PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION · AMCAT Mean Score – National ... Student Feedback Report 83 Campus Feedback Report 84 Findings 85 Recommendations 86 Technical Annexure

1

PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

A global leader in talent assessments and credentialing

Presence and clients across the globe including in the US, China, India, Middle East, Philippines and Africa

Driven by data science on millions of assessment data points enabling smart job matching & employability feedback.

AMCAT is the world’s largest job skills credential integrated with platforms such as LinkedIn, Monster.

4 million+ Annual test takers

(proctored)

3000+ Corporate clients, 100+

large MNCs

900+ Job roles matched,

credentialed

500K+ Job matches every

month

A Quick Snapshot

Backed by venture fund - Omidyar Networks

Leading employability research with dozens of patents and publications.

Repeatedly covered by global media including WSJ, Economist, Financial Times, Forbes, Times of India, Economic Times, etc.

Table of Content Description Slide No.

Executive Summary 1

Assessment Snapshot 2, 3

Demography 4

Demography (Category-wise) 5

Demography (State-wise) 6

Demography (Batch-wise & specialization-wise) 7

AMCAT Mean Scores and Comparison with National Average 8

National Average of Scores 9

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Category-wise) 10

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Category-wise) 11

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Batch-wise/Category-wise) 12

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 All Batches) 13

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 All Batches) 14

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Batch-wise) 15, 16

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 4th Year) 17

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 4th Year) 18

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1– 3rd Year) 19

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 3rd Year) 20

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 2nd Year) 21

Description Slide No.

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 2nd Year) 22

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 1st Year) 23

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 1st Year) 24

AMCAT Mean Score - Comparison with Tier-1, Tier-2 and Tier-3 colleges 25

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Summary) 26

AMCAT Mean scores - Gains 27

AMCAT Mean Scores – Gains (1.1) 28, 29

AMCAT Mean Scores – Gains (1.3) 30, 31

AMCAT Mean Scores – Domain 32

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain Category-wise 33

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain (1.1) 34

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain (1.3) 35

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis 36

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Category-wise) 37, 38

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis(1.1) 39, 40

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (1.3) 41, 42

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Batch-wise) 43, 44

Employability Analysis 45

Employability – Category-wise 46

Employability – State-wise (1.1) 47

Table of Content


Employability – State-wise (1.3) 48

Training Need Analysis 49

Training Requirement – Category-wise 50

Training Requirement (Batch/Category-wise) 51

Training Requirement (1.1) All Batches Combined 52

Training Requirement (1.3) All Batches Combined 53

Training Requirement – Batch-wise 54

Training Requirement (1.1) 4th Year 55

Training Requirement (1.3) 4th Year 56

Training Requirement (1.1) 3rd Year 57

Training Requirement (1.3) 3rd Year 58

Training Requirement (1.1) 2nd Year 59

Training Requirement (1.3) 2nd Year 60

Training Requirement (1.1) 1st Year 61

Training Requirement (1.3) 1st Year 62


Mean Scores, Standard Deviation and Training Need (4th Year) 63

Training Need (Category-wise) 4th Year 64

Training Need (1.1) 4th Year 65

Training Need (1.3) 4th Year 66

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year - English 67 - 71

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year – Quantitative Ability 72 - 76

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year – Logical Ability 77 - 81

Feedback reports 82

Student Feedback Report 83

Campus Feedback Report 84

Findings 85

Recommendations 86

Technical Annexure 87 - 90

Executive Summary

Project was directed by NPIU in order to ascertain the skill gaps of student groups of category 1.1 (focus group) and

category 1.3 (mentor group). 118 engineering campuses from 4 categories were assessed as on 8th Dec coming under TEQIP Phase - III The broad objective of conducting employability assessments shall be given as below: 1) Conduct assessments of students for analyzing their current skill levels and training needs. 2) Provide personalized feedback reports to students 3) Provide a consolidated feedback report to colleges and suggesting approaches and tools to learning for improving their employability. Students were assessed across the following skills: Language, Cognitive, Personality & Domain Process: Departments involved – The National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU) support was critical to complete the

project to current status. SPIU has also been supporting the activity by engaging with institutes. Institute’s TEQIP coordinators and their teams have created synergy with Aspiring Minds team to make this program a success

Duration – It is projected that the assessment program of the remaining institutes should be finished by end of January month

Problems – Major challenge was to commence the assessment from initial months across the states. It is planned to design a more suitable schedule of assessment, under the guidance of NPIU, for future assessments

1

Assessment Snapshot

Category-wise Participation

Category Colleges Students Assessed Total Students Participation

1.1-CFI 8 1839 2978 62%

1.1-State 73 58401 87018 67%

1.3-CFTI 8 5914 11850 50%

1.3-State 29 42679 59105 72%

TOTAL 118 108833 160951 68%

The Assessment Snapshot presents the participation figures for the assessments conducted for different categories and also for multiple states

The highest participation was from 1.3 State colleges and lowest from 1.3 CFTI colleges.

2

Assessment Snapshot State-wise Participation


AP 3 1938 2150 90%

AR 1 384 550 70%

AS 6 3214 5240 61%

BR 8 4986 8050 62%

CG 5 5150 7457 69%

GJ 1 1972 2800 70%

HP 3 1738 2491 70%

HR 3 3132 4681 67%

JH 4 1665 2749 61%

JK 4 1371 3091 44%

KA 4 9534 12500 76%

KL 1 2278 2500 91%

MH 10 10628 14806 72%

ML 1 418 600 70%


MN 3 890 1060 84%

MP 6 8714 12600 69%

MZ 1 165 600 28%

NL 1 107 110 97%

OD 6 11552 15427 75%

PB 2 2208 2250 98%

RJ 11 6544 12495 52%

SK 1 94 400 24%

TN 7 12636 17465 72%

TR 1 586 1080 54%

UK 6 3685 5197 71%

UP 16 12335 18315 67%

UT-AN 1 326 340 96%

UT-CH 2 583 4803 12%

The highest participation was from colleges in Punjab (98%) and lowest was from colleges in UT-Chandigarh

3

Demography

4

Demography (Category-wise)

54% 40%

4%

2%

1.1-State

1.3-State

1.3-CFTI

1.1-CFI

Among the 1.1 CFI and 1.3 CFTI colleges, majority of the students assessed are from 1.3 CFTI colleges. An equal number of students are assessed in the 1.1. State and 1.3 State colleges, with candidates from 1.1 State colleges being slightly

more.

The Category wise demographics represent the assessed student percentage by each category

5

Demography (State-wise)

21%

19%

15% 10%

6%

6%

6%

5%

3%

3%

2% 1%

1%

3%

1.1 State and 1.1 CFI Uttar Pradesh

Orissa

Madhya Pradesh

Rajasthan

Uttarakhand

Chhattisgarh

Bihar

Assam

Himachal Pradesh

Jharkhand

Jammu and Kashmir

Tripura

Manipur

1.1 CFI

25%

22%

19%

7%

5%

5%

4% 4%

9%

1.3 States and 1.3 CFTI

Tamil Nadu

Maharashtra

Karnataka

Haryana

Kerala

Punjab

Gujarat

Andhra Pradesh

1.3 CFTI

In 1.1 State and 1.1 CFI colleges, more than 60% of the students assessed are from 4 states- UP, Orissa, MP and Rajasthan In 1.3 State and 1.3 CFTI colleges, 66% of assessed students are from TN, Maharashtra and Karnataka. At 9%, 1.3 CFTI colleges form a considerable number of students assessed in 1.3 States and 1.3 CFTI pool. But 1.1 CFI colleges’ assessed

students form 3% of the candidates assessed in 1.1 State and 1.1 CFI pool.

The State wise demographics represent the assessed student percentage across the Indian states 6

Demography (Batch-wise & specialization-wise)

27%

25% 25%

23% 3rd Year

4th Year

2nd Year

1st Year

17%

15%

13%

11% 10%

6%

3%

3%

3%

2%

17%

Mechanical Engineering

Civil Engineering

Computer Science &EngineeringElectrical Engineering

Electronics andCommunication EngineeringInformation Technology

Electronics and ElectricalEngineeringElectronics &TelecommunicationsChemical Engineering

Computer Engineering

Others*

* Data points below 2000 have been included in Others

Students assessed across all 4 batch years. Students assessed across various specializations.

A proportional number of candidates are assessed across all 4 batch years, with candidates from 3 rd year being marginally higher. 56% of the candidates assessed are from four specialization- Mechanical, Civil, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering.

The Batch wise and Specialization wise demographics display the assessed student percentage across all 4 batch years and across various specializations

7

AMCAT Mean Scores and Comparison with National Average

8

National Average of Scores

The national average score of the modules are calculated by sampling of data on more than 100,000 engineering students from multiple engineering colleges across multiple Indian states. The scores are calculated based on different demographics- Gender, Region, Tier of Cities, Top Campuses. The analysis and findings of these help us calculate the national average of the module. It is the score which majority of the candidates achieve. The given figure shows the sample distribution and the national average score for the module is 470. The data of candidates is sampled on a yearly basis and the national averages are annually updated.

3%

11%

17%

40%

15%

10%

4%

900

Sample Distribution

9

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Category-wise)

Above National Average

Close to National Average (Mean Score – 25)

Below National Average

Category Number of Colleges

Assessed

English Quantitative Ability Logical Ability

National Average - 475



1.1-CFI 8 491 492 447

1.3-CFTI 8 520 617 498

1.1-State 73 442 448 430

1.3-State 29 462 435 432

Overall 118 454 450 434

The mean scores in 1.3 CFTI colleges are well above the national average. The mean scores in 1.1 CFI colleges is also very similar to the national average.

It is disheartening to see the shape of 1.1 State and 1.3 State colleges. Almost none of the mean scores in these colleges are even close to the national average.

There is a staggering difference of 182 between the mean scores of 1.3 CFTI and 1.1 State colleges for Quantitative Ability We can infer that colleges under Centre are performing better than those under the State.

The Category wise mean score table represent the average scores obtained by students in each category for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

10

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Category-wise)

491 492 447

520

617

498 442 448 430

462 435 432

475 495 465

ENGLISH QUANTITATIVE ABILITY LOGICAL ABILITY

1.1-CFI 1.3-CFTI 1.1-State 1.3-State National Average

The Category wise mean score comparison compares the average scores obtained by students in each category for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability with the National Average of these modules

In 1.3 CFTI colleges, the mean scores are always above the national average for all the three modules.

11

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Batch-wise/Category-wise)




In 1.3 CFTI colleges, the mean scores are always above the national average from 1st year as top layer of students make it through their admissions.

The students from 1.1 CFI colleges have performed better than students from 1.3 State and 1.1 State colleges in all the years.

Category/ Batch

2019 2020 2021 2022

English (475)

Quantitative Ability (495)

Logical Ability (465)

English (460)



English (440)



English (435)



1.1-CFI 514 532 464 499 463 435 475 476 442 465 475 439

1.3-CFTI 547 634 507 517 610 498 485 594 489 516 618 492

1.1-State 457 479 450 450 450 433 428 421 415 426 435 417

1.3-State 484 476 458 469 440 437 449 413 420 450 416 415

The Batch wise/ Category wise mean score table display the batch wise average scores obtained by students in each category for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

12

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 All Batches)

State English Quantitative Ability Logical Ability

National Average - 475 National Average - 495 National Average - 465

AS 500 445 432

BR 404 469 428

CG 394 377 398

HP 439 393 408

JK 462 399 412

JH 408 414 418

MP 458 473 443

OD 464 447 437

RJ 415 433 424

UP 438 491 440

UK 437 414 419




MP is the only state that has mean scores close to the national average across all three sections.

81% of the states are not even in the close range of national average in Quantitative and Logical Ability.

63% of the states are not close to the national average in English.

The State wise mean score table provides the state wise average scores obtained by students in 1.1 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

13

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 All Batches)

State



AP 464 466 439

GJ 431 462 422

HR 467 484 453

KA 452 398 415

KL 518 511 472

MH 473 475 455

PB 468 470 448

TN 457 395 412




Only Gujarat has performed below the national average in all the sections.

87% of the states have their mean scores similar or above the national average in English. 50% of states have performed close to or over national average in Quants and logical.

The State wise mean score table provides the state wise average scores obtained by students in 1.3 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

14

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Batch-wise)

Batch English Quantitative Ability Logical Ability


4th Year 471 485 455

3rd Year 462 455 438

2nd Year 439 422 419

1st Year 442 435 420




We observe a increased mean scores of 1st year students than 2nd year students. This can be attributed to the decline in engineering seats and only strongly interested candidates applying for engineering.

The 4th year scores are comparable to national average when compared to initial years.

The Batch wise mean score comparison compares the average scores obtained by students across all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability with the National Average of these modules

15

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Batch-wise)

471

485

455 462

455

438 439

422 419

442 435

420

475

495

465

ENGLISH QUANTITATIVE ABILITY LOGICAL ABILITY

4th Year 3rd Year 2nd Year 1st Year National Average

The Batch wise mean score graph compares the average scores obtained by students across all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability with the National Average of these modules

We observe that mean scores of students from 4th year batch is closest to the National Average.

16

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 4th Year)



AS 518 470 451

BR 412 479 434

CG 409 399 416

HP 447 415 428

JH 415 423 428

JK 455 385 408

MP 474 511 466

OD 480 481 459

RJ 434 492 451

UK 447 437 437

UP 449 517 456




No state has mean scores above national average for all the sections.

Chhattisgarh, HP, Jharkhand, and Uttarakhand are not even close to the national average in any of the sections assessed.

The State wise mean score table displays the state wise average scores obtained by 4th year students in 1.1 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

17

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 4th Year)



AP 472 502 466

GJ 457 519 449

HR 463 473 458

KA 471 440 444

KL 526 526 485

MH 506 518 478

PB 449 457 441

TN 471 432 445




All the states assessed have mean scores comparable or above the national average for English and Logical.

Karnataka, Punjab and Tamil Nadu are below the national average in the quantitative ability section

The State wise mean score table displays the state wise average scores obtained by 4th year students in 1.3 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

18

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1– 3rd Year)


National Average – 460 National Average – 465 National Average – 450

AS 509 454 435

BR 410 476 434

CG 398 379 406

HP 436 382 403

JH 398 396 412

JK 476 418 423

MP 466 477 445

OD 465 442 436

RJ 416 425 426

UK 446 412 422

UP 460 521 455




No state has mean scores above the national average in all the sections except UP. The mean scores for only AS and MP are close to the national average in the 3 sections.

64% of the states have mean scores well below the national average for Quant. This figure is 45% for Logical and 36% for English.

The State wise mean score table displays the state wise average scores obtained by 3rd year students in 1.1 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

19

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 3rd Year)


National Average – 460 National Average – 465 National Average - 450

AP 462 444 433

GJ 433 457 427

HR 482 497 464

KA 452 388 410

KL 523 516 474

MH 491 490 466

PB 470 461 448

TN 458 399 418




Only Gujarat has mean scores well below the national average for English.

Only KA and TN has mean scores well below the national average in Quant and Logical.

The State wise mean score table displays the state wise average scores obtained by 3rd year students in 1.3 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

20

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 2nd Year)



AS 463 394 401

BR 402 460 427

CG 397 376 394

HP 433 369 391

JH 413 428 422

JK 457 388 405

MP 448 448 428

OD 451 414 419

RJ 400 387 402

UK 418 390 399

UP 421 458 424




No state has mean scores above the national average in all 3 sections.

64% of the states have mean scores well below the national average for Quant. This figure is 55% for Logical and 36% for English.

The State wise mean score table shows the state wise average scores obtained by 2nd year students in 1.1 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

21

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 2nd Year)



AP 471 463 442

GJ 419 442 410

HR 459 456 438

KA 441 381 405

KL 513 486 462

MH 437 438 436

PB 479 473 452

TN 442 354 389




Only GJ has mean scores below (but close to) the national averages in all the sections.

AP, HR, KL and PB have mean scores above the national averages in all 3 sections.

The State wise mean score table provides the state wise average scores obtained by 2nd year students in 1.3 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

22

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.1 – 1st Year)



AS 492 439 427

BR 392 465 420

CG 375 357 380

HP 438 405 405

JH 409 418 412

JK 448 391 401

MP 432 430 419

OD 457 442 429

RJ 394 392 401

UK 425 412 408

UP 425 474 426




No state has mean scores above the national averages in all the sections except OD.

45% of the states are below the National average in Quant; 64% of the states are close to national average in Logical.

The State wise mean score table displays the state wise average scores obtained by 1st year students in 1.1 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

23

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison State-wise (1.3 – 1st Year)



AP 458 499 437

GJ 413 425 400

HR 454 497 450

KA 444 389 403

KL 510 516 468

MH 455 449 439

PB 446 530 448

TN 458 401 407




Karnataka have performed below the national average for Quant and Logical.

Majority of the states have performed above national average in all 3 sections.

The State wise mean score table represents the state wise average scores obtained by 1st year students in 1.3 colleges in all batches for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

24

Institute Set English

Mean Score Quantitative Ability

Mean Score Logical Ability Mean Score

TEQIP – 2019 Batch (Overall) 471 485 455

TEQIP – 2019 Batch (1.1 Colleges) 459 481 450

TEQIP – 2019 Batch (1.3 Colleges) 490 492 463

Tier 1 Colleges 537 532 502

Tier-2 Colleges 481 443 464

Tier-3 Colleges 449 399 446

AMCAT Mean Score - Comparison with Tier-1, Tier-2 and Tier-3 colleges

The AMCAT Mean Score table compares the average scores obtained by students of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 colleges in English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

We observe that mean scores of students from Tier 1 colleges is the highest among all

25

Category-wise: Students from 1.3 CFTI category have performed above National Average in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical

Ability modules. Students from 1.1 CFI have performed above National Average in English module. Students from 1.1 State and 1.3 State have performed below National Average in English, Quantitative Ability and

Logical Ability modules. Students from 1.1 CFI have performed below National Average in Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability modules.

State-wise: 1.1

Students from Assam have performed above National Average in English Comprehension module. State-wise: 1.3

Students from Kerala have performed above National Average in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability modules.

AMCAT Mean Score – National Comparison (Summary) 26

AMCAT Mean scores - Gains

27

AMCAT Mean Scores – Gains (1.1)

English Mean Scores Quantitative Ability Mean Scores

State 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year

AS 439 394 454 470

BR 465 460 476 479

CG 357 376 379 399

HP 405 369 382 415

JH 418 428 396 423

JK 391 388 418 385

MP 430 448 477 511

OD 442 414 442 481

RJ 392 387 425 492

UK 412 390 412 437

UP 474 458 521 517


AS 492 463 509 518

BR 392 402 410 412

CG 375 397 398 409

HP 438 433 436 447

JH 409 413 398 415

JK 448 457 476 455

MP 432 448 466 474

OD 457 451 465 480

RJ 394 400 416 434

UK 425 418 446 447

UP 425 421 460 449

The AMCAT Mean Score- Gains (1.1) tables displays the average scores obtained by students across all batches of 1.1 Colleges in English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

28


Logical Ability Mean Scores

A majority of states have positive year on year added growth and increase in students capacities for 1.1 State and 1.1 CFI.

Assam, Jharkhand, J&K, and UP colleges have distorted scores in English during 4 years and should focus slightly more on student’s English skills in later college years. These states along with Bihar can improve quant scores.

Similarly Jharkhand, J&K, UP and Bihar should focus on Logical ability during final and pre-final years.


AS 427 401 435 451

BR 420 427 434 434

CG 380 394 406 416

HP 405 391 403 428

JH 412 422 412 428

JK 401 405 423 408

MP 419 428 445 466

OD 429 419 436 459

RJ 401 402 426 451

UK 408 399 422 437

UP 426 424 455 456

29


English Mean Scores Quantitative Ability Mean Scores


AP 458 471 462 472

GJ 413 419 433 457

HR 454 459 482 463

KA 444 441 452 471

KL 510 513 523 526

MH 455 437 491 506

PB 446 479 470 449

TN 458 442 458 471


AP 499 463 444 502

GJ 425 442 457 519

HR 497 456 497 473

KA 389 381 388 440

KL 516 486 516 526

MH 449 438 490 518

PB 530 473 461 457

TN 401 354 399 432

The AMCAT Mean Score- Gains (1.3) tables shows the average scores obtained by students across all batches of 1.3 Colleges in English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability

30


Logical Ability Mean Scores

We observed the following in 1.3 State and 1.3 CFTI Haryana and Punjab’s English scores have dipped

during last year in college. Karnataka and Gujarat’s have increased.

AP, Haryana and Punjab’s Quant scores have also declined in later years of college. Gujarat, Maharashtra and TN’s have increased.

In logical ability, the scores of Gujarat, Maharashtra, Kerala have improved and have declined for Haryana and Punjab.


AP 437 442 433 466

GJ 400 410 427 449

HR 450 438 464 458

KA 403 405 410 444

KL 468 462 474 485

MH 439 436 466 478

PB 448 452 448 441

TN 407 389 418 445

31

AMCAT Mean Scores – Domain

32

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain Category-wise

4th year students from 1.3 CFTI colleges have highest domain scores followed by 1.1 CFI and 1.3 State. These scores are lowest for students from 1.1 State Colleges.

Category

4th Year

Domain Mean Scores (National Weighted Mean – 422)

1.1-CFI 477

1.1-State 455

1.3-CFTI 501

1.3-State 465 Above National Average



The AMCAT Mean Score- Domain table represent the domain average scores obtained by 4th year students from different college categories

33

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain (1.1)

State 4th Year


AS 435

BR 441

CG 416

HP 439

JK 420

JH 430

MP 482

OD 445

RJ 459

UP 487

UK 442

4th year students from MP and UP are at the top and J&K and Chhattisgarh at bottom.




The AMCAT Mean Score- Domain (1.1) table shows the domain average scores obtained by 4th year students from various states in 1.1 Colleges

34

AMCAT Mean Score – Domain (1.3)

State 4th Year


AP 488

GJ 507

HR 461

KA 436

KL 478

MH 495

PB 465

TN 445

4th year students from Gujarat and Maharashtra are at the top and Karnataka and TN at bottom




The AMCAT Mean Score- Domain (1.3) table displays the domain average scores obtained by 4th year students from various states in 1.3 Colleges

35

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis

36

ENGLISH COMPREHENSION (475)

QUANTITATIVE ABILITY (495)

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Category-wise)

Score Levels 1.1 CFI 1.3 CFTI 1.1 State 1.3 State Overall

>= 480 915 (52%) 2645 (61%) 19359 (35%) 17545 (40%) 40464 (39%)

>=470 and <=479 70 (4%) 134 (3%) 1809 (3%) 1666 (4%) 3679 (3%)

<=469 781 (44%) 1544 (36%) 35239 (62%) 24129 (56%) 61693 (58%)

52%

4%

44%

61%

3%

36% 35%

3%

62%

40%

4%

56%

>= 480 >=470 and <=479 <=469

1.1 CFI 1.3 CFTI 1.1 State 1.3 State Overall


>= 500 813 (50%) 3358 (81%) 2118 (6%) 14661 (35%) 20950 (25%)

>=490 and <=499 55 (3%) 86 (2%) 1732 (5%) 1358 (3%) 3231 (4%)

<=489 772 (47%) 696 (17%) 31280 (89%) 26083 (62%) 58831 (71%)

50%

3%

47%

81%

2%

17%

6% 5%

89%

35%

3%

62%

>= 500 >=490 and <=499 <=489


The Category wise performance of students from all college categories are shown in English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability according to the score levels. 37

LOGICAL ABILITY (465)

Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Category-wise)


>= 470 786 (45%) 3045 (70%) 20022 (36%) 15807 (37%) 39660 (38%)

>=460 and <=469 60 (3%) 151 (4%) 2101 (4%) 1597 (4%) 3909 (4%)

<=459 905 (52%) 1095 (26%) 33310 (60%) 25418 (59%) 60728 (58%)

45%

3%

52%

70%

4%

26% 36%

4%

60%

37%

4%

59%

>= 470 >=460 and <=469 <=459


38


Aptitude-Bucket Analysis(1.1)


Assam has the highest percentage of candidates above national average and Chhattisgarh has the least for English UP has the highest percentage of students above national average and Chhattisgarh the least for Quants.

Score Levels AS BR CG HP JK JH MP OD RJ UP UK

>= 480 1744 (56%) 708 (21%) 644 (20%) 528 (31%) 565 (43%) 357 (22%) 3299 (41%) 4783 (42%) 1406 (24%) 3931 (33%) 1181 (32%)

>=470 and <=479 134 (4%) 98 (3%) 91 (3%) 71 (4%) 37 (3%) 38 (2%) 224 (3%) 399 (4%) 167 (3%) 377 (3%) 140 (4%)

<=469 1244 (40%) 2616 (76%) 2529 (77%) 1092 (65%) 727 (54%) 1228 (76%) 4495 (56%) 6179 (54%) 4221 (73%) 7749 (64%) 2318 (64%)


>= 500 1108 (37%) 1475 (45%) 654 (21%) 373 (23%) 363 (28%) 427 (28%) 3577 (47%) 4228 (39%) 1938 (34%) 5867 (51%) 1030 (30%)

>=490 and <=499 118 (4%) 133 (4%) 83 (3%) 53 (3%) 37 (3%) 58 (4%) 213 (3%) 339 (3%) 191 (3%) 367 (3%) 120 (3%)

<=489 1749 (59%) 1702 (51%) 2372 (76%) 1202 (74%) 890 (69%) 1013 (68%) 3833 (50%) 6365 (58%) 3496 (63%) 5394 (46%) 2316 (67%)

The State wise performance of students from 1.1 colleges in different states are displayed for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability according to the score levels. 39


Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (1.1)

MP and UP have the highest percentage of candidates above national average and Chhattisgarh has the least for Logical Ability.


>= 470 1130 (26%) 1110 (24%) 724 (18%) 433 (20%) 393 (22%) 443 (21%) 3445 (29%) 4341 (27%) 1885 (24%) 4888 (29%) 1099 (23%)

>=460 and <=469 114 (3%) 153 (3%) 95 (2%) 59 (3%) 41 (2%) 71 (3%) 296 (3%) 460 (3%) 226 (3%) 416 (2%) 139 (3%)

<=459 3090 (71%) 3394 (73%) 3211 (80%) 1684 (77%) 1326 (76%) 1612 (76%) 7812 (68%) 11096 (73%) 5749 (73%) 11837 (69%) 3579 (74%)

40




Kerala has the highest percentage of candidates above national average and Gujarat has the least for English Kerala has the highest percentage of students above national average in Quantitative Ability and Tamil Nadu the least

Score Levels AP GJ HR KA KL MH PB TN

>= 480 783 (41%) 581 (30%) 1442 (42%) 3468 (37%) 1376 (61%) 4537 (44%) 931 (42%) 4785 (39%)

>=470 and <=479 92 (5%) 67 (3%) 133 (4%) 413 (4%) 70 (3%) 352 (3%) 79 (4%) 478 (4%)

<=469 1041 (54%) 1291 (67%) 1883 (54%) 5518 (59%) 823 (36%) 5512 (53%) 1170 (54%) 7036 (57%)


>= 500 808 (43%) 808 (43%) 1618 (48%) 2307 (25%) 1216 (56%) 4519 (45%) 942 (46%) 2891 (24%)

>=490 and <=499 70 (4%) 54 (3%) 110 (3%) 310 (3%) 82 (4%) 316 (3%) 49 (2%) 375 (3%)

<=489 988 (53%) 1009 (54%) 1639 (49%) 6609 (72%) 862 (40%) 5265 (52%) 1079 (52%) 8677 (73%)

The State wise performance of students from 1.3 colleges in different states are displayed for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability according to the score levels. 41



Kerala has the highest percentage of candidates above national average and Karnataka has the least for Logical Ability.


>= 470 769 (40%) 627 (33%) 1625 (47%) 2533 (27%) 1299 (58%) 4863 (47%) 936 (43%) 3572 (30%)

>=460 and <=469 87 (5%) 62 (3%) 126 (4%) 358 (4%) 85 (4%) 372 (4%) 103 (5%) 424 (3%)

<=459 1053 (55%) 1229 (64%) 1678 (49%) 6394 (69%) 860 (38%) 5043 (49%) 1114 (52%) 8142 (67%)

42



Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Batch-wise)

Score Levels 4th Year 3rd Year 2nd Year 1st Year Overall

>= 480 11890 (45%) 11838 (41%) 8657 (33%) 8079 (34%) 40464 (39%)

>=470 and <=479 903 (3%) 1018 (4%) 905 (3%) 853 (4%) 3679 (3%)

<=469 14069 (52%) 16012 (55%) 16671 (64%) 14941 (62%) 61693 (58%)

45%

3%

52%

41%

4%

55%

33%

3%

64%

34%

4%

62%

>= 480 >=470 and <=479 <=469

4th Year 3rd Year 2nd Year 1st Year Overall


>= 500 12344 (48%) 11222 (41%) 8264 (33%) 8120 (35%) 39950 (39%)

>=490 and <=499 789 (3%) 933 (3%) 775 (3%) 734 (3%) 3231 (3%)

<=489 12849 (49%) 15511 (56%) 16303 (64%) 14168 (62%) 58831 (58%)

48%

3%

49%

41%

3%

56%

33%

3%

64%

35%

3%

62%

>= 500 >=490 and <=499 <=489


The Batch wise performance of students across all batches are represented for English Comprehension, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability according to the score levels.

43


Aptitude-Bucket Analysis (Batch-wise)


>= 470 12436 (48%) 11369 (40%) 8291 (32%) 7564 (32%) 39660 (38%)

>=460 and <=469 1047 (4%) 1128 (4%) 926 (4%) 808 (3%) 3909 (4%)

<=459 12551 (48%) 16192 (56%) 16781 64%) 15204 (65%) 60728 (58%)

48%

4%

48%

40%

4%

56%

32%

4%

64%

32%

3%

65%

>= 470 >=460 and <=469 <=459


44

Employability Analysis

45

Employability – Category-wise

1.3 CFTI college has the highest employability among all the colleges across various roles. 1.1 State and 1.3 State colleges have similar employability with 1.3 state colleges being slightly better.

Category IT

Services IT

Product Hardware & Networking

Electronics & Semiconductor

Automotive Civil Design/ Construction

Electrical/ Energy &

Power Mechanical

KPO/ Analyst

Industrial/ Production

Total Students Employable

1.1-CFI 41% 16% 69% 16% 38% 32% 32% 31% 32% 27% 64%

1.3-CFTI 60% 29% 82% 35% 65% 41% 46% 47% 47% 57% 78%

1.1-State 26% 14% 54% 9% 16% 16% 18% 13% 19% 15% 48%

1.3-State 30% 10% 61% 12% 28% 18% 18% 19% 24% 21% 56%

The Category wise Employability table shows the employability figures of students from different category colleges in various job roles

46

Employability – State-wise (1.1)

State/ Industry

IT Services

IT Product

Hardware & Networking


Automobile/ manufacturing

Civil Design/ Construction


Power Mechanical

KPO/ Analyst


Total Employable

Students

AS 31% 11% 67% 9% 14% 16% 21% 14% 18% 7% 59%

BR 15% 0% 40% 5% 15% 12% 11% 4% 8% 5% 36%

CG 11% 4% 37% 1% 4% 17% 10% 8% 4% 5% 31%

HP 14% 2% 46% 1% 16% 14% 3% 9% 7% 20% 41%

JK 16% 0% 38% 4% 50% 14% 9% 50% 10% 50% 34%

JH 12% 3% 39% 5% 23% 2% 4% 9% 5% 4% 34%

MP 37% 25% 61% 19% 30% 27% 22% 24% 20% 26% 53%

OD 33% 15% 61% 14% 16% 19% 27% 13% 20% 16% 55%

RJ 20% 9% 52% 7% 14% 11% 11% 12% 9% 14% 48%

UP 27% 17% 56% 11% 18% 23% 20% 16% 15% 16% 51%

UK 18% 9% 48% 5% 12% 7% 7% 7% 9% 7% 42%

MP has the most and Chhattisgarh has the least employability using IT Services as a scale for employability.

The State wise Employability table shows the employability figures of students from 1.1 colleges in different job roles across various states.

47

Employability – State-wise (1.3)

State/ Industry

IT Services

IT Product

Hardware & Networking


Automobile/ manufacturing

Civil Design/ Construction


Power Mechanical

KPO/ Analyst


Total Students Employable

AP 29% 23% 63% 10% 27% 6% 6% 16% 14% 22% 61%

GJ 25% 30% 58% 10% 21% 11% 21% 18% 14% 18% 52%

HR 27% 10% 59% 8% 16% - - 19% 15% 18% 56%

KA 22% 4% 57% 10% 9% 3% 8% 8% 12% 8% 53%

KL 44% 18% 78% 30% 55% 20% 30% 33% 29% 31% 74%

MH 42% 16% 67% 17% 53% 31% 22% 31% 28% 34% 61%

PB 19% 8% 51% 2% 24% - 10% 11% 10% 18% 46%

TN 24% 4% 54% 9% 26% 12% 17% 17% 13% 19% 50%

Kerala is the most and Punjab has least employability using IT Services as a scale for employability.

The State wise Employability table represents the employability figures of students from 1.3 colleges in different job roles across various states.

48

Training Need Analysis

49

Training Requirement – Category-wise

Very Less Improvement Required

Moderate Improvement Required

Strong Improvement Required

Category English Quantitative Ability Logical Ability

1.1-CFI 491 492 447

1.3-CFTI 520 617 498

1.1-State 442 448 430

1.3-State 462 435 432

Overall 454 450 434

1.1 State Colleges require most improvement across all the sections whereas 1.3 CFTI colleges require very less improvement. Overall, there should be strong focus to improve students in all the sections with Logical Ability being at priority.

The Training Requirement- Batch/Category wise table highlights the need for training of the students from different college categories to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

50

Training Requirement (Batch/Category-wise)




Category/ Batch

4th Year 3rd Year 2nd Year 1st Year

English Quantitative

Ability Logical Ability







1.1-CFI 514 532 464 499 463 435 475 476 442 465 475 439

1.3-CFTI 547 634 507 517 610 498 485 594 489 516 618 492

1.1-State 457 479 450 450 450 433 428 421 415 426 435 417

1.3-State 484 476 458 469 440 437 449 413 420 450 416 415

Strong improvement is required for 1.1 State colleges across all batches. Logical Ability also require moderate to strong improvement in all years.

The Training Requirement- Batch/Category wise table brings out the need for training of the students from all college categories across batch years to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

51

Training Requirement (1.1) All Batches Combined





AS 500 445 432

BR 404 469 428

CG 394 377 398

HP 439 393 408

JK 462 399 412

JH 408 414 418

MP 458 473 443

OD 464 447 437

RJ 415 433 424

UP 438 491 440

UK 437 414 419

Almost all states require high improvement across all 3 sections.

All of the states require strong improvement in Logical Ability

90% of states need strong focus in Quantitative Ability

90% of states need high improvement in English

The Training Requirement- All Batches (1.1) wise table points out the need for training of the students from 1.1 colleges from all batch years in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

52

Training Requirement (1.3) All Batches Combined





AP 464 466 439

GJ 431 462 422

HR 467 484 453

KA 452 398 415

KL 518 511 472

MH 473 475 455

PB 468 470 448

TN 457 395 412

Karnataka needs very less improvement across all 3 sections.

87% of states require strong improvement in Logical Ability



The Training Requirement- All Batches (1.3) wise table points out the need for training of the students from 1.3 colleges from all batch years in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

53

Training Requirement – Batch-wise




Batch English Quantitative Ability Logical Ability

4th Year 471 485 455

3rd Year 462 455 438

2nd Year 439 422 419

1st Year 442 435 420

Even moderate improvement in 4th year students would help them score above the national averages in English, Quantitative and Logical ability.

Strong improvement is required for 2nd year college students.

The Training Requirement- Batch wise table shows the need for training of the students across all batch years to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

54

Training Requirement (1.1) 4th Year





AS 518 470 451

BR 412 479 434

CG 409 399 416

HP 447 415 428

JH 415 423 428

JK 455 385 408

MP 474 511 466

OD 480 481 459

RJ 434 492 451

UK 447 437 437

UP 449 517 456

81% of states require improvement in Logical Ability

72% of states need to focus in Quantitative Ability

72% of states need improvement in English

The Training Requirement-(1.1) table points out the need for training of the 4th year students from 1.1 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

55

Training Requirement (1.3) 4th Year





AP 472 502 466

GJ 457 519 449

HR 463 473 458

KA 471 440 444

KL 526 526 485

MH 506 518 478

PB 449 457 441

TN 471 432 445

Punjab need high improvement across all 3 sections.

62% of states require improvement in Logical Ability

50% of states need to focus in Quantitative Ability


The Training Requirement-(1.3) table highlights the need for training of the 4th year students from 1.3 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

56

Training Requirement (1.1) 3rd Year





AS 509 454 435

BR 410 476 434

CG 398 379 406

HP 436 382 403

JH 398 396 412

JK 476 418 423

MP 466 477 445

OD 465 442 436

RJ 416 425 426

UK 446 412 422

UP 460 521 455

Almost all the states require moderate to strong improvement in 3 sections.

All of the states require strong improvement in Logical Ability



The Training Requirement-(1.1) table points out the need for training of the 3rd year students from 1.1 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

57

Training Requirement (1.3) 3rd Year





AP 462 444 433

GJ 433 457 427

HR 482 497 464

KA 452 388 410

KL 523 516 474

MH 491 490 466

PB 470 461 448

TN 458 399 418

Kerala requires very less improvement.




The Training Requirement-(1.3) table shows the need for training of the 3rd year students from 1.3 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

58

Training Requirement (1.1) 2nd Year





AS 463 394 401

BR 402 460 427

CG 397 376 394

HP 433 369 391

JH 413 428 422

JK 457 388 405

MP 448 448 428

OD 451 414 419

RJ 400 387 402

UK 418 390 399

UP 421 458 424

All states require very strong improvement across all sections.

100% of states require strong improvement in Logical Ability and as well as in Quantitative Ability and English Comprehension.

The Training Requirement-(1.1) table represents the need for training of the 2nd year students from 1.1 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

59

Training Requirement (1.3) 2nd Year





AP 471 463 442

GJ 419 442 410

HR 459 456 438

KA 441 381 405

KL 513 486 462

MH 437 438 436

PB 479 473 452

TN 442 354 389

Kerala may not require much improvement in English.


All the states need strong focus in Quantitative Ability


The Training Requirement-(1.3) table brings out the need for training of the 2nd year students from 1.3 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

60

Training Requirement (1.1) 1st Year





AS 492 439 427

BR 392 465 420

CG 375 357 380

HP 438 405 405

JH 409 418 412

JK 448 391 401

MP 432 430 419

OD 457 442 429

RJ 394 392 401

UK 425 412 408

UP 425 474 426

All states require very strong improvement almost across all sections.

All the states require strong improvement in Logical Ability and a strong focus in Quantitative Ability too.


The Training Requirement-(1.1) table points out the need for training of the 1st year students from 1.1 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

61

Training Requirement (1.3) 1st Year





AP 458 499 437

GJ 413 425 400

HR 454 497 450

KA 444 389 403

KL 510 516 468

MH 455 449 439

PB 446 530 448

TN 458 401 407

Kerala may not require very strong improvement across all sections.




The Training Requirement-(1.3) table highlights the need for training of the 1st year students from 1.3 colleges in various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

62

Mean Scores, Standard Deviation and Training Need (4th Year)

63

Training Need (Category-wise) 4th Year

Category


Mean (475)

SD (100)

SD Points away from National

Mean

Training Need

Mean (495)

SD (115)


Mean

Training Need

Mean (465)

SD (101)


Mean

Training Need

1.1-CFI 514 110 0.39 Low 532 163 0.32 Low 464 84 -0.01 Moderate

1.3-CFTI 547 115 0.72 Low 634 155 1.21 Low 507 77 0.41 Low

1.1-State 457 116 -0.18 Moderate 479 164 -0.14 Moderate 450 80 -0.15 Moderate

1.3-State 484 117 0.09 Low 476 166 -0.17 Moderate 458 80 -0.07 Moderate

Overall 471 118 -0.04 Moderate 485 167 -0.09 Moderate 455 81 -0.10 Moderate

The Training Need-Category wise table shows the mean, standard deviation and the need for training of the 4th year students from different category colleges to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

64

Training Need (1.1) 4th Year

State


Mean (475)

SD (100)


Mean

Training Need

Mean (495)

SD (115)


Mean

Training Need

Mean (465)

SD (101)


Mean

Training Need

AS 518 108 0.43 Low 470 141 -0.22 Moderate 451 75 -0.14 Moderate

BR 412 100 -0.63 High 479 145 -0.14 Moderate 434 78 -0.31 Moderate

CG 409 106 -0.66 High 399 138 -0.83 High 416 83 -0.48 Moderate

HP 447 101 -0.28 Moderate 415 129 -0.69 High 428 75 -0.37 Moderate

JK 455 111 -0.20 Moderate 385 160 -0.96 High 408 81 -0.56 High

JH 415 98 -0.60 High 423 147 -0.63 High 428 74 -0.37 Moderate

MP 474 125 -0.01 Moderate 511 179 0.14 Low 466 84 0.01 Low

OD 480 120 0.05 Low 481 171 -0.12 Moderate 459 81 -0.06 Moderate

RJ 434 100 -0.41 Moderate 492 150 -0.02 Moderate 451 74 -0.14 Moderate

UP 449 115 -0.26 Moderate 517 161 0.19 Low 456 78 -0.09 Moderate

UK 447 109 -0.28 Moderate 437 147 -0.50 High 437 75 -0.28 Moderate

The Training Need (1.1) table displays the mean, standard deviation and the need for training of the 4 th year

students from 1.1 category colleges across various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

65

Training Need (1.3) 4th Year

States


Mean (475)

SD (100)


Mean

Training Need

Mean (495)

SD (115)


Mean

Training Need

Mean (465)

SD (101)


Mean

Training Need

AP 472 90 -0.03 Moderate 502 166 0.06 Low 466 76 0.01 Low

GJ 457 106 -0.18 Moderate 519 165 0.21 Low 449 74 -0.16 Moderate

HR 463 104 -0.12 Moderate 473 157 -0.19 Moderate 458 74 -0.07 Moderate

KA 471 103 -0.04 Moderate 440 152 -0.48 Moderate 444 71 -0.21 Moderate

KL 526 111 0.51 Low 526 144 0.27 Low 485 74 0.19 Low

MH 506 130 0.31 Low 518 178 0.20 Low 478 81 0.13 Low

PB 449 103 -0.26 Moderate 457 152 -0.33 Moderate 441 72 -0.23 Moderate

TN 471 113 -0.04 Moderate 432 149 -0.55 High 445 84 -0.20 Moderate

The Training Need (1.3) table represents the mean, standard deviation and the need for training of the 4th year

students from 1.3 category colleges across various states to improve their scores in English, Quantitative Ability and Logical Ability.

66

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year - English

S.No College Name State Category English

Mean (475)

SD (100)

Campus Percentile

SD Points away from National Mean

Training Need

1 Government College of Engineering Kalahandi Orissa 1.1-State 431 94 0.33 -0.44 Moderate

2 Government College of Engineering, Karad Maharashtra 1.3-State 473 103 0.49 -0.02 Moderate

3 Government College of Engineering, Jalgaon Maharashtra 1.3-State 427 99 0.31 -0.48 Moderate

4 Rajakiya Engineering College, Ambdkarnagar Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 421 91 0.29 -0.54 High

5 Gaya College of Engineering , Tarka Bihar 1.1-State 414 72 0.27 -0.61 High

6 Samrat Ashok Technological Institute Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 445 111 0.38 -0.3 Moderate

7 Jorhat Engineering College Assam 1.1-State 530 103 0.71 0.55 Low

8 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Dr RML Awadh University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 412 91 0.27 -0.63 High

9 Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institute of Engineering & Technology Maharashtra 1.3-State 468 110 0.47 -0.07 Moderate

10 Lok Nayak Jay Prakash Institute of Technology, Chhapra Bihar 1.1-State 376 93 0.16 -0.99 High

11 Government Engineering College, Banswara Rajasthan 1.1-State 394 81 0.21 -0.81 High

12 Indira Gandhi Engineering College Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 401 101 0.23 -0.74 High

13 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 520 121 0.67 0.45 Low

14 Rajkiya Engineering College, Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 417 93 0.28 -0.58 High

15 Government Engineering College Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 409 106 0.25 -0.66 High

16 Uma Nath Singh Institute of Engineering & Technology Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 369 82 0.15 -1.06 High

17 Madan Mohan Malviya University of Technology Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 478 115 0.51 0.03 Low

18 Rajkiya Engineering College Banda Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 424 96 0.3 -0.51 High

19 Government Engineering College, Keonjhar Orissa 1.1-State 424 99 0.31 -0.51 High

20 Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh Union Territory 1.3-State 565 114 0.82 0.9 Low

21 Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology Haryana 1.3-State 442 93 0.37 -0.33 Moderate

67



Mean (475)

SD (100)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

22 Gauhati University Institute of Science and Technology Assam 1.1-State 487 111 0.55 0.12 Low

23 Parala Maharaja Engineering College Orissa 1.1-State 433 98 0.34 -0.42 Moderate

24 Dibrugarh University Institute of Engineering and Technology Assam 1.1-State 512 98 0.64 0.37 Low

25 Indian Institue of Information Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 496 100 0.58 0.21 Low

26 Uttar Pradesh Textile Technology Institute, Kanpur Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 430 108 0.33 -0.45 Moderate

27 Rajkiya Engineering College - Bijnor Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 441 102 0.37 -0.34 Moderate

28 Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Maharashtra 1.3-State 469 102 0.48 -0.06 Moderate

29 Basaveshwar Engineering College, Bagalkot Karnataka 1.3-State 428 92 0.32 -0.47 Moderate

30 PET MJP Rohilakhand University, Bareilly Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 418 96 0.28 -0.57 High

31 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bundelkhand University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 413 115 0.27 -0.62 High

32 Atal Bihari Vajpai Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 417 88 0.28 -0.58 High

33 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Technology Union Territory 1.1-State 433 79 0.34 -0.42 Moderate

34 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Dr BR Ambedkar University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 385 71 0.18 -0.9 High

35 Assam Engineering College, Guwahati Assam 1.1-State 538 112 0.73 0.63 Low

36 Government College of Engineering and Technology, Chak Jammu and Kashmir 1.1-State 494 110 0.58 0.19 Low

37 Malnad College of Engineering Karnataka 1.3-State 453 98 0.41 -0.22 Moderate

38 Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur Bihar 1.1-State 467 111 0.47 -0.08 Moderate

39 Nalanda College of Engineeirng, Gokhulpur Bihar 1.1-State 391 84 0.2 -0.84 High

40 College of Engineering and Technology, Udaipur Rajasthan 1.1-State 454 101 0.42 -0.21 Moderate

41 Nanhi Pari Seemant Engineering Institute, Pithoragarh Uttarakhand 1.1-State 412 82 0.26 -0.63 High

42 Motihari College of Engineering, Motihari Bihar 1.1-State 373 77 0.15 -1.02 High

68



Mean (475)

SD (100)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

43 Sri Venkateswara University College Of Engineering Andhra Pradesh 1.3-State 472 90 0.49 -0.03 Moderate

44 Government Engineering College, Ajmer Rajasthan 1.1-State 441 104 0.37 -0.34 Moderate

45 Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 478 112 0.51 0.03 Low

46 Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Muzaffarpur Bihar 1.1-State 440 104 0.36 -0.35 Moderate

47 Government College of Engineering & Technology, Bikaner Rajasthan 1.1-State 422 97 0.3 -0.53 High

48 Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri Jammu and Kashmir 1.1-State 421 91 0.29 -0.54 High

49 Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology Punjab 1.3-CFTI 449 103 0.4 -0.26 Moderate

50 Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering & Technology , Jhansi Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 473 107 0.49 -0.02 Moderate

51 Kumaon Institute of Technology, Almora Uttarakhand 1.1-State 457 114 0.43 -0.18 Moderate

52 National Institute of Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 480 103 0.56 0.05 Low

53 Government Engineering College - Jhalawar Rajasthan 1.1-State 383 72 0.18 -0.92 High

54 YMCA Institute of Engineering Haryana 1.3-State 491 114 0.56 0.16 Low

55 Government Engineering College - Bharatpur Rajasthan 1.1-State 381 84 0.17 -0.94 High

56 Ujjain Engineering College Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 443 128 0.37 -0.32 Moderate

57 University Institute of Engineering and Technology Haryana 1.3-State 487 109 0.55 0.12 Low

58 Birla Vishwakarma Mahavidyalaya Gujarat 1.3-State 456 106 0.43 -0.19 Moderate

59 Bhuvaneshwar College of Engineering and Technology Orissa 1.1-State 510 121 0.76 0.35 Low

60 BVB College of Engineering and Technology Karnataka 1.3-State 510 98 0.7 0.35 Low

61 National Institute of Technology, Yupia Arunachal Pradesh 1.1-CFI 545 103 0.76 0.7 Low

62 School of Engineering, Cochin University of Science of Technology Kerala 1.3-State 526 111 0.7 0.51 Low

63 Bineswar Brahma Engineering College Chandrapara Assam 1.1-State 473 109 0.49 -0.02 Moderate

69



Mean (475)

SD (100)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

64 Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology Orissa 1.1-State 532 120 0.71 0.57 Low

65 Government Engineering College, Jagdalpur Bastar Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 398 100 0.22 -0.77 High

66 National Institute of Technology Nagaland 1.1-CFI 552 121 0.78 0.77 Low

67 Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 492 102 0.57 0.17 Low

68 National Institute of Technology Sikkim 1.1-CFI 513 102 0.65 0.38 Low

69 University Institute of Chemical Technology Maharashtra 1.3-State 414 92 0.27 -0.61 High

70 Darbhanga Engineering College Bihar 1.1-State 388 92 0.19 -0.87 High

71 Rajiv Gandhi Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 442 96 0.37 -0.33 Moderate

72 Jawaharlal Neharu Government Engineering College, Ghangoon Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 465 108 0.46 -0.1 Moderate

73 National Institute of Technology, Shillong Meghalaya 1.1-CFI 508 114 0.63 0.33 Low

74 National Institute of Technology, Surathkal Karnataka 1.3-CFTI 559 117 0.8 0.84 Low

75 National Institute of Technology, Srinagar Jammu & Kashmir 1.1-CFI 552 107 0.78 0.77 Low

76 PSG College of Technology (PSGCT) Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 500 111 0.6 0.25 Low

77 Institute Of Technology Gopeswar Uttarakhand 1.1-State 385 91 0.18 -0.9 High

78 Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai Maharashtra 1.3-State 617 114 0.92 1.42 Low

79 Government Women's Engg College, Ajmer Rajasthan 1.1-State 448 96 0.39 -0.27 Moderate

80 Madhav Institute of Technology & Science, Gwalior Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 498 115 0.59 0.23 Low

81 Women Institute Of Technology Uttarakhand 1.1-State 434 131 0.34 -0.41 Moderate

82 THDC Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 425 98 0.31 -0.5 Moderate

83 Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 468 127 0.47 -0.07 Moderate

84 Government College of Engineering, Bargur Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 403 93 0.24 -0.72 High

70



Mean (475)

SD (100)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

85 Coimbatore Institute of Technology Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 473 112 0.49 -0.02 Moderate

86 Tripura Institute of Technology Tripura 1.1-State 401 100 0.23 -0.74 High

87 University college of Engineering & Technology Jharkhand 1.1-State 433 100 0.34 -0.42 Moderate

88 National Institute of Technology, Aizwal Mizoram 1.1-CFI 457 108 0.43 -0.18 Moderate

89 BVB's Sardar Patel College of Engineering Maharashtra 1.3-State 559 115 0.8 0.84 Low

90 Malaviya National Institute of Technology Rajasthan 1.3-CFTI 599 170 0.73 1.24 Low

91 National Institute of Technology, Raipur Chhattisgarh 1.3-CFTI 552 116 0.78 0.77 Low

92 Govt College of Engineering, Salem Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 487 147 0.26 0.12 Low

93 Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University Jammu and Kashmir 1.1-State 503 136 0.61 0.28 Low

94 Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute Maharashtra 1.3-State 596 123 0.89 1.21 Low

95 Johrat Institute of Science & Technology Assam 1.1-State 477 93 0.51 0.02 Low

96 Dumka Engineering College Jharkhand 1.1-State 388 94 0.19 -0.87 High

97 Government Engineering College, Raipur Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 423 112 0.3 -0.52 High

98 Govt College of Technology, Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 443 105 0.38 -0.32 Moderate

99 Techno India Ramgarh Jharkhand 1.1-State 415 97 0.28 -0.6 High

100 Shri Govindram Seksaria Institute of Technology And Science Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 537 122 0.73 0.62 Low

101 MBM Engineering College Rajasthan 1.1-State 461 97 0.44 -0.14 Moderate

102 Department of Technology, Kolhapur Maharashtra 1.3-State 408 98 0.25 -0.67 High

103 Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang Orissa 1.1-State 499 121 0.59 0.24 Low

71

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year – Quantitative Ability

S.No College Name State Category Quantitative Ability

Mean (495)

SD (115)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

1 Government College of Engineering Kalahandi Orissa 1.1-State 384 120 0.17 -0.97 High

2 Government College of Engineering, Karad Maharashtra 1.3-State 494 137 0.5 -0.01 Moderate

3 Government College of Engineering, Jalgaon Maharashtra 1.3-State 418 140 0.25 -0.67 High

4 Rajakiya Engineering College, Ambdkarnagar Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 467 134 0.41 -0.24 Moderate

5 Gaya College of Engineering , Tarka Bihar 1.1-State 513 141 0.56 0.16 Low


7 Jorhat Engineering College Assam 1.1-State 468 139 0.41 -0.23 Moderate

8 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Dr RML Awadh University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 432 122 0.29 -0.55 High

9 Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institute of Engineering & Technology Maharashtra 1.3-State 484 145 0.46 -0.10 Moderate



12 Indira Gandhi Engineering College Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 418 145 0.25 -0.67 High


14 Rajkiya Engineering College, Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 491 132 0.49 -0.03 Moderate

15 Government Engineering College Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 403 137 0.21 -0.80 High


17 Madan Mohan Malviya University of Technology Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 534 155 0.63 0.34 Low

18 Rajkiya Engineering College Banda Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 489 129 0.48 -0.05 Moderate

19 Government Engineering College, Keonjhar Orissa 1.1-State 386 137 0.17 -0.95 High

20 Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh Union Territory 1.3-State 570 183 0.74 0.65 Low

21 Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology Haryana 1.3-State 428 136 0.28 -0.58 High

72



Mean (495)

SD (115)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

22 Gauhati University Institute of Science and Technology Assam 1.1-State 412 134 0.24 -0.72 High

23 Parala Maharaja Engineering College Orissa 1.1-State 406 142 0.22 -0.77 High

24 Dibrugarh University Institute of Engineering and Technology Assam 1.1-State 444 142 0.33 -0.44 Moderate

25 Indian Institue of Information Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 553 179 0.69 0.50 Low



28 Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Maharashtra 1.3-State 486 169 0.47 -0.08 Moderate

29 Basaveshwar Engineering College, Bagalkot Karnataka 1.3-State 380 127 0.16 -1.00 High

30 PET MJP Rohilakhand University, Bareilly Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 474 138 0.43 -0.18 Moderate

31 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bundelkhand University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 410 140 0.23 -0.74 High

32 Atal Bihari Vajpai Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 393 116 0.19 -0.89 High

33 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Technology Union Territory 1.1-State 354 102 0.11 -1.23 High



36 Government College of Engineering and Technology, Chak Jammu and Kashmir 1.1-State 439 144 0.31 -0.49 Moderate

37 Malnad College of Engineering Karnataka 1.3-State 396 134 0.19 -0.86 High

38 Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur Bihar 1.1-State 606 128 0.83 0.97 Low

39 Nalanda College of Engineeirng, Gokhulpur Bihar 1.1-State 460 136 0.38 -0.30 Moderate

40 College of Engineering and Technology, Udaipur Rajasthan 1.1-State 542 151 0.66 0.41 Low

41 Nanhi Pari Seemant Engineering Institute, Pithoragarh Uttarakhand 1.1-State 375 134 0.15 -1.04 High


73



Mean (495)

SD (115)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

43 Sri Venkateswara University College Of Engineering Andhra Pradesh 1.3-State 502 167 0.52 0.06 Low



46 Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Muzaffarpur Bihar 1.1-State 521 137 0.59 0.23 Low

47 Government College of Engineering & Technology, Bikaner Rajasthan 1.1-State 467 133 0.4 -0.24 Moderate



50 Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering & Technology , Jhansi Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 610 131 0.84 1.00 Low


52 National Institute of Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 481 142 0.61 -0.12 Moderate



55 Government Engineering College - Bharatpur Rajasthan 1.1-State 396 124 0.2 -0.86 High



58 Birla Vishwakarma Mahavidyalaya Gujarat 1.3-State 522 164 0.59 0.23 Low


60 BVB College of Engineering and Technology Karnataka 1.3-State 504 151 0.61 0.08 Low



63 Bineswar Brahma Engineering College Chandrapara Assam 1.1-State 398 129 0.2 -0.84 High

74



Mean (495)

SD (115)

Campus Percentile


Training Need




67 Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 507 136 0.54 0.10 Low



70 Darbhanga Engineering College Bihar 1.1-State 444 134 0.33 -0.44 Moderate

71 Rajiv Gandhi Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 398 116 0.2 -0.84 High


73 National Institute of Technology, Shillong Meghalaya 1.1-CFI 471 155 0.42 -0.21 Moderate



76 PSG College of Technology (PSGCT) Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 457 158 0.37 -0.33 Moderate



79 Government Women's Engg College, Ajmer Rajasthan 1.1-State 434 125 0.3 -0.53 High


81 Women Institute Of Technology Uttarakhand 1.1-State 390 137 0.18 -0.91 High

82 THDC Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 413 132 0.24 -0.71 High

83 Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 504 184 0.53 0.08 Low


75



Mean (495)

SD (115)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

85 Coimbatore Institute of Technology Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 414 142 0.24 -0.70 High



88 National Institute of Technology, Aizwal Mizoram 1.1-CFI 427 147 0.28 -0.59 High




92 Govt College of Engineering, Salem Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 487 147 0.18 -0.07 Moderate



95 Johrat Institute of Science & Technology Assam 1.1-State 457 133 0.37 -0.33 Moderate


97 Government Engineering College, Raipur Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 425 150 0.27 -0.61 High

98 Govt College of Technology, Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 426 139 0.27 -0.60 High

99 Techno India Ramgarh Jharkhand 1.1-State 425 144 0.27 -0.61 High

100 Shri Govindram Seksaria Institute of Technology & Science Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 596 171 0.81 0.88 Low

101 MBM Engineering College Rajasthan 1.1-State 591 137 0.8 0.83 Low

102 Department of Technology, Kolhapur Maharashtra 1.3-State 379 134 0.16 -1.01 High


76

Training Need (College-wise) 4th Year – Logical Ability

S.No College Name State Category Logical Ability

Mean (465)

SD (101)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

1 Government College of Engineering Kalahandi Orissa 1.1-State 417 73 0.32 -0.48 Moderate

2 Government College of Engineering, Karad Maharashtra 1.3-State 478 67 0.55 0.13 Low

3 Government College of Engineering, Jalgaon Maharashtra 1.3-State 442 72 0.41 -0.23 Moderate

4 Rajakiya Engineering College, Ambdkarnagar Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 443 68 0.41 -0.22 Moderate

5 Gaya College of Engineering , Tarka Bihar 1.1-State 463 71 0.49 -0.02 Moderate


7 Jorhat Engineering College Assam 1.1-State 451 73 0.44 -0.14 Moderate

8 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Dr RML Awadh University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 422 67 0.34 -0.43 Moderate

9 Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institute of Engineering & Technology Maharashtra 1.3-State 465 74 0.5 0.00 Low



12 Indira Gandhi Engineering College Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 428 74 0.36 -0.37 Moderate


14 Rajkiya Engineering College, Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 443 69 0.41 -0.22 Moderate

15 Government Engineering College Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 424 73 0.34 -0.41 Moderate


17 Madan Mohan Malviya University of Technology Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 457 82 0.47 -0.08 Moderate

18 Rajkiya Engineering College Banda Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 443 72 0.41 -0.22 Moderate

19 Government Engineering College, Keonjhar Orissa 1.1-State 426 77 0.35 -0.39 Moderate

20 Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh Union Territory 1.3-State 457 118 0.47 -0.08 Moderate

21 Guru Jambeshwar University of Science & Technology Haryana 1.3-State 443 71 0.41 -0.22 Moderate

77



Mean (465)

SD (101)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

22 Gauhati University Institute of Science and Technology Assam 1.1-State 442 79 0.41 -0.23 Moderate

23 Parala Maharaja Engineering College Orissa 1.1-State 429 74 0.36 -0.36 Moderate

24 Dibrugarh University Institute of Engineering and Technology Assam 1.1-State 429 71 0.36 -0.36 Moderate

25 Indian Institue of Information Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 461 51 0.48 -0.04 Moderate



28 Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Maharashtra 1.3-State 469 78 0.52 0.04 Low

29 Basaveshwar Engineering College, Bagalkot Karnataka 1.3-State 423 69 0.34 -0.42 Moderate

30 PET MJP Rohilakhand University, Bareilly Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 435 67 0.38 -0.30 Moderate

31 Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bundelkhand University Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 429 77 0.36 -0.36 Moderate

32 Atal Bihari Vajpai Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 416 72 0.31 -0.49 Moderate

33 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Institute of Technology Union Territory 1.1-State 426 59 0.35 -0.39 Moderate



36 Government College of Engineering and Technology, Chak Jammu and Kashmir 1.1-State 422 62 0.34 -0.43 Moderate

37 Malnad College of Engineering Karnataka 1.3-State 437 72 0.39 -0.28 Moderate

38 Bhagalpur College of Engineering, Bhagalpur Bihar 1.1-State 477 50 0.55 0.12 Low

39 Nalanda College of Engineeirng, Gokhulpur Bihar 1.1-State 405 77 0.28 -0.59 High

40 College of Engineering and Technology, Udaipur Rajasthan 1.1-State 461 65 0.49 -0.04 Moderate

41 Nanhi Pari Seemant Engineering Institute, Pithoragarh Uttarakhand 1.1-State 416 75 0.31 -0.49 Moderate


78



Mean (465)

SD (101)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

43 Sri Venkateswara University College Of Engineering Andhra Pradesh 1.3-State 467 76 0.51 0.02 Low



46 Muzaffarpur Institute of Technology, Muzaffarpur Bihar 1.1-State 453 75 0.45 -0.12 Moderate

47 Government College of Engineering & Technology, Bikaner Rajasthan 1.1-State 441 75 0.41 -0.24 Moderate



50 Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering & Technology , Jhansi Uttar Pradesh 1.1-State 488 63 0.59 0.23 Low


52 National Institute of Technology Manipur 1.1-CFI 448 73 0.55 -0.17 Moderate



55 Government Engineering College - Bharatpur Rajasthan 1.1-State 415 72 0.31 -0.50 Moderate



58 Birla Vishwakarma Mahavidyalaya Gujarat 1.3-State 450 74 0.44 -0.15 Moderate


60 BVB College of Engineering and Technology Karnataka 1.3-State 461 67 0.58 -0.04 Moderate



63 Bineswar Brahma Engineering College Chandrapara Assam 1.1-State 410 75 0.29 -0.54 High

79



Mean (465)

SD (101)

Campus Percentile


Training Need




67 Govind Ballabh Pant Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 457 63 0.47 -0.08 Moderate



70 Darbhanga Engineering College Bihar 1.1-State 414 82 0.31 -0.50 Moderate

71 Rajiv Gandhi Government Institute of Engineering & Technology Himachal Pradesh 1.1-State 422 64 0.33 -0.43 Moderate


73 National Institute of Technology, Shillong Meghalaya 1.1-CFI 443 93 0.41 -0.22 Moderate



76 PSG College of Technology (PSGCT) Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 453 81 0.45 -0.12 Moderate



79 Government Women's Engg College, Ajmer Rajasthan 1.1-State 448 67 0.43 -0.17 Moderate


81 Women Institute Of Technology Uttarakhand 1.1-State 431 84 0.37 -0.34 Moderate

82 THDC Engineering College Uttarakhand 1.1-State 429 70 0.36 -0.36 Moderate

83 Jabalpur Engineering College, Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 462 82 0.49 -0.03 Moderate


80



Mean (465)

SD (101)

Campus Percentile


Training Need

85 Coimbatore Institute of Technology Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 444 93 0.42 -0.21 Moderate



88 National Institute of Technology, Aizwal Mizoram 1.1-CFI 413 87 0.3 -0.51 High




92 Govt College of Engineering, Salem Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 487 147 0.34 0.22 Low



95 Johrat Institute of Science & Technology Assam 1.1-State 439 66 0.4 -0.26 Moderate


97 Government Engineering College, Raipur Chhattisgarh 1.1-State 440 78 0.4 -0.25 Moderate

98 Govt College of Technology, Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 1.3-State 450 77 0.44 -0.15 Moderate

99 Techno India Ramgarh Jharkhand 1.1-State 430 76 0.36 -0.35 Moderate

100 Shri Govindram Seksaria Institute of Technology And Science , Indore Madhya Pradesh 1.1-State 494 88 0.61 0.29 Low

101 MBM Engineering College Rajasthan 1.1-State 484 60 0.57 0.19 Low

102 Department of Technology, Kolhapur Maharashtra 1.3-State 422 78 0.34 -0.43 Moderate


81

Feedback reports

82

Student Feedback Report

How did I perform?

AMCAT Scores

Personalized feedback

What is my personality?

Scores and their

description

Your personality

type

What jobs will I get?

Which job profiles you

best fit in

Cut-offs for different profiles

How can I improve?

Authoritative resources and

references

Time schedule

AMCAT Scores

Your Personality

Your Industry and Job Fitment

Module Feedback

References & Time schedule

87

83

CAMPUS FEEDBACK REPORT

Score Analysis (Inferences & Performance Summary)

Training Suggestions

Company Match (Perspective on company shortlisting criteria)

Employability Prospects

Bird’s Eye view of Employability

Intra Campus comparison (Degree & stream comparison)

Perspective on students (Star performers, High potential Students)

88

84

Findings: 1.3 CFTI college students have scored better than 1.1 CFI, 1.1 State and 1.3 State college student. It has been observed that the final year students across all categories have performed significantly better than the

rest of Batches. Performance of first, second & third students across 1.1 state & 1.3 state category is below the national average. MP is the only state in 1.1 state category where mean scores close to national average across all modules. Kerala is the only state in 1.3 state category where the mean scores are close to national average across all modules. 1.3 CFTI colleges have the highest employability among all the colleges 1.1 State Colleges require very high improvement across all the sections when compared to other colleges.

85

Recommendations:

We need to understand requirements of companies and at the same time make students realize and understand the scope/career prospects the large global corporations and new age start-ups have in store for them. It is important that students understand the skill sets needed to work in corporations

Use of standardized employability assessments from the first year itself to recognize student gaps and provide them personalized feedback to improve. These skills need to be tested year-on-year to track improvement and also, measure newly acquired skills each year.

We need to make our students ready for the changing skill demands of the future therefore learning new skills, which will

be relevant and useful in future, is the need of the hour.

86

Technical Annexure (1/4) AMCAT The AMCAT is a computer adaptive test which measures candidates on critical areas like communication skills, logical reasoning, quantitative skills and job specific domain skills thus helping recruiters identify the suitability of a candidate. By having a standardized aptitude test (i.e. a common aptitude test taken by millions of candidates), scores can be quickly compared across multiple candidates. The candidates can obtain a score varying from 100 to 900 in English, Logical, Quantitative Ability and Domain modules based on his performance. AMCAT is inherently fair since every test taker is evaluated on same parameters. Hence shortlisting can happen strictly on merit. A few prominent features of AMCAT are listed below:

• Adaptive: AMCAT is an Item Response Theory (IRT) driven statistical assessment technology with intelligent learning

system ensures highly accurate evaluation • Standardized: Accurate and comparable evaluation across location and time and establishes long term benchmarks of

quality • Valid: Used a few million times every year in recruitment and L&D scenarios and validated for 200+ job roles across various

industry sectors • Reliable: Adheres to global standards of reliability and repeatability and ensures un-biased, predictive evaluation • Large Question Banks: Has high quality, large statistically rated question banks which are evolving with exposure control,

automatic filtering, content balancing

87

Technical Annexure (2/4) National Mean The national average score of the modules are calculated by sampling of data on about 169290 engineering students from multiple engineering colleges across multiple Indian states. The scores are calculated based on different demographics- Gender, Region, Tier of Cities, Metro and Non-Metro Cities, and Top Campuses. The analysis and findings of these help us calculate the national average of the module. It is the score which majority of the candidates achieve. The figure 1 shows the sample distribution and the national average score for a module. The candidates are sampled based on scores received in the modules and National Average is the score which maximum candidates achieve for the module. It is 470 for the module taken as an example. The data of candidates is sampled on a yearly basis and the national averages are annually updated. The analysis and findings are based on the results of the students on AMCAT: Aspiring Minds Computer Adaptive Test, which is India's largest and only standardized employability test. AMCAT covers all objective parameters such as English communication, Quantitative aptitude, Problem-solving skills, and knowledge of domain areas. The test was conducted under a proctored and credible environment ensured by Aspiring Minds.

Figure 1: Sample Distribution and National Average

88

Technical Annexure (3/4) Tables below provides the sample size of various demographics like Gender, Region- Tier of City, College City, Residence City and College Variance that Aspiring Minds use to calculate the National Averages for various modules

Gender Sample Size Percentage

Female 67322 39.77%

Male 101968 60.23%

Tier Sample Size Percentage

Tier 1 69495 41.05%

Tier 2 60149 35.53%

Tier 3 39646 23.42%

City- Metro/ Non Metro Sample Size Percentage

Metro 48280 28.52%

Non-Metro 121010 71.48%

City- Metro/ Non Metro Sample Size Percentage

Metro 74056 43.75%

Non-Metro 95234 56.25%

Top 30 vs Rest colleges Sample Size Percentage

Top 30 15789 9.33%

Rest 153501 90.67%

Table 2: Region- Tier of City

Table 5: College Variance- Top 30 colleges Vs Rest

Table 4: Region- City of College Metro Vs Non-Metro

Table 1: Gender

Table 3: Region- City of Residence Metro Vs Non-Metro

89

Technical Annexure (4/4)

Standard Deviation Standard deviation is the measurement of how a number varies from the average number in a group. A low standard deviation means that most data is very close to the average and a high standard deviation means that numbers are spread out. It is calculated using the formula in figure 2.

Figure 2

Employability

A person is said to be employable if he/she possesses the required skill set to perform well on the job. The skill sets are measured by the different modules under the AMCAT test and Aspiring Minds has established the cutoffs on each module and benchmarked it with multiple corporations. The criteria for employability is based on the studies conducted with various corporations in various sectors, benchmarking their current employees in different profiles through objective assessment based on AMCAT and establishing feedback through on-job performance data. These benchmarks serve as a standard for several large-sized companies across the nation. To calculate the employability of a candidate in the role of Software Engineer- IT Services, he should score equal to or above 950 marks together in Quants and Logical Ability section. He also has to score equal to or above 450 and 480 in Logical Ability and English sections respectively to be considered as employable for this role. The candidates who clear this criterion verses the total number of candidates give the national employability for the role of Software Engineer- IT Services.

90

Thank You

Documents

PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION · AMCAT Mean Score – National ... Student Feedback Report 83 Campus Feedback Report 84 Findings 85 Recommendations 86 Technical Annexure