Free dissemination

Study for the European Commission DGTREN unit D3, contact: Andras Toth

Contractor Subcontractors:

2007/ETE/R/114

VITO

July 2007

(Contract- TREN/D1/40-2005/LOT8/S07.56452) Preparatory Studies for Eco-design Requirements of EuPs

Project Report Lot 8: Office lighting

P. Van Tichelen, B. Jansen , T. Geerken, M. Vanden Bosch (Laborelec), V. VanHoof, L. Vanhooydonck (Kreios), A. Vercalsteren

DISCLAIMER & IMPORTANT NOTE The authors accept no liability for any material or immaterial direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. Note: This report contains the results of research by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of the European Commission. In a multi-stakeholder consultation a number of groups and experts provided comments on a preliminary draft of this report prepared by Vito. The report was then revised, benefiting from stakeholder perspectives and input. The views expressed in the report remain those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission or the individuals and organisations that participated in the consultation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................ 5 1 CONTACTS WITH STAKEHOLDERS ............................................ 7 1.1 Website................................................................................................7 1.2 Stakeholder meetings..........................................................................7 1.3 Stakeholder-expert meetings and experts consultation .....................8 1.4 Participation in workshops, conferences and trade fairs ..................8 1.5 Consultations in writing......................................................................8 1.5.1 Inquiry ...................................................................................................................8 1.5.2 Consultation in writing on draft reports ..................................................................9 1.5.3 Other .....................................................................................................................9 2 IDENTIFICATION OF INFORMATION SOURCES.............. ...... 11 3 PLANNING ........................................................................................ 11 ANNEX A MINUTES 1ST STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON

10TH APRIL 2006................................................................................ 13 ANNEX B MINUTES 2ND STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 12 TH

MAY 006............................................................................................. 19 ANNEX C MINUTES STAKEHOLDER MEETING / WORKSHOP ON

02TH APRIL 2007................................................................................ 27 ANNEX D MINUTES OF EXPERT INTERVIEW ELC ON

16TH JUNE 2006.................................................................................. 35 ANNEX E MINUTES STAKEHOLDER-EXPERT CONSULTATION

ON 10TH MAY 2007............................................................................ 37 ANNEX F MINUTES OF VISIT TO TRADE FAIR LIGHT &

BUILDING ON 5 TH & 6TH APRIL 2006 ........................................... 39 ANNEX G WORKSHOP BUY BRIGHT INITIATIVE ELC ................ 4 3 ANNEX H CELMA STRATEGIC FORUM ON 18 TH NOVEMBER 2006

45 ANNEX I MINUTES OF WORKSHOP ‘IAE-ECBS ANNEX 45

ENERGY EFFICIENT ELECTRIC LIGHTING FOR BUILDINGS ON 19TH APRIL 2007......................................................................... 47

ANNEX J MINUTES OF PARTICIPATION IN WORKSHOP “STATUS, PROSPECTS AND STRATEGIES FOR LED’S IN GENERAL LIGHTING”................................................................... 49

ANNEX K BUNDLED COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS ON DRAFT CHAPTERS 1 – 7 AND RESPONSES TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE STAKEHOLDER MEETING / WORKSHOP ON 02 TH APRIL 2007 ........................................................................................ 51

ANNEX L COMMENTS ON CHAPTER 8 ............................................ 73

ANNEX M STAKEHOLDER LIST ON 19 TH JUNE 2007....................... 79 ANNEX N VITO PRESENTATION AT 1 ST STAKEHOLDER

MEETING ON 10TH APRIL 2006..................................................... 87 ANNEX O VITO PRESENTATION AT 2 ND STAKEHOLDER

MEETING ON 12TH MAY 2006........................................................ 91 ANNEX P CELMA PRESENTATION AT THE 2 ND STAKEHOLDER

MEETING ON 12TH MAY 2006........................................................ 95 ANNEX Q VITO PRESENTATION AT 3 TH STAKEHOLDER

MEETING / WORKSHOP ON 02ND MAY 2007.............................. 97 ANNEX R VITO PRESENTATION AT CELMA STRATEGY FORUM

ON 18TH NOVEMBER 2006 ............................................................ 103 ANNEX S CELMA PRESENTATION AT STRATEGY FORUM ON

18TH NOVEMBER 2006................................................................... 105

5

0 INTRODUCTION

The underlying report is the MEEUP Project Report, serving an administrative purpose vis-à-vis the contract and providing more background on how the preparatory study was conceived and the process to arrive at the results. Reporting on the study consists of three parts:

1. Final Report, Lot 8: Office lighting 2. EcoReports for the different BaseCases which can be consulted on the project website

http://www.eup4light.net 3. This Project Report, describing the process to arrive at the above results

The project report answers to the contractual requirements of the service contract and demonstrates that:

• All tasks listed in the MEEUP methodology were performed in close consultation with the European Commission and the stakeholders.

• A project website was created: http://www.eup4light.net to present preliminary data for discussion with the stakeholders related to the EuP preparatory study for public street lighting.

• There has been made an inquiry on the website that was addressed to all registered stakeholders, to collect data of:

o office surface and segmentation in large offices (open plan) and small offices o installed luminaires (ceiling mounted and suspended with direct and indirect

light distribution) o differences between installed and new lighting installations o different kind of lamps, used in office lighting o operating methods (individual control, daylight sensors, presence detection) o renewal and relighting politics.

• Data retrieval was also completed by using Eurostat, extensive literature search, personal contacts and personal experience of the team members.

• Several expert meetings were organised in close cooperation with the European Commission and the expert group (OIL-workgroup) representing the sector organisations CELMA and ELC.

• All intermediate task reports have been disseminated in an open and transparent way to the registered stakeholders by means of the website.

• More than 176 persons were registered on the website as a stakeholder; they were representing sector organisations, lighting experts, pressure groups etc.

• Three stakeholder meetings were held in Brussels. The project started with a ‘KickOff’ meeting that was held at the EC on 14th March 2006. The final report was delivered on 16th June 2007. This underlying Project Report provides the minutes of meetings and the presentations as well as the comments from stakeholders on the draft documents.

7

1 CONTACTS WITH STAKEHOLDERS

1.1 Website

People could register as stakeholder on the website and were asked if they wanted to be included in a public stakeholder list. The public list of registered stakeholders on 19th June 2007 and their interests can be found in Annex M . In this list 216 persons are registered, with 83 persons from large companies, 56 from SMEs and 160 have specific interest in street lighting luminaires. Some people are component or lamp manufacturer with no explicit interest for office lighting or street lighting. Registered stakeholder are from 24 countries. Web statistics are included in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Web statistics

1.2 Stakeholder meetings

Three stakeholder meetings were held in Brussels in the offices of the EC: o 10th April 2006: First stakeholder meeting in Brussels (see Annex A . o 12th May 2006: Second stakeholder meeting in Brussels (see Annex B . o 02nd April 2007: Final stakeholder meeting/workshop in Brussels (see Annex C .

8

The minutes of these meetings can be found in this project report in the annexes A, B and C as mentioned before. The presentations that were displayed on these meetings are included in Annex N ,Annex O , Annex P and Annex Q .

1.3 Stakeholder-expert meetings and experts consult ation

Also several stakeholder expert meetings and expert consultations were held: o 16th June 2006: Expert interview at ELC, Brussels (see Annex D ); o 10th May 2007: Stakeholder-expert consultation at ASSIL, Milan (see Annex E ).

1.4 Participation in workshops, conferences and tra de fairs

o 5th and 6th April 2006: Visit trade fair ‘Light & Building at Frankfurt (see Annex F ); o 30th and 31th May 2006: Workshop Buy Bright at ELC, Brussels (see Annex G ); o 18th November 2006: CELMA strategy forum, Brussels (see Annex H and Annex R

and Annex S ); o 19th April 2007: Workshop IEA-ECBCS Annex 45 Energy Efficient Electric Lighting

for Buildings- open session (see Annex I ); o 03th & 04th May 2007: Workshop participation" Status, Prospects and Strategies for

LEDs in General Lighting", organized by: The European Commission, Directorate-General JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Renewable Energies Unit together with ASSIL-Italy (see Annex J ).

1.5 Consultations in writing

1.5.1 Inquiry

An inquiry about existing installations and politics for office lighting was executed. This inquiry was putted on the project website and all stakeholders were invited to fill in these inquiry. Information was asked about:

• existing office building stock, surface, distribution between large (open plan) offices and small offices and annual growth rate,

• existing lighting installations, renewal period, percentage of electronic ballasts in existing and new installations, direct or direct/indirect luminaires different types of installed lamps,

• use of controls (daylight sensors, presence detection) in new installations. Only four answers were received.

9

The questionnaire and the summary of the responses can be found in the final report of the study (Annex K of the Final Report). To complete the information, estimations from CELMA/ELC were taken into account.

1.5.2 Consultation in writing on draft reports

Comments from stakeholders on draft chapters 1-7 and the responses that were given can be found in Annex K . These comments were extensively discussed on the stakeholder meeting / workshop that was held on 02th April 2007 at the European Commission in Brussels. Comments from stakeholders on draft chapter 8 can be found in Annex L .

1.5.3 Other

The authors also wish to thank the many people that supplied information by e-mail, phone and websites during the elaboration of the draft final report. Much of this information is included in the study; consult therefore the reference list in the final report.

11

2 IDENTIFICATION OF INFORMATION SOURCES

Please consult the reference list in the Final Report.

3 PLANNING

Hereafter is a task per task chronology as executed including publication dates: 10 May 2007: Deadline for comments on chapter 8. 24 April 2007: Publication of ‘Integrated version of draft final report’ with updates on Tasks 1 – 7, including also Task 8. 18 April 2007: Publication of ‘Draft Interim Task Report - Task 8 Scenario, policy, impact and sensitivity analysis’. 02 April 2007: Final stakeholder meeting in Brussels. 28 March 2007: Deadline for comments on draft final chapters 5 and 7. 21 March 2007: Deadline for comments on draft final chapters 1-4 and 6. 06 March 2007: Publication of ‘Draft Interim Task Report’ - Tasks 7 Improvement potential’. 06 March 2007: Publication of ‘Draft Interim Task Report’ - Tasks 5 Definition of the base case’. 14 February 2007: Publication of 'Draft Interim Task Report - Task: 6 Technical analysis BAT and BNAT’. 14 February 2007: Publication of 'Draft Interim Task Report - Task: 4 Technical analysis of existing products’ 22 December 2006: Publication of 'Draft Interim Task Report - Task: 2 Economic and market analysis’. 05 December 2007: Publication of 'Draft Interim Task Report - Task: 3 Consumer behaviour and local infrastructure’. 27 November 2006: Publication of 'Draft Interim Task Report - Task: 1 Definition' 03 January 2007: Interim project report sent to EC. 29 November 2006: General inquiry sent out to all registerd people on the website. 12 May 2006: Second stakeholder meeting in Brussels 10 April 2006: First stakeholder meeting in Brussels

13

ANNEX A MINUTES 1ST STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 10TH APRIL 2006

Preparatory Eco-design studies Lot 8 and 9 Office and Public Street Lighting

1ST STAKEHOLDER MEETING 10 APR.2006 Minutes by : Bart Jansen Date: 10 April 2006, 10.00h Location: Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Rue de Mot 24, Brussels Organisation: VITO (service contract to the European Commission, DG TREN) Documents: http://www.eup4light.net Attendance: András Tóth DG TREN, responsible Lots 8, 9, Consultation Forum, Coordination between lots, horizontal issues andras.toth@cec.eu.int Paul Van Tichelen VITO, Project Manager Energy Technology, Lighting expert Coördinator contractor paul.vantichelen@vito.be Theo Geerken VITO, Project Manager Product & Environmental studies theo.geerken@vito.be Bart Jansen VITO, Researcher Product & Environmental studies bart.jansen@vito.be Marc Vanden Bosch LABORELEC (subcontractor), Lighting expert marc.vandenbosch@laborelec.com Lieven Vanhooydonk KREIOS (subcontractor), Lighting & Infrastructure expert lieven.vanhooydonck@kreios.be Gerald G. Strickland ELC, Secretary General gerald.strickland@elcfed.org Eddy M.J. Ceelen Chairman of CELMA Ecodesign Working Group (to which the CELMA sub WG's on Street and Office Lighting report to) eddy.ceelen@philips.com

14

Stéphanie Mittelham CELMA, Managing Director stephanie.mittelham@celma.org Richard Lothholz OSRAM, Director Marketing Fluorescent Lamps r.lothholz@osram.de Agenda: 1. 10.00-10.15 Introduction round participants and organisations 2. 10.15-10.45 Presentation by VITO about the preparatory EuP study on street and

office lighting 3. 10.45-11.30 Presentation by ELC and CELMA on their organisations and

previous work done (MEEUP case study on street lighting, VHK, 2005)

4. 11.30-12.00 Questions and Answers 5. 12.00-12.15 Planning and continued actions

Presentation: (All slides used during the presentation can be found on the project website www.eup4light.net) Point 1. Introduction round: The participants are welcomed by Mr. Tóth, DG TREN (Unit D3) responsible for the coordination of Lots 8 & 9 on office and street lighting, the Consultation Forum and horizontal issues concerning the preparatory studies. VITO is the contractor that will conduct the 2 prepararoty studies, Lots 8 and 9, on public street lighting and office lighting. Besides the 3 researchers of VITO present at the stakeholder expert meeting, 2 subcontractors were present that will also be working on both lots 8 & 9: these are Marc Vanden Bosch of LABORELEC and Lieven Vanhooydonk of KREIOS bvba. They are both experts in the field of lighting equipment, lighting application, standardisation etcetera and will work on specific tasks. 4 stakeholder representatives presented themselves at this 1st stakeholder expert meeting; these are Mr. Strickland of ELC (European Lamp Companies Federation), Mrs. Mittelham of CELMA (Federation of National Manufacturers Associations for Luminaires and Electrotechnical Components for Luminaires in the European Union), Mr. Ceelen, Chairman of the CELMA EcoDesign Working Group, to which the CELMA sub WG's on Street and Office Lighting report to and Mr. Lothholz of OSRAM, project leader of the ELC working group on office lighting.. . Point 2. Presentation preparatory EuP studies on office and street lighting (VITO) (see slides on website) After the presentation by VITO, Mr. Strickland suggested to get access to a book shortly to be published by the IEA study; “Lights Labours Lost” for data retrieval of good quality global

15

statistics on lighting. The study report is currently under review process and is expected to become public soon. He also remarked that, in order for ELC and CELMA to come up with good quality data, reasonable deadlines for delivering this data should be given. VITO acknowledges this and will make as soon as possible a questionnaire that lists the data required from ELC and CELMA. Mr. Strickland and Mrs. Mittelham asked for some clarification on the approach towards stakeholders and more in particular on the personal interviews with experts (see slide n° 12 on “level 3” stakeholders). Mr. Van Tichelen responded that all stakeholders or experts, including individual companies or experts on personal behalf, can register on the website (level 1) and can express their standpoint on particular matters or can give specific information for the project. If found appropriate, VITO will communicate directly with some of these registered experts by means of personal interviews (level 3) (email, telephone or personal visits). All data retrieved from these personal communications will be referred to in the project report (made public on regular basis on the eup4light-website) and can be commented on as to all data and results published in the report. A discussion arose on the scope of the EuP Directive with respect to the street lighting. The presentation of Mr van Tichelen included to this end that the EuP Directive is intended for CE marked end products fulfilling Ecodesign criteria and with regard to the free circulation of goods. Mr. Ceelen pointed out that for many products (he used a fridge as an example) it is possible to address all ecodesign criteria within the product istelf and before it is placed on the market, also the energy efficiency aspects. The product performance is hardly dependent on who the user is or where it is used. Luminaires, to the contrary are products of which the performances depend largerly on the ability to cope with the criteria of the environment in which they are placed and in the way they are maintained. Part of the product criteria, but specifically the use of the energy for the correct lighting of a street, can be quantified to be in line with the lighting needs on condition that the luminaire is placed in its environment as intended by the producer. Hence Mr Ceelen pointed out also the need to specify obligations for the installation designer and installer. He also expressed that in many cases, but maybe still not sufficiently, “the choice for the better technology is made” for new installations. So the better options to improve energy efficiency with regard to reduce the emission of CO2 are available in the existing applications. Due to the long lifetime of lighting equipment the replacement with more efficient types is slow. According to Mr. Ceelen the EuP Directive addresses this issue and refers to Art. 2 on the definition of EuP’s where is stated “…‘EuP’ means a product which, to be placed on the market and/or put into service,…”; interpreting that also attention should be given to how an EuP luminaire is to be installed and maintained as a whole of an installation, not limiting the scope to products and components and not limiting to only new installations. Mr. Tóth responded that 1. "Putting into service" is a complement to placing on the market, it is used in the Directive to ensure full coverage of the possible scenarios by which a product can start to be used (e.g. through hiring a service). It has nothing to do with installation methods. 2. The scope of the Directive is on eco-design of energy-using 'products' and not on systems, it targets manufacturers, not installers. . However the Directive sets out the possibility for requirements on supply of information by the manufacturer to the installer (Annex 1, Part 2 of the Directive). Mr vanden Bosch fully supported the explanations of Mr Ceelen. It is also his long

16

term experience that a luminaire can only perform correctly if it is installed as intended. He explained that performance and energy efficiency was the cause for the renovation of most HPL streetlighting applications in Belgium. Mr. Geerken complemented this answer that it is the intention of the study on how eco-design of components and products within the whole installation can contribute to reducing total energy use levels. For example for street lighting, aspects such as pole distance and the height of the light source, street lighting management schemes, etcetera are not in the scope of the Directive, thus not of this preparatory study. To conclude; this discussion will probably best continue when a more elaborated preliminary document on the definition of the product is produced by the contractor and for now, no definitive answers are formulated. Point 3. Presentations CELMA (see slides on web site) and ELC In conclusion of the CELMA presentation Mrs. Mittleham stresses that it is important to understand how CELMA is organised and that, due to its many branches within the organisation, it will take some time for CELMA to comment on, or come up with data for the study. CELMA organises a Strategy Forum 18th November where among others, the EuP Directive will be discussed, and invites Mr. Tóth and the contractors to this event. Mr. Strickland briefly presented ELC and its activities (no slides) and presented VITO with the ELC-Strategy Document entitled ‘The ELC Road Map for deploying energy efficient lighting across Europe’ and copies of other recent relevant publications. He also informed those present about 2 initiatives, also dealing with street/office lighting: funded under the Energy Intelligent Europe Program the SAVE program‘Buy Bright’ a 2-day event bringing together people responsible for procurement of energy efficient lighting which takes place 30/31 May 2006 in Brussels, and the 2nd initiative (funding not yet granted) called ‘Bottom up to Kyoto’ with 6 municipalities, European wholesale, installer and ESCO organisations looking at what can be done at national/local level to reduce energy and CO2 emissions through energy efficient street & office lighting.. Point 4. Discussion / Questions and Answers Mr. Tóth remarked that the European Ballast Group (Copper Institute) has also expressed its interest for the preparatory study and asked Mr. Van Tichelen to contact and inform them to register as stakeholder on the eup4light-website. Mr. Tóth also informed the stakeholders on the status of the Consultation Forum, where currently the process of selection is ongoing. Thematic Working Groups will be organized and Horizontal Forum Members will be able to delegate persons to the Thematic Working Groups. A first meeting is planned in last quarter of 2006, when also results of the 2 short 9-month preparatory studies will be available (on street lighting andbattery charges and external power supplies). Mr. Ceelen suggested to access a study of the University of Cambridge (estimated from 1996) on the energy-efficiency possibilities of lighting. Mr. Van Tichelen will contact Mr. Bertoldi for this.

17

Theo Geerken asked to ELC and CELMA to sent market data and any other relevant information including information that was sent previously to VHK. VITO will send a request outlining exactly what is required. Point 5. Planning and Continued Actions Organisation of BAT (Best Available Technology) tours on the Light + Building fair in Frankfurt:

o ELC BAT tour on Wednesday 26 from 13h30 to 18h (meeting point OSRAM reception Halle 2.0 stand B.50)

o CELMA BAT tour on Thursday 27 from 10h30 to 17h30 (meeting point CELMA stand (Hall 3.1 – Stand A40)

2nd stakeholder expert meeting with VITO, ELC and CELMA representatives will take place on 12 May in Brussels (EC) (9-18h or later).

19

ANNEX B MINUTES 2ND STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 12TH MAY 006

Preparatory Eco-design studies Lot 8 and 9 Office and Public Street Lighting

2nd STAKEHOLDER MEETING 12 MAY.2006 Minutes by: Veronique Van Hoof Date: 12 May 2006, 09.00h Location: Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Rue de Mot 24, Brussels Organisation: VITO (service contract to the European Commission, DG TREN) Documents: http://www.eup4light.net Participants: András Tóth DG TREN, responsible Lots 8, 9, Consultation Forum, Coordination between lots, horizontal issues andras.toth@cec.eu.int Paul Van Tichelen VITO, Project Manager Energy Technology, Lighting expert Coördinator contractor paul.vantichelen@vito.be Veronique Van Hoof VITO, Researcher Product & Environmental studies veronique.vanhoof@vito.be Lieven Vanhooydonk KREIOS (subcontractor), Lighting & Infrastructure expert lieven.vanhooydonck@kreios.be Marc Vanden Bosch LABORELEC (subcontractor), Lighting expert marc.vandenbosch@laborelec.com Gerald G. Strickland ELC, Secretary General gerald.strickland@elcfed.org Richard Lothholz OSRAM, Director Marketing Fluorescent Lamps r.lothholz@osram.de Eddy M.J. Ceelen Chairman of CELMA Ecodesign Working Group (to which the CELMA sub WG's on Street and Office Lighting report to) ) (NLA) eddy.ceelen@philips.com

20

Stéphanie Mittelham CELMA, Managing Director stephanie.mittelham@celma.org Norbert Wittig Representant of the CELMA Active Components - member of the

ELC/CELMA Street Lighting WG.(ZVEI) norbert.wittig@vs.vossloh-schwabe.com Markku Norhio Chairman of CELMA Active Components WG – member of CELMA/ELC Office Lighting WG (AFLE). markku.norhio@helvar.com Berno Ram Chairman of ELC/CELMA Street Lighting WG (Philips / ELC) berno.ram@philips.com Fabrizio Tironi Chairman of CELMA/ELC Office Lighting WG (ASSIL & ASSOLUCE) fabrizio.tironi@flos.it Agenda: 1. 09.00-09.15 presentation of participants and organisations 2. 09.15-09.45 Presentation by VITO about the preparatory EuP study on street and

office lighting 3. 09.45-10.15 Presentation by VITO: Introduction to the model and questions 10.45-11.00 Break 4. 11.00-11.30 Presentation by ELC/CELMA: Street lighting by Mr. Ram 5. 11.30-12.10 Presentation by ELC/CELMA by Mr. Ceelen 6. 12.10-12.30 Presentation by ELC/CELMA: Office lighting by Mr. Tironi 12.30-13.30 Lunch break 7. 13.30-15.00 Discussion of questions

Related documents and presentations: (All related slides and documents used during the meeting can be found on the project website www.eup4light.net) Point 1. Presentation of participants: The participants are welcomed by Mr. Tóth, DG TREN (Unit D3) responsible for the coordination of Lots 8 & 9 on office and street lighting, the Consultation Forum and horizontal issues concerning the preparatory studies. VITO is the contractor that will conduct the 2 preparatory studies, Lots 8 and 9, on public street lighting and office lighting. Besides the 2 researchers of VITO present at the stakeholder expert meeting, 2 subcontractors were present who will also be working on both lots 8 & 9: these are Marc Vanden Bosch of LABORELEC and Lieven Vanhooydonck of KREIOS bvba.

21

They are both experts in the field of lighting equipment, lighting application, standardisation etcetera and will work on specific tasks. 8 stakeholder representatives presented themselves at this 2nd stakeholder expert meeting; these are Mr. Strickland of ELC (European Lamp Companies Federation), Mrs. Mittelham of CELMA (Federation of National Manufacturers Associations for Luminaires and Electrotechnical Components for Luminaires in the European Union), Mr. Ceelen, Chairman of the CELMA EcoDesign Working Group, to which the CELMA sub WG's on Street and Office Lighting report to, Mr. Lothholz of OSRAM, project leader of the ELC working group on office lighting, Mr. Norbert Wittig from CELMA (Representant of the CELMA Active Components - member of the ELC/CELMA Street Lighting WG), Mr. Markku Norhio from CELMA (Chairman of CELMA Active Components WG – member of CELMA/ELC Office Lighting WG), Fabrizio Tironi from CELMA (Chairman of CELMA/ELC Office Lighting WG (ASSIL & ASSOLUCE) and Berno Ram from ELC (Chairman of ELC/CELMA Street Lighting WG (Philips). Point 2. Presentation preparatory EuP studies on office and street lighting (VITO), repeated from previous meeting (The presentation is available on the website www.eup4light.net) Q: Mr. Ram asked how the consultation forum will be addressed. A: Mr. Van Tichelen responded that this is not the task of the contractor but of the European Commission. Q: Mr. Ram stressed that the VHK study made some assumptions in describing the street light case. A: Mr. Van Tichelen responded that VITO will go into more detail. Point 3. Presentations by VITO: Introduction to the model (The presentation is available on the website www.eup4light.net) Q: On slide 4, concerning the product definition, Mr. Ram stated that the standards EN13201-2 and EN 12464-1 are not mandatory and so the memberstates are not obliged to follow the requirements A: Mr. Van Tichelen responded that according to his knowledge EN 13201-2 (2004) and EN EN 12464-1:(2002) are not mandatory, but they are CEN (European) standards. This means that no European country can impose a deviant national standard. The local authority or user always has the right to decide whether a road will be lit or not and it is also possible to impose no standard at all. Q: Mr. Ram also asked whether Vito knows how many streets are in compliance with the EN 13201. A.( Mr. Van Tichelen) The standard is indeed new (2004) and probably many roads are not yet in line with this standard. The data will be asked for in a user enquiry. As mentioned in the slide, older not compliant roads (or buildings) will be analysed in the equivalent category corresponding with the new standard.

22

S. Mr. Ram also stated that this standard is a reference for lighting levels, but never mentions energy performance. S. Mr. Van Tichelen confirms this. Q. Mr. Ram asked whether VITO is going to make a trade-off between a complete detailed analysis or a rough analysis working with references? A. Mr. Van Tichelen confirms that VITO did make a trade-off. The VHK methodology (MEEUP report see web site http://ec.europa.eu/energy/demand/legislation/eco_design_en.htm ) indeed uses only one 'base case' and this would be to rough. The preparatory study has as its objective to be pragmatic and realistic. Therefore VITO introduced more categories (see slides 4 and 5) that can be identified by users and that still are practical in number. These categories are for the purpose of the preparatory study and model (slide 6) only. VITO will also conduct a sensitivity analysis to see whether the model is realistic to simulate the effect of implementing measures. Q: Mr. Norhio wondered whether we have the intention to look up what illuminance level is maintained per road category; he asked what VITO will do with the different applications between countries e.g. in Sweden, motorways are lit, in Germany not at all? A. Mr. Van Tichelen confirmed that VITO is aware that levels can be different from country to country and responded that VITO will investigate this in the user enquiry. He would be pleased if the manufacturing stakeholders formulate remarks or worries about specific applications in EU25 countries. R: Mr. Norhio pointed out the trend of increasing lighting levels to enhance safety feelings (e.g. in the parks in Helsinki) and Mr. Wittig confirmed this statement. S: Mr. Van Tichelen stated that VITO will also take into account in the developed model (slide 6) that there is a trend to increase lighting levels in street lighting (for safety) as well as in office lighting (for well-being). Details about existing installations (maintained lighting levels and % of lit roads per category) and also about future politics will be asked in an enquiry via CIE or appropriate organizations. Q: On slide 5 concerning the product definition for office lighting Mr. Norhio asked how the scope for implementing measures will be defined. A: Mr. Van Tichelen said that the scope of an implementing measure could be indeed limited if it is only linked to the defined office product (slide 5). In this case an installer or building owner can always buy and install another lighting product in an office (e.g. a decorative domestic luminaire sold in a DIY store). The model should be capable to take this effect into account. A: Mr. Toth answers that the manufacturer may be required by the implementing measure to provide the installation guidelines as product information. The Directive focuses only on the product itself. Mr. Toth will have to check whether it is possible to integrate installation requirements and how their market surveillance can be effective Q: Mr. Wittig asked about the link with the Energy Performance of Building Directive? A: Mr. Van Tichelen responded that it could indeed be a possible solution to provide a link between both Directives (Building (EPB (2002/91/EC)) and Ecodesign (EuP) directive), especially if the building directive stimulates the use of office products with EuP compliance.

23

S: On slide 7 concerning the parameters of the model Mr. Norhio stressed that the length of illuminated roads are important. S: Mr. Van Tichelen added that this is a parameter in the user enquiry (e.g. CIE members) and that it is the job of the contractor to search for data that are as realistic as possible. S: Mr. Norhio explained that for Finland the CIE members are not the right source for this information. In Finland there is an association of communal companies that manages public roads and that keeps these kind of statistics. He will provide Mr. Van Hooydonck the contact information of this association. S: Mr. Ceelen remarks that there are a number of recent studies about buildings (in the light of the Building Directive), such as the study by the IEA (Paul Waide) (please send information to the contractor). S: Mr. Wittig confirms that there is no standardized method for measuring losses for HID-control gear. The existing ”Gear Directive/Ballast Directive (2000/55/EC)” (related to formula in slide 10) is for fluorescent ballasts only. S: Mr. Toth remarked that the ballast directive is already an implementing measure and that its extension may be further discussed in the policy options of the preparatory study. S: Mr. Van den Bosch stressed that control gear parameters in the formula of slide 10 are not yet part of an existing standard and wanted to get updated information on standards for control gear. S: Mr. Van Tichelen stressed that it is important to have realistic data for these parameters in order to perform BAT and BNAT scenario analysis even if no draft standards are available. S: Mr. Wittig confirmed that there are a lot of control gear standards in the pipeline. More info will be provided during the next scheduled expert meeting (6/6 in Brussels). S: On slide 10 Mr. Ram remarked that different countries use different ratios. S: Mr. Van Tichelen responded that in general in English literature the LPDI ratio is often used, but in Belgium 1/LPDI is used in public lighting. S: On slide 11 Mr. Ram reported that there exists some discussion internally in ELC/CELMA whether or not to leave the parameter R (reflection related conversion factor) in the formula. Point 4. Presentations from the ELC/CELMA Street lighting WG by Mr. Ram (see SLIM slides ' Street Lighting Possible Implementing Measure under the EuP Directive' on website www.eup4light.net) On slide 6 Mr. Ram pointed out that in about 1/3 of the EU old energy inefficient Mercury Vapour lamps are still used. They estimate an installed park of about 35 million Mercury Vapour lamps. There is a very slow conversion rate due to the long lifetime of the luminaries (30 years). So there is still a great potential to save not only in energy costs, but also in maintenance costs and materials. S: Mr. Norhio remarked that the conversion can be done in three ways:

• replace a high pressure mercury vapour lamp in an old luminaire by a retrofit HP sodium lamp

• change ballast and lamp in the same luminaire

24

• replace the luminaire by a new one for an energy efficient, tubular, clear lamp. Only the last solution can provide a significant saving. Therefore the conversion speed of luminaires (3% per year gives 30-35 years) has to be increased by:

• Restriction of availability (phasing out old technology) • Stimulation of energy efficient options (need budget; financial incentives)

S: On slide 9 Mr. Strickland pointed out that they have no definition for service lifetime. Point 5. Presentations by ELC/CELMA: by Mr. Ceelen (see slides “Placing on the market/putting into service” by E. Ceelen' on website www.eup4light.net) The presentation of Mr. Ceelen stressed the fact that in lighting a lot of the decisions for energy efficiency are taken by other ‘players’ than the producers/manufacturers (lighting designers, installers and owners). Energy consumption for lighting can also be decreased by installation requirements. Mr. Ceelen also expressed that in many cases, but maybe still not sufficiently, “the choice for the better technology” is made for new installations. So the better options to improve energy efficiency with regard to reduce the emission of CO2 are available in the existing applications (retrofit), due to the long lifetime of lighting equipment. This presentation illustrates the point discussed in the previous meeting about the difference between 'product requirements' (clearly an EuP topic) and 'installation requirements' (see also previous meeting (10/4) report). S: Mr. Toth stressed that it has to be checked whether there is a legal basis for this (if we go with installation requirements to the consultation forum). He will check whether the Directive can be interpreted like this. Mr. Toth suggests anyway to work out different scenarios in this study (with and without installation requirements). Even if the Ecodesign directive cannot address them, the study can point out the necessity of other types of measures. An absolute minimum is to give product criteria. S: Mr. Van Tichelen remarks that in the proposed energy performance formula (slide 10 of the VITO presentation) most of the parameters are product related with exception of UF (utilisation factor) and R (illuminance to luminance conversion factor). The model will be capable to simulate different scenarios. Point 6. Presentation of ELC/CELMA Office Lighting WG by Mr. Tironi This text is in draft status only (so is not available on the website for the moment), a final version will be presented at the next ELC/CELMA expert meeting with VITO on 6/6.

25

Point 7. Discussion of questions (see Vito presentation on the website www.eup4light.net) S: Mrs. Mittelham stated that the Street Lighting WG prepared answers to (the first version of) the VITO questions. The Office Lighting WG did not yet prepare answers but they will be presented during the 6th June meeting organised by ELC/CELMA. The Street Lighting answers are available in the memo 'SLIM answers to VITO' available on the website. Additional remarks to this memo are: Add to question 5 and 8: S: Mr. Wittig stated that LEDs are used in outdoor lighting but not in functional street lighting. Question 5 should not concern LEDs because it is confusing in this context. A separate question for LEDs should be formulated. S: Mr. Van Tichelen therefore asks ELC/CELMA to formulate a statement about the use of LED technology for functional street and office lighting for the coming years (5 and 10 years ahead) on the next meeting (6/6). S: ELC will give its statement on LED efficiency in a “Did you know” document by the end of May. Add to question 11: S: ELC will supply an Eco(energy)profile of fluorescent tubes and give an estimate on HO versus HE (for office). Add to question 12: S: Mr. Strickland reported that ELC gathers sales data from its members from 1998 onwards in 4 regions (North, Central/Eastern, Southern, Western Europe). They have data for EU-15 by country and for EU10 in two groups. Malta and Cyprus fall into Group 2 with remaining countries in Group 1. ELC member companies account for a European market share of about 90-95%. They can give a rough estimation of application % of the sales in office and street. For office the linear fluorescent tubes (33 energy inefficient ones, versus 80 energy efficient ones) and the compact (non-integrated or pin-based) fluorescent lamps are relevant. ELC will provide standard definitions for different lamp types. Concerning the share per road category, ELC will estimate this according to the Wattage (for example 500W is applied in road category ME3). Ms. Van hoof will contact Mr. Strickland directly to agree about the data format and the interpretation. S: Mrs. Mittelham stated that CELMA has no statistics for luminaires except for street lighting (because of the few number of luminaires companies compared to other areas) due to the specific structure of the lighting luminaires market (many companies in different countries with different statistical reporting systems). No reliable global EU-25 data exist. S: Mr. Ceelen remarked that the only exception to this is Sweden where they keep very good statistics, but they do not even want to give them to CELMA so he questions whether the contractor can get them. Mr. Ceelen further remarked that for luminaries the export represents a very big market. Add to question 13: Little but more than 10%. ELC will make a table available for T5, T8 and CFL by the next meeting.

26

Point 8. Planning and Continued Actions The next ELC/CELMA Street & Office Lighting WGs meetings will take place in parallel on 6 June in Brussels (Sheraton Brussels Airport). From 11h to after lunch, VITO will be invited for a joint session with both WGs. At this occasion experts will give answers to the pending questions and are available for discussion. Mr. Norhio will provide the contact information of the association of communal companies that manages state roads and that keeps statistics on km of roads illuminated for Finland. If anyone is aware of there being other comparable associations for the other EU countries, please provide contact details. Mr. Ceelen will provide an overview of recent studies (and contact persons) about buildings relevant for this contract.

27

ANNEX C MINUTES STAKEHOLDER MEETING / WORKSHOP ON 02TH APRIL 2007

Preparatory study Eco-design EUP Lot 8 Office Lighting

STAKEHOLDER MEETING / Workshop on 02 APRIL 2007 Minutes by : Bart Jansen and Lieven Vanhooydonck Date: 02 April 2007, 10.00h Location: Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, de Motstraat 24, Brussels Organization: VITO (service contract to the European Commission, DG TREN) Documents: http://www.eup4light.net Attendants: András Tóth DG TREN, responsible Lots 8, 9, Consultation Forum, Coordination between lots, horizontal issues andras.toth@cec.eu.int Paul Van Tichelen VITO, Project Manager Electrical Energy Technology, Lighting expert, Coordinator EuP contract. paul.vantichelen@vito.be Bart Jansen VITO, Researcher Product & Environmental studies bart.jansen@vito.be Marc Vanden Bosch LABORELEC (subcontractor), Lighting expert marc.vandenbosch@laborelec.com Lieven Vanhooydonk KREIOS (subcontractor), Lighting & Infrastructure expert lieven.vanhooydonck@kreios.be Jarita Christie ELC, Public Affairs Manager jarita.christie@elcfed.org Richard Lothholz OSRAM, Director Marketing Fluorescent Lamps r.lothholz@osram.de Sandro Benini ASSIL/ANIE (CELMA) assil.at@anie.it

28

Norhio Markku Helvar Oy Ab (CELMA) markku.norhio@helvar.com Frans Taeymans Etap Lighting (CELMA) frans.taeymans@etaplighting.com Jan Veldhuis Philips Nederland BV (CELMA/ELC) jan.veldhuis@philips.com Ralf Wershoven ERCO Leuchten GmbH (CELMA) rd.wershoven@erco.com Hilary Graves UK Market Transformation Programme gravesh@bre.co.uk Catherine Lootens Groen Licht Vlaanderen info@groenlichtvlaanderen.be Poul Erik Pedersen The Danish Electricity Saving Trust pepe@elsparefonden.dk Stefan Fassbinder Deutsches Kupferinstitut Berufsverband sfassbinder@kupferinstitut.de Michael Herfurth Infineon Technologies AG michael.herfurth@infineon.com Manfred Schlenk Infineon Technologies AG manfred.schlenk@infineon.com Agenda:

o Welcome and context of EuP (Andras Toth) o Stakeholder information and project time line o Questions of horizontal nature o Short presentation of chapters followed by questions and discussions o Conclusion

29

Meeting: Documents distributed in the meeting/workshop: - bundled comments from stakeholders on the published chapters 1 till 7, including the

answers of VITO (included as annex to these minutes), - an handout of the presented slides, - an updated, bundled version of the published chapters. All slides used during the presentation can also be found on the project website www.eup4light.net. 1. Welcome The participants are welcomed by Mr. Tóth, DG TREN (Unit D3) responsible for the coordination of EuP Lots 8 & 9 on office and street lighting. He summarizes the activities that were already done for office lighting and also for street lighting. The interest of the lighting field in general, domestic lighting included, is additionally putted in the spotlights by the European council on 8th and 9th March 2007 in Brussels. This workshop will discuss chapter 1 till 7. As they consider mainly basic, technical information and make an analysis of the products, of the market and of the environmental impact, a general consensus on these chapters should be the aim. 2. Stakeholder information and Timeline Paul Van Tichelen presents a brief survey of the website statistics and the timeline (see slides). An updated draft final version of the study (chapter 1 till 7) and also the draft of chapter 8 will be published on 18th April 2007. Deadline for comments on chapter 8 is 10th May 2007. A general remark is that the MEEUP methodology is followed, characterized by the typical 8 tasks / chapters structure. 3. General comments / Questions of horizontal nature (different chapters) Lighting levels (Comment 1 see annex 'Bundled Comments'). The study references to the latest European standard EN 12464-1 (2004): ‘Light and Lighting - Lighting of indoor work places.’ This new standard specifies 500lx on the task area for general office work (see chapter 1). The standard gives a specification for the task area: ‘The partial area in the work place in which the visual task is carried out. For places where the size and/or location of the task area is unknown, the area where the task may occur shall be taken as the task area.’ The immediate surrounding area: ‘A band with a width of at least 0,5 m surrounding the task area within the field of vision’, shall be illuminated with 300lx. In this study, only the fixed lighting installation is taken into account to meet the requirement of 500 lx (as we assumed that the location of the task area is unknown).

30

Poul Erik Pedersen from the Danish Electricity Saving Trust has sent a remark about these values. In Denmark, a general lighting level of 200 lx for offices is applied and this value can be enhanced to 500 lx at the task area by a desk lamp. A discussion was raised about the validity of this European standard. Andras Toth states that to his knowledge this lighting standard is not related to any European directive or law; it is a stand alone standard. The attendants give following additional information: - in Denmark, task area up to 500 lx, general 200 lx, - in Germany, this standard has become a law, - in Belgium the standard is accepted as an harmonized standard, but the legislation on safety

and health on the working places only imposes 300lx for normal desk work, it has the status of a law

In Denmark 500lx work place 200 lx general lighting Paul Van Tichelen asks all attendants to fill out the inquiry on the website. Conclusion: The assumption in the study is made that all office surface is lighted at 500 lx. If this average is not corresponding with reality, there will only be a difference on total EU energy consumption and on the amount of luminaires, not on individual product level (product level is in the scope of this study). In chapter 8, a sensitivity analysis will be performed from 500 lx to 350 lx average (if we assume that not the whole office surface is task area surface). Halophosphate lamps(Comments 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 52, 53, 60, 66 see annex 'Bundled Comments'). Halophosphate lamps are not considered as a base case in chapter 5 because these lamps don’t meet the requirements of the standard (EN 12464-1(2004)) concerning the light colour rendering; Ra≈63 whereas the standard requires Ra≥80. A second reason is that probably all new installations are calculated with the tri-phosphor lamps because they have a much higher efficacy and so the amount of installed luminaires (cost) can be reduced and a more competitive price quote can be made. In office lighting, there is no lock-in effect by renewal of installations as it is in street lighting; in street lighting renewal, poles stay mostly on the same place whereas in office lighting the total installation and often even the ceiling is replaced. By assuming this, the base case model can be kept simple and easy to be understood; the base case is thus a real minimum performance product in contrast to street lighting where we calculated an imaginary base case. ELC statistics demonstrate that there is still a huge amount of halophosphate lamps that are sold today. Albeit for new installations only triphosphor lamps are calculated, it is possible that at lamp replacement still halophosphate lamps are used. We therefore included the BOM’s for halophosphate lamps (double mercury content) in chapter 4. In chapter 7 in option 1 the halophosphate lamps are considered as a negative option (worst case scenario). Also the eco-reports are calculated (see the website). If the cheaper halophosphate lamps are used as a replacement lamp instead of a triphosphor lamp, there is no influence on energy consumption, but the illuminance level will be lower and more mercury is brought into circulation. This will be explained in more detail in chapter 8.

31

4. Chapter 1. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). 5. Chapter 2. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). Helvar (CELMA), producer of ballasts, reacts on ‘comment 21’ from the Kupferinstitut: a change for magnetic ballasts will really have an influence on ballast producers (new investments for an old technology are not likely). As a consequence of this discussion, the referred text in chapter 2 will not be adapted. 6. Chapter 3. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). ‘Comment 22’ from the Kupferinstitut raises a discussion. Power factor compensation capacitors that are not necessary for the ignition and functioning of the lamp are mostly not situated in the highest quality range. (Some manufacturers even offer new luminaires where this capacitor is optional.) If this capacitor is blown up or short circuited, he will be replaced (or removed) by maintenance people. But this capacitors also suffer from deterioration during their lifetime; this is confirmed by Helvar/CELMA but real data are not available. In street lighting, ADEME in France as calculated this ageing influence (9-10%). These data are used in the BMF for half of this value i.e. 5%. If no additional information will become available, the current text will not be changed. 7. Chapter 4. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). For ‘comment 12’, VITO asks if an adaptation and clarification of LLMF and LSF data in table 3.2 of CIE 97 can be made and forwarded. This is very urgent! VITO also asks data for efficacy of T5 lamps at 25°C and at 35°C. Osram (ELC) answers that these values can be found in the catalogues (see Osram and Philips). ‘Comment 73’ raises a discussion about the use of electronic starters in combination with a magnetic ballast. These starters are rarely used because they are too expensive. A common practice in maintenance is to replace also the starter at lamp replacement because a bi-metal starter is cheap. The Kupferinstitut reacts that an electronic starter has the same positive effect on lamp life as an electronic ballast and that it lasts as long as the ballast. OSRAM (ELC) can not confirm this because there are no data available on lifetime of lamps operated on electronic starters. (After the meeting, two samples of an electronic starter were given to VITO for a test. Later tests showed that one of them was not working.)

32

For ‘comment 40’ about ballast prices, VITO asks for realistic prices. For magnetic ballasts there is the current problem of the raising copper price; ballast price is proportional to the copper price but of course also inversely proportional to the wire diameter. Price is also dependent on quantities and promotional actions. VITO will apply prices for OEM-clients (luminaire manufacturers) in new luminaires and catalogue prices, discounted with 30%, for maintenance replacement. The same price setting for electronic as for magnetic ballasts will be used. Following the MEEUP methodology, in the LCC, the recycling of materials is taken into account (e.g. copper and steel for magnetic ballasts) but not the take back price after a long lifetime. (Speculative considerations on raising copper prices will not be taken into account.) VITO will look into other EUP studies where copper is an issue. For the luminaire price for category A2, cellular offices, VITO assumed that these (mostly suspended) luminaires are more design and consequently more expensive. The price of € 300,00 will be lowered to € 250,00. CELMA remarks that the most important energy savings can be realized by measures on putting into service and on system level (intelligent control with dimming and presence detection etc). VITO replies that putting into service is not the scope of chapter 4 and the EuP directive. However, it can be taken into account in chapter 8 where system improvements can be proposed. The starting point is a good product, the second step is indeed the installer and the last step is finally the user (this process is explained in chapter 3). Examples of product related features are: luminaires (products) could have the possibility to dim the light or to be influenced by presence detection. Andras Toth repeats what was already discussed in earlier meetings that legally, in this study, it is only possible to discuss the product level. VITO can, in chapter 8, make recommendations for what additionally can be done on installation level. They can also make assumptions and estimates about additional measures and saving potential. ‘Comment 28’ was unclear. CELMA-representatives could not explain it either. ‘Comment 41’: The available information on the BLF stays unclear. The measuring method in the standard is only a recommendation and depends a.o. on the reference ballast and reference lamp. Ballast producers are normally not giving these values. The European market asks the ENEC certification in which tolerances on BLF are specified. VITO will update and complete this section. Magnetic ballast will be calculated with LMF is 0.95 and electronic ballasts with 1. ‘Comment 49’: The input data of materials for the end of life scenario are calculated in the model. The different amounts are known. 8. Chapter 5. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). Conclusion on discussion ‘comment 57 and 58’ is that there will be a different calculation with a longer lifetime of lamps on electronic ballasts than on magnetic ballasts; this will result also in a lower mercury content per year. In this way, halophosphate lamps will be penalized additionally. Replacement time of lamps was also influenced by the bad and unrealistic values for the luminaire LMF, that requires short luminaire cleaning intervals (see CIE 97). A CELMA member agrees that these LMF values are unrealistic and could cause an overdimensioning of the lighting installation because we calculate with maintained illuminance. If overdimensioning is applied, the possibility for dimming is needed and very beneficial.

33

9. Chapter 6. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). Discussion raises about stand-by losses. No exact values are provided by the manufacturers. A European study on stand-by losses is not finished yet. For ‘comment 17’, ELC (Osram) will supply diagram's for T5 lamps. For ‘comment 18’, ELC and CELMA declare that there is no negative influence on lamp life by dimming if the lamp is operated on a pre-heating ballast (see standard IEC 60929). ‘Comment 51’: we will take into account that the catalogue data are better than the CELMA-labelling especially for electronic ballasts. CELMA values are maximum values that take into account the production tolerances but catalogue values are the typical values. With magnetic ballasts this variance is not large. The text will be adapted accordingly. 10. Chapter 7. Paul Van Tichelen summarized this chapter and the comments of the stakeholders. The answers on these comments are discussed (see annex “Bundled comments”). In option 14, HO-lamps will be re-evaluated accordingly to the new diagram's that ELC will provide. CELMA (Helvar) reacts on option 2. Going to B1 and banning B2 asks for investments in an outdated technology and ballast manufacturers will not do this. B1 is now only produced in small quantities for plastic luminaires where heat can be a problem. VITO reacts that this heat is lost energy. B2 should not be used in office lighting anymore. This could be discussed in a special expert meeting. For the comment from the Kupferinstituut about electronic starters, see ‘comment 73’ in chapter 4. ELC (Osram) emphasizes that there is always a cost – benefit comparison and therefore the electronic starter is rare on the market and not commonly known by the electricians. CELMA (Helvar) reacts that an electronic starter will stop starting if a lamp doesn’t start and so can save energy. Catherine Lootens asks why the T5 to T8 adapters are not mentioned negatively because this is also a cheap but non profitable solution. VITO will see how the use of this adapters can be included. 11. Closing. Paul Van Tichelen closes the workshop, repeating the timeline for chapter 8 and the deadline for comments on this chapter. The final report will be available about mid-June. Norio Markku (CELMA) asks if the date for the consultation forum is already planned and if the consultation forum for street and office lighting will be at the same time.

34

Andras Toth answers that the consultation fora will be separate. For street lighting it can be foreseen that this will be before the summer break, June or July. For office lighting this will be in autumn. He thanks all participants, also in the name of the Commission, for their contribution to this interesting workshop and emphasises that further suggestions can still be made. He concludes that at this stage there does not seem to be any major disagreement on the main lines along which VITO have conducted the study, and that after the questions on the technical details discussed in the meeting are settled, it can be assumed that we will have a consensus on chapters 1-7. The stakeholders present do not contradict him. Richard Lothholz (ELC) also thanks for the possibility to discuss the study in this direct way, what is always better than changing letters by email. PS: ELC has provided all requested information on 15th May 2007 and text was updated accordingly.

35

ANNEX D MINUTES OF EXPERT INTERVIEW ELC ON 16TH JUNE 2006

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 9 Street Lighting

Minutes of meeting: expert interview Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 16/06/2006, 10h00 Location: European Lamp Companies federation, Brussels Participants: Gerald Strickland, ELC (GS) Paul Van Tichelen, VITO (PvT) Veronique Van Hoof, VITO (VVH) Subject: Meeting on ELC lamp sales data. Status: Public distribution. Report: ELC data are processed by an independent consultant (Bryan, UK) based on manufacturers data (1999 tot 2004). GS doesn't know the exact market share per lamp type and also suggested that more data will become available in the IEA book that will be published soon. According to GS, the ELC members have a 95% market share. The ELC data don't contain automotive and projector HID lamps. The ELC data also contain Russian Federation and Turkey. The ELC data are propertyof ELC and ELC will be referred to in the study. Actions and conclusion: VVH will correct the ELC data to EU25, taking population numbers into account. PVT+LVH will study the proposal.

37

ANNEX E MINUTES STAKEHOLDER-EXPERT CONSULTATION ON 10TH MAY 2007

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 8 Office Lighting

Minutes of meeting: CELMA/ELC expert interview Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 10 May 2007, 12h30 Location: ASSIL, Milan Participants: Paul Van Tichelen, Vito Marc Vanden Bosch, Laborelec OIL workgroup CELMA/ELC:

Mrs. Eckhardt ( ELC/Sylvania) new member Mr. Auber (ZVEI) Mr. Barling (LA) new member Mr. Bedocs (LIF) Mr. Benini (ASSIL) Mr. Ceelen (NLA) Mr. Dehoff (FEEI) Mr. Gaunet (Synd. Eclairage) Mr. Goven (Belyngind.) Mr. Lotholz (ELC/Osram) Mr. Newnham (ELC/Sylvania) replacing Mr.Brehm Mr. Norhio (AFLE) Mr. Pagano (ASSIL) observer Mr. Riha (ANFALUM) Mr. Sterzbach (ZVEI) new member from Siteco Mr. Tironi (ASSIL/ASSOLUCE) Mr. Wershoven (ZVEI)

Subject: Expert consultation concerning the still pending input data for draft chapters 1-7 and comments on draft chapter 8 from CELMA/ELC OIL members. Status: Experts opinion. Report: Data requested by Vito: Table 62 lamp data, data will be supplied by ELC (OK received).

38

Table 64 magnetic lamp data, new OEM prices proposed were: • 18 & 36W ballast B2 1.45 EUR per 2500 • 18 & 36W ballast B1 2.00 EUR per 2500

ELC confirmed that CFL-ni lamps are inherent less efficient compared to LFL due to the internal absorption when fluorescent tubes are bended (e.g. U shaped CFL-ni). Vito presented the proposal for a ‘Luminaire Efficacy Rating’ and labelling system according to lighting distribution classes, that is described in the study. CELMA is elaborating a similar system. Vito can mention this ongoing development in the study and recommend to take it into consideration in the framework of the EuP directive implementation when it becomes available. Detailed remarks on chapter 8: p.200: refer to CE mark instead of LVD directive. p.203: 'category A3 is obsolete'.. is not correct, they are still in use for very compact ballasts without cut off technology. Remark: category EEI = A1 dimming ballasts have level EEI= A3 in non dimming conditions. It is also confirmed that the coexistence of EEI = A1 versus EEI = A2 and A3 is confusing for users because A1 refers to dimming ballasts only. A way out is to introduce levels EEI = AD1, AD2 for dimming ballasts and EEI = A1, A2, A3, for non dimming. Also more efficient BAT ballasts exist compared to the actual EEI = A1 and A2. A revision of this classification can be recommended. p. 205: '2. Increase to B1 ..' should be corrected to plastic IP4X luminaires only. p. 208: table 96, '1990 A1 direct lighting %' is to high and should be corrected. p. 208: table 96, add ballasts EEI level assumptions and references to sources or previous chapters. p. 210 table 210 'ballast reliability' is wrong terminology. p. 212 '(e.g. 8 m² ..)' is very limiting '15 m² is more realistic and add 'a control switch within a distance of 11 m from a luminaire should be required'. p. 213 section 8.1.6 should be reformulated toward its focus for easy 'market surveillance'. Actions and conclusion: ELC will send requested lamp data and comments on chapter 8 to VITO by15/5/07 (is done). VITO will include the information of this expert consultation in the updated report.

39

ANNEX F MINUTES OF VISIT TO TRADE FAIR LIGHT & BUILDING ON 5TH & 6TH APRIL 2006

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 8&9 Street and Office Lighting

Minutes of visit to trade fair: ELC/ CELMA event Minutes by :Marc Vanden Bosch Date: 5-6 April 2006 Location: Frankfurt, Germany Participants: Paul Van Tichelen, Vito Marc Vanden Bosch LABORELEC (subcontractor), Lieven Vanhooydonk KREIOS (subcontractor) Andras Toth, EC Several 'ELC/CELMA members' were met during the tour. Subject: Presentation of BAT on trade fair. Status: public information. Report: LAMPS Visited Manufacturers:

• PHILIPS • OSRAM • GENERAL ELECTRIC • AURA

Synthesis of the visit to the different stands set up by the manufacturers and the discussion with their representatives. HID Lamps. The new technology of lamps with ceramic burners is still in evolution. A larger power range can now be found on the market. This technology is still in evolution: lamps become smaller and improvement of lifetime and lumen maintenance is continuing. This evolution is realised for lamps for indoor as well as for outdoor applications. Thanks to the smaller burner

40

technology, an improvement of the LOR of luminaires can be realised. The smaller dimensions of the lamp permit the development of optimised optic systems. A new product but still in a development phase is the Cosmopolis system. Especially the improvement of lifetime and lumen maintenance for white light lamps meets the growing demand for these light sources. In several scientific discussions and tests, the better visual perception under white light conditions is a current topic. For all HID lamps, except for sodium low pressure, there is still improvement of the lighting performances, the lifetime and the environmental impact. Fluorescent Lamps T5 lamps are still improved and new lamps appear on the marked (80 W, Circline, ….). Due to known problems with T5 lamps functioning at variable ambient temperatures, manufacturers developed a new technology for this lamp types. This new concept is described as T5 with amalgam technology. These lamps will be less sensitive to ambient temperature fluctuations. Compact Fluorescent lamps CFL’s are still improved. New lamps are the high power range lamps for use in shop lighting and for applications in industrial lighting. Amalgam technology is now available for certain CFL lamps and also the dimmable CFL’s were introduced. There are new induction lamps on the marked and some are specially developed for domestic use. LED LEDs are still in development. For indoor and outdoor lighting, LEDs are not an interesting technology for the moment. For an example: a T5 lamp has an efficacy of 100 lm/W whereas a LED is situated around 30 lm/W. The LED technology will improve but manufacturers estimate that this will take over 4 years before better, reliable performances can be reached. The declaration of lifetime is still a problem. As there is still no standard, definition concerning lifetime for LED’s, the “declared lifetime”, is still under discussion. New interesting developments are organic LEDs. Visit AURA stand This manufacturer is specialized in particular fluorescent lamps. Thanks to the application of own technologies, the lamp life is improved. New is the application of these technologies to T5 lamps and CFL lamps.

41

Luminaires Visited Manufacturers (not all the visited stands are mentioned on this list):

• THORN • ZUMTOBEL • SITECO • PHILIPS • TRILUX • DISANO • NERI • IGUZZINI • ARTEMIDE • TARGETTI • SCHREDER • INDAL

Current indoor luminaires are equipped with electronic ballasts that can be controlled by an independent control system at room level or at building level; these ballastst are often dimmable. The DALI protocol is mostly used for communication with the ballast. The use of performant reflectors and lamps is also an important point in energy performances. Nowadays, luminaires equipped with T5 lamps have the most important share of the market for indoor lighting systems. For outdoor lighting, the situation is different. If the development of performant optics and luminaires is a standard for most manufacturers, the step to electronic (dimmable) ballasts is more difficult due to:

• the difficult and exigent environment in which outdoor luminaires must function, • the fact that electronic (dimmable) ballasts for HID lamps for outdoor applications are

still in further development. As a consequence, outdoor luminaires are mostly offered with electromagnetic ballasts. Ballasts Visited Manufacturers (not all the visited stands are mentioned on this list):

• ERC • ELT • HELVAR • VOSSLOH

As stated before, in indoor lighting applications the use of electronic (dimmable) ballasts is still growing (Directive EU – CELMA) and most manufacturers offer control systems with their products. This situation is completely different for outdoor lighting. Few manufacturers are currently producing electronic ballasts for outdoor lighting and only a small minority of them is announcing the introduction on the market from electronic dimmable ballasts. A significant effort on R&D is still needed to resolve the remaining problems.

42

Some remarks mentioned by ballast manufacturers are:

• a ban of electromagnetic ballasts for indoor lighting could lead to a rise of unemployment in the EU25 countries producing these ballasts, due to the economical fact that labour cost in far eastern countries is far lower than in EU25,

• measures should be taken (protection) against minor quality, based on low cost technologies and imported from low labour cost countries, (“Installers look to prices not to performances and endurance of products.”)

• once the electronic ballast for outdoor will be a reality and it can be produced at large quantities, these production plants could also leave Europe.

Actions and conclusion: PVT: this information will be included in chapter 6.

43

ANNEX G WORKSHOP BUY BRIGHT INITIATIVE ELC VITO Ref.: N1103/ETE/PVT/ VITO Mission Ref.: IMS/2006/N9058/002

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 9 Street Lighting

Minutes of meeting: Workshop Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 30-31/05/2006 Location: European Lamp Companies federation, Brussels Participants: about some 70 participants (30/05 and 31/05) EC DG TREN: Andras Tòth IEA: Paul Waide VITO: Veronique Van Hoof (VVH), Paul Van Tichelen (PVT) Kreios: Lieven Vanhooydonck (LVH) Subject: Workshop Status: Public distribution. Report: A meeting report is available at: http://buybright.elcfed.org

45

ANNEX H CELMA STRATEGIC FORUM ON 18TH NOVEMBER 2006

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 8&9 Office & Street Lighting

Minutes of meeting: presentation at CELMA event Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 18 November 2006, 10h00 Location: Jolly Hotel, Brussels Participants: Paul Van Tichelen, Vito Andras Toth, EC 47 participants 'CELMA members' Subject: Presentation 'Draft results of the ongoing street & office lighting preparatory studies for the EuP directive' on the CELMA strategy Forum Meeting. Status: Presentation, public information. Report: Vito presented the 'Draft results of the ongoing street & office lighting preparatory studies for the EuP directive'. This powerpoint presentation will be put on the www.eup4light.net web site including the general presentation by the EC. The industry (Berno ram, Fabrizio Tironi) also presented 'The position of the European Lighting Industry on Street & Office Lighting', these presentation will be sent to the Vito EuP members e-mail group. Actions and conclusion: PVT: presentation available on the www.eup4light.net website (OK done).

47

ANNEX I MINUTES OF WORKSHOP ‘IAE-ECBS ANNEX 45 ENERGY EFFICIENT ELECTRIC LIGHTING FOR BUILDINGS ON 19TH APRIL 2007

Preparatory Eco-design study Lot 8 Office Lighting

Minutes of meeting: Workshop participation'IEA-ECBCS Annex 45 Energy Efficient Electric Lighting for Buildings- open session"

Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 19 April 2007 Location: WTCB Limelette, Belgium Participants: Paul Van Tichelen, Vito 21 participants from 11 countries: Subject: Workshop participation: information to be included in the EuP preparatory study on office lighting. Status: Workshop, technical information. Report: Detailed information can be found on the website: http://www.lightinglab.fi/IEAAnnex45/meetings/0704Brussels/index.html Actions and conclusion: Conclusion related to the preparatory study on office lighting: Data ware presented on efficiency of dimmed LFL lamps (Roisin on ' Optimisation and control of energy lighting consumption in offices'). This data were used in the study.

49

ANNEX J MINUTES OF PARTICIPATION IN WORKSHOP “STATUS, PROSPECTS AND STRATEGIES FOR LED’S IN GENERAL LIGHTING”

Minutes of meeting: Workshop participation" Status, Prospects and Strategies for LEDs in General Lighting", organized by: The European Commission,

Directorate-General JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Renewable Energies Unit together with ASSIL-Italy

Minutes by : Paul Van Tichelen Date: 3&4 May 2007 Location: Ispra, Italy Participants: Paul Van Tichelen, Vito About 100 participants: Subject: Workshop participation, information will be included in the EuP preparatory studies on office lighting. Status: Workshop, technical information. Report: Detailed information can be found on the website: http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/energyefficiency/html/Workshop_LED_34052007.htm Actions and conclusion: Conclusion related to the preparatory study on office lighting: - White LEDs did made significant progress in efficacy during the last year, by consequence the related section 6.3 in the report needs to be rewritten. - Significant improvement can be expected in the upcoming years and LEDs might become an appropriate light source for general office lighting. - Actual commercial available white LEDs still not meet the efficacy requirements for office lighting and colour rendering that can be compared with fluorescent lighting, therefore LEDs still need to be considered as BNAT (Best Not Yet Available technology. Action: Section 6.3 was rewritten, 4 references were included.

51

ANNEX K BUNDLED COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS ON DRAF T CHAPTERS 1 – 7 AND RESPONSES TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE STAKEHOLDER ME ETING / WORKSHOP ON 02TH APRIL 2007

1 From:

Poul Erik Pedersen Project Manager The Danish Electricity Saving Trust Dear Paul Van Tichelen, VITO I have read most of your provisional chapters regarding “Office Lighting” published on the web-site. Everywhere you talk about 500 lux general lighting, which gives a rather high power consumption for lighting. I know that general lighting with an illuminance level of 500 lux is commen in some countries in EU. But for example in Denmark most of the office lighting is a 2-component lighting consisting of about 200 lux (maintained) general lighting and a desk lamp for each work place (often a HF asymmetrical 15-20 Watt desk lamp). The total power consumption for this solution is considerably lower than the power consumption in a solution consisting of 500 lux general lighting installation and no desk lamps. And often we get a better lighting quality because both the illuminance level and the direction of the light from the desk lamp can be chosen individually by the actual person at the work place according to his actual needs. One of the consequences of the situation described above is that all luminaires (almost) for general lighting installations in offices in Denmark have only one linear fluorescent lamp each. In other words: One of your basic assumptions in your provisional studies does not cover the present situation for example in Denmark. I would like to go into more details if you need so. But please let me get your immediate comments. Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

� This is a question of general nature. It has to do with the status of the new EN 12464-1(2004) and its implementation (see also chapter 1). To be discussed in the stakeholder meeting / workshop.

52

2 ELC OIL on chapter 1

p.18: spelling mistake: LUMILUX instead of LUMIMUX � Text adapted

3 ELC OIL on chapter 2 p. 2: second paragraph: "is protected for reasons of manufacturing trade secrets." • this is not correct; all necessary information was provided by

ELC (2.1.1.)

� This sentence does not refer to ELC. It is a general statement. For example, data might not be found in Europroms because of confidentiality. (If only a small number of enterprises produce a product in the reporting country, there is a risk that information regarding an individual enterprise might be revealed. If the enterprise does not agree to this, the reporting country declares the production figures confidential. They are transmitted to Eurostat but not published. However if several countries declare their production for a heading to be confidential, an EU total can be published because the data for an individual country cannot be inferred).

4 ELC OIL on chapter 2 p. 3: footnote 10: "Very big (almost monopolist) manufacturers with a high-market share-as is the case in the lamp market (see Annex 8 “the Big Three”)- are sometimes exempt from reporting their data publicly because it would reveal confidential company information." • whilst the lamp market is concentrated, there certainly is no

monopolist structure in this market – degree of concentration varies widely between product groups

� OK deleted “almost monopolist”

5 ELC OIL on chapter 2 p. 4: • this statistic includes CFLi (with ballast) - for Office-Lighting it

should rather be just CFL pinbased – the chart (high import volumes) gives a wrong impression as imports are far stronger for CFLi lamps vs. CFL pinbased

� This is true, in chapter 1 “segmentation of lamps” (1.1.6) we already stated that CFL non integrated lamps are the most commonly used in office, while the CFL integrated are occasionally in office buildings. Unfortunately the Prodcom classification of lamps (see 1.1.2.2) does not allow us to make that distinction. By consequence only aggregated import figures for the total of CFL lamps can be reported.

� This is now more clarified in a footnote “Note that this holds for the imports of all CFL. According to ELC imports are far stronger for CFL integrated (with ballast) lamps, which are only used occasionally in offices, vs CFL pinbased (non integrated or retrofit) lamps, which is one of the main lamp types used in offices. Unfortunately the Europroms classification of lamps does not make the distinction between integrated and non integrated CFL lamps, and only aggregated import figures are thus available”

Furthermore this is again stressed under 2.2.1 “Market” “Remark that for office (task) lighting (with high demand) only CFL-ni (retrofit) lamps are relevant

53

6 ELC OIL on chapter 2 p. 15: "Further input was asked from the lamp industry experts (through ELC) to provide, per different lamp type, reliable estimates on the share of these sales figures intended for application in office lighting. Up till now no response was received to this question." • this is not correct as ELC reacted and informed that,

unfortunately, there is no such data available

� Is adapted: “Unfortunately no such data is available”

7 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 6: colour 835 is taken as most relevant for office lighting. • we believe that 840 is used the most across Europe

� Is adapted: 835 is changed to 840.

8 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p 9: BOM: 0,005 g mercury for T8 • is only true for three band phosphor lamps, not for

halophosphat (which have 0,01). In addition this is the law, however some manufacturers dose less for both, T5 and T8 lamps

� The BOM in the new table 54 is extended for halophosphate lamps. The ecoreports and related data, see option 1 in chapter 7, will be adapted. Halophosphate lamps are not included in the base case.

9 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 9: BOM: • lamps are made of soda-lime glass, not float glass

� Is adapted.

10 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 16: Efficacy Range: • There should be a differentiation between Halo and 3-band

phosphor lamps as well for T8. Halo : 50-70 lm/W, 3-band: 80-104.

• For T5 this should be 87-104 and a footnote saying “for 35°C or max.lumen” as the IEC measurement is taken at 25°C

� Figure has to be updated (Laborelec).

54

11 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 16: lifespan: • There should be a differentiation between Halo and 3-band

phosphor lamps as well for T8. Halo with 13.000 h, 3-Bands with 20.000 h.

• T5 have 20.000 (HE) to 24.000 (HO). • If 50.000 h are listed for white LEDs (which is only true for

certain thermo conditions) it should also be mentioned that there are longlife T8 lamps which have a 50.000h lifespan.

• CFL and CFLi have 15.000 h.

� Figure has to be updated (Laborelec).

12 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 17, 2. paragraph: • what is said about the CFLs is only partly true. Many CFL

lamps have a much higher lumen output than 550 lm. Also the life-span at 15.000 hours is close to the 20.000 hours of FL. They are more expensive but that is a question of taste/money/design/space

� Text is rephrased: “CFLni-lamps have lifetimes up to 15000h (in comparison with 20000h for T5) and are more expensive. They are also available in different, smaller sizes with a lower light output range (e.g. 550 lumen). These smaller lamps are therefore more used in area with lower lighting requirements such as corridors. The CFLni-lamps with 2G11 socket are mainly used where design or available space play a part.” Question to the stakeholders: Is there a difference in lifespan between CFLi and CFLni? Can table in CIE 97 be adapted?

13 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 17, 4. paragraph: • another important difference is the higher efficiency of 3-bands

vs. Halos (see above)

� Will be adapted in ecoreports and related data, see option 1 in chapter 7.

55

14 ELC OIL on chapter 4 p. 17 & 18 par 4.3.1.3 table 8&9: • In table 8 CFL 36W is mentioned. In table 9 for CFL no ballast

relation as for LFL is given and also the data given are too low for CFL.

• LLMF will be not lower than 0.90 and LSF is for EM 0.5 at 15 khrs and HF at 20 khrs (long-life types even 2 x longer); at 10 khrs resp 0.9 and 0.97 (also in chapter 3 par 3.2.2. table 3.2)

p. 17: chart on bottom of page: • the last lamp (28W) is mentioned with 25°C (IEC

measurement) – normally, the lamp is operated at higher temperatures;

• max. lumen are not 2600 but 2900 and thus 104 lm/W; • same thing is true for T5 in 14W and 54W (higher efficiency at

35°C vs. IEC 25°C) needs to be mentioned

� New tables were prepared; to be discussed in the me eting

56

57

15 ELC OIL on chapter 4

p 17: the statement in the text below that "Therefore it is unrealistic to assume that..." • is overinterpreted. People can conclude even from data shown

in Chapter 2 where is still mentioned that T8 halophosphate were at large scope used in public sector in offices. Rephrase is needed or simply skipping these last two sentences, because there is clearly pointed out above that halophosphate lamps do not match EN 12464-1.

� Text rephrased: T8 fluorescent lamps are sold in Tri-phosphor and halophosphate, more info on the technology will be included in chapter 6. T8 halophosphate is more sold in numbers compared to Tri-phosphor (see chapter 2 (ELC data 2005)). T8 halophosphate lamps have poor colour rendering (Ra < 80) and therefore do not match the EN 12464-1 requirements for office work. In general, standard EN 12464-1 states that ' Lamps with a colour rendering index lower than 80 should not be used in interiors where people work or stay for longer periods'. Halophophate lamps are therefore not commonly used when dimensioning new office lighting installations, however this does not exclude from use or at lamp replacement (see data chapter 2). Another important difference between halo- and tri-phosphate lamps is the poor efficiency of halophosphate lamps in comparison with the high efficiency of the tri-bands lamp. In chapter 6 and 8 the halo-phosphate lamps will be qualitatively reconsidered in their proper application perspective but they are excluded for the base case assessment in chapter 5.

16 ELC OIL on chapter 6 p 10; point 6.1.5: • we propose to skip the whole intro about history of fluorescent

lamps. It is not of any added value. Let's be here short in conclusions and specific aiming at clear conclusions about T8/T5 triphosphors being in line with En 12461-1 + in combination with HF gears as Best Available Technology.

� This short (historical) survey might be useful for a ‘non-technical’ reader, we added therefore subtitles.

� Agreed with BAT for HF gears.

58

17 ELC OIL on chapter 6 p. 11, 2. paragraph, last line: "That new compound enables them to maintain full lumen output through a wide range of temperatures, irrespective of the lamp’s burning position. This has lead to shorter T5 lamps with an efficacy that can be compared with longer T5 lamps of the same power." • Information is not correct. The lamps are as long as they were

before, the efficacy is the same as with the other lamps, but over a wider temperature range!

� We skipped the sentence:. This has lead to shorter T5 lamps with an efficacy that can be compared with longer T5 lamps of the same power. Stakeholders are asked to provide a diagram of the lamp efficiency in function of the operating temperature.

18 ELC OIL on chapter 6 p. 11, last paragraph: "Also special provisions are needed in order to

avoid 'striations' when lamps are dimmed to very low power levels (e.g. below 30 %); 'striations' are a series of bright an dim areas in fluorescent lamps"

• it is not a problem at room temperatures to dim down to 1% • please also double-check the conclusion 3 on page 12 in this

regard!!

� We adapted the text: “ Also special provisions are needed in order to avoid 'striations' when lamps are dimmed to very low power levels (e.g. below 30 %) and at low temperature; 'striations' are a series of bright an dim areas in fluorescent lamps. At room temperatures, dimming can be realized up to 1% without problems when special techniques are used.

19 ELC OIL on chapter 6 p. 12: 1. paragraph • as far as we know, dimming has no effect on lamp lifespan

• New text to be discussed at the stakeholder meeting : “This small DC current injection could affect lamp life; no large scale data are known. In June 2005, the Lighting Research Center (US) initiated one of the largest independent studies of fluorescent dimming systems to date. Over the next three to five years, the LRC will run a life-test study to investigate the performance of linear fluorescent lamps on a wide range of dimming ballasts, testing more than 850 systems in all. According to ELC (stakeholder remark anno 2007) dimming has no influence on the lamp life. Curve efficiency versus dimming level needed.

59

20 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut Chapter 2: “Operated on magnetic ballasts, most lamp wattages need one ballast per lamp. Electronic ballasts are designed to operate several lamps at the same time, which allows the use of one ballast only for any luminaire, independent of the number of lamps.” • This is not necessarily so. There are also a considerable number

of single-lamp electronic ballasts around, and quite a number of lamps in the range up to 18 W are suitable for »tandem« operation as two on one magnetic ballast. By the way, this is a very advantageous mode of operation, which should be mentioned in an adequate place in the paper.

� Is related to chapter 1 and chapter 2 (p.61). The text is updated.

21 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut Chapter 2: “The market is dominated by magnetic ballasts anno 2004 (see previous paragraphs). Some companies might experience/suffer severe competition if electronic ballast technology takes over the old ferromagnetic control gear technology because other production lines and technological competences are needed.” • To my knowledge this is not so. The typical producer of the

magnetic ballast does not exist in all of Western Europe. I know only one minor Bulgarian producer offering magnetic ballasts only; all others offer both. Strange though it may sound, this leads to an imbalance of this said market because to the producer there is much more added value in an electronic ballast with its higher price and much shorter lifetime expectancy. Therefore magnetic ballasts have no lobby.

� No comments received from ELC and CELMA.

60

22 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut In chapter 3 it says: “Power factor compensation capacitors are used with magnetic ballasts. The capacitance decreases with capacitor age. Poor performance of this capacitor is causing an increase of useless currents in the distribution grid and additional power losses in this distribution grid.” • Yes, but this is theory. The lifetime expectancy of capacitors is

very long, and the active power losses even in a very old capacitor are negligible. So is the loss of capacitance over the decades, while a small error in compensating capacitance also has as much as no effect at all.

� We think that we should take this into account for an equal comparison because we take the limited lifetime of electronic ballasts also into account.

23 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut In chapter 3: “Moreover discharge lamps are causing third harmonic currents that cannot be compensated in magnetic ballasts. These third harmonic currents (limited by EN 61000-3-2) can cause increased magnetic losses in distribution transformers. Only electronic ballast with pure sine wave electronic power factor correctors can overcome this problem. This power factor corrector feature is standard for electronic ballasts with lamp power above 22 Watt as required by EN 61000-3-2.” • The limit is 25 W. Apart from this, the harmonic content in the

current of a fluorescent lamp with magnetic ballast is minor, ≈10…20% of harmonic distortion, which is totally harmless compared to other electricity users, such as compact fluorescent lamps <25 W, TV sets etc (≈80%). The power factor correction feature for electronic ballasts is not perfect either (also ≈10…20% of distortion, see example measurements attached – here it is even 18.9% for electronic and 12.9% for magnetic gear), but as mentioned, this is totally tolerable.

� The text is adapted to “ 25W “.

61

24 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut In chapter 6 it says: “A large improvement in lamp efficacy can be obtained with high-frequency operation of fluorescent lamps. A typical 10 % efficacy gain (p. 209, Lighting handbook( 1995)) can be obtained by operating the lamp above 10 kHz compared to 50 or 60 Hz line frequency operation. … Electronic ballasts are intrinsic more efficient compared to electromagnetic ballasts and electromagnetic ballasts can never close the gap in energy efficiency.” • Well, we had a series of tests carried out with an appropriately

equipped, neutral institute. On a 58 W T8 lamp they found that at the point of equal light outputs with both an A3 electronic ballast and with a magnetic B1 ballast on the same lamp (which was the case at 222 V input voltage, not at 230 V), the difference of input power was only 2.1 W. Now either this 2.1 W difference is attributable to the 10% lamp efficacy improvement due to the higher frequency; then the ballast losses are equal. Or the 10% difference is attributable to the lower ballast losses; then there is no improvement of lamp efficacy through higher frequency. By all means, there can be no talk of a »large improvement«.

� CELMA official data are used.

62

CELMA/ELC OIL

General coment on task 4 & 6: The reports contain much material and figures. The working groups considered mainly issues related to ballasts but did not study the content and figures in detail. Giving these comments does not mean that the working group agrees with the content in general. The working group’s opinion is that the major impact to the environment is caused by the energy used in the use phase. Therefore many aspects of the study e.g. BOM analysis is of minor importance (only few percents). Therefore the WG considered unnecessary to look at the correctness of these figures. The working group stated that the highest energy saving potential is in the renovation of the installed park of the luminaires. In the new installations, the good design of the lighting application have much more saving potential than considering just the energy efficiency of luminaires. Good lighting design utilizes e.g. intelligent lighting control (occupancy detectors, daylight utilization), which can typically save 20-30% energy. Good lighting design ensures the adequate lighting levels and quality of light, as defined in EN 12464. These cannot be taken care in the IM, which is based only on luminaire requirements (placing on the market). Therefore the EuP implementing measure, after confirmation that the “putting into service” is not applicable, can affect only a marginal part of the total energy saving potential in the office lighting.

� Noted. This study is only on product level.

25 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 In § 4.1.1, page 6, • the lamps used (tab. 1) does not cover compact fluorescent

lamps.

� These lamps are not considered in the base case. We propose to add the BOM in chapter 4, that can be used in chapter 8 for further impact analysis.

26 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 At page 7, first paragraph, • the power of the lamp should be 36W instead of 18W.

� ILCOS-code in text was wrong. Adapted ILCOS FD-18-E-G13-26/600.

63

27 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 At page 7, in paragraph “Ceiling Mounted (Category A1)” in 3rd line, • delete IP2X

� Terminology from CIE 97 is used.

28 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 8, clause 4.1.3 Ballast (control gear) Production:

� Clarification of this question is needed (at stakeholder meeting).

29 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 After Table 5 of § 4.1 • it is stated that among luminaires no significant differences are

on their weight, according to VHK study.

� Not mentioned as this. What is the remark?

30 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 § 4.3.1.1: • the parasitic power should be calculated as in EN 15193; • in the third paragraph the word “parasitic” is written twice.

� OK. Adapted.

31 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 § 4.3.1.1: • Is UF different from the parameter used in Chapter 1?

� No.

32 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 16, clause4.3.1.3, figure life span of lamps: • Life of the lamp is not as important as the efficacy of the lamp,

as the impact on the environment is mostly determined by the energy use in the use phase.

� Will be confirmed in chapter 5.

33 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 In Figure 2, page 16, • the CFL with external ballast span life should be checked.

� OK. Figure 28 and 29 have to be updated. Information from stakeholders asked.

34 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 17: • last sentence of the 3rd paragraph could be skipped.

� OK. Skipped.

64

35 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 17: • to delete the text in 4th paragraph, last but one phrase:

“Therefore it is unrealistic to assume that they are applied in office lighting.” to avoid a complete ban of incandescent lamps and halogens, that in some cases are necessary for a proper lighting.

� We don’t see the need of using incandescent and halogen lamps in office lighting task area according to EN 12464-1? Please clarify (at the stakeholder meeting).

36 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page17, 4th paragraph: • EN 12464-1 is not mandatory in many countries and it is

unknown if it is or not common practice to use it in all European Countries. The sentence “Therefore it is unrealistic to assume that…” should be re-considered.

� The sentence is rephrased: T8 fluorescent lamps are sold in Tri-phosphor and halophosphate, more info on the technology will be included in chapter 6. T8 halophosphate is more sold in numbers compared to Tri-phosphor (see chapter 2 (ELC data 2005)). T8 halophosphate lamps have poor colour rendering (Ra < 80) and therefore do not match the EN 12464-1 requirements for office work. In general, standard EN 12464-1 states that ' Lamps with a colour rendering index lower than 80 should not be used in interiors where people work or stay for longer periods'. Halophophate lamps are therefore not commonly used when dimensioning new office lighting installations, however this does not exclude from use or at lamp replacement (see data chapter 2). Another important difference between halo- and tri-phosphate lamps is the poor efficiency of halophosphate lamps in comparison with the high efficiency of the tri-bands lamp. In chapter 6 and 8 the halo-phosphate lamps will be qualitatively reconsidered in their proper application perspective but they are excluded for the base case assessment in chapter 5.

37 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 18, Table 8: • the code LLF should be replaced by LFL (twice)

� OK. Adapted.

38 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 19, Table 11: • the capacitor for 18W lamp could be checked; the proper value

should be 4.5uF.

� OK. Adapted.

39 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 19, Table 11 • is with the same content as Table 12. Should either table have

other content?

� OK. Table deleted.

65

40 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 20, Table 13: • the ballast prices are not correct and it is better to leave it out. • the values in efficiency and ballast price columns are not

correct. The efficiency values should correspond to the values calculated from the CELMA guide values.

� Ballast prices are needed for LCC calculation. Catalogue price was adapted (60% discount). To be discussed at the meeting (see ELC comments).

� Efficiency is adapted.

41 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 On page 21, 1st paragraph: • the paragraph should be more accurate on BLF • the meaning of point 2 is not clear

� Update needed. Approach to be discussed at the meeting.

42 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 27: • The UF values for cellular offices were systematic lower

compared to open plane offices. • Why UF is used to compare installation? There are no reasons

for such statement

� It is for information only (indeed not product related). Is converted in a remark.

43 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 27: • the table number is missing (Table 18)

� OK. Adapted.

44 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 29: • the first table number is missing (Table 19)

� OK. Adapted.

45 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Due to the previous comments 10 and 11 • the present numbering from 18 should be changed accordingly.

� OK. Adapted.

46 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 30: • Table 20 and 21: to be updated.

� OK. Adapted.

66

47 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 30: • the scope of this part of the report is not clear. The estimation

of 35% written after the two tables, in paragraph “conclusions” should be verified.

� Scope see introduction on section 4. “System related issues.”

48 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 30: • the EPB directive does not link to the right installations

because the EN 12464-1 is not a mandatory standard.

� Maybe in future see section on prEN 15193.

49 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 4 Page 32, §4.5 General remark: • it would be necessary to know the amount of luminaire present

on the market (that are mainly metallic and a part in plastic).

� It is related to the BOM of new luminaires (Bart has to confirm).

50 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 6 Page 12, clause 6.1.6 Improved efficiency for electronic ballasts, bullet points: • Ballast industry cannot agree with the views presented in these

bullet points. The presented methods are already in use where applicable and only marginal improvement is to be expected compared to the current status of technology used already in ballasts.

� Text adapted ' 6.1.6 Improved efficiency for electronic ballasts compared to CELMA EEI = A2 & A1.

� Text adapted: The technical solutions 'are' into 'were' Please provide an alternative explanation if necess ary .

51 CELMA/ELC OIL on chapter 6 Page 12, clause 6.1.6 Improved efficiency for electronic ballasts, table and conclusion: � The figures in the table could not be confirmed to be correct.

Industry does not consider these savings to be significant in the total scope of the energy saving in lighting. It is more important to renovate the old installation with C and D ballasts than to improve ballasts which have only marginal effect to total energy saving.

� Based on catalogue data.

� EEI = C and D can not be an issue in this BAT - chapter.

67

52 ELC on chapter 5 Page 8 - BOM: • no mention is made of halophosphate lamps which in our mind

is not correct - these are still a major product installed in Europe, and our industry and the EU should support the switch to halophosphate lamps - thus we need them in the base case.

� The BOM for halophosphate lamps was integrated in table 48 (chapter 4). We calculate the ecoreport for halophosphate lamps in chapter 7, option 1 to compare the use of these inefficient lamps in comparison with the good tri-phosphor lamps. We only do not take them into account for the base case.

53 ELC on chapter 5 Page 8 - BOM: • "a mercury content of 5 mg is assumed for all these lamps" -

should be modified for halophosphate at least. Although 5 mg is not correct for all lamps in the market (many having a lower content) I suggest not mentioning this to make things not too complicated.

� The BOM for halophosphate lamps marks now a mercury content of 10 mg (chapter 4).

54 ELC on chapter 5 Page 9 - Table 1 - "Lamp lumen output"

• stated too high for T8 (referring to typical industry catalogue values) with 3348 vs. typical 3200, stated far too low for T5 with 4428 vs. typical max. lumen values at 35°C of 5000 lm

� For the T8 36W 840 lamp, all consulted catalogues (5 members of ELC) mention 3350lm. For T5 lamps, we can adapt the values in accordance to the data of tables 53&54 in chapter 4 (data for 35°C).

55 ELC on chapter 5 Page 9 - Table 1 - "Ballast unit cost" • vor CCG I think 2,90 € is too low for 2 x CCG + 2 x starter -

suggest 4,00 €; on the other hand 17,20 for a non-dimmable (?) 1x54W ballast seems rather high to me.

� See chapter 4.

56 ELC on chapter 5 Page 9 - Table 1 - "luminaire cost" • price difference between 2x36W T8 and 1x54W T5 of 400%

seems far too high for me

� See chapter 4.

57 ELC on chapter 5 Page 9 - Tabel 1 • Burning hours - more typical would be 3000 h in office lighting

(?)

� See section 3.2.3 User influence on switching schemes (annual operating time) based on prEN15193-1 Annex G.

68

58 ELC on chapter 5 Page 10 - table at top of page, last line: • 2.5 mg Hg / year for T8 (with 5 mg assumed at 6 year life-

time) is not clear to me, even less clear is why Hg is assumed to be 0,9 for T5 with the same base data?

� The value is based on the base case (0,5 lamps per year):

o 1 luminaire with 2 lamps

o 2500 burning hours per year

o replacement of lamps every 10000h (according to CIE 97).

59 ELC on chapter 5 Page 10 - Disposal and Recycling • have asked round if we have any data (GERALD: is there an

official ELC statement from WEEE on this one?) • General: have forwarded the following pages to my

Environmental Departement (Osram) for comments and will distribute them in case there are any

� New information on stakeholder meeting?

60 ELC on chapter 7 Page 9 - second to last paragraph:

• again halophosphate lamps are not considered due to non-conformity with EN 12464-1 - however this does not reflect reality, and halo should be included.

� The effects of the halophosphate lamps are calculated in this study in option 1 from this chapter 7. They are not taken into account for the base case to keep the model more comprehensible.

61 ELC on chapter 7 Page 9 - last paragraph: • do not understand the logic - should we assume 18W with

75 lm / W should be replaced with 58W with 90 lm / W?

� We adapted the text. This section concerns only T5 lamps.

62 ELC on chapter 7 Page 10 - first paragraph: • this is also not quite clear to me as there needs to be a certain

lumen package for the lighting plan, thus a switch from 54W HO to 28W HE is not so often possible?

� This option calculates the impact of changing HE T5 lamps by HO T5 lamps. More energy use against less lamps and luminaires (see EcoReport).

69

63 ELC on chapter 7 Page 10 - second paragraph: • this would imply there are lamps with high CRI and others with

high efficacy? Maybe this refers to > 90 colours, however then it should be stated clearly, otherwise it creates the impression that we have some lamps with low CRI but very high efficacy.

� The option concerns T5 lamps with efficacies that are less sensitive to temperature change. The remark is indeed made for the Ra ≥ 90 lamps. Text is clarified as follows: ‘Remark: Within the same technology (tri-phosphor fluorescent lamps T5 as well as T8) it is also possible to trade-off between improved colour rendering (Ra ≥ 90) and efficacy. This will not be calculated in this study because Ra ≥ 80 is base case for office lighting. Lamps with Ra ≥ 90 are more expensive and have lower efficacies. They are only needed for special visual tasks where excellent colour rendering is needed and therefore they are not included in the base case.’

64 ELC on chapter 7 Page 11 - 7.2.1.5: • this means "clean luminaire more often and then LMF is

increased"? What would be the logic?

� Text adapted 7.2.1.5 ‘Luminaires that easily can be cleaned resulting in improved luminaire maintenance factor (LMF).’

65 ELC on chapter 7 Page 12 - Option 7.2.2.1: • while going from T8 to T5 may only lead to a small overall

BOM impact, the efficiency gain should be much bigger.

� This is only possible if higher lumen output at 35°C can be introduced. Information by stakeholders needed.

66 ELC on chapter 7 Page 14 - Preliminary conclusions: • exclusion of halophosphate should (once again) not be taken as

granted, as there is not only a huge installed base, but also a lot of new lamps installed (in Southern Europe, Eastern Europe, UK)

� See previous related remarks.

67 ELC on chapter 7 Page 14 - bottom of page: • LED / OLED: some mention should be made of timelines - for

the next 5-10 years I do not see any significant improvement in efficiency of office lighting with LED / OLED technology.

� We take note of this statement; LED / OLED are considered as BNAT for office lighting.

70

68 CELMA on chapter 5 & 7 The WG has a general comments on chapter 5 (and than also for the chapter 7): • we are not aware on the origin of data and so we cannot have

an opinion, • the content of Option 6 in Chapter 7 (page 11) is related to the

type of reflector/diffuser used.

� More guidance on the origin of data will be included in the final version of chapter 5.

� Indeed, the manufacturer should provide the most appropriate solution in accordance to the application.

69 CELMA on chapter 5 General comment The reports contain much material and figures. The working group considered mainly issues related to ballasts but did not study the content and figures in detail. Giving these comments does not mean that the working group agrees with the content in general. The working group’s opinion is that the major impact to the environment is caused by the energy usage in the use phase. Therefore many aspects of the study e.g. BOM analysis is of minor importance (only few percents). Therefore the wg considered unnecessary to look at the correctness of these figures. The working group stated that the highest energy saving potential is in the renovation of the installed park of the luminaires. In the new installations, the good design of the lighting application have much more saving potential than considering just the energy efficiency of luminaires. Good lighting design utilizes e.g. intelligent lighting control (occupancy detectors, daylight utilization), which can typically save 20-30% energy. Good lighting design ensures the adequate lighting levels and quality of light, as defined in EN 12464. These cannot be taken care in the IM, which is based only on luminaire requirements (placing on the market). Therefore the EuP implementing measure, after confirmation that the “putting into service” is not applicable, can affect only a marginal part of the total energy saving potential in the office lighting.

� We take note of these statements. As mentioned earlier, this study is only product related.

71

70 CELMA on chapter 7 Page 10, clause 7.2.1.2, Option 2:

• Industry cannot accept this option. Transition from B2 to B1 requires too high investments (much higher than from C to B2) which are not sensible in the declining market.

� This remark will be considered in chapter 8 when discussing related IMs. To be discussed at the stakeholder meeting.

71 CELMA on chapter 7 Page 10, clause 7.2.1.2, Option 3:

• This option is agreeable providing that there is reserved sufficient lead time (10 years) to allow industry to adapt its production and to meet the increased demand of electronic ballasts and that B1&B2 magnetic ballasts are still permitted for those applications where they are better suited.

� Chapters 1 to 7 focus on office lighting. This remark will be considered in chapter 8 when discussing related IMs.

72 CELMA on chapter 7 Page 10, clause 7.2.1.2, Option 4:

• This is not acceptable; see comments Chapter 6, clause 6.1.6.

� This remark will be considered in chapter 8 when discussing related IMs.

73 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut

Dear, Please let me add another idea: Usually lifetime tests on fluorescent lamps, when carried out with magnetic ballasts, are done using common glow starters. Some experts in the field say the lamp life could be at least as long as with electronic ballasts when using magnetic ballasts together with electronic starters. Others deny this. Opinions are conflicting but there is no data available on the lamp lifetime expectancy with magnetic ballasts and electronic starters. Would it be an idea to include such a test in your examinations? I know a number of companies and organisations who are interested enough in having such results, so that they would be willing to support such a complex test, but none of them is able to pay for it alone. I could make contacts if this were welcome. Just let me know.

� ELC please comment.

72

74 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut Dear Of course I support option 1. It does not become entirely clear to me whether option 2 relates to a general prohibition of class B2. I would object this because there are some applications with short operating periods where an upgrade to B1 is both economically and ecologically inefficient. But I would support this measure if it is meant to apply to office lighting only. Here the annual usage is always around 3000h/a, where B1 should be more economical than B2. As for improvement potential in option 3, when discussing this in chapter 8, please make sure you do not use the power ratings given in the Directive 2000/55/EG but true measured values. For a number of reasons the ratings tend to be tuned to the advantage of electronic ballasts. True measured values suggest something different than what can be concluded from the Directive, as I pointed out earlier (see attached).

� Chapters 1 to 7 focus on office lighting. This remark will be considered in chapter 8. Please note that in our model we take into account the shorter lifetime of electronic ballasts inclusive the extra replacement cost when calculating the LCC! For more information see chapter 4 and the EcoReports from chapter 5 and 7 on the website.

75 Stefan Fassbinder - Deutsches Kupferinstitut Option 4 – stand-by losses for A1 type fluorescent lamp ballasts: Yes, this is an important issue, and there is also a lot of customer dissatisfaction with sensitive electronic gear causing a lot of configuration and adjustment costs until it finally works properly. This should be included in the calculation, however hard it may be to quantify. I think you should also compare it to a plain and simple solution that uses B1 magnetic ballasts and a light sensor to switch off the light at a certain daylight level, which then requires manual action to turn it on again. What I usually observe in offices is that in winter when it is dark in the morning everybody switches on the light and then forgets about it when the sun rises. A plain and simple auto-off and manual-on solution would probably serve most customers’ needs better than sophisticated electronic gear.

� This product is not available on the market up to our knowledge and therefore not considered.

73

ANNEX L COMMENTS ON CHAPTER 8 Comments from ELC: General comment: • The current published version of Chapter 8 is incomplete, with

complete many paragraphs stating "under consideration". The ELC requests the right to provide final comments on the complete report, where all relevant elements clearly link together.

� Indeed this is a draft version that will be completed.

Page 10/11: paragraph 8.1.1.2: • We believe this paragraph must be based upon the provided Eco-

Profiles. This information must be leading and the targets must be mandatory. As this document is focused on office lighting, lamps not used for general lighting but for special applications must be exempted. LLMF's must be part of the document and be presented in a comprehensive way. Targets up to lifetimes of 5000 hrs must be added.

� EcoProfiles of ELC are used in the final version.

74

Table 4: • The ELC does not agree to the use of this table. This table does not

sufficiently support energy efficient lamps and would disqualify most CFLni lamps. Eco-Profiles FL and CFLni Annex 1, provide clear information and exemptions, based on lm/W targets. All ELC lamps conform to the RoHS Directive, thus we support a mercury target of < 5mg. This is also listed in our Eco-Profile for FL Lamps.

� Tables are adapted in harmony with the provided EcoProfiles from ELC.

Page 11: • The ELC believes lamps with Ra>90 are used and optimised for

special applications, and not for general lighting.

� A compensation factor for lamps with Ra≥90 is applied.

75

Page 11: • Lamps that are used for special applications are listed in Annex 2 of

Eco Profiles and thus excluded from performance criteria specified in Annex 1. These lamps are not marketed or commercialised primarily for the production of visible light. They are marketed however where: - the non-visible radiation has highest importance; - different looking lamp designs are relevant for use; and - different applications require specific lamps.

� Text adapted in harmony with ELC statements.

Page 11: • LLMF - The ELC agrees of the use the maximum LLMF value of

80% at 5,000hrs for FL and CFLni lamps

� In harmony with the table sent by ELC itself, a minimum LLMF of 0,90 can be applied.

Page 11: • Lamp efficacy to be measured after 100hrs of burning as stated in

IEC 60081.

� Explicitly mentioned in the text.

Page 11: • The ELC requests the use of approved legislation (RoHS Directive

2202/95/EC)) for mercury content in lamps. 1. Mercury in compact fluorescent lamps not exceeding 5 mg per lamp. 2. Mercury in straight fluorescent lamps for general purposes not exceeding: — halophosphate 10 mg — triphosphate with normal lifetime 5 mg — triphosphate with long lifetime 8 mg 3. Mercury in straight fluorescent lamps for special purposes. 4. Mercury in other lamps not specifically mentioned in this Annex.

� A recommendation is made to adapt the RoHS directive. An absolute maximum mercury content of 8mg for LFL will be proposed.

76

Comments from CELMA: These comments were expressed at the stakeholder-expert consultation. They are also included in the Minutes of Meeting from the Stakeholder-expert consultation on 10TH MAY 2007 (see Annex E ). LER: CELMA is elaborating a similar system.

� Vito can mention this ongoing development in the study and recommend to take it into consideration in the framework of the EuP directive implementation when it becomes available.

Page 200: • Refer to CE-mark instead of LV-directive.

� CE-mark is connected to the LV-directive. This needs to be elaborated by the EC after the study.

Page 203: ‘ category A3 is obsolete ’ • This is not correct; they are still in use for very compact ballasts

without cut off technology. Remark: category EEI = A1 dimming ballasts have level EEI= A3 in non dimming conditions. It is also confirmed that the coexistence of EEI = A1 versus EEI = A2 and A3 is confusing for users because A1 refers to dimming ballasts only. A way out is to introduce levels EEI = AD1, AD2 for dimming ballasts and EEI = A1, A2, A3, for non dimming. Also more efficient BAT ballasts exist compared to the actual EEI = A1 and A2. A revision of this classification can be recommended.

� Requirement adapted for low power lamps. (After the meetingHelvar reported that neither they still produce A3 ballasts.)

Page 205: ‘2. Increase to B1…’ • Should be corrected to plastic IP4X luminaires only.

� OK. Adapted.

Page 208: table 96 • 1990 A1 direct lighting % is to high and should be corrected.

� OK. Adapted.

Page 208: table 96 • Add ballasts EEI level assumptions and references to sources or

previous chapters.

� Partially adapted.

Page 210: table 210 • Ballast reliability is wrong terminology.

� OK. Was already adapted in a recent version.

77

Page 212: ‘ e.g. 8m²…’ • Is very limiting; 15m² is more realistic and there should be added:

‘a control switch within a distance of 11m from a luminaire should be required’.

� OK. Adapted.

Page 213 section 8.1.6: • Should be reformulated towards its focus for ‘easy market

surveillance’.

� OK. Text adapted and clarified.

79

ANNEX M STAKEHOLDER LIST ON 19 TH JUNE 2007.

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

N. Copernicus Observatory and Planetarium in Brno and Int. Dark Sky Assoc., Czech Section Jan Hollan Czech Republic national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ABB Gianluca Donato Italy Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Agoria Laurent Hellebaut Belgium national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

AIDI Paolo Soardo Italy national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

AIE Evelyne Schellekens Belgium SME international ■ ■ ■

Arcelor Sigrid Jacobs Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■

Artemide Bernard Chevalier France Large ■ ■ ■ ■

ASSIL / ANIE Sandro Benini ■ Italy national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ASSIL / ANIE Fabio Pagano Italy national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Austrian Association of Electricity Companies (VEÖ) Karl Pitel Austria national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Austrian Standards Institute Monika Hartl Austria national ■ ■ ■ ■

AustrianEnergyAgency Thomas Barth Austria national ■ ■ ■ ■

BEGHELLI SPA Fabio Pedrazzi Italy Large ■ ■

BIO Intelligence Service S.A.S. Shailendra Mudgal France

Boockmann GmbH Kai Boockmann Germany SME international ■

BRE Environment Hilary Graves United Kingdom Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

CCCME(China Chamber of Commerce) Cai Ming China national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

CCI Slovenia Zarko Jenko Slovenia national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

CE Lighting Ltd Mick Wilkes China Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

CELMA Stéphanie Mittelham Belgium international ■ ■ ■ ■

Centre Design Est-France Edith Nanty France SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

80

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

CieloBuio Fabio Falchi Italy national ■ ■ ■

Concord Lighting Ltd Ray Newnham United Kingdom Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Concord:marlin Jon Hinton United Kingdom Large international ■ ■ ■

Danish Energy Authority Peter Nielsen Denmark national

Danish Environmental Protection Agency Janus Lorentz-Petersen Denmark

Danish Illuminating Engineering Society Kenneth Munck Denmark SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

DISANO ILLUMINAZIONE SPA Lorenzo Franchi Italy Large international ■ ■ ■

DKI Deutsches Kupferinstitut Berufsverband Stefan Fassbinder ■ Germany national ■ ■ ■

Eamonn Bates Europe Feodora von Franz Belgium SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Ecofys Rogier Coenraads Netherlands SME ■ ■

Eden Energy Hugues Dailliez France national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ELC Federation Gerald Strickland Belgium international ■ ■ ■

Electricity of France Odile Le Cann France Large national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ENDS Europe Sonja van Renssen Belgium Large international ■ ■

Energy piano Casper Kofod Denmark SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Environment and Development Foundation Albert Chen Taiwan SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

ERCO Leuchten GmbH Ralf Wershoven ■ Germany national ■ ■ ■

Especialidades Luminotecnicas S.A. Marco Antonio Lahoz Pfeiffer Spain Large ■ ■ ■

Essexnexans Leonard Danel France Large ■ ■ ■

Etap Lighting Frans Taeymans ■ Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

ETAP NV Luc Truyen Belgium SME ■ ■ ■ ■

ETAP NV Ronny Verbeeck Belgium Large national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

EuP network Germany Dirk Jepsen Germany ■ ■

EuroCommerce Christel Davidson Belgium international ■

Eurofer Clare Broadbent Belgium international

European Commission Andras Toth Belgium international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

European Copper Institute Hans De Keulenaer Belgium international ■ ■

81

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

European Copper Institute Sergio Ferreira Belgium international ■ ■ ■ ■

European Lamp Companies Federation Jarita Christie ■ Belgium international ■

Eutema Technology Management GmbH Erich Prem Austria SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

EÝEÝ Derya Aydemir Turkey national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Federale Raad voor Duurzame Ontwikkelling Stefanie Hugelier Belgium national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Finnish Environment Institute Ari Nissinen Finland national ■ ■

Foresite Systems Rupert Foxall United Kingdom SME international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

FOTISTIKI SA Pakis Sotiropoulos Greece SME ■ ■

Foundation of taiwan Industry service Dinah Tai Taiwan SME green NGO ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Foundation of taiwan Industry service Lin Yei Taiwan SME national ■ ■

Fraunhofer IZM Karsten Schischke Germany national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Future Electronics Mauro Ceresa Italy Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

General Electric Ferenc Papp Hungary Large ■

Genesis Energy Kelvin Blackwell New Zealand Large national ■

German Energy Agency Tobias Marsen Germany national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Groen Licht Vlaanderen Catherine Lootens ■ Belgium SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Helvar Max Björkgren Finland Large international ■ ■ ■

Helvar Leena Tähkämö Finland SME international ■ ■ ■ ■

Idman Oy Riikka Lahdenperä Finland SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Illuminating Engineering Society of Finland Heikki Härkönen Finland national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

IMQ SpA Paolo Gianoglio Italy Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

INDAL Federico Arias Spain Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Industria b.v. Nic van Koningsbruggen Netherlands Large ■ ■ ■ ■

Industrias Ventura S.L. Rafael del Aguila Alvarez Spain SME ■ ■

Industry Technology Research Insittute Nick, Tzu-Yar Liu Taiwan national ■ ■

Industry Technology Research Insittute George, Shin-Ru Tang Taiwan national ■ ■

INECSA Manel Gonzalez Spain SME international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

82

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

Infineon Technologies Werner Ludorf Germany Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Infineon Technologies AG Michael Herfurth ■ Germany Large ■ ■ ■

Infineon Technologies AG Manfred Schlenk ■ Germany Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Infra Engineering Menno Van Noort Netherlands Large

International CFL Harmonisation Initiative Stuart Jeffcott United Kingdom

International Dark-Sky Association Europe Friedel Pas Belgium international ■

IREM SpA Marco Ugo Italy SME ■

ISGR Hisao Nakashima Japan SME national ■ ■

IVF Industrial Research and Development Corp. Anna Karin Jönbrink Sweden national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

KERP Andreas Schiffleitner Austria SME international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

KREIOS Lieven Vanhooydonck ■ Belgium SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

LABORELEC Marc Vanden Bosch ■ Belgium international ■ ■ ■ ■

LG Electronics Hee Il Park KOREA Large international ■

Light Consult International Axel Stockmar Germany ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Lighting Industry Federation ltd Bernard Pratley United Kingdom SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

lisheng Jeff Zhu China SME international ■ ■ ■

Lund University Carl Dalhammar Sweden national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Lysteknisk Selskab Ulrich Klausen Denmark SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Lysteknisk Selskab Velk Denmark national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

MA 39-VFA Nikolaus Thiemann Austria Large national ■ ■ ■ ■

Metrolight Inc. Jonathan Hollander United States Large international ■ ■

Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic Jan Magyar Slovakia national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Ministry of Economy, Labour and Entrepreneurship Hrvoje Medarac Croatia national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

MUSEUM AM SCHÖLERBERG Andreas Hänel Germany

NEMA Craig Updyke United States Large national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Neonlite Tony Yu China Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Neonlite Electronic & Lighting (HK) Ltd Debbie Tam China SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

83

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

Nowak Licht und Strom e.K. Alexander Nowak Germany SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Odyssey Energy Limited Roger Loveless New Zealand SME ■

Öko-Institut e.V. Dietlinde Quack Germany national ■ ■

OSRAM Josef Stienen Germany Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

OSRAM GmbH Richard Lothholz ■ Germany Large

OSRAM-Italy Pietro Tedesco Italy Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Palmstep Electronics Ltd Jan Christlieb Mauritius Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

Panasonic MEI Gareth Rice Japan Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

PETITJEAN Helet Sebastien France SME national ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Bert Kenis Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Paul Wu China Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips AG Lighting Job Daams Switzerland Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Electronics Peter Adriaans Netherlands Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Frank Altena Netherlands Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Eddy Ceelen Netherlands Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Robert Class Germany Large international ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Gil Soto Tolosa Netherlands Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Jan Zeguers Netherlands Large ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting BV Marcel Jacobs Netherlands Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lighting Turnhout Dirk Smeyers Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Lys A/S Hans Jørgen Jacobsen Denmark Large national ■ ■ ■ ■

Philips Nederland BV Jan Veldhuis ■ Netherlands Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Planning & Architecture Thomas Christoffersen Denmark Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

PlesTech Ltd Graham Adams United Kingdom SME international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Prismalence AB Lars Bergkvist Sweden SME ■

Rijkswaterstaat Bob Hamel Netherlands national ■ ■ ■

R-Tech Marc Gillet Belgium Large ■ ■ ■ ■

84

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

SAFE Giuse Togni Switzerland national ■

Schréder Uitrusting Rob Verbeelen Belgium SME ■

SenterNovem Ruud van Wordragen Netherlands national ■

Sibelga Benedicte Collard Belgium Large national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Siteco Oliver Scopes United Kingdom Large ■ ■ ■ ■

Siteco Beleuchtungstechnik GmbH Kai Hendrik Sabla Germany SME international ■

Siteco Beleuchtungstechnik GmbH Bernhard Schroll Germany SME international ■ ■ ■

SLI Christian Brehm Germany Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

SLI Sylvania Wannong Eckhardt Germany Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

SLI Sylvania Rudy Geens Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

STU FEI Bratislava Dionyz Gasparovsky Slovakia national ■ ■

Sylvania Nicole Loysch Belgium Large international ■

Syndicat Eclairage Jacques Villat France SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Synergrid Koen Wouters Belgium national ■

Technical University Iasi Dorin Lucache Romania SME international ■ ■ ■ ■

Technology Industries of Finland Carina Wiik Finland national ■ ■ ■ ■

Thanglong Neon Co Nguyen Van Tien Noord-Vietnam. SME ■ ■ ■ ■

The Centre Jacek Truszczynski Belgium SME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

The Danish Electricity Saving Trust Poul Erik Pedersen ■ Denmark

The Lighting Association Keven Kearney United Kingdom national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Thorn Lighting Ltd Lou Bedocs United Kingdom Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Thorn Lighting Ltd Peter Thorns United Kingdom Large ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

TridonicAtco GmbH & Co KG Roy Vageskar Austria Large international ■

TRILUX Jan Van Riel Belgium Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Troyes University of Technology Fabrice Mathieux France national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Troyes University of Technology Alexandre Diepdalle France national ■ ■ ■

Tungsram-Schréder Zrt Péter Schwarcz Hungary SME international ■ ■

85

CompanyName First name Last name

Mee

ting

Offi

ce

02/

04/2

007

Country

Typ

e c

ompa

ny

nat

iona

l /

inte

rnat

iona

l

inte

rest

la

mp

inte

rest

lu

min

aire

inte

rest

c

ontr

ol g

ear

inte

rest

s

tree

tligh

ting

inte

rest

o

ffice

light

ing

TUV Gary Hu China international ■ ■ ■

TUV Rheinland Adams Liu China Large international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

TWI Ltd David Calder United Kingdom international ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

UK Market Transformation Programme Hilary Graves ■ United Kingdom national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

VITO Theo Daems Belgium

VITO Bart Jansen ■ Belgium national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

VITO Dries Maes Belgium Large international

VITO Veronique Van Hoof Belgium national ■ ■

VITO Paul Van Tichelen ■ Belgium

WTCB - CSTC Arnaud Deneyer Belgium SME national ■ ■ ■ ■

WWF Switzerland Anette Michel Switzerland international ■

Zumtobel Lighting Peter Dehoff Austria Large ■ ■ ■ ■

ZVEI Norbert Wittig Germany SME national ■

ZVEI - Zentralverband Elektrotechnik- und Elektronikindustrie e. V. Dieter Schornick Germany SME national ■ ■ ■ ■ ■

Tachibana Hirokazu Japan Large national ■ ■ ■

Some stakeholders are not mentioned in the list above, because they have expressed their will to be not officially published in this report.

87

ANNEX N VITO PRESENTATION AT 1 ST STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 10TH APRIL 2006

1March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Eco-design studiesLot 8 and 9

Office and public street lightingGeneral presentation

(preliminary version for information only, based on the consultants point of view)

Paul Van Tichelenhttp://www.eup4light.net

2March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Definition of terms• EuP (Energy using Products)• BOM (Bill of Materials)• LCA (Life cycle analysis)• LCC&LLCC ((Least) Life cycle cost)• TCO (Total Cost of Ownership)• BAT&BNAT (Best (Not yet) Available Technology)

• Ref. MEEUP methodology report, p.138-140– BAT = “…giving the highest possible environmental benefit in absolute

terms”• “Not intended as a target level for legislation” but “promotional target”

– LLCC = “best performing” and giving the best environmental “value for money” (per environmental impact indicator)

• “Value of Environmental Parameter at that point is proposed as the threshold value for minimum requirements (legislation) or target for voluntary agreements”

3March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Example from VHK eco-design study for street lighting

Case study (VHK, 2005) for street lighting, system parameters:

• HPL-N (mercury vapour lamps) 125 Watt• Total fixture weight: 6.6 kg• System life: 30 y• 4000 hr/y or 548 kWhr/yEnvironmental impact (LCA summary):• 0,2 kg/y waste hazardous• 12 kg/y waste• 270 kg/y CO2Cost in euro (LCC summary):• product=750, install&maintenance=400,

electricity=1494, lamps=38Main conclusion from VHK example = electricity

use causes main impacts in LCA & LCC!

4March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

What is EuP directive

• see full text: EuPs (2005/32/EC)= “EuP-Establishing a framework for the

setting of ecodesign requirements for Energy using products”

= for products (exact definition see directive)

5March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Some EuP directive properties• ‘Framework directive’ >> implementing measures can

follow later• ‘New approach directive’ >> complies with CE label

product requirements• ‘self regulation’ (including voluntary measures) or

‘implementing measures’• contribute to IPP (integrated product policy)• Focus on eco-design requirements for products entering

the EU market• Review by ‘consultation forum’, preparatory studies are

input for this forum • Related to standardization

6March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

EuP Directive, Annex 1, Part 1

• Part of “Method for setting generic Eco-design requirements”

• Annex 1, Part 1 can be used as a generic framework for a life cycle approach and determination of environmental aspects

• Following slides : – Schematic representation of Annex 1, Part 1 in

matrix form

88

7March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

f) End of life

e) use

d) Installation and maintenance

c) packaging, transport, distribrution

b) manufacturing

a) Raw material use

e) Reuse, recycling, recovery

d) Wastec) Fysical nuisance (noise, radiation,…)

b) air-, water-, soil-emissions

a) energy, water, resources

PARAMETERS / LCA

PART 1 . Ecodesign parameters for EuPs

PA

RT 1.1. “phases of the life cycle of the product:

”

PART 1.2. “environmental aspects to be assessed whe n relevant”

PART 1.3. “parameters for evaluating the potential forImproving the environmental aspects…”

(a) Product weight / volume

(b) Materials issued from recycling(c

) Ene

rgy

use

thro

ugho

utLi

fe C

ycle

(d) Hazardous Substances Use

(f) Ease for reuse and recycling

(g) Incorporation ofUsed components

(h) Avoidance technical solutions detrimental to reuse/recycling

(i) Extension of lifetime (j) A

mou

nts

of w

aste

gene

rate

d

(k)

Em

issi

ons

to a

ir

(l) E

mis

sion

s to

wat

er

(m)

Em

issi

ons

to s

oil

(+)Light Pollution, Noise

8March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

General objectives preparatory study

• Provide the necessary information based on technical, economical and ecological analysis to prepare for the next phases carried out by the Commission (a.o. a consultation forum).

• According to MEEUP methodology report (see website).

9March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Approach Study

• Tasks (summary):– Define the product=

• task1– Collect data (for 3 scenarios)=

• task2 (economic>>LLCC)• task3 (user+local infra)

– Analyse =• task4 (system analysis=interaction model to overall

environmental performance)• task5 (base case calculation = BAU reference)• task6 (technical improvement potential=BAT+BNAT)

– Simulate scenarios =• task7 (3scenarios (BAU, LLCC, BAT(BNAT))

10March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Improvement Potential (MEEUP, p 135-142)

Identification of Design options

Identification of Costs and

Env Benefits of design options

Evaluation OptionsAnalysis LLCC and BAT

Scenario-, Policy-, Impact- andSensitivity analysis

(Example, does not reflect situation for street lighting)

kWh

/ Fun

ctio

nal u

nit

11March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Improvement Potential (MEEUP, p 135-142)

Identification of Design options

Identification of Costs and

Env Benefits of design options

Evaluation OptionsAnalysis LLCC and BAT

Scenario-, Policy-, Impact- andSensitivity analysis

(Example, does not reflect situation for street lighting)

1990 20202006

Delay(IM

in force)

BAU

LLCC2005

BAT2005

EN

V.

IND

ICA

TO

R (

TO

TA

L E

U25

)

WORST CASE SCENARIO

(hypothetical)

2000 2010

BNAT

12March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Approach: ‘communication with stakeholders’

• Level 1 : with all stakeholders (internet = http://www.eup4light.net)

• Level 2 : Key affected stakeholders organisations reps (meetings with ELC, CELMA, ..)

• Level 3 : Personal interviews with registered experts / stakeholders (selected from level1)

• Written enquiries to all EU-25 CIE orgs (=users + manufacturers, incl. standards) for good coverage and data

• Other

89

13March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

MethodKey elements: Part 1

• according to VHK but more detailed :also look at optical system efficiency as functional parameter for

performance assessment, e.g.:

typical 95 % light output ratio (in/out) but system

utilization <50 %

typical 75 % light output ratio (in/out) but system utilization

>50 %

very high light output ratio but lower system

utilization for office desk

Lower light outputratio but higher system

utilization for office desk

14March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

MethodKey elements: Part 1

• Intrastat data is not detailed enough as data source, therefore direct and indirect estimations will be needed:– with production data from manufacturers– with application data (e.g. office surface, km street,

#habitants, #workers, ..) will be sought (CIE enquiries (incl. BIV), national stats, public bids(street), EU greenlight(tbc), FP7 e-street(tbc), IEA workgroups(tbc), sector feds (office market data), Belgian data @ Vito, Save II-EU enlight (eu-enlight.org),..

15March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

MethodKey elements: Part 2

• BAT&BNAT generation of improvement options:– literature and publications– consultant analysis (Laborelec, Kreios)– stakeholder consultation– ..

16March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Planning: Lot 8 (office)

interim report:

15/12Final report:

15/3

N° DESCRIPTION M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M JPART I PRESENT SITUATION 1 Definition

2 Economic and Market Analysis

3 Consumer Behaviour and Local Infrastructure

4 Product System Analysis 5 Definition of Base-Case

PART II IMPROVEMENT POTENTIAL

6 Technical Analysis

7

Scenario-, Policy-, Impact- And Sensitivi ty Analysis

A

INFORMATION SOURCING / PUBLICITY / STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

A.1 Website A.2 Stakeholder Experts M M M

A.3 Participations in other workshops & conferences

A.4 Personal interviews A.5 Consultations in wri ting A.6 Expert Review

B

REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

B.1 Interim Report B.2 Final Report C MEETINGS

C.1 Kick-off meeting Brussels

C.2

(Meeting on Commission's comments draft final report)

M=stakeholder meeting

17March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Planning: lot 9 (street)

interim report: 15/8

Final report:15/11

N° DESCRIPTION M A M J J A S O N D J F I PRESENT SITUATION

1 Definition 2 Economic and Market Analysis

3 Consumer Behaviour and Local Infrastructure

4 Product System Analysis

5 Definition of Base-Case x

II IMPROVEMENT POTENTIAL

6 Technical Analysis

7 Scenario-, Policy-, Impact- And Sensitivity Analysis

A

INFORMATION SOURCING / PUBLICITY / STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

A.1 Website x A.2 Stakeholder Experts M x M M

A.3 Participations in other workshops & conferences

x

A.4 Personal interviews x A.5 Consultations in writing x

A.6 Expert Review

B REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

B.1 Interim Report

B.2 Final Report

C MEETINGS

C.1 Kick-off meeting Brussels

C.2 (Meeting on Commission's comments draft final report)

18March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Important issue Large product-system interference

• The final product performance is strongly related to what has to be lit(system) by its geometry and optical characteristics (in lesser extent for outdoor lighting outdoor climate)

• System geometry and optical performance can be very diverse, especially in street lighting

• High potential of efficiency improvement options are at system level.

90

19March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Stakeholder input

• How:– register at the website http://www.eup4light.net

• What:– Cost, BOM and product data according to product

definition (see definition spreadsheet available later)– Market data: stock, production and trends

– improvement options and state of art

– Models for classification of luminaire efficiency– ..

20March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Product definition(preliminary)

• system level = luminaire• component level or sub assemblies(art. 11):

lamp + control gear +optic system+housing

21March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Luminaire definition(preliminary – detailed spreadsheet will be available later on the website)

• Luminaires for street lighting = functional linked to EN 13201-1&2:

A. Class ME4a- ME1, fast traffic only(e.g. highway):luminance (Cd/m2) specs only

B. Class (ME4a(6)-ME2)&(CE4(6)-CE2), mixed traffic (e.g. intercity):luminance (Cd/m2) and illuminance(lux) specs

C. Class S4-S2(S1), slow traffic only (e.g. urban, pedestrian):illuminance(lux) specs

• Luminaires office lighting market = functional linked to EN 12464-1:

A. Task: normal office work (500 lux)B. Task: other to be defined

22March 8, 2007 © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Important primary performance parameters(preliminary )

• Luminaire (e.g.: cost, components, ..):– Lamp (e.g.: efficacy (lm/W), technical life

time(s), ..)– Control gear (e.g.: efficiency, up to 3 parts, ..)– Optic system (e.g.: light output ratio,..)

Detailed spreadsheet available later on the website!

91

ANNEX O VITO PRESENTATION AT 2 ND STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 12TH MAY 2006

1March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

EuP stakeholder meeting 12/5 on‘manufacturer data enquiry’

EuP preparatory study on office and street lighting

2March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

meeting agenda

• 9h-9h15 short presentation of participants• 9h15-9h45 short presentation of EuP study by

VITO(repeated from previous meeting).• 9h45-10h15 short introduction to model and questions by

VITO introduction to model and questions by VITO• 10h15-10h30 break• 10h30-11h15 presentation 1 by CELMA/ELC + questions• 11h15-12h00 presentation 2 by CELMA/ELC + questions• 12h00-13h15 lunch break• 13h15-.. chronological discussion of questions (list see

hereafter

3March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

• short presentation of EuP– repeated from 10/4 meeting

4March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsProduct definition Street Lighting

• For street lighting according to EN 13201-1&2:– Category A. 'fast traffic only' = with only luminance requirements

Classes: ME4a up to ME1+ older roads with similar requirements not already in line with the new EN 13201 system.

– Category B 'mixed traffic' with both luminance and illuminance requirementsClasses: (ME6 up to ME2) &(CE6 up to CE2)+ older roads with similar requirements not already in line with the new

EN 13201 system.– Category C. 'slow traffic' (urban, pedestrian) with illuminance

requirements onlyClasses: S6 up to S1. + older roads with similar requirements not already in line with the new

EN 13201 system.– Category D: any other public or street lighting system.

5March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsProduct definition Office Lighting

• For office lighting according to EN 12464-1:(2002):– Category A: 'functional (EN 12464-1) task oriented lighting (3.1,

3.3, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7) with high demand‘ (writing, reading, technical drawing, ..).+ older offices with similar requirements not already in line with the new EN 12464-1 system.

– Category B, ‘functional (EN 12464-1) task(1.1, 3.7, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.4) oriented lighting with low demand' (corridor, archives, toilet, ..).+ older offices with similar requirements not already in line with the new EN 12464-1 system.

– Category C: Any other office lighting equipment (e.g.: decorative, ambience, ..).

6March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsModel structure for scenarios

Installed base= application & stock data

(base case approach)

Product data(base case approach)

(VHK) model(includes

environmental and costaspects)

Scenarios

92

7March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsinstalled base

• parameters– km roads, road width, m2 office, office workers,

average illuminance, .. (under definition)

• sources:– Macro-economic data (Eurostat, ..)– Application cases (from publications and

enquiries e.g. CIE members, greenlight, ..)– Application and data questions directed to

manufacturers (see product data!).

8March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsProduct data

• Macro-economic data (urgent)– Linked with installed base (..trough life time)(production volumes + estimates for application (fit or not fit with

definition).– Definition of base cases!

• Product data and parameters– energy performance model and data: see slide later(+photometric

data).– BOM data: luminaire, control gear(1 or 3 parts), lamp.– cost data: luminaire, control gear(1 or 3 parts), lamp.– life time data: luminaire, control gear(1 or 3 parts), lamp.– labour time data: installation, lamp + control gear replacement.

9March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsMacro-economic data

• Enquiry 1: urgent– Consumption data

• EU-25: production, imports, exports• Volume [units] and Value [EUR] data

– Application data• % of total consumption applied in street/office lighting• % of street/office lighting applied per (road) category • Avg lamp power per (road) category

– For 35 lamp categories (if possible), otherwise aggregated per lamp (sub)group

• Enquiry 2: after data interpretation of enquiry 1– Only for relevant lamp types

• Avg lamp efficacy• Avg lamp unit cost

10March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsMacro-economic data

• Enquiry 1: urgent– Consumption data

• EU-25: production, imports, exports• Volume [units] and Value [EUR] data

– Application data• % of total consumption applied in street/office lighting• % of street/office lighting applied per (road) category • Avg lamp power per (road) category

– For 35 lamp categories (if possible), otherwise aggregated per lamp (sub)group

• Enquiry 2: after data interpretation of enquiry 1– Only for relevant lamp types

• Avg lamp efficacy• Avg lamp unit cost

11March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsproduct energy performance model

?gear (ratio <1) = gear efficiency in standard conditions = Plamp/PgridGMF = Gear Maintenance Factor ( < 1)GGF =Gear Gain Factor ( > 1)

?lamp (lumen/Watt) = lamp efficacy in standardconditions (= 100 h)LLMF(ratio)=Lamp Lumen MaintenanceFactor (CIE 154 or 97)

UF(l1 lux.1 m 2/1 lumen)= Utilization factor instandard conditionsLMF(ratio)=Luminaire MaintenanceFactor (CIE154 or 97)

1

(UF * LMF) * (?lamp * LLMF) * (?gear * GMF * GGF)

LPDi[ W /( m² x 1lx)]

Lighting PowerDensity for1(00) luxilluminance perm²

e.g.(typical):indoor lighting

2.5 Watt/(100 lux.m2)

=

energyperformance

luminaire lamp control gear

remark: there is a strong relation between UF and the environment (defined room or street)

12March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction to model and questionsproduct energy performance model

modified for street lighting luminance case

LPDl[W /(m² x (1cd / m²))]= LPDi[W /( m² x 1lx)]/ R= Lighting Power Density pro 1 cd /m² luminance per m²withR = I(lux)/L(1cd / m²) = reflection related conversion factorTypical: R = 10 for concrete and 16 for asphaltTypical efficient road: 0.5 W/(m² x (1cd / m²))

For fast traffic road vision theluminance(1cd / m²)

performance concept is used

93

13March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 1. Is there preparatory work done by ELC/CELMA that you want to show on the meeting? How much presentation time is needed(minimum-maximum)( it is also possible to hand over documents)?

(see scheduled presentations)

14March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions• 2. Specific for luminaires: is it possible to provide bench mark data(e.g. in W/(1 lux x

m^2) or W/(1 Cd/m^2 x m^2) )? What is the expected improvement potential?If possible, use the following proposed categories:For street lighting according to EN 13201-1&2:

Category A. 'fast traffic only' = with only luminance requirementsClasses: ME4a up to ME1 Category B 'mixed traffic' with both luminance and illuminance requirementsClasses: (ME6 up to ME2) &(CE6 up to CE2) Category C. 'slow traffic' (urban, pedestrian) with illuminance requirements onlyClasses: S6 up to S1.

For office lighting according to EN 12464-1:(2002): Category A: 'functional (EN 12464-1) task oriented lighting (3.1, 3.3, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.7) with high demand‘ (writing, reading, technical drawing, ..).Optionally with subcategories? Category B, ‘functional (EN 12464-1) task(1.1, 3.7, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.4) oriented lighting with low demand' (corridor, archives, toilet, ..).Category C: Any other office lighting equipment (e.g.: decorative, ambience, ..).

15March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 3. Is there a strong relationship between LOR (light output ratio) and energy efficiency? Is there an improvement potential? For street lighting, what should be taken as installation angle?

• 4. How fast control gear can be replaced in lighting fixtures? Is there improvement potential? What is standard practice and what is 'fast'?

• 5. How temperature can be lowered in luminaires for electronic control gear? Is there improvement potential? Is there an increase in life time and how much? Which relationships or standards can be used?

16March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 6. Is there actual life time data for electronic control gear in lighting? Is there improvement potential? How this can be achieved (e.g. for outdoor lighting increase the surge immunity EMC standards?)?

• 7. Provide the lamp lumen maintenance factor(see table 3.1 from CIE 154:2003) for ceramic metal halide lamps? 8. Provide BOM (Bill of Materials) data for LEDsin order to perform LCA? 9. -

17March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 10. Can you provide an expert list for luminaire, ballast and lamp performance?

• 11. For T5 fluorescent lamps: how many (%) HE (High Efficiency) lamps are sold compared to HO (High Output) or other?

18March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 12. Please provide data for the completion of these worksheets about production volumes and use (see spreadsheets).

94

19March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions

• 13. Is there a difference in efficacy for a T8 lamp operated with HF electronic control gear and ferromagnetic control gear (how much average in %)?

• 14. Please provide product data (BOM, cost, photometric, LMF, lamp efficacy, LLMF) for (preliminary analysis only!):A. 2 x Tubular fluorescent lamp (standard + tri phosphide) T8 56 W.B. A T8 56W luminaire with ferromagnetic ballast.C. 2 x ballast (ferromagnetic + electronic) for 56W T8

• Any other question?

95

ANNEX P CELMA PRESENTATION AT THE 2 ND STAKEHOLDER MEETING ON 12 TH MAY 2006

12-05-2006 CELMA 1

EuP Directive for Lighting Products

CELMA/ELC and DG TREN/VITO

Exchange of views

12 May 2006 - Brussels

Eddy Ceelen / CELMA

12-05-2006 CELMA 2

Sustainable development

12-05-2006 CELMA 3

Sustainable development

The aim of the Directive is to change the

Business as Usual

scenario’sThe BaU for many products, mainly domestic is

Producer

User

Defines all performance aspects

Fulfills its legal duties

SAFETY

HEALTH

EMC

EnvironmentUses the product as intended

Distributor

Takes part in the sales chain only

12-05-2006 CELMA 4

Sustainable development

The aim of the Directive is to change the Business as Usual scenario’s

The BaU for professional lighting products is

Producer

User

Defines all performance aspects

Fulfills its legal duties

SAFETY

HEALTH

EMC

Environment

Switches the light on and off, dims it

/changes the colour setting

Distributor

?

?

?

But partly the energy use

12-05-2006 CELMA 5

Sustainable development

What is Street lighting and Office Lighting?

These are lighting solutions consisting of two dist inctyet inter-dependent operational elements

• Products (lamp, control circuit, luminaire)

• Installation (places, arrays of luminaires, circuit s

• Office lighting = Office luminaire + Installation

• Street lighting = Street lantern + Installation

• Lighting solution = Put on the market + Put into se rvice

12-05-2006 CELMA 6

Sustainable development

The ProductRoad lantern

A manufactured item consisting of lamp, connecting circuits,optics and housing together called “Luminaire”

The luminaire is placed on the market by a producer whoMaybe a manufacturer or importer

The luminaire must conform to the CE marking requirementsBefore it can be placed on the market

Office luminaire

96

12-05-2006 CELMA 7

Sustainable development

The Installation

A lighting scheme is an array of luminaires in the space,designed, installed, connected to the mains and operated to fulfil the task lighting requirements.

The scheme may use several different type of luminaires.

The installation process will involve several steps and skillsDesigners, distributors, contractors, users and maintainers.

Street lighting

Office lighting

12-05-2006 CELMA 8

Sustainable development

Lighting designer

Is the person, in liaison with the owner, who designs the lighting solution for a given application

- initial cost is the main constraint

- no binding rules, apart from architectural wishes

12-05-2006 CELMA 9

Sustainable development

Installer

- executes the lighting plans

- sometimes acts as purchaser, thereby has influence on the lighting design

- is often also contracted to perform lamp replaceme nt schemes

12-05-2006 CELMA 10

Sustainable development

Industry representation

OWNER

- budget owner for the lighting installation- initial costs- maintenance costs

- sets the lighting installation boundaries

12-05-2006 CELMA 11

Sustainable development

The aim of the Directive is to change the Business as Usual scenario’s

The EuP for professional lighting products is

Producer

User

Defines all performance aspects

Fulfills its legal duties

SAFETY

HEALTH

EMC

Environment

Switches the light on and off, dims it

/changes the colour setting

Distributor

Lighting designer

Installer

Owner

But partly the energy use

Placing into the market

Putting into service

12-05-2006 CELMA 12

Many thanks

97

ANNEX Q VITO PRESENTATION AT 3 TH STAKEHOLDER MEETING / WORKSHOP ON 02ND MAY 2007

1July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

EuP stakeholder meeting 2/07QuestionsBrussels

EuP preparatory study on lot 8:Office lighting

2July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Agenda

• Stakeholder information and project time line• The context of EuP (Andras Toth)• Questions of horizontal nature• Short presentation of chapters followed by

questions• Please note:

– preparatory studies follow the MEEUP methodologyand chapter structure (see document) = uniform over all EuP products = typical 8 chapters structure

– Many people contributed to this work (see full draft text)

3July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Stakeholder statistics

• Status 28/3:• 172 people registered at www.eup4light.net• 125 interested in office lighting luminaires• 66 Large companies, 46 SME, 60 organisations, gov, R&D• 26 Countries

4July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Project time line

• Stakeholder kick-off meetings on 20/4/2006 and 12/5/2006

• Enquiry sent out on 29/11 to all registered people at the website 2 replies

• Draft chapter publications:– chapter 1 (27/11/06) – chapter 7(6/3/07)– deadline for comments on draft chapter 1-4 and 6: 21/03/07– deadline for comments on draft chapter 5 and 7: 28/03/07– updated draft final version chapter 1-8 will published on 18/03/07– deadline for comments on chapter 8: 10/5/07

5July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

The context of EuP

• by Andras Toth

6July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Questions of general nature

• Please note: C... refers to reference in document with bundled comments

• 500 lux assumption and EN 12464-1 (C1)– Related to EN 12464-1 (see chapter 1), to be

discussed– Impact should be low (200 or 300 lux)– few enquiry replies

• Halophosphate lamps (C8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 52, 53, 60, 66)– Included in chapter 4 and 7, but not considered as

base case in chapter 5

98

7July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 1: Definition (office)

• “Products for fixed installation for office work intended to “enable people to perform visual tasks efficiently and accurately, adequate and appropriate”– focus on products with similar charactistics- luminaire + lamp +ballast- very close to EN standards and CIE guidelines >

parameters (L, E, ηlamp, LSF, LLMF, ηballast, UF, ULOR, LMF, IP rating, ..)

- Functional Unit (FU): ‘The maximum maintained useful luminous flux (lumen) from the luminaire according to the performance requirements for the office lighting task as set out in EN12464-1’

8July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 1: Definition (office)

• For analysis 2 categories are used in the study:– Subcategory A1 : Direct lighting (e.g.: ceiling mounted

luminaires)

– Subcategory A2 : Direct/indirect lighting (suspended,:wall-mounted, floor standing, other…luminaires)

9July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C2 adapted• C20 (tandem magnetic ballast): text updated

10July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 2:Economic and marketanalysis (office)

• no detailed sales data available in Eurostat at the required level of detail• but no doubt about total > 200.000 annual sales• Contains a collection of related data• Finally sales and stock volume data will be fitted in chapter 5 and later to:

– total EU25 office area from literature– assumption about light level according to EN12464-1– assumption about ‘cellular’ versus ‘open plan’offices (from enquiry and literature)– product life assumption = 25y– growth of office stock area– note: many ‘office building’ data in literature is not applicable because it includes:

corridors, stairways, .. >> simple model for further analysis with assumptions will be used

• Electricity rates• Repair, maintenance, installation costs• Interest and inflation rate

11July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C3: text clarified• C4: adapted• C5: adapted + footnote

• C6 adapted• C21: From CELMA no comments received, are

there?

12July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 3: Consumer behavior and local infrastructure (office)

• Definition of 'consumer'• Influence of maintenance factors (LMF, LLMF, RSMF)• annual operating time (2500 h) (or 2000 h with presence

detection)• BMF• 2 typical (dimension, reflection (dark, typical, bright),

daylight zone) office rooms are defined for this study:– cellular office– open plan office

• overdimensioning effect of the task area• other potential ‘consumer’ barriers

99

13July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C22+23: (PF capacitor) > in this study equaldisadvantages between electronic (life time assembly) ballast and ferromagnetic (life time compensation capacitor, harmonics) ballast

14July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 4: Technical analysisexisting products (office)

• Production phase related to BOM data + MEEUP data (table 29).• Use phase (product):

– annual resources consumption (energy, lamps) related to performance parameters defined in chapter 1 & 3(formulas).

– Lamp + ballast performance parameters– Luminaire performance parameter UF, 3 way evaluation:

• ‘UF flux code’ according to EN 13201-2 (takes system into acount)• ‘UF software’ based on software simulation (takes system into account)• ‘UFb or UFu’ based on luminaire flux code product data alone>> the good correlation between these approaches indicates that bench marking of

luminaires based on product data is very relevant!– Assessment of performance parameters per category

• Use phase (system):– please note: the good correlation between these approaches indicates that bench

marking of luminaires based on product data is very relevant!– assessment of influence of surface reflectance >> UF order remains + bright office

could save energy• End of life phase: According to BOM and MEEUP (assumed: only 10 % Hg is emitted).

category A1 cellular

0,0000,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

l uminaire number

UF

UF flux code

UF software

UFb

15July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A• C7, 9: adapted• C8: Halo > BOM added

• C10+11: figures will be updated• C12: CIE 97 data update requested to ELC, : Is there a

difference in lifespan between CFLi and CFLni?• C14 + C40: data, New tables were prepared; to be

discussed in the meeting, Ballast prices are needed for LCC calculation

• C15: text rephrased, please consult

16July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C25 (BOM CFL): will be added, usefull for impact in chapter 8

• C26 (ILCOS): adapted• C27 (IP2X): CIE terminology• C28: clarify the question?• C29: clarify your comment?• C30: adapted• C31: UF is the same• C32: .. indeed (see chapter 5)

17July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C33(figures) : will be updated• C34: adapted• C35: We don’t see the need of using incandescent and

halogen lamps in office lighting task area according to EN 12464-1? Please clarify

• C36 (halo): rephrased• C37, C38, C39: adapted• C40 see C14• C41: approach BLF, to be discussed• C42: text adapted (to remark)• C43, C44, C45, C46: adapted

18July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C47: scope see intro• C48: see draft prEN 15193

• C50: is related to BOM of new luminaires (Bart?)

100

19July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 5: Definition of the base case (office)

• 4 base cases cat A1 and A2 for both cellular and open plan office.• 2 existing products were chosen as a reference base case product (1 for A1

and 1 for A2)• (not a virtual average product was selected in order to keep the study more

comprehensive)• Category A1, cellular office: luminaire with two 36 W T8 LFL lamps, having a

aluminium reflector and two electromagnetic ballasts operating the two lamps • Category A2, cellular office: luminaire with one 54 W T5 LFL lamp, having a

refractor and one electronic ballast • Open plan base cases have only different UF• Products will be later compared to this option• Remark:

– This straightforward and simple approach needs more care when interpreting‘EU25 totals’ because the base case is not de facto the average ‘stock’ or ‘new’ product (..this is unknown).

– New products are probably better but stock products are probably worse..

20July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 5: Definition of the base case (office)

• Estimated sales A1: 9,78 Munits

• Estimated sales A2: 2 Munits

Table 1: input parameters for EU25 totals

input parameters EU25 totals Cellular Offices % 48% Open plan (landscape) Offices

% 52%

A1 direct lighting 90% A2 direct+indirect lighting 10% Surface offices m2 885.000.000

Annual increase offices m2 28.500.000

21July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 5: Definition of the base case (office)

• The total annual energy consumption, GER of the stock in 2005 is 413 PJ primary energy equivalents of which 38,4 TWh due to electricity use.

• Related EcoReports available on the website

0%

10%20%30%

40%50%

60%70%80%

90%100%

To

tal E

nerg

y (

GE

R)

of w

hic

h, e

lect

rici

ty (

in p

rimar

yM

J)

Wat

er (

pro

cess

)

Wa

ter

(coo

ling

)

Wa

ste,

no

n-h

az./

lan

dfill

Was

te, h

azar

dou

s/ in

cin

era

ted

Gre

enh

ouse

Ga

ses

in G

WP

100

Ac

idifi

cat

ion

, em

iss

ion

s

Vo

latil

e O

rga

nic

Com

pou

nds

(VO

C)

Per

sis

tent

Org

anic

Pol

luta

nts

(PO

P)

Hea

vy M

eta

ls t

o A

ir

PA

Hs

Par

ticul

ate

Mat

ter

(PM

, du

st)

He

avy

Met

als

to W

ate

r

Eut

roph

ica

tion

LUMINAIRE BALLAST LAMPS ELECTRICITY

22July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C52: halo >> option 1 in chapter 7• C53 (halo BOM): adapted in chapter 4• C54 (3350 lm): is catalog data?• C55+56: see data request in chapter 4• C57 (3000 h): see chapter 3 > prEN15193-1

value

• C58(2.5 mg Hg): explanation in document• C59: > has ELC new info?• C68+69 (CELMA): noted

23July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 6: Technical AnalysisBAT and BNAT (Office)

• BAT:– Luminaires with improved luminaire maintenance factor– Luminaires with daylight responsive dimming– Luminaires with dimming ballasts that compensate for luminaire pollution

or room surface reflection deviations over its lifetime– Luminaires with presence detection– Improved fluorescent lamp types– Improved efficiency for electronic ballasts– Electronic dimmable ballasts– High reflectance aluminium materialBNAT:– New luminaires for WLED lamps– New luminaires for OLED lamps– WLEDs lamps– OLED lamps

24July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A

• C16 (history): titles added + BAT HF• C17: Stakeholders are asked to provide a

diagram of the lamp efficiency in function of the operating temperature

• C18+19 (dimming): text adapted please verify?

• C24: CELMA data is applied in the study• C50 (BAT HF): adapted ‘compared to EEI=A1&2,

are>were’, please provide background info?• C51: based on catalog data•

101

25July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 7: options• options (from ch.4 and ch. 6):

– Increasing the lamp efficacy (1=no halo, 14= no T5 HO in A2, 15 = T5 HO constant in A2)

– Increasing the ballast efficiency ( ηballast) (2 = CELMA B1, 3 = CELMA A2, 4 = BAT)

– Maximum stand by (TBC)– LMF = 0.95 improvements (6)– LMF (TBC)– minimum UF level >70 % average found– dimming options (9-12)

• 9 = Automatic dimming of the daylight zone at inst allation level• 10 = Individual daylight dimming• 11 = Individual control & daylight dimming• 12 = Individual control dimming

• All related EcoReports are available on the website• System: installation skill, energy awareness, maximum levels

26July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 7: options

Ranking of options cat A1 cellular

0

0,02

0,04

0,06

0,08

0,1

0,12

1 0 2 6 3 8 4 9 12 10 11

option

0

0,05

0,1

0,15

0,2

0,25

LCC/FU euro/lm

Ey/FU kWh/(y.lm)

kWh versus LCC

1

02

6 384

912

1011

0

0,02

0,04

0,06

0,08

0,1

0,12

0,1 0,12 0,14 0,16 0,18 0,2 0,22 0,24

LCC

En

viro

nmen

tal

Indi

cato

r (E

y)

1

0

2

6

3

8

4

9

12

10

11

Ranking of options cat A2 cellular

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

15 0 8 14

option

0,0920,0940,0960,0980,10,1020,1040,1060,108

LCC/FU euro/lm

Ey/FU kWh/(y.lm )

27July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Q&A• C60, C67 (halo): option 1• C61, C63 (T5): text adapted• C62 (T5): text added, see Ecoreport• C64 (luminaires LMF): text clarified, still optional (not a

focus of products on the market?)• C65 (T5):This is only possible if higher lumen output at

35°C can be introduced. Information needed?• C70: investment cost B2 > B1, to be discussed? • C71, 72, 74 :chapter 7 = office lighting, info to chapter 8• C73: Electronic starters and CIE 97 data?• C74: product not available on the market to our

knowledge? 28July 3, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Conclusion

• Chapter 8 - to be published after discussion by 18 April 2007(deadline for comments on Chapter 8: 10 May 07)

• Final report on 31/5/07• Any other question?

103

ANNEX R VITO PRESENTATION AT CELMA STRATEGY FORUM ON 18TH NOVEMBER 2006

1March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Draft results of the ongoing street & office lighting

preparatory studies for the EuP directive

status on 18/11/06

Paul Van TichelenVITO / Flemish Institute for Technological

Research

2March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Introduction

• This presentation includes the draft results in a nutshell

• Consult and register as stakeholder on the website http://www.eup4light.net for the full draft text

• Please note:– preparatory studies follow the MEEUP

methodology and chapter structure = uniform over all EuP products = typical 8 chapters structure

– Many people contributed to this work (see full draft text)

3March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 1: Definition (street)

• “fixed lighting installation intended to provide good visibility to users of outdoor public traffic areas during the hours of darkness to support traffic safety, traffic flow and public security”– focus on products with similar charactistics- luminaire + lamp +ballast- Very close EN standards and CIE guidelines >

parameters (L, E, ηlamp, LSF, LLMF, ηballast, UF, ULOR, LMF, IP rating, ..)

- Functional unit (FU): The maintained usefulluminous flux (lumen) from the luminaire according to requirements (EN13201-2).

4March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 1: Definition (street)

• For analysis 3 categories are used in the study: A (F) = Fast traffic only, B (M) = Mixed traffic, C (S) = slow traffic

5March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 1: Definition (office)• Products for fixed installation for office work

intended to “enable people to perform visual tasks efficiently and accurately with adequate and appropriate lighting”

• Subcategory A1 : Direct lighting (ceiling mounted luminaires)

• Subcategory A2 : Direct/indirect lighting (suspended,:wall-mounted, floor standing, other…luminaires)

• Follows very close EN and standards and CIE guidelines

• For ballasts: according to CELMA classification = extension category A1(dimming ballasts) with info on incorporated control features

6March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 2:Economic and market analysis (street)

• data fitted to: literature, CELMA+ELC, enquiry, Eurostat (lamps + road length).

• sales = ‘new + replacement’ project sales

• stock = 56 M street light points (32 % HPM, 48 % HPS, 9 % LPS, 2 % MH, 8 % FL) or 0.12 light point per EU25 capita

• product life = 30y & growth rate =1.7% (TBC)

104

7March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 3: Consumer behavior and local infrastructure (street)

• Note: Lamp efficacy is related to scotopic (@ low luminance) and photopic view

• burning 4000 h/y + estimates for dimming (factor BGF)

• Typical road characteristics (W, SHR, Qo, ..)• E.g.: extra losses due to poor power factor

(factor BMF)• E.g.: lock in effect, need for skilled workers,

consumer interest, colour preference, ..• EU road length (Eurostat)= 5.3 Mkm > 1 light

point per 100 m

8March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 4: Technical analysis existing products (street)

• Production phase related to BOM data + MEEUP data (table 29).

• Use phase (product):– annual resources consumption (energy, lamps) related to

performance parameters defined in chapter 1 & 3(formulas).– remark on light pollution– Assessment of performance parameters per category

• Use phase (system):– Large product system interference (road surface, light point

implantation, luminaire) > parameter UF– LPDi parameter + ‘putting into service’ has to be examined

• End of life phase:– According to BOM and MEEUP (assumed: only 10 % Hg is

emitted).

9March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 5: Assessment of the base case (street)

• 3 base cases (A (fast), B (mixed), C (slow)) based on averaged EU25 anno 2005 estimates for ‘new & replacement’ project sales for luminaires and lamps.

• = basis for comparison of improvement options in chapter 7

• data: 36.7 TWh,13 t haz. waste, 9 t haz. waste from use phase (more see chapter 7).

10March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 6: Technical AnalysisBAT and BNAT (street)

• BAT:– New luminaires (improved: LMF, ballast life time, UF, ULOR

(+ lower sky glow))– improved HID light sources (η, LLMF, LSF, colour).– improved CFL (LSF)– electronic dimmable ballast– bi-level dimmable ballast– high reflectance reflector aluminum

• BNAT:– LEDs luminaire (imaging for SLL: ULOR=0, DLOR =0.9, UF

= 0.7)– LEDs (imaging for SLL: 50 lm/W, tgroup = 15 y, 4 €/W ??)

Remaining questions: Is there enough Ga and In for SLL? What is SSL production energy? Is it technical possible? What about OLEDs in future (OLEDs UF?)??

11March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Chapter 7: options• options (from ch.4 and ch. 6):

– Increasing the lamp efficacy – improved HID light sources– LMF by IP rating– LM by self cleaning glass– tubular clear lamps– decreasing upward light flux ULOR– Increasing optic efficiency – bi-level dimmable ballasts– electronic dimmable ballasts– Decreasing mercury content in

lamps– other BOM luminaire(?TBC)

• >EcoReports, LLCC+BAT• BNAT (LEDs)• System: installation skill, energy

awareness, maximum levels

rank ing of options

-0,4

-0,35

-0,3

-0,25

-0,2

-0,15

-0,1

-0,05

0

0,05

0,1

0,15

options

option number

unit euro/lm

kWh/ (y.lm )

kWh versus LCC

y = 0,5502x + 0,0012

-0,3

-0,25

-0,2

-0,15

-0,1

-0,05

0

0,05

0,1

-0,4 -0,3 -0,2 -0,1 0 0,1 0,2

euro/lm

kWh

/(y.lm

)

options

Linear (options)

12March 8, 2007 confidential – © 2006, VITO NV – all rights reserved

Conclusion

• Draft study for street lighting is available for comment chapter 1-7 and for office lighting chapter 1

• For office (actually some technical delay):but enquiry + draft chapter 2 and 3 <29/11.

• For street lighting, please note:– 18 december stakeholder meeting– deadline for comments on draft final report for street lighting

= 30 December on chapter 1-7– Chapter 8 - to be published after discussion by stakeholders

of the results from Chapter 1-7 (deadline for comments on Chapter 8: 12 January)

• more info: http://www.eup4light.net

105

ANNEX S CELMA PRESENTATION AT STRATEGY FORUM ON 18TH NOVEMBER 2006

CELMA Strategy Forum meetingBrussels 18th November 2006

Berno Ram (ELC / Philips)Chairman of the joint CELMA/ELC Working Group on Street Lighting / SLIM

Fabrizio Tironi (CELMA / ASSIL & ASSOLUCE)Chairman of the joint CELMA/ELC Working Group on Office & Industrial Lighting / OIL

The position of the European Lighting Industry on Street & Office Lighting

�CELMA (luminaires and ballasts) and ELC (lamps) are working

closely together to actively contribute to the two ongoing EuP

Studies on lighting from the Commission by highlighting the

advantages of a new generation of lighting technology available

on the market today, which can have a serious impact on

energy efficiency, CO2-emissions, and running costs reductions.

�To this end, ELC and CELMA are preparing energy saving

solutions on street and office lighting via two dedicated joint

ELC/CELMA Working Groups on Street & Office Lighting.

INTRODUCTION

Projected additional potential savings by end-use for IEA-Europe

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Other usesCirculation pumpsPCsStandbyTelevisionDishwashingClothes-dryingClothes-washingRefrigerationLightingCookingWater heatingSpace coolingSpace heating

STREET LIGHTING

�One third of Europe’s streets still use old energy inefficient 1960’s technology (High Pressure MercuryVapor lamps & inefficient luminaires)

�Installed park: between 20 & 35 Mio. in EU25 Most installed 20 plus years ago

�Average lifetime of lighting installation: 40 years

�New technology available, more energy efficient and better quality light.

STREET LIGHTING

�Europe could save 3.5 Mio. tons CO2 when this old technology is upgrading to the latest technology

�European Municipality’s could save at least 700 million euros per year in running costs if they are switched

�Current conversion rate over to energy efficient lighting is only 3% per year meaning it will take another generation to create the saving

STREET LIGHTING - ENERGY

106

€ 0.00

€ 10.00

€ 20.00

€ 30.00

€ 40.00

€ 50.00

€ 60.00

70W HPS/MH Lamp 125W Mercury lamp

Electricity costper annum

Lamp replacementcost per annum

€28€50

€5 €3.3

Total cost of ownership

Note: Luminaire

improvements not included!

SAVING MONEY

STREET LIGHTING Barriers

� Lack of awareness of high lifetime energy costs & technological opportunities(95% of the environmental &cost impact of a lamp is duringits use)

� Initial & renovation investment cost barrier – budgets geared towards short term costs rather than long term savings

STREET USING NEW LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY

WHICH ARE OUR PROPOSALS TO ACHIEVE THIS???

STREET LIGHTING

OLD energy inefficient technology

• Low efficacy typical 35-60 lm/W

• Large source

• Service lifetime 10000 hr (70%)

• Modest Ra: 40 - 50

•Bad light distribution

due to 3 part reflector

•Low maintenance

factor due to low IP-23

NEW energy efficient technology

• High efficacy typical 65-120 lm/W

• Small source

• Service lifetime 10000 hr (70%)

• Better Ra up to 95

•Good light distribution

due to facetted reflector

•High maintenance

factor IP-5X or higher

Mercury Vapor System Metal Halide / HP Sodium System

Data: 4000 hr large source for optics, 0.42 kg CO2/kWh

Metal Halide

• Very high efficacy typical 65-150 lm/W

• Small source

• Service lifetime 20000 hr (70%)

• Low Ra : 20

HP Sodium

New Energy Savings Technologies are available….so let’s use them!

There are 3 aspects to take into consideration:

1) IM on product (component) level (“placing on the

market”) - EuP Directive

2) IM on application level (“putting into service”)

- EuP Directive

3) Proposed measure on existing solutions

(“renovation of existing solutions”) – ESD / Energy

Services Directive

SLIM PROPOSALS IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

107

� LAMP CRITERIA� Per IM-date all lamps must have an minimal energy

efficiency as shown in the efficacy/power table (see next slide). New solutions at IM-date and existing solutions at IM-date ASAP, to be discussed with the value chain.

� BALLAST CRITERIA� Per IM-date, there will be a limitation of the energy

consumption of ballasts or of the whole system. The limtation will be defined in the coming months with a suitable measurement setup. There is no standardised measurement setup available at this time. Therefore the CELMA Active Components WG will find a solution to give the

energy requirements in a table for the different lamp power classes.

� LUMINAIRES CRITERIA� per IM-date all luminaires:1. Must comply with the lamp and ballast criteria as mentioned above2. Must have the IP rating >= 5X (CIE-154) of the optical housing3. Have dimming and switiching capability availability as an option

SLIM PROPOSALS EuP IM « placing on the market »

(product CE marked)

902000 and higher

851000 < 2000

80400 - < 1000

70125 - < 400

6570 - < 125

6050 - < 70

500 - < 50

Minimal Efficacy [lm/W]Lamp wattage [W]

Minimal lamp efficacy vs. wattage of HID lampsused for street lighting

Per IM-date new lighting solutions will be based on the following SLEEC / Street Lighting Energy Efficieny Criteria:

Functional street lighting� must comply to the placing on the market criteria� must be in compliance with EN 13201� must have an energy performance of less than

0.06 W/lx/m2 or 0.9 W/cd.m-2/m2 (values are being checked)

Amenity street lighting (only functional decorative lighting)� must comply to the placing on the market criteria� must be in compliance with EN 13201� must have an energy performance of less than

0.15 W/lx/m2 (values are being checked)

SLIM PROPOSALS EuP IM «putting into service»

(new solutions)

�Auditing existing road lighting solutions from IM-date:

1.Measure the energy performance by W = Psys/E*s*w (where Psys= power, E= average illumance of grid, s=spacing between luminaires, w=width of the street). This will be compared to thelimits in SLEEC.

2.It is advisable to measure the system lighting conditions against the requirement of EN 13201-4 (otherwise you will have energy efficienct lighting but not in line with the European Lighting norm)

SLIM PROPOSALS ESD proposed measure

(renovation of existing solutions)

� CELMA/ELC proposal consists of 3 parts and it will be effective only if the whole proposal will be adopted and not just individual parts.

� The biggest environmental improvement in terms of energy saving will be when the installed park of energy in-efficient outdoor lighting will be renovated at a faster acceleration rate than we are currently seeing in the market.

� The second highest energy saving potential will come from applying the "putting into service" criteria for new installations using the lighting norm EN 13201 and minimal energy performance criteria for initial road lighting schemes.

� Finally new luminaires, gear and lamps must comply to the "placing on the market" product criteria under the CE-marking. These product criteria can only make energy savings possible if the "putting into service" and "renovation" measures are applied.

STREET LIGHTING CONCLUSIONS

OFFICE LIGHTING

108

OFFICE LIGHTING

�Usually realized with linear fluorescent lamps and compact fluorescent lamps (other lighting sources could be used)

�Estimation related only to the change of fluorescent lamps:ca. 1.000 Mio. lamps installed in EU 25 (in offices)still with old, inefficient systems

�Average life-time of lighting installation: 25 years

�Huge differences in efficiency between old and new systems (energy saving potential 30-80%)

�Main cost factor over life-time: energy cost during use(> 90%)

�Long life-time => very slow re-installation rate => old, inefficient systems stay in use

�Usually building contractor, building owner and building user are separate legal entities in professional office buildings

=> While building user has high interest in energy efficient lighting installation, building contractor and building owner naturally prefer low investment cost – which will lead to higher running cost later

OFFICE LIGHTINGENERGY

• high loss ballast • halo-phosphate lamp• no control (dimming)• high glare (UGR)• large luminaire

• electronic ballast (highly efficient)• tri-phosphor lamp• fully controllable (daylight/presence) • glare control (UGR)• smaller luminaire due to better optics

Old T12/T8 System Modern T5 System

OFFICE LIGHTINGENERGY USE

OLD energy inefficient technology

Note: the lamps are not always

supplied with the luminaire

NEW energy efficient technology

OFFICE LIGHTINGTECHNOLOGY COMPARISON

Up to 80% savings, most efficient lamp, with dimming & controls

T5 (elec. Ballast)

Up to 50% savingsenergy efficient lamp, with dimming & controls

T8 (elec. Ballast)

Up to 30% savingsenergy efficient lamp, no dimming no controls

T8 (conv. Ballast)

Referenceenergy inefficient lamp, no dimming no controls

T12 (conv. Ballast)

Energy savingSystem

OFFICE USING NEW LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY

7 x 10 m, height 3,2 m

WHICH ARE OUR PROPOSALS TO ACHIEVE THIS???

OFFICE LIGHTING

109

Summary for general office lighting

INTRODUCTION:

� Designed according to relevant standards (EN 12464-1)

� Installed and operated in the way as it designed

� Daylight control for rooms having a daylight penetration (EN 15193); presence control where people do not stay permanently, switchingcontrol for rooms where the function is over a predefined period and a combination of all.

� Energy savings result from proper operation (trends, see EPBD pr. EN 15193 annex E)

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTS

�Products designed for use in office (types of installations covered by the implementing measure), provided with optical means achieving an optimum lighting performance taking into account the light technical criteria as given in EN 12 464-1

�Fluorescent lampsLinear fluorescent lamps > .. lm/W Compact fluorescent lamps > …lm/W

�Complete with either electronic ballast Class A1-A3 , or magnetic ballast Class B1 or B2 in relation to control mechanism (see Ballast Directive 2000/55/EC)

�Provided with means (or being suitable to be connected to means) to control the lumen output according to the need of the user and daylight availability (the user need includes at least the correct light level related to the task to be performed, taking into account the time the task is executed and the use of daylight, where available).

�Provided with all the information regarding the correct use in Office Lighting (daylight control, presence control, type of lamp to be used, and so on), on mounting instructions.

�Luminaires dedicated for their specific field of application efficiency of Luminaire-ballast-lamp system.

�Table with limiting lm/W (luminaire efficiency) for similar luminaries concerning light distribution and lamp type.

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

Criteria for luminairesLimiting values for luminaire efficacy in luminaire lm/W(LOR x lamp nominal lumens / system input power EEI )

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

Specific identification as suitable to be used in office lighting

�Box 1: type of lamp (T5, compact fluorescent)�Box 2: type of ballast: electronic (E), magnetic (M), with relevant energy classification�Box 3: availability of presence control: internal (IPC), external (EPC) �Box 4: availability of light control: internal (ILC), external (ELC)�Box 5: Control switching/dimming�Box 6: Luminaire Identification�Box 7: lm/W

* Either supplied in conjunction with the luminaire or separately

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

IPCILCA3

lm/WLuminaire Identification

Control switching / dimming*

Light Control availability*

Presence control availability*

Type of ballastType of lamp

Office Lighting luminaires EUP compliance specifica tion

� With a specific declaration regarding the compliance with EuP Directive and relevant implementing measure for Office lighting and properly identified as suitable for use in Office lighting.

� Products must fulfil the installation requirements when properly installed in the foreseen places (office lighting, luminaries and controls designed and installed in work places, public and private, to provide the “state of the art in lighting” according to EN 12464-1). A reference room method can be used.

� Easily disassembled (the use of resin and other materials that does not allow their easily removal is not allowed).

� New luminaires shall have at least 50 % recyclable material. and their identification, where necessary, in order to allow level of recycling > 70% (see WEEE Directive 2002/96/EC)

� Reference to RoHS Directive compliance(2002/95/EC)

� Information about measures taken to avoid pollution to air, water and soil during production.

� “CE” marking covering all requirements.

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

� STANDARDS: (non exhaustive list) EN 60081 for lamp performance; EN 60929 for ballasts;EN 13032-1 for photometry and presentation of dataEN 60598-1 for safety requirements

� MEASUREMENT METHODSUnder consideration

� DECLARATION OF CONFORMITYBy the Manufacturer for the product when placed on the market.

� TRANSITIONAL PERIOD(usually 18 months, for new installations)

� to be discussed.� new installations to be envisaged (but with the same criteria also

existing installations could be subject to renovation; audit of existing installation).

OFFICE LIGHTING CELMA/ELC DRAFT PROPOSALS

FOR AN IMPLEMENTING MEASURE

110

CONCLUSIONS

�Modern lighting installations will reduce energy consumption and running costs by up to 80%, and with pay-back time between 3-10 years

�In addition: � better quality light & in line with lighting norms� More safety and less light polution on the roads� Higher employee satisfaction and working conditions in offices� Longer life-time of lighting installation and less lamp replacement, so less waste and work place disturbances� Less material consumption of lighting, more design freedom

CONCLUSIONS

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!