2
Promissory estoppel ~~ Find interactive games and quizzes on contract law ~~ ~~Take a quiz on promissory estoppel ~~ ~~ Try a word search on promissory estoppel ~~ ~~ Play hangman on promissory estoppel ~~ Promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine which in some instances can stop a person going back on a promise which is not supported by consideration. Promissory estoppel was developed by an obiter statement by Denning J (as he then was) in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Ltd [1947] KB 130 (Case summary). Denning J based the doctrine on the decision in Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 439 (Case summary). The House of Lords affirmed the existence of promissory estoppel in contract law in Tool Metal Manufacturing v Tungsten [1955] 1 WLR 761 (Case summary). Requirements of promissory estoppel: 1. A pre-existing contract or legal obligation which is then modified 2. There must be a clear an unambiguous promise 3. Change of position 4. It must be inequitable to allow the promisor to go back on their promise 5. 1. A pre-existing contractual or legal obligation which is then modified: 6. Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215 Case summary 7. 8. 2. A clear and unambiguous promise. 9. This may be implied through conduct: 10. Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd. v. Nigerian Product Marketing Co. Ltd. [1972] AC 741 11. Case summary 12. 13. 3. Change of position: 14.

Promissory Estoppel

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

dzxgfcv

Citation preview

Page 1: Promissory Estoppel

Promissory estoppel~~ Find interactive games and quizzes on contract law ~~

~~Take a quiz on promissory estoppel ~~~~ Try a word search on promissory estoppel ~~

~~ Play hangman on promissory estoppel ~~

Promissory estoppel is an equitable doctrine which in some instances can stop a person going back on a promise which is not supported by consideration. Promissory estoppel was developed by an obiter statement by Denning J (as he then was) in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Ltd [1947] KB 130 (Case summary). Denning J based the doctrine on the decision in Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 439 (Case summary). The House of Lords affirmed the existence of promissory estoppel in contract law in Tool Metal Manufacturing v Tungsten [1955] 1 WLR 761 (Case summary).

Requirements of promissory estoppel:

1. A pre-existing contract or legal obligation which is then modified2. There must be a clear an unambiguous promise3. Change of position4. It must be inequitable to allow the promisor to go back on their

promise5. 1. A pre-existing contractual or legal obligation which is then

modified:6.

Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215 Case summary7.8. 2. A clear and unambiguous promise. 9. This may be implied through conduct:10. Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd. v. Nigerian Product Marketing Co.

Ltd. [1972] AC 741 11. Case summary

12.

13. 3. Change of position:14.

Alan v El Nasr [1972] 2 WLR 800 Case summary

15. 4. It must be inequitable to allow the promisor to go back on their promise:

16.

D & C Builders v Rees [1966] 2 WLR 28

Page 2: Promissory Estoppel

17. Case summary