Upload
lyhuong
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Report for DACS Contract Corresponding author: 1
(Project Number 00123945) Jonathan F. Day 2
Florida Medical Entomol. Lab, 3
Running head: Arbovirus Surveillance Program 200 9th
St. SE, Vero Beach, 4
Florida 32962, USA 5
Phone: (772) 778-7200 x 132 6
Fax: (772) 778-7205 7
E-mail: [email protected] 8
9
10
Implementation of a Comprehensive and Sustainable Arbovirus 11
Surveillance Program at the County Level—Year 1 Preliminary Final Report 12
13
14
15
16
Jonathan F. Day and Gregory K. Ross 17
University of Florida, IFAS, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, 200 9th
St. SE, Vero Beach, FL 18
32962 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
ABSTRACT 28
New technologies have come online recently that have the potential of enhancing local arboviral 29
surveillance efforts and the forecasting of arboviral transmission events. These technologies utilize a 30
host of environmental data including Doppler radar-based total precipitation and Keetch Byram Drought 31
Indexing (KBDI), both at a 4 km2 resolution and MOSIAC modeling at an 11 km2 resolution. These 32
three environmental models have yet to be integrated into a single local arboviral surveillance protocol. 33
During the 2014 arboviral transmission season 36 sentinel chicken seroconversions, three EEE equine 34
cases, and four West Nile human cases were reported by the Volusia County Mosquito Control (VCMC). 35
The majority of the seroconversions occurred between July and September. Seroconversions were 36
reported at all 13 sentinel chicken sites maintained by VCMC suggesting that arboviral transmission was 37
widespread throughout the county. Here we propose a two-year research project. During the first year an 38
in-depth analysis of arboviral transmission in Volusia County during 2014 will be conducted focusing 39
on the daily Doppler radar-based precipitation totals, KBDI, and MOSIAC model signatures at each of 40
the 13 sentinel chicken flocks where arboviral transmission was reported. Environmental signatures will 41
be identified that indicated or preceded the 2014 transmission events based on all available data. During 42
the second year we will track the same environmental signatures in real-time at each sentinel chicken 43
site searching for the arboviral transmission signatures identified in the 2014 data set. Additional data, 44
such as mosquito abundance, gravid indices, exit trap data, and bird counts will be integrated into the 45
program during year two. Predicted transmission events will be verified by tracking sentinel chicken 46
seroconversions. The strengths of individual surveillance technologies or various combinations of the 47
three technologies will be evaluated and recommendations made concerning the best combination of 48
methods for arboviral surveillance at the local level. The goal of this project is to establish a 49
comprehensive, sustainable, and effective arboviral surveillance program at the mosquito control district 50
level by using all available environmental and biological surveillance data. The established program will 51
be used as an arboviral surveillance model for other MCDs throughout Florida. 52
53
3
KEY WORDS 54
Arboviral surveillance, environmental triggers, County-level disease surveillance 55
INTRODUCTION 56
The objective of this study is to establish a comprehensive, sustainable, and effective arboviral 57
surveillance program at the mosquito control program level by using all available environmental and 58
biological surveillance data. Arboviral transmission surveillance currently relies on three main 59
components: vertebrate sentinels, mosquito abundance data (including mosquito pooling for viral 60
isolation), and human cases. When used together, these three methods can provide a clear concise 61
picture of the current state of arboviral activity if the data are interpreted correctly. However, when these 62
methods are used to predict arboviral transmission, especially at the epidemic scale, major problems 63
with the surveillance methods becomes apparent. Sentinel chickens are unevenly distributed in space 64
and when seroconversions occur they provide little lead time for an operational mosquito control 65
response. Mosquito pooling, suffers from the same issues and is also expensive and labor intensive. 66
Human surveillance provides the data too late for mosquito control and health departments to have an 67
impact on virus transmission. 68
Historically, spatial and temporal arboviral surveillance results have been reported on a large 69
scale. For example, CDC Arbonet results are reported at the state level for West Nile positive sentinels, 70
wild birds, horses, and humans. To date, there has been little effort to integrate environmental factors 71
(rainfall and temperature) with the biological factors (mosquito abundance and age structure and 72
amplification host 73
abundance and age structure) that drive arboviral amplification on a county-level spatial scale. 74
The relationship between rainfall and vector abundance, reproduction, and dispersal has been 75
well documented (Shaman et al. 2004a, 2004b, 2005). Two predictive models have been developed for 76
the seasonal prediction of epidemic scale arboviral transmission (Day and Shaman 2008). The primary 77
model was developed in 2006 and estimates the real-time risk of SLEV/WNV amplification and 78
transmission based on Modeled Water Table Depth (MWTD). This model identifies areas of interest 79
4
(AOIs) in peninsular Florida. A second FMEL model was introduced in 2009. This model is based on 80
the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) and estimates the real-time risk of arboviral amplification and 81
transmission. The model identifies AOIs throughout Florida. Both models estimate the risk of epidemic 82
scale arboviral transmission based on environmental factors that have been shown to be driving forces of 83
arboviral amplification and transmission in Florida and in other parts of North America. Different 84
environmental input variables are used for the datasets of each model, as are different ecological 85
assumptions specific to the biology of each major arbovirus found in Florida. Both models also assume 86
that there are populations of competent mosquito vectors and susceptible avian amplification hosts in the 87
AOIs identified as high risk by the models. 88
There are currently no available models that estimate the risk of sporadic arboviral amplification 89
and transmission on a local scale. Here we propose to build such a model for use by mosquito control in 90
Volusia County, Florida to monitor and predict arboviral transmission risk. This model will integrate 91
Doppler rainfall, KBDI, and MOSAIC models for use at a 4 to 11 km2 resolution around the 12 existing 92
sentinel chicken flocks located within the county. We know from past modelling efforts that accurate 93
real-time acquisition of precipitation and soil moisture indices are of critical importance for the tracking 94
of arboviral vectors including Culiseta melanura, Culex erraticus, Culex nigripalpus and Mansonia spp. 95
populations. Doppler radar provides a source of real-time precipitation data on a local scale. The well-96
established relationship between rainfall, vector dispersal, and arboviral amplification allows us to use 97
Doppler radar and the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) (Keetch and Byram 1968) to track standing 98
and surface water as predictors of mosquito movement, mosquito reproduction, viral amplification, and 99
disease transmission risk (Shaman and Day 2005, Shaman et al. 2002). We propose that tracking of both 100
Doppler Radar-based Precipitation (DRP) totals and KBDI based can be used to predict vector mosquito 101
population movements and reproduction. 102
103
104
105
5
106
RESULTS 107
During the first year, the process of an in-depth analysis of Volusia County arboviral 108
transmission events and environmental signatures has been started. During the 2014 arboviral 109
transmission season 33 sentinel chicken West Nile seroconversions and four West Nile human cases 110
were reported by the Volusia County Mosquito Control (VCMC) (Table 1). The majority of the 111
seroconversions occurred between July and September. Seroconversions were reported at all 12 sentinel 112
chicken sites maintained by VCMC suggesting that arboviral transmission was widespread throughout 113
the county (Figures 2 - 3). In addition to the sentinel chicken arboviral seroconversions there were four 114
reported West Nile human cases reported in the county. Exact spatial and temporal environmental data 115
has been collected for each of these 33 transmission events. For each transmission event we have 116
calculated Doppler Radar-Based Precipitation (DRP), KBDI, and MOSAIC soil-moisture model data for 117
the three weeks prior to the reported transmission event. The National Weather Service (NWS) DRP was 118
download at: http://water.weather.gov/ahps/ in daily and hourly temporal formats. The data are at a 119
spatial resolution of 4km2 and projected in the Hydrologic Rainfall Analysis Project (HRAP) grid 120
coordinate system available for all of the lower 48 United States. Data was formatted for inclusion into a 121
GIS and weekly Doppler averages were calculated for 33 sites in Volusia county (Figure 5). Sites were 122
selected using a 4km buffer around the 12 sentinel sites to ensure that relevant environmental data was 123
selected (Figure 1). 124
To calculate the KBDI, 24-hour rainfall totals and the maximum daily temperature are needed. 125
The Florida Department of Forestry (DOF) combines traditional rainfall observations with data derived 126
from the National Weather Service's WSR88D (NEXRAD) radar network to provide a detailed view of 127
rainfall across the state to calculate the KBDI. Temperature is routinely measured at a number of sites 128
across Florida and since temperature is continuous, interpolation to regions that lack measurements is 129
straightforward. The calculation of KBDI by the Florida DOF is performed through an automated 130
procedure and a surface map for Florida is created and published daily. We have coordinated with the 131
6
Florida DOF to create a web portal for the real-time daily download of raw KBDI values for Florida and 132
portions of southern Georgia and southern Alabama. The web portal is available on the Florida DOF 133
website at http://www.fl-dof.com where downloads can be made at any time. We have automated the 134
downloading of KBDI datasets is automated through the use of computer software code written and 135
maintained by personnel at the Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory in Vero Beach. Downloaded 136
datasets were formatted for inclusion into a GIS and weekly KBDI averages were calculated for 30 sites 137
in Volusia county (Figure 4). Sites were selected using a 4km buffer around the 12 sentinel sites to 138
ensure that relevant environmental data was selected. 139
Analysis of Doppler and KBDI data has been performed within a Geographical Information 140
System (GIS) developed and maintained at the FMEL. The downloaded datasets were converted to 141
different formats (GRID and Feature Class) to allow for final analysis. Conversion of datasets was 142
automated using the GIS and the output files will be maintained within an Environmental Systems 143
Research Institute (ESRI©) Geodatabase. Each Florida KBDI dataset consists of 11,679 data points with 144
a spatial resolution of 4.0 km2 and a temporal resolution of 24 hours. Each Florida Doppler dataset 145
consist of 14,930 data points with a spatial resolution of 4.0 km2 and a temporal resolution of 24 hours. 146
Mosaic model simulations are produced through the North American Land Data Assimilation 147
Systems (NLDAS) project-2, and are available in hourly time steps at 0.125 degree resolution from 1979 148
through the present (NLDAS 2010, Mitchell et al. 2004). At this resolution (approximately 13 km by 13 149
km), each grid cell resolves hydrologic conditions at a geographic scale matching the upper limit of the 150
flight range reported for Cx. tarsalis in California (Reisen et al. 1992) and represents an area in which 151
the vector mosquito population and WNV transmission dynamics are likely localized. The Mosaic 152
model uses three soil layers with thicknesses from top to bottom of 10, 30, and 160 cm, respectively, and 153
a uniform rooting depth of 40 cm. Water storage in each model column layer is the weighted average of 154
the water storage from the column tiles. During the first year, we have acquired two Mosaic model-155
simulated estimates of land surface wetness: root zone soil moisture (RZSM), which represents water 156
content in the top 40 cm of the soil column, and layer 1 soil moisture (L1SM), which represents water 157
7
content in the top 10 cm of the soil column. For the ongoing analysis, local hourly RZSM and L1SM 158
estimates are each temporally aggregated to weekly averages and compared with the spatiotemporal 159
distribution of arboviral (EEEV, HJV, WNV, and SLEV) seropositive sentinel chickens, human WN 160
cases, and equine EEE cases. The MOSIAC datasets are currently going through processing and 161
formatting in preparation of analysis. 162
During the reporting period, we have met with Volusia County Mosquito Control personnel on to 163
become familiar with the district’s surveillance program and to initiate a data transfer of necessary data. 164
Data received from the district included sentinel chicken flock locations, seroconversion data, mosquito 165
exit trap, and mosquito ovitrap data for the year 2014. Personnel at FMEL have acquired environmental 166
datasets for Volusia County that include land cover/land use, hourly Doppler precipitation, daily Keetch 167
Byram Drought Index (KBDI) data, and hourly MOSIAC modeling data for 2014. In addition to the 168
environmental arboviral drivers discussed above, the biological factors associated with each sentinel 169
chicken transmission event in 2014 have been acquired. Exit trap and Ovitrap date for the three weeks 170
prior to all 33 West Nile sentinel chicken seroconversion events have been acquired and inputted into a 171
spatio-temporal database for analysis. 172
Table 1. 173
SITE WN PERCENTAGE
DAYTONA 2 6.06%
DELTONA 7 5 15.15%
FAIRGROUNDS 5 15.15%
HONTOON 2 1 3.03%
LOUIS 2 6.06%
LPGA 3 9.09%
NEEDLES 3 9.09%
NEW SMYRNA 3 9.09%
OAK HILL GROVE
2 6.06%
ORMOND 2 6.06%
PIERSON 3 9.09%
TATER ROAD 2 6.06%
8
TOTAL 33
174
175
176
Acknowledgments 177
This project was funded by the Florida Legislature. We would like to acknowledge the following 178
organizations and people for these help with this project: Florida Department of Agriculture and 179
Consumer Services, Florida Department of Health, Timothy Hope, and Daniel Forsythe. 180
References Cited 181
Cosgrove, BA. 2003. Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation 182
System (NLDAS) project. Journal of Geophysical Research 108(D22): 8842, /2002JD003118. 183
Day, J. F. 1990. The use of sentinel chickens for arbovirus surveillance in Florida. J. Fla Anti-Mosquito 184
Assoc. 60 (2): 56-61. 185
Day, J. F. and A. L. Lewis. 1992. An integrated approach to SLE surveillance in Indian River County, 186
Florida. Fla J. Publ. Hlth 4: 12-16.Shaman, J., J.F. Day, and M. Stieglitz. 2003. St. Louis 187
encephalitis virus in wild birds during the 1990 south Florida epidemic: the importance of drought, 188
wetting conditions, and the emergence of Culex nigripalpus to arboviral amplification and 189
transmission. J. Med. Entomol. 40:547-554. 190
Day, J.F. and J. Shaman. 2008. Using hydrologic conditions to track the risk of focal and epidemic 191
arboviral transmission in peninsular Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology 45(3):458-469. 192
Florida Department of Health (FDOH). 2014. Surveillance and Control of Selected Arthropod-borne 193
Diseases in Florida. 194
Keetch, J.J and G.M. Byram. 1988. A drought index for forest fire control. Southeast Forest Experiment 195
Station, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper Number SE-38, 32 pp. 196
Koster, R. D. and M. J. Suarez. 1996. Energy and water balance calculations in the Mosaic LSM. NASA 197
Technical Memo. 9: 58. 104606. 198
9
Mesinger F., et al. 2006. North American Regional Reanalysis, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87(3):343-199
360. 200
Mitchell K.E., et al. 2004. The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System 201
(NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partner in a continental distributed hydrological 202
modeling system, J. Geophys. Res. 109: doi:10.1029/2003JD003823. 203
NLDAS-North American Land Data Assimilation Systems Project. 2010. NASA. Digital Media. 204
http://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/. 205
Reisen, W. K., Milby, M. M., and R. P. Meyer. 1992. Population dynamics of adult Culex mosquitoes 206
(Diptera: Culicidae) along the Kern River, Kern County, California, in 1990. J. Med. Entomol. 29: 207
531-543. 208
Seo, D.-J., 1999: Real-time estimation of rainfall fields using radar rainfall and rain gauge data. J. 209
Hydrol., 208, 37-52. 210
Seo, D.-J. and J. Breidenbach, 2002: Real-time correction of spatially nonuniform bias in radar rainfall 211
data using rain gauge measurements. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 93-111. 212
Seo, D.-J., J. Breidenbach, and E. Johnson, 1999: Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar 213
rainfall data. J. Hydrol., 223, 131-147. 214
Shaman, J. and J.F. Day. 2005. Achieving real-time operational hydrologic monitoring and forecasting 215
of mosquito-borne disease transmission. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11:1343-1350. 216
Shaman, J., J.F. Day, and M. Stieglitz. 2002. Drought-induced amplification of St. Louis encephalitis 217
virus, Florida. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8:575-580. 218
Shaman, J., J.F. Day and M. Stieglitz. 2005. Drought-Induced amplification and epidemic transmission 219
of West Nile Virus in south Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology 42:134-141. 220
Shaman, J., J.F. Day, M. Stieglitz, S. Zebiak and M. Cane. 2004a. Seasonal forecast of St. Louis 221
encephalitis virus transmission, Florida. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10:802-809. 222
10
Shaman, J., J.F. Day and M. Stieglitz. 2004b. The spatial-temporal distribution of drought, wetting, and 223
human cases of St. Louis encephalitis in south-central Florida. American Journal of Tropical 224
Medicine and Hygiene 71:251-261. 225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
Figure 1. 245
246
247
248
11
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
Figure 2. 266
267
268
12
269
270
Figure 3. 271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
Figure 4. 280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
Figure 5. 289
290
291
292
293
294
13
295
296
297
Figure 6. 298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
Figure 7. 307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
Figure 8. 315
316
317
318
319
320
14
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
Figure 9. 357