Upload
amber-petty
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone Interview Data Preliminary Analysis. Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004. Track B Progress to Date. [2] Meeting with State Officials while in Tuscola County. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Project Management Committee MeetingWashington, D.C.
September 21, 2004
Independent Study to Assess FutureIndependent Study to Assess FutureSavings from Mitigation, Track BSavings from Mitigation, Track B
Telephone Interview DataTelephone Interview DataPreliminary AnalysisPreliminary Analysis
3
Track B Progress - ICommunity
FEMACall w/ Region
StateVisit
Federal Visit
FEMA LetterSent
Given OK to Start Calls
Hayward, CA
11/25/03 12/15/03(Sacramento)
12/16/03(Oakland)
12/19/03 1/8/04
Jefferson Co., AL Project Impact
1/5/04 Not Planned(Clanton)
2/11/04(Atlanta)
1/15/04 2/5/04
Horry Co., SC Project Impact
1/5/04 2/18/04(Columbia)
2/13/04(Atlanta)
1/15/04 2/7/04
Freeport, NY Project Impact
2/5/04 Not Planned(Albany)
2/27/04(New York City)
3/1/04 3/11/04
Tuscola, MI
1/27/04 3/17/04(Lansing)
2/18/04(Chicago)
3/4/04 3/10/04
Jamestown, ND Project Impact
3/30/04 8/16/04(Bismarck)
4/27/04(Denver)
4/15/04 4/26/04
Multnomah Co, OR Project Impact
6/23/04 Not Planned(Salem)
8/2/04(Seattle)
7/15/04 8/9/04
Orange, CA
Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
Fort Walton Bch., FL Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
Mandeville, LA Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
4
Track B Progress - IICommunity
Given OK to Start Calls
Interviews Completed
CommunityVisited
BCA DataCollected
Bibliography Created
Hayward, CA
1/8/04 3/12/04 1/22/04 Complete Complete
Jefferson Co., AL Project Impact
2/5/04 3/10/04 4/6/04 Complete Complete
Horry Co., SC Project Impact
2/7/04 3/2/04 4/20/04 Complete Complete
Freeport, NY Project Impact
3/11/04 7/1/04 7/15/04 Complete Complete
Tuscola, MI
3/10/04 7/15/04 3/17/04 Complete Complete
Jamestown, ND Project Impact
4/26/04 7/25/04 8/17/04 Complete Pending
Multnomah Co, OR Project Impact
8/9/04 In Process Pending Complete Pending
Orange, CA
Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
Fort Walton Bch., FL Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
Mandeville, LA Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
6
Informant Participation Status
88
67
52
0102030405060708090
100
# In
divi
dual
s
Referred Approached Interviewed
7
Informant Participation Status by Community
15
21
10 10
1517
1311
79
12
15
7
10
67
11 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
Hayward
Jefferson Co.
Horry Co.
Freeport
Tuscola
Jamestown
Referred Approached Interviewed
# In
div
idu
als
8
Reasons Informants WereNot Approached (n=21)
• Likely bias (e.g., State Hazard Mitigation Officer, Federal Hazard Mitigation Officer)
• Insufficient/inaccurate contact information
• Individual working outside of the country/moved/retired
• Interviews already completed for community
• Job title/role suggests minimal contribution to study– Approved by Track B team leader
9
Informant Referrals by Community FAKE DATA
02468
101214161820
Hayward
Jefferson Co.
Horry Co.
Freeport
Tuscola
Jamestown
# R
efer
rals
Avg. Referrals per Person Tot. Individuals Referred
10
Total Number of Contacts Needed to Complete Interviews
(Includes Telephone, Mail, Fax, Email)
98
69
50
8193
79
7 10 6 7 11 11
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Hayward
Jefferson Co.
Horry Co.
Freeport
Tuscola
Jamestown
(n )
Total Contacts Interviews
11
Index Informants
• Key individuals with knowledge of mitigation activities within the community
• Identified based on:
– FEMA recommendation
– Preliminary data analysis
• Provided research staff with names and contact information of potential informants
• Provided local “endorsement” of study
12
Acting AssistantCity ManagerREFUSED2/3/04
Assistant Director of Public WorksINTERVIEWED 1/27/04 1
City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED 1/30/04 1
Dir. Public WorksINTERVIEWED 2/9/04
Chief BuildingInspectorREFUSED 2/5/04
Associate CivilEngineerINTERVIEWED2/11/04
SeniorPlannerREFUSED 2/5/04
HAZMAT ProgramCoordinatorINTERVIEWED 2/18/04
Fire ChiefREFUSED2/5/04
Emergency OperationsREFUSED 2/9/04
Division Head of Water FacilityINTERVIEWED 2/19/04
1 Index Informant2 Independent Network
Director, Community &Economic DevelopmentINTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2
Public Information OfficerINTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Hayward
FEMA
Deputy Publicity Dir. for UtilitiesNot Approached
Cal State HaywardNot Approached
13
FEMA
Director, County EMAInterviewed 1
3/1/04
1 Index Informant
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Jefferson Co.
CountyCommissionerInterviewed 1
3/4/04
Director, Land DevelopmentInterviewed 3/4/04
Land Development eInterviewed 2/24/04
Land Development prInterviewed 2/17/04
Former City Planner, Consultant Interviewed 2/23/04
Admin. Assistant,County EMA Interviewed 2/24/04
City NFIPNot Approached
Director, Inspection ServicesNot Approached
County GIS ManagerNot Approached
CountyCommissionerRefused 3/8/04
Dir., Local Land TrustInterviewed 3/4/04
Fire Chief, City of TarrantNot Approached
Auburn UniversityNot Approached
USGSNot Approached
Dir. of County Inspection ServicesNot Approached
State Hazard Mitigation OfficerNot Approached
President, Local Engineering CompanyInterviewed 3/10/04
Hydrologist, Local Engineering CompanyInterviewed 3/10/04 County EMA
Not Approached
County EMANot Approached
14
FEMA
1 Index Informant
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Horry Co.
Emergency Planner,County EMDInterviewed 1
2/18/04
Director, Emergency ServicesCounty Red Cross ChapterInterviewed 3/19/04
Meteorologist, Local Television StationInterviewed 3/1/04
Public Safety Director,County EMDInterviewed 2/25/04
Property Manager, County EMDInterviewed 3/2/04
Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Clemson UniversityInterviewed 2/23/04
National Weather ServiceNot Approached
Head Building Official,City of ConwayNot Approached
Fire Chief,County Fire DepartmentRefused 3/8/04
Director, County Storm Water ManagementNot Approached
15
FEMA
1 Index Informant
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Freeport
Grant Administrator,Public WorksInterviewed 1
3/23/04
Floodplain Manager,Superintendent of Buildings, Mitigation CoordinatorInterviewed 3/18/04
Manager,Public WorksInterviewed 3/16/04
Village Trustee; Owner, Local Insurance AgencyInterviewed 3/23/04
Business Owner, Local Marine StorageInterviewed 4/14/04
Coordinator, Emergency Management TeamInterviewed 5/25/04
Director, Emergency ManagementInterviewed 4/21/04
Business Owner, Local Restaurant Refused 5/27/04
Village Trustee Refused 5/21/04
Village Engineer,Department of Public WorksNot Approached
16
FEMA
1 Index Informant
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Tuscola
County Drain CommissionerInterviewed 1 4/5/04
Engineer, Local Eng. GroupRefused 4/6/04
Prog. Admin., Intercounty DrainsInterviewed 5/25/04
Lieutenant, State Police Dept.Interviewed 4/5/04
Township Mgr., TittabawasseeInterviewed 4/1/04
Engineer, Local Company Interviewed 3/25/04
Flood Specialist,City of Vassar Interviewed 4/2/04
President, Local BusinessNot Approached
Environmental Engineer,State Dept. Environmental QualityInterviewed 5/24/04
Engineer, Local Eng. GroupInterviewed 4/1/04
Preliminary Research
Manager, City of VassarInterviewed 1 3/25/04
Director, Public WorksCity of FrankenmuthInterviewed 1 4/2/04
State Hazard Mitigation Officer Not Approached
Local Construction Co.Interviewed 1 3/22/04
Engineer, Canadian CompanyNot Approached
171 Index Informant
Flow Chart of InterviewNetwork in Jamestown
City Engineer Interviewed 6/4/04
Consultant Interviewed 6/7/04
Local Red Cross ChapterInterviewed 6/18/04
Parks and Recreation Interviewed 6/30/04
State House of Reps. Interviewed 7/9/04
Weather SpotterRefused 6/4/04
Training Office, Fire Dept.Refused 6/8/04
City Fire Chief Interviewed 6/8/04
Police ChiefNot Approached
State Department of Emergency ManagementNot Approached
City AdministratorInterviewed 7/1/04
FEMA
MayorInterviewed 1
6/1/04
Director, State Dept. of Emergency Mgmt.Refused 7/6/04
Asst. City EngineerRefused 7/6/04
President, Amateur Radio Association Interviewed 6/17/04
Local Cable Services Interviewed ??/??/04
County Emergency Manager Interviewed 6/21/04
18
Interview Informant Job Titles (N=52)
70%
15%
15%
Community Official
NGO/Community Partner
Local Informant
20
Informant Perceptions of Community Risk
123456789
10
Quake Wind Flood
VeryLow
Very High
(n=47, n=48, n=49)
21
Percent of Informants who Believe the Community Has a Natural Hazard
Mitigation Program
83100 100 100
5060
0102030405060708090
100
% Y
es%
Yes
In your opinion, does the community have a natural hazard mitigation program? (N=47)
22
Informants’ Knowledge of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation
Program
3.4
6.7
3.5
7.97.3
4.8
123456789
10
Not Very
Much
Very Much
Ave
rage
Kn
owle
dge
How much do you know about the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (N=39)
23
Informants’ Assessment of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Program?
(Community Officials)
• Insert Sample quotes.
What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?
24
Informants’ Assessment of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Program?
(CBO/Community Partners)
• Insert Sample quotes.
What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?
25
Informants’ Assessment of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Program?
(Local Informants)
• Insert Sample quotes.
What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?
26
Informants’ Assessment of the Appropriateness and Effectiveness of Natural Hazard Mitigation Programs
123456789
10
Appropriate Effective
How appropriate/effective do you consider these [natural hazard mitigation] efforts? (N=40)
27
Informants’ Perceptions of how the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation
Program Compares to Others
In your opinion, how does the community’s natural hazard mitigation program compare to natural hazard mitigation programs in other communities? (N=38)
Much Better
3.84.3
3.84.1
4.7 5
1
2
3
4
5
Hayward
Jefferson Co.
Horry Co.
Freeport
Tuscola
Jamestown
Much Worse
About the Same
ME
AN
28
Informants’ Perceptions of Benefits Provided by Mitigation Activities
Which of the following benefits were provided by [this mitigation activity]? (N=?)
29
Informants’ Perceptions of Primary Objectives/Benefits of Mitigation
Activities
What was the major objective of this activity? (N=?)
30
Informants’ Perceptions of Success Meeting Major Objectives with VS.
without Mitigation Activities
How would you rate the community’s success in meeting this [major] objective with/without this activity? (N=?)