulation

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 5 10 15 20

Distance away from outlet (outboard), inch

Toroidal field

Surface normal field Axial field

Jet experimental setup

Film flow experimental setup

Ga

1. flux concentrator with taper block for gradient toroidal field simulation 2. Permanent magnet placed near the outlet for gradient surface normal field simulation

Page 7: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Stainless Steel Conducting-Walls Test Article with Permanent Magnets

Drain section

Nozzle /inlet manifold

Inlet

Outlet Permanent magnets

steel wall thickness: 0.5 mm

Page 8: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Conducting-Walls Film Flow Test Article (schematic) and MTOR Magnetic Fields

Flow direction

inboard

outboard

34 cm

Permanent magnets (2)

MTOR field vector plot to illustrate field

direction and relative strength

x: axial (flow direction)y: toroidal

z: normal

Flow d

irection

Distance away fromnozzle inlet (cm)

Bx (axial), Tesla By (toroidal),Tesla

Bz (surface normal),Tesla B

, Tesla

0.4 0.023 -1.121 -0.019 1.1212.94 -0.003 -1.068 -0.021 1.0685.48 -0.009 -1.015 -0.026 1.0158.02 -0.012 -0.964 -0.029 0.964510.56 -0.01 -0.918 -0.024 0.91813.1 -0.034 -0.876 -0.03 0.87715.64 -0.068 -0.837 -0.052 0.84118.17 -0.135 -0.799 -0.152 0.82420.72 -0.101 -0.771 -0.262 0.82023.26 -0.074 -0.738 -0.297 0.79925.8 -0.038 -0.712 -0.306 0.77628.34 -0.019 -0.685 -0.314 0.75430.87 0.047 -0.656 -0.32 0.731

Page 9: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

MHD LM (GaInSn) Film Flow Characteristics(Gradient Toroidal Fields)

• Near the inlet, the MHD effect is the strongest, while the turbulence is

quickly damped and the turbulent structures are markedly elongated in the magnetic field direction.

• The stretched 2-D turbulent structures begin to break down as Ga proceeds to the lower field regions (outboard).

Page 10: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

LM Film Flow Under Gradient Toroidal Fields: Movie with Better Lighting

Stretched 2-D rolling waves

2-D turbulent structures broken down

Inlet velocity 3 m/s

20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9

Field magnitudes vs distance

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 5 10 15 20

Distance away from outlet (outboard), inch

Toroidal field

Surface normal field Axial field

Flow

Page 11: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Stronger MHD Present as Velocity Increases (gradient toroidal field only)

4.4 m/s

At higher velocity, 2D rolling waves persist to lower fields.

3 m/s 2-D rolling waves broken down as field drops

Angular momentum normal to B field

being destroyed over a time scale of 4 ( = 0.0017 s )

12

)(

B

Toroidal field

Page 12: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Effect of Field Orientation on LM MHD (3 m/s) No field

Gradient toroidal field

Surface normal field

Invert image

Invert image

Invert image

Page 13: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

MHD LM (GaInSn) Film Flow Characteristics(Surface Normal with/without Gradient Toroidal Fields)

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32(cm)

Distinct wavy flow pattern appeared/observed as magnet field configuration becomes complicated (inlet velocity 3 m/s)

2-D stretched- rolling waves

Ga flow appears thickened/frozen

Outboard

Surface normal field applied at ~18 cm downstream and increases from

0.15 T to 0.32 T (at 30.87 cm downstream) and 0T thereafter (see slide #3 for field values)

Significant damping force from surface normal field 2

VB

inboard

Page 14: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Ultrasonic Film Height Transducers 7 ultrasonic film height transducers used Speed of sound for Ga alloy measured 2740 m/s Speed of sound for stainless steel measured 5400 m/s (a thicker

and larger plate needed to differentiate time-of-flight) Ultrasonic transducers mounted directly touching Ga alloy Ga alloy oxidation results in no signal (cleaned Ga alloy) Turbulent fluctuation of liquid surface causes energy to be lost

before the wave reflects back to sensor (lose of signal) Shown difficulties to use for high velocities such as 3 m/s

8.3

5.893.42

3.0

3.97

2.32

Unit: mm; inlet ga alloy velocity = 2.0 m/s

Surface normal field applied

Only one data point obtained and showed additional MHD effect from added gradient toroidal field; film thickness increased by

a factor 2

Page 15: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Capacitance Probe Film Height Measurements

Results using in-house capactive probe have obtained for static films

However, those probes were acquired to measure sub- minimeter gaps encountered in thermomechanics experiments. They are difficult to implement in the ga film flow runs (which needs probe installed near touching the free surface)

Principles of Operation

The capacitive reactance is proportional to the spacing of a parallel-plate capacitor, which is made up of the probe and an electrically conductive measuring surface (Ga surface)

As the distance varies due to the change of the film height, the capacitive reactance varies accordingly

probe

gap

As a mean to measure film height at higher velocities(> 2.5 m/s)

Page 16: Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov. 2002- April 2003)

Exploratory studies for flowing liquid metal divertor options for ALIST NSTX in MTOR facility- A. Ying et al.

Contents0. Introduction I. Background Information (FLOW3D Numerical Simulation

results to show why experimental study is critical)II. MTOR Facility- Flux concentrator/Engineering Scaling and

Stage-one Objectives of MTOR ExperimentsIII. Characterization of Liquid Metal Jets Under Gradient

Transverse FieldsIII.1 Introduction /Typical Jet Behavior without MHD,

Literature Review of MHD-Jet Studies III.2 Experimental Studies in MTORIII.3 Experimental Results

IV. Film Flow Characteristics Under Complex Gradient FieldsIV.1 Introduction /Typical Film Behavior without

MHD, Literature Review of MHD-Film Studies IV.2 Experimental Studies in MTORIV.3 Experimental Results and Analysis

V. Summary and Next-step Plan