Upload
paulina-skinner
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Properties of Vector Mesons in Matter
- Theory and Phenomenology
Ralf Rapp
Cyclotron Institute + Physics Department
Texas A&M University College Station, USA
19. Quark Matter Conference Shanghai, China, 16.11.06
1.) Introduction: Basic Questions
• Vector-meson propagators
Broader Impact: • Are , and alike?• cold vs. hot matter • in-medium hadrons + equation of state• phase transitions (condensates, f, susceptibilities, …)
122 ]mM[)T,;q,M(D VViV
Phenomenology: • production mechanism (elementary: p-A, -A, thermal: A-A) • competing sources (centrality, pT, √s, …)
T
iqx )(j)x(je)x(xdi)q(Π 0emem04
em E.M. Correlation Function:
Imem ~ [ImD+ImD/10+ImD/5]
qq_
4
KK
2.) Constraints from QCD Lattice Sum Rules
3.) Hadronic Spectral Functions Many-Body Theory Bare Parameters Dilepton Rates
4.) Dilepton Phenomenology in URHICs SPS (NA60, NA45) RHIC
5.) Conclusions
Outline
2.1 Lattice QCD: Susceptibilites
Quark-number susceptibilities:
[Allton etal. ’05]
22
20
)m(~)q(~~ ,I,q
I,qI,q
• “dropping” -mass at critical point?
• “smooth” spectral function across phase diagram?!
Isoscalar (“”) Isovector (“”)
2.2 Sum Rules and Order Parameters
)Im(ImsdsI AVn
n
210
21
222
031
q)q(αcI,I
,fI,FrfI
s
πAππ
[Weinberg ’67, Das etal ’67, Kapusta+Shuryak ‘93]
• QCD-SRs:
- lhs: OPE (condensates!) - rhs: spectral function, (0)=1⁄9(0)
[Hatsuda+Lee’91, Asakawa+Ko ’92, Klingl etal ’97, Leupold etal ’98, Kämpfer etal ‘03 ,Ruppert etal ’05]
Promising synergy of lQCD and effective models!
220
2
2 0
Q
)(
sQ
)s(Ims
dsQ
)Q(Π
0.2%1%
• Weinberg-SRs: moments VectorAxialvector
Meson
>>
VB*,a1,K1
...
N,,K…
3.) Medium Effects I: Hadronic Interactions
DV(M,q;B ,T) = [M 2 - mV2 - VP- VB - VM ] -1V-Propagator:
[Chanfray etal, Herrmann etal, RR etal, Koch etal, Weise etal, Mosel etal, Eletsky etal, Oset etal, Lutz etal …]
VP = VB,VM=Selfenergies:V
Constraints: decays: B,M→ VN, V scattering: N/A, N→VN, …
B /0
0 0.1 0.7 2.6
[RR,Wambach etal ’99]
Meson “Melting” Switch off Baryons
3.2Spectral Functions from Free V-N/- Scattering
• fair model agreement (~ compatible with QCDSR)• -broadening somewhat less pronounced
[RR+Wambach ’99]
[Eletsky etal ’01]
[Eletsky etal ’01]-Meson -Meson
• ImV ~ ImTVN N + ImTV ~ VN,V + dispersion relation for ReTV
3.2 Medium Effects II: Dropping Mass
• Hidden Local Symmetry: -mass ↔ “Higgs” mechanism
• Vector Manifestation of Chiral Symmetry: L↔
• In-Medium: thermal -loops, m(0), g→0 (renormalization group)
- dropping -mass - vector dominance violated: a = 2 → 1
[Harada+Yamawaki ‘01]
~(a-2) ~a
• Open Issues: - “flash temperature” Tf ~ 0.7 Tc ( symm.!) - extrapolation to Tc
- no resonances, baryons [Sasaki+Harada ’06: P81]
EM Formfactor
0.85Tc
vac
3.3 Dilepton Emission Rates
• “matching” HG -QGP at ~Tc: “Quark-Hadron Duality” ?! (pQCD↔ chirally symmetric)• anti-/baryons important at RHIC• -meson more stable
)q,M(Im)T(fq
qd
MdM
dR Beeem
c 0
3
2
2
2
Isovector () at SPS
[qq→ee][qq+HTL]
--
Inclusive () at RHIC
4.) Dilepton Spectra in Heavy-Ion Collisions
• evolve over thermal fireball, isentropic QGP-Mix-HG• central In-In: T0-fo=195→120MeV, Tc=175MeV, FB=7fm
Acc),T;q,M(qdxd
dNq
qMd)(Vd
dMdN
i
thermll
FB
thermll
fo
44
0
3
0
Thermal Emission: +
• absolute norm., melting • M>0.9GeV: “4”→and • baryon effects essential
[van Hees+ RR ‘06]
4.2 Chiral Virial Approach vs. NA60• low-density expansion + chiral reduction • also: compare fireball vs. hydrodynamics
• good agreement fireball - hydro (pT-spectra!) • lack of broadening
[van Hees+RR ‘06] [Dusling,Teaney+Zahed ’06]
4.3 NA60 pT-Spectra vs. Hadronic Many-Body
• improved freezeout- (-factor!) + Drell-Yan (pT>1.5GeV) • approx. agreement (local slopes?!) See parallel talks by
H.van Hees, J.Ruppert
4.4 Pb-Au Collisions at SPS: CERES/NA45
• very low-mass di-electrons ↔ low-energy photons[Turbide etal.’03, Alam etal.‘01]
4.5 Dileptons at RHIC
• low mass: thermal! (mostly in-medium )• connection to Chiral Restoration: a1 (1260)→ , 3• intermed. mass: QGP vs. cc → e+e-X (softening?)-
[RR ’01]
[R. Averbeck, PHENIX]
QGP
[Toia etal. ’06]
5.) Conclusions
• Hot+Dense Hadronic Matter:
-broadening matured (melting at ~Tc → hadronic liquid!?)
• Differences between and (critical point)?!• NA45, NA60: - support “quark-hadron duality”
- (anti-)baryon-induced medium effects
Looking forward to further exciting developments …
• Chiral Restoration:
- direct (exp.): measure axialvector ()
- indirect (theo.): chiral + QCD sum rules
• HADES, RHIC, LHC, SPS-09, CBM, …, elementary reactions (cf. working group reports RHIC-II [nucl-ex/0611009], CBM [in prep.])
• “4“ states dominate the vacuum e.m. correlator above M ≈ 1.1GeV
• lower estimate: use vacuum 4 correlator
• upper estimate: O(T2) medium effect → “chiral V-A mixing”:
with
4.2.3 Intermediate-Mass Region
)q()q()()q( AVV001
21)T( c
[Eletsky+Ioffe ‘90]
[van Hees+RR ‘06]
42
[Leupold ’98, Ruppert etal ’05]
0.2% 1%
3.1.3 QCD Sum Rules + (770) in Nuclear Matter
)ss()(s
)s(DImg
m)s(Im
s0
2
4
18
dispersion relation for correlator: sQ
)s(Ims
dsQ/)Q(Π
20
22
• lhs: OPE (spacelike Q2): • rhs: hadronic model (s>0):
...Q
)qq(C
Q
GQ)(
s
ss
6
2
4
22
2
2
2 3ln1
81
[Shifman,Vainshtein+Zakharov ’79]
4-quark condensate!
3.1.2 (770) Spectral Function in Nuclear Matter
In-med -cloud +-N → B* resonances
Relativist.-N → B*(low-density approx)
In-med -cloud + -N → N(1520)
Constraints:N , A N →N PWA
• good agreement: strong broadening + small mass-shift up• constraints from (vacuum) data important quantitatively
N=0
N=0
N=0.50
[Urban etal ’98]
[Post etal ’02]
[Cabrera etal ’02]
3.1 Lattice QCD (QGP)
T=1.5Tc
• lQCD << pQCD at low mass (finite volume?)• currently no thermal photons from lQCD• vanishing electric conductivity!? but: [Gavai ’04]
Dilepton Rate ~ Im(,q=0)/2 EM Correlator Im(,q)/2
[Bielefeld Group ’02, ‘05]
3.) Medium Effects and Thermal Dileptons
4.6 Dropping-Mass Scenarios vs. NA60
• thermal fireball with absolute normalization
• dropping mass disfavored? • free decays at freezeout?• flash temperature? baryons? • chem. potentials? extrapolation to Tc?
[Brown+Rho ’91, Hatsuda+Lee ’92,…, Harada+Yamawaki ‘01]
HLS: [Sasaki+Harada ‘06]
(Tflash=122MeV)
4.2.5 Chiral Virial Approach vs. NA60 (central)
[Steele,Yamagishi+Zahed ’99]
[implementation van Hees+RR ’05]
5.) Electromagnetic Probes 5.1.1 Thermal Photons I : SPS
Expanding Fireball + pQCD
• pQCD+Cronin at qt >1.6GeV T0=205MeV suff., HG dom.
• addt’l meson-Bremsstrahlung → K→K substantial at low qt
[Liu+ RR’05]
WA98 “Low-qt Anomaly”
[Turbide,RR+Gale’04]
4.2.2 In-In at SPS: Theory vs. NA60
• predictions based on -spectral function of [RR+Wambach ’99]
• uncertainty in fireball lifetime (±25% norm.); or: infer FB≈7fm/c !
• relative strength of thermal sources fix
• good agreement with melting, including pt dependence [van Hees +RR ‘06]