What is the current TRAC Tier on the 2016-2019

Major New Construction Program List?Tier III

Please identify the project mode (roadway, transit

or frieght):Roadway

Project Description:

Proposed TRAC funding is for the completion of Right-of-Way acquisition for a 5.2 mile section of

two lane highway with additional climbing lanes and with a full interchange at SR 775 as part of a

future four lane limited access highway. This current phase is known as Phase 2 of the Chesapeake

By-pass project. This project has been listed as part of the Southeast Ohio Plan.

ODOT District District 9 County Lawrence

ODOT PID 75923 Project Mode Roadway

Project Information

Application ID 2016-D09-01 Date Submitted 6/28/2016

Project Name LAW-Chesapeake Bypass Phase 2 / LAW-7-2.17

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 1 of 13

Roadway Segments No

Local Investments No

What Type of Application Are you Submitting?

Existing TRAC Project - Tier I, II or III project

seeking additional funds to advance to the

next stage of project development.

Existing TRAC Projects

Existing TRAC projects are not required to submit the complete application. The information submitted in your most recent application will be used in the evaluation and scoring of the application. However, since the level of project detail continually increases you can choose to update the following sections:

Project Development Schedule & Milestones Yes

City Chillicothe

State OH Zip Code: 45601

Phone (740) 774-9067

Email christopher.pridemore@dot.ohio.gov

Address650 Eastern Avenue

Project Sponsor Information

Project Name LAW-Chesapeake Bypass Phase 2 / LAW-7-2.17

Sponsoring Agency ODOT - District 9

Project Contact Christopher Pridemore

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 2 of 13

Utility Relocation Not Started 12/1/2017

Detailed Design In Progress 12/1/2017

Right-of-way Acquisition In Progress 12/1/2017

Preliminary Engineering Studies Complete 6/15/2001

Environmental / NEPA Approval Complete 6/15/2001

Status Date

Planning Studies Complete 1/1/2001

Interchange Modification Study (IMS) /

Interchange Justification Studies (IJS)Not Started 1/0/1900

Project Schedule

New projects are required to supply project milestone information. Please select the status of each

milestone below as either Not Yet Started, In Progress or Completed. Additionally please enter the

corresponding date for the milestone and status.

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 3 of 13

0 0 0 0

0 0 0

New Roadways / New Alignment 0

Begin Latitude Begin longitude End Latitude End longitude

0 0 0

0 0 0

Secondary Roadway

Segments

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

ODOT NLFID Begin Point End Point

Primary Roadway

Segment0 0 0

Transportation Information

In an effort to understand the complex issues associated with the project TRAC collects a variety of transportation related data and information in the evaluation process including: congestion data, safety data, truck traffic, and model derived transportation values; such as, cost/benefit analysis and air quality. The roadway segments associated with the application is the basis of this analysis. Transit and Freight related projects should identify the roadway segments that will receive the benefit from projects

New project applications must identify the primary roadway segment that will be improved by the project and ancillary roadways that will be improved as part of the project.

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 4 of 13

Truck Miles Traveled (TMT) Reduction 0

Existing Freight Capacity 0

Existing Freight Volume / Existing Freight Capacity

Ratio0

Freight Capacity Increase 0

Freight Multi-Modal Project Information

Freight Type 0

Route/Number 0

Existing Freight Volume 0

Existing Peak Hour Ridership / Capacity Ratio 0

Added Peak Hour Capacity 0

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction 0

Route/Number 0

Peak Hour Ridership 0

Existing Capacity 0

Transit Multi-Modal Project Information

Transit Type 0

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 5 of 13

Please provide a brief explanation as to how this project will connect an STS resource with a

local freight or transit facility or resource

Improves access to "The Point" Intermodal Industrial Park. This facility has highway access, rail

access with an operational siding of the Norfolk-Southern Heartland Corridor, and an existing deep

water port and barge facility on the Ohio River.

Will the project facilitate a connection between two

or more corridors or modal hubs identified on the

STS?

No

Please provide a brief explanation as to how this project will facilitate a connection between

two or more STS resources.

0

Will the project connect an STS resource with a local

freight or transit facility or resource?Yes

Strategic Transportation System (STS) Connections

The Strategic Transportation System (STS), identified as part of Access Ohio 2040 - ODOT’s long

range transportation plan - stratifies Ohio’s significant transportation corridors and inter-modal

hubs across Ohio. Additional information about the STS and Access Ohio 2040 can be view at

the Access Ohio 2040 Website

Is the project part of an STS corridor? Yes

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 6 of 13

What is the estimated percentage of road route

miles served by transit routes (excluding ADA/Para

Transit) within the project area?

68%

Warehouse 104,073

Commerical 2,590,805

Insitutional 1,853,242

Water and Sewer Service 100%

What is the estimated square footage for the following building types within the calculated project

area?

Light Industrial -

Heavy Industrial -

Estimated Project Area Acerage 9,677

What is the estimated percentage of acres being served by the local services within the

estimated project area calculated above?

Local Streets and Roadways 50%

Electrical Service 100%

Local Investment Factors

Built Out Local AttributesLocal Investment factors analysis and evaluation of the dollar value of existing, local built-out attributes such as streets, water, and land use. For this analysis TRAC has standardized the project area as a one-mile "rectangular" buffer around the primary roadway segment. Additionally TRAC also considers percentage of acres served by local services within the rectangular buffer with the the following

formula: (Length of the primary roadway segment in miles + 2 miles) x 2 miles x 640 acres)

What is the length of the primary roadway segment

being improved by the project?5.560

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 7 of 13

Poverty Rate Data Source

Sub-County Unempolyment Rate

Unempolyment Rate Data Source

0

0

0

As part of the application scoring process, ODOT collects county level information as the standard measurement for poverty and unemployment factors; however, if a project sponor provides defensible data at a sub-county or census tract level, TRAC can consider that level of geographic analysis for scoring and evaluation.

Do you want to enter distress values for a sub-

county area to be used in the evaluation of this

application?

No - I want to use the information collected

by ODOT.

County 0

Sub-County Poverty Rate 0

What is the dollar value of committed or recent

public investment in new, non-project

infrastructure within the project area? (Millions)

$ 30,000,000

What is the present value of private investment in

existing facilities within the project area? (Millions) $ 255,543,000

Local Investment Factors

Economic Distress - Poverty & Unemployment Rates

What is the estimated percentage of existing

building square footage that is currently vacant?5%

New Local Investments

TRAC will consider the monetized value of public investments or commitments for new, non-project infrastructure and private investments within 5-year time horzion prior to and after the date of this TRAC Application.

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 8 of 13

-$ -$ -$ 100.00$

Will additional TRAC funds be needed for future

phases of development or construction?Yes

PE DD RW CO

PE DD RW CO

-$ 4.77$ 6.50$ -$

CO Funding Request -$ 0

Total New TRAC Funding Reqeust 11.55$

Has TRAC previously committed funding for the

development or construction of this project?Yes

DD Funding Request -$ 0

RW Funding Request 11.55$ 2017

Which phase(s) you are requesting new TRAC

funding for as part of this application?RW - Right-of-way

Amount (Millions) Requested Fiscal Year

PE Funding Request -$ 0

Project Funding Plan

TRAC Funding ReqeustPlease indicate the amount of funding being requested by phase and fiscal year. Funding requests should consider the funding that will be needed with the next two fiscal years.

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 9 of 13

Local Funding Totals

PE DD RW CO

-$ -$ -$ 0.10$

PE DD RW CO

-$ -$ -$ -$

-$ -$ -$ -$

Local funding Source (5) 0

Local funding Source (4) 0

PE DD RW CO

PE DD RW CO

-$ -$ -$ -$

-$ -$ -$ 0.05$

Local funding Source (3)Lawrence County Transportaton Improvement

District

Local funding Source (2) Lawrence County Port Authority

PE DD RW CO

PE DD RW CO

-$ -$ -$ 0.05$

Will local funding sources be used in the

development or construction of this project?Yes

What is the total number of local funding sources for

the development and construction of this project?3

Local funding Source (1) Lawrence County Engineer

Local Funding CommitmentsProject Development and construction can be funded with multiple local funding sources. The questions below will help identify the funding sources for this project.

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 10 of 13

% Local % ODOT % OTIC % TRAC

1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.0%

Total Local Total ODOT Total OTIC Total TRAC

0.10$ -$ -$ 122.82$

Funding Totals -$ 4.77$ 18.05$ 100.10$

Total Project Cost 122.92$

New TRAC Funding -$ -$ 11.55$ -$

Future TRAC Funding -$ -$ -$ 100.00$

OTIC Bond Funding -$ -$ -$ -$

Previous TRAC Funding -$ 4.77$ 6.50$ -$

Local Funding -$ -$ -$ 0.10$

ODOT / Earmark Funding -$ -$ -$ -$

Funding Summary

PE DD RW CO

PE DD RW CO

-$ -$ -$ -$

-$ -$ -$ -$

OTIC Turnpike Bond Revenue Funding

Have Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission

(OTIC) Revenue Bonds been committed for the No

ODOT Program or Emark Funding Commitments

Will funding from another ODOT program or

legislative earmarks be used in the development or No

PE DD RW CO

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 11 of 13

Date of Inflated Estimate 1/0/1900

Year of Inflation Estimate $ -

Railroad $ -

Contingency $ -

Total Estimate $ -

Traffic Control $ -

Structures $ -

Retaining Walls $ -

Tier I Construction Estimate

Projects requesting Tier I status are required to submit a budgetary construction estimate. Additionally estimates must be inflated to the anticipated year of construction using ODOT's 2014-20818 Business Plan Inflation Estimator Excel worksheet.

Roadway $ -

Drainage $ -

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 12 of 13

District Acknowledgement

Has the appropriate ODOT District Planning Office

been contacted about the development and

construction of this project?

Yes

Has the ODOT District Office provided a letter or

support or acknowledgment for this project?No

Is this project within the boundaries of a

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)?Yes

Please identify the respective MPO. KYOVA

Has the MPO provided a letter or support or

acknowledgment for this project?Yes

MPO & District Acknowledgement

MPO Acknowledgement

Processed: 6/29/2016 2016 TRAC Funding Application 13 of 13

¾¾7

¾¾7

¾¾34 2

¾¾873

¾¾577

£ ¤06

§̈ ¦46

¾¾2

Phase II

Phase I - Comp

lete

Proctorville

Chesapeake

§̈ ¦46Phase IAPhase I

B

HuntingtonM

ap #

1C

hesa

peak

e By

pass

Pha

se II

Loc

atio

n

Lege

nd

Inte

rsta

te

Loca

l Roa

ds

US

Hig

hway

Sta

te R

oute

s

Ü0

10.

5M

iles

M

ap #

2 E

cono

mic

Impa

ct

Phas

e 2

Proj

ect

Phas

e 1

Proj

ect O

uter

belt

Oth

er

1 M

ile

Eco

nom

ic

Influ

ence

A

rea

Indu

stri

al A

reas

C

omm

erci

al /

Offi

ce A

reas

1

Mile

Zon

e

K

ey E

mpl

oym

ent C

ente

rs

The

Poi

nt In

term

odal

Po

rt/L

ogis

tics C

ente

r (S

uper

fund

Red

veop

men

t)

(New

FE

D E

X R

egio

nal

Gro

und

Cen

ter)

Dow

ntow

n

Hun

tingt

on/

Pullm

an S

quar

e

Mar

shal

l U

nive

rsity

Ohi

o U

nive

rsity

So

uthe

rn

Eas

t Cam

pus

Tri

-Sta

te A

irpo

rt

FE

D E

X Re

gion

al A

ir

Ope

ratio

ns

St. M

ary’

s M

edic

al

Map

#2

E

cono

mic

Impa

ct

Map