Upload
michael-cummings
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32 Article V
Solid Waste Management and Chapter 38 Zoning
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32 Article V
Solid Waste Management and Chapter 38 Zoning
5:01 P.M. Public HearingPresented by the
Orange County Environmental Protection DivisionJanuary 14, 2014
5:01 P.M. Public HearingPresented by the
Orange County Environmental Protection DivisionJanuary 14, 2014
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
BackgroundBackground
1992 Solid waste management ordinance adopted
2005 Added “yard trash and land clearing debris recycling facilities”
2012 Environmental Streamlining Task Force recommends:
– simplify permitting for yard trash recycling
– reduce costs – increase recycling
1992 Solid waste management ordinance adopted
2005 Added “yard trash and land clearing debris recycling facilities”
2012 Environmental Streamlining Task Force recommends:
– simplify permitting for yard trash recycling
– reduce costs – increase recycling
BackgroundBackground
• Vegetative matter from landscaping maintenance and land clearing operations
• Includes materials such as: – trees and tree stumps– shrub trimmings– palm fronds – grass clippings – associated rocks and soils– other vegetation
• Vegetative matter from landscaping maintenance and land clearing operations
• Includes materials such as: – trees and tree stumps– shrub trimmings– palm fronds – grass clippings – associated rocks and soils– other vegetation
What is yard trash?What is yard trash?
Yard trash
Mulch covering internal road paths
Mulch and “fines”
Equipment used for moving, grinding, screening, coloring, mixing, etc.
Dyes to color mulch
Equipment fuel and maintenance fluids
Waste containers
BackgroundBackground
Oct 2012 EPC Work Session
Dec 2012 Stakeholder Workshop
Dec 2012 EPC Briefing
Mar 2013 Ag Advisory Board
Apr 2013 EPC Final Approval
Jun 2013 Local Planning Agency
Aug 2013 LPA Finding of Consistency
Sep 2013 BCC Public Hearing (1st)
Dec 2013 BCC Work Session
Oct 2012 EPC Work Session
Dec 2012 Stakeholder Workshop
Dec 2012 EPC Briefing
Mar 2013 Ag Advisory Board
Apr 2013 EPC Final Approval
Jun 2013 Local Planning Agency
Aug 2013 LPA Finding of Consistency
Sep 2013 BCC Public Hearing (1st)
Dec 2013 BCC Work Session
Public review process:Public review process:
BackgroundBackground
Issue
• incompatible zoning
• decreased setbacks
• storage issues
• abandonment
Issue
• incompatible zoning
• decreased setbacks
• storage issues
• abandonment
Recommendation
• keep special exception
• keep original setbacks
• handle at special exception
• financial assurance
Recommendation
• keep special exception
• keep original setbacks
• handle at special exception
• financial assurance
BCC Work Session RecommendationsBCC Work Session Recommendations
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Yard trash processing facility:
“A yard trash transfer station or a facility at which yard trash is processed into a size-reduced, usable material or is composted, but does not include a facility used for the disposal of yard trash.”
Yard trash processing facility:
“A yard trash transfer station or a facility at which yard trash is processed into a size-reduced, usable material or is composted, but does not include a facility used for the disposal of yard trash.”
Sec. 32-213. DefinitionsSec. 32-213. Definitions
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Current process treats small yard waste sites the same as Class I landfills.Current process treats small yard waste sites the same as Class I landfills.
Sec. 32-214. Permit Procedures.Sec. 32-214. Permit Procedures.
Development
Review Committee
Development
Review Committee
Environmental Protection
Division
Environmental Protection
Division
Board of Zoning
Adjustment
Board of Zoning
Adjustment Board of County
Commissioners
Board of County
Commissioners
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Existing
• exempt if <200 cu yds
• EPD permit if 200 cu yds or more
– DRC review– BZA hearing– BCC hearing
• financial responsibility required
Existing
• exempt if <200 cu yds
• EPD permit if 200 cu yds or more
– DRC review– BZA hearing– BCC hearing
• financial responsibility required
Proposed
• no change
• conditional exemption for 200 – 12,000 cu yds
– no DRC review– BZA hearing– BCC consideration– commercial plan
review• no change, but set at
$25,000
Proposed
• no change
• conditional exemption for 200 – 12,000 cu yds
– no DRC review– BZA hearing– BCC consideration– commercial plan
review• no change, but set at
$25,000
Sec. 32-214. Permit Procedures.Sec. 32-214. Permit Procedures.
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Existing
• special exception inI-2/3, I-4
• special exception inA-1, A-2
Existing
• special exception inI-2/3, I-4
• special exception inA-1, A-2
Proposed
• special exception required if adjoining property is not Industrial or C-3
• adding I-1/5
• no change
Proposed
• special exception required if adjoining property is not Industrial or C-3
• adding I-1/5
• no change
Sec. 38-77. Use table.Sec. 38-77. Use table.
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Existing
• 200 ft machinery setback from residential property
• 150 ft processing and storage setback in I-2/3, and I-4
• 150 ft processing and storage setback in A-1, A-2
• no specific buffer yardin A-1, A-2
Existing
• 200 ft machinery setback from residential property
• 150 ft processing and storage setback in I-2/3, and I-4
• 150 ft processing and storage setback in A-1, A-2
• no specific buffer yardin A-1, A-2
Proposed
• same – but included residences
• 50 ft setback when adjacent to Industrial or C-3
• no change
• buffer yard Type C
Proposed
• same – but included residences
• 50 ft setback when adjacent to Industrial or C-3
• no change
• buffer yard Type C
Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Existing
• fire lanes
• dust control
• litter control
• vector control
• odor control
• noise control
• access control
• no explicit pile height limit
Existing
• fire lanes
• dust control
• litter control
• vector control
• odor control
• noise control
• access control
• no explicit pile height limit
Proposed
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• same, but no longer specify 6 ft fence
• 25 ft pile height limit
Proposed
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• no change
• same, but no longer specify 6 ft fence
• 25 ft pile height limit
Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)
Ordinance ReviewOrdinance Review
Existing
• unauthorized waste control
• could stockpile 12,000 cu yds unprocessed material indefinitely
• after size-reducing, remove within 18 months
Existing
• unauthorized waste control
• could stockpile 12,000 cu yds unprocessed material indefinitely
• after size-reducing, remove within 18 months
Proposed
• same, but also remove from bags within 48 hours
• all material must be size-reduced within 12 months of intake
• no change
Proposed
• same, but also remove from bags within 48 hours
• all material must be size-reduced within 12 months of intake
• no change
Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)Sec. 32-216. Technical requirementsSec. 38-79. Conditions (120)
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
SummarySummary
Benefits to operator– save money ($9K application fees + consulting
costs)– save time (6+ months review)
Benefits to County– may increase recycling– conserve landfill space– may increase storm debris recovery infrastructure– focus staff resources on larger sites
Benefits to operator– save money ($9K application fees + consulting
costs)– save time (6+ months review)
Benefits to County– may increase recycling– conserve landfill space– may increase storm debris recovery infrastructure– focus staff resources on larger sites
SummarySummary
• Simplify permitting for small-scale operations
• Continue to address environmental and nuisance issues
• Simplify permitting for small-scale operations
• Continue to address environmental and nuisance issues
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
• Background
• Ordinance Review
• Summary
• Next Steps
Next StepsNext Steps
• No action necessary at this hearing
• BCC Adoption Public Hearing scheduled for January 28, 2014 at 2:00 P.M.
• No action necessary at this hearing
• BCC Adoption Public Hearing scheduled for January 28, 2014 at 2:00 P.M.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32 Article V
Solid Waste Management and Chapter 38 Zoning
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32 Article V
Solid Waste Management and Chapter 38 Zoning
5:01 P.M. Public HearingPresented by the
Orange County Environmental Protection DivisionJanuary 14, 2014
5:01 P.M. Public HearingPresented by the
Orange County Environmental Protection DivisionJanuary 14, 2014
Board of County Commissioners