Project Costing and Economics

  • Upload
    jekos27

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    1/22

    2 /4 /2009

    1

    Pro ject Co st ing & Econ o m ics

    AN D... LIFE

    Dave M ody

    Engineer ing Design

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    2/22

    2 /4 /2009

    2

    Example

    Citr ic Acid Extract ion Plant

    Cit r ic Acid Ext ractio n Plant

    http://www.lemonadegame.com/

    http://www.lemonadegame.com/http://www.lemonadegame.com/
  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    3/22

    2 /4 /2009

    3

    Just A Lem o nad e St and

    W HO W HEN W HY

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    4/22

    2 /4 /2009

    4

    Th e Tim e Accu racy o f Est im ates

    % Time vs Estimate Accuracy & % Completion

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Time (% of total schedule)

    EstimateAccuracy

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    %WorkCompleted

    Construction

    Begins

    Equipment

    Factored

    CapacityFactored

    SemiDetailed

    D

    etailed

    Work Completed

    32

    Capacit y Facto r

    1000 lb / h r

    $10 M i ll ion

    5000 lb / h r

    ? M i ll ion

    $ ? Mi l l ion = $10 M i l l ion5000 lb / h r1000 lb / h r

    0. 7

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    5/22

    2 /4 /2009

    5

    Capacit y Facto r

    The expon ent (0.7)

    Product Process Route ExponentEthylene Refinery Gases 0.85

    Acetaldehyde Ethylene 0.70

    Ammonia Steam Reforming 0.70Phosphoric Acid Calcium Phosphate/H2SO4 0.60

    Formaldehyde Methanol 0.55

    Perrrys

    TIM E! HEY ! W hat Chan ged?

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    6/22

    2 /4 /2009

    6

    Capacit y Fact o r - Co st Indices

    Chem ical Enginee ring M agazine

    33

    Lang Facto r Est im ate

    Plant Cost = Lang Facto r x Equ ipm ent Costs

    Plant Type Lang Factor

    Fluid Processing Plant 4.74, usually rounded to 5.0Solid-Fluid Processing Plant 3.63Solid Processing Plant 3.10

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    7/22

    2 /4 /2009

    7

    Big Box Sh o p p ing

    For Ch em ical Plant s

    Equ ipm ent Co stGarage Cost

    # Cars

    $

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    8/22

    2 /4 /2009

    8

    EQUIPMENTFACTOR

    INSTALLEDCOSTPURCHASE COST

    Equipm ent Fact ored Est im at es

    36-37

    Equipm ent Fact ored Est im at es DIRECT FIELD COSTS (50 %)

    Eq uip m e nt (20%)

    Fie ld Labour & M ater ia l to insta l l equip. (30%)

    INDIRECT FIELD COSTS (32 %)

    CONTINGENCY AN D FEES (15% + 3 %)

    35

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    9/22

    2 /4 /2009

    9

    Equipm ent Fact ored Est im at es

    Tan ks and Vessels

    Colu m ns and Trays

    Pum ps and Com pressors

    Exchangers

    Heaters

    Direct FieldCost

    x

    Factor=

    36-37

    Equipment Factors

    Sho p Fab . Vessels

    Compressors

    Exchangers

    Fired Heate rs

    Pumps

    M ater ia l HandlingEquipment

    2 .0 - 2 .5

    1 .5 - 2 .5

    1 .7 - 2 .5

    1 .7 - 2 .5

    2 .5 - 3 .5

    1 .5 - 3 .0

    37

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    10/22

    2 /4 /2009

    10

    Heat & M ater ial Balance (simu lat ion ) Prel im inary Equ ipm ent Sizing M aterials Select ion Equ ipm ent List 1st Draf t P& IDs - recom m ended

    Process Hazards Analysis - recom m end ed Pre lim inary Layout - recom m ended

    Facto red Est im ateEngineer ing Requ irem ent s

    Det ai led Est im ates

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    11/22

    2 /4 /2009

    11

    Detai led Est im ate

    % Time vs Estimate Accuracy & % Completion

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    Time (% of total schedule)

    EstimateAccuracy

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    %WorkCompleted

    Construction

    Begins

    Equipment

    Factored

    CapacityFactored

    SemiDetailed

    D

    etailed

    Work Completed

    32

    W hat s Eco no m ics?

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    12/22

    2 /4 /2009

    12

    Angkor Wat Built by a series of kings at huge cost

    Bankrupt the K hmers

    Lucky For Us, No Project Econ om ic Evaluat io n W as Used

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    13/22

    2 /4 /2009

    13

    BEFORE YOU BUY!

    DECISION M AKING $$

    Econ om ics & Pro ject Decision M aking

    $

    Compound Interest

    Discounted

    To day The Fu t u re

    $

    $

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    14/22

    2 /4 /2009

    14

    Econ om ics & Pro ject Decision M aking

    $

    $

    Discounted

    i

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    To day The Fu t u re

    $$$?

    To day 2 YEARS 3YEARS 4 YEARS

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    15/22

    2 /4 /2009

    15

    Tim e M at ters!

    $$$

    To day 2 YEARS 3YEARS 4 YEARS

    $

    Net Present Value

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    $$$

    $Our Init ial Cost

    Revenue

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    16/22

    2 /4 /2009

    16

    $$$

    $

    Our Init ial Cost

    Revenue

    $$$

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    $

    $=

    $

    Net Present Value

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    17/22

    2 /4 /2009

    17

    Discou nt Rate M atters !

    $$$

    $

    Our Init ial Cost

    Revenue

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    $$$

    Net Present Value

    W ith Larger Discou nt Interest Rate

    $Our Init ial Cost

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    $

    $

    =

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    18/22

    2 /4 /2009

    18

    Disco un t Rate

    Large Discou nt Rate Valu es = LOW ER NPVS

    Industry Low-Risk Projects

    AverageProjects

    High RiskProjects

    Industrial Chemicals 11 25 44

    Petroleum 16 25 39

    Pulp and Paper 18 28 40

    Pharmaceuticals 24 40 56

    Metals 8 15 24Paints 21 30 44

    Fermentation Products 10 30 49

    Adapted from Aries and Newton (1995)

    Typical MARR or Hurd le Rates in Industry

    Intern al Rate o f Ret urn (IRR)i w hen NPV = 0

    $

    PV = FV / (1+i)n

    $

    =

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    19/22

    2 /4 /2009

    19

    Net Present Value A $ am ount exceeding thehu rdle interest rate

    Internal Rate of Retu rn Equ ivalent InterestRate o f You r In it ial Cost

    Invest m ent Com par ison

    You have $200, how d o you m ake the m ost m oney in 6 years?

    A. Put in Bank B. Lem on ade C. Soap Box Car

    A. Put Money in Bank (i=10%)

    -200

    0 0 0 0 0

    354.3122

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Years

    Dollars($)

    B. Lemonade Stand (i=10%)

    -200

    100

    50 50

    100120 130

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Years

    Dollars($)

    C. Build Soap Box Car (i=10%)

    -50 -50

    -100

    70

    120

    220250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Years

    Dollars($)

    Slide by Dean Latham

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    20/22

    2 /4 /2009

    20

    Investm ent Com parison : Net Present Value (NPV)

    Risk AnalysisUnd erstand t he r isk and effects to t he pro ject

    30

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    21/22

    2 /4 /2009

    21

    Risk Analysis

    Test on e value (Tor nad o Plot s)

    Develop 3 scenar ios

    30

    Risk AnalysisM onte Car lo

    Probability

    -50% -10% +10% +50%

    30

  • 7/31/2019 Project Costing and Economics

    22/22

    2 /4 /2009

    22

    So This is Engin eer ing Econo m ics

    Conversion o f Br i t ish Colum bia M oun tain PineBeet le Wo od to Natu ral Gas via Syngas

    Ut i l ize a Tur bine t o red uce pressure and p rod uceelectr ic i ty

    The des ign of a W ater For In ject ion Ut i l i ty for ab io / pha rm a p lan t