Upload
edmund-parks
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project Delivery Methods Part I
What is A Project Delivery Method?
• The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project.
• Three popular structures:
1. Traditional (Competitive Bid)2. Design/Build 3. Construction Manager
• Includes the selection of a team to manage project from design through construction
• Also includes selection of contract arrangements• Ie: Lump Sum, Unit Price, Cost Plus A Fee, etc.
Three Most Common DeliveryMethods
• Traditional• Design/Build• Construction Management
Each has its own specific risks, incentives and capabilities.
Owner’s Order of Priorities Will Dictate Best Delivery Method
• Certain contract types will serve specific goals better than others.
• Some typical owner’s goals:• To achieve project completion within time
allowance• To build a high quality project• To finish the project within budget
The Traditional Project Delivery Method
Owner
Architect/Engineer General Contractor
Sub Sub
TWO PRIME CONTRACTS:
Traditional ProjectDelivery• Owner hires a design professional
• Design professional prepares design drawings & specifications.
• When design is complete: • Owner initiates bidding process or,• Negotiates a private contract with prime contractor
• Contractor is responsible for execution of the work
• Owner may hire representative for quality assurance• Owner’s rep is often the design professional at this stage
Advantages of the Traditional Project Delivery Method to The Owner
• Well defined relationships & responsibilities
• Traditionally, MOST risks of construction performance lies primarily on contractor
• Open bidding (IF COMPETITIVE BID) gives owner the lowest price available
• Owner has minimal involvement in construction phase (MAY OR MAY NOT BE ADVANTAGE!)
Disadvantages of the Traditional Project Delivery Method to The Owner
• Design & construction phase are linear (finish to start relationship)
• Design must be complete before bidding begins (lag time)
• Reduced interaction between designer & constructor
• Unforeseen conditions may require costly renegotiation of the contract for changes (CHANGE ORDERS)
Design/Build Method
Owner
Design Consultant(Architect/Engineer)
Design Build Firm
Subcontractors & Suppliers
ADVANTAGES TO THE OWNER
• Less complicated structure for the owner
• One responsible party throughout entire project (single point of contact)
• Design phase & construction phase can run parallel = time savings
• Enhanced communication & constructability
DISADVANTAGES TO THE OWNER
• Early estimates are usually not realistic because:• Design & construction phase overlap• Scope of project may vary as design progresses
• Owner loses the “representative” option in the field….which means…..
• No system of “checks & balances”
Construction Management Approach
Owner
Architect/Engineer
General Contractor
Sub Sub
ConstructionManager
Resident Field Engineer
Advantages of Construction Management Structure to the Owner:
Owner hires CM firm & designer in preconstruction phase:
• Allows input by CM during design phase
• Leads to “value-engineering” & collaboration
• Best product for the $$
• “Team” approach
• Quality assurance is provided by CM firm
• Changes during construction are simpler due to close communication between designer & CM
Implications ofContract Changes
• Construction contracts are entered into before the work is performed.
• The contract is based on an “estimate” and a set of working drawings & specifications.
• Sometimes, conditions change (or are discovered) that require changes to the contract.
Some Examples:
• Scope of the project increases or decreases due to owner’s requirements
• Unforeseen conditions are present that were not known at the time of execution of the contract.
• Omissions in the drawings/specifications that must be accounted for.
The type of contract will dictate the way changes are handled.
• For example:
• Cost Plus Fixed Fee: Changes in cost of project are automatically absorbed.
• Fixed Price Contracts: Contract will require modification to fairly account for price change
Changes are a REALITY!
• Changes cost the project (owner) money, especially on competitively bid jobs
• Contractor will often negotiate inflated prices when changes occur (PROFIT)
• Preparation and a competent design/construction team is paramount!• Constructability reviews, etc.