Upload
sibyl-oliver
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment, 2008
(PIBA, 2008)
Presented by Robert Deutsch, PIBA Team Leader to the Building a Better Land Administration System Workshop,
World Bank, Washington DC, March 11, 2009
photo
1. To assess the extent of realization of the RALAS objectives from the beneficiaries point of view.
2. To study the contributions of RALAS in terms of project methodology, effectiveness and efficiency of implementation.
2
To assess RALAS outputs in terms of: 1. Land Titling
a) Information Dissemination and Co-ordination with NGOs and CSOs
b) Titling Processc) Social Inclusion and consideration of vulnerable
groupsd) Community Perception and Satisfaction with the
Systematic Titling Process
2. Land Management and Administrationa) Re-establishing and strengthening land
administration and management systems.b) Compliance with Safeguards and addressing
Complaints, Land Disputes and their Resolution.c) Governance Issues (including coordination with
MDF/WB)
3. Project Implementation and Management3
4
In each study village: Interviewed the village leader
Prepared a village profile Conducted Focus Group
Discussions (FGD) with Farmers, Fisher folk and Women
Interviewed project beneficiaries (semi-structured questionnaire)
In each study district : Interviewed Land Office officials
District leaders
Sub-district leaders
Additionally interviewed: Other local authorities BPN and BRR officials Project staff NGOs/CSOs Donors
A team of 8 researchers jointly funded by GOI and MDF/World Bank
Desk review of project documents Randomly selected research sites Three months of intensive field research in 37
village with 269 individual beneficiary interviews and 62 focus group discussions conducted, more than 700 total informants
PIBA Study Areas
Aceh Province, Northern Sumatra, Indonesia
Key Findings,Conclusions and
Recommendations
6
Raised public awareness on land issues immediately after tsunami.
Supported land policy development. Established long-term goals.
In realizing the project objectives: Modest contributions towards
recovery of security of land tenure. Moderate contributions towards
recovery of land administration system
7
High beneficiary satisfaction Enhanced perception of legal protection of land rights. Resolution of land disputes. Reasonable accuracy land certificates produced. Seen as an open and transparent, community-based
process.
Issues: Large unmet need and high demand.
Gender concerns were adequately covered in the project design, but not given sufficient focus during project implementation.
Women are under-represented in the village and local institutions. As a result, women’s land rights are easily overlooked or not taken seriously.
Until 2008, joint titling was not promoted and rarely done.
Barriers to women’s participation identified8
Implementation of the land titling process and
beneficiary satisfaction
Gender Concerns
Early identification that land administration system key to reconstruction process.
Project design was appropriate to address complex needs.
Output targets reasonable and achievable.
No dispossession of land ownership found.
9
Project Design and Safeguards
Acceptance and ownership of the CDA process
The Community-Driven Adjudication (CDA) approach has both local legitimacy and legal backing of the government. There is high public confidence in the land title certificates.
The process is seen as reinforcing traditional adat land rights
The restoration of land rights was seen as critical to supporting social stability and securing livelihoods.
Appropriateness of the CDA model The CDA approach is effective in securing land
rights and reducing land conflicts in a post-disaster, post-conflict situation
The CDA Model is portable and replicable in a wide range of conditions. 10
Policy and Institutional Development to support preparedness
The restoration of land rights was seen as critical to supporting social stability and securing livelihoods.
National Land Policy should include clear focus on disaster preparedness
Land institutions should be prepared to respond to new and increasing demands (proactive approach)
Building partnerships is the key to success (Gov – NGO – CSO – Donor – local authorities – communities)
Data and proper data management /storage are critical speedy recovery
11
12
Thank You - Terima kasih