40
1 Propulsion Control Part 1 of 2 Øyvind Smogeli and Asgeir J. Sørensen, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Otto Nielsens Vei 10, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway E-mail: [email protected] [email protected]

Propulsion Control Part 1 of 2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Propulsion Control Part 1 of 2. Øyvind Smogeli and Asgeir J. Sørensen, Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Otto Nielsens Vei 10, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway E-mail: [email protected] [email protected]. Outline. Part 1: Modelling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Propulsion Control

Part 1 of 2

Øyvind Smogeli and Asgeir J. Sørensen,

Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Otto Nielsens Vei 10, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway

E-mail: [email protected]@ntnu.no

2

OutlinePart 1: Modelling• Motivation and problem formulation• Mathematical modelling• Propeller characteristics• Propeller losses and dynamics• Experimental results

Part 2: Local control• Conventional local thruster control• Combined power and torque control• Sensitivity to thrust losses• Propeller load torque observer• Torque loss calculation• Anti-spin control• Simulation results• Experimental results

3

• Thrust and power allocation (over/under actuated systems)

• Pitch/rpm/torque/ power control

• Combined torque and power control

• Anti-spin thruster control

• Combined rudder and propeller control

POWER

PITCH or RPM CONTROL

VARIABLETORQUE

CONSTANTTORQUE

TORQUE CONTROL

POWER

Propulsion and Thruster Control

4

Dynamic Positioning and Transit

• Demand for vessels to conduct all-year operation in harsh environment and extreme conditions

• High positioning accuracy required

• DP system and propulsion system must be robust to any single failure

• It’s a trend towards physical and functional integration between the power and automation systems

5

Motivation

6

Thrusters affected by waves, current and vessel motion:

– Rapidly changing operating conditions

– Load fluctuations

Motivation

7

Thrusters affected by waves, current and vessel motion:

– Rapidly changing operating conditions

– Load fluctuations

Effects of bad low-level thruster control:

– Danger of blackout

– Wear and tear of the propulsion system

– Increased fuel consumption

– Reduced thrust capability

Motivation

8

Propeller Types: FPP and CPP

Two controllable parameters: Shaft speed and pitch– Shaft speed: Fixed pitch propellers (FPP)

• No hydraulics needed to control the pitch• Preferable for electric motors with variable speed• Optimized for one advance speed

– Pitch: Controllable pitch propellers (CPP)• Used for direct-driven shafts when varying thrust is

needed• Fast response, produces thrust in two directions• Better hydrodynamics for varying advance speed

– Consolidated control: Combination also possible (CPP)• Typically two or three speed setpoints• Varying pitch dynamically

Pitch P measured at 0.7R, commonly given as pitch/diameter ratio P/D

Shaft speed given as RPM, n = RPS = RPM/60 or ω = 2n

9

Conventional Propulsion Control

RPM INPUT

POWER

RPM

PITCH INPUT

FPP:Fixed Pitch Propeller with controllable speed (RPM)

CPP:Controllable Pitch Propeller withfixed speed

POWER

PITCH

10

Propulsion

Courtesy to Rolls-Royce Marine: http://www.rolls-royce.com/marine/default.jsp

11

Electric Motor

Ventilation Unit

Bearing

Slipring Unit (Power/Data Transmission)

Air Cooling

Bearing, Shaft Seals

FP Propeller Shaft Line

Installation Block

Hydraulic Steering Unit

Propulsion

Courtesy to ABB Marine: http://www.abb.com/

12

Functionality: Control Modes• Station keeping models• Marine operation models• Slender structures• Multibody operations

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ….. Speed [knots]

Station keeping

Marked position

Low speed tracking

High speed tracking/Transit

• Manoeuvring models • Linearized about some Uo

• Sea keeping • Motion damping

13

Control Modes: - Speed range and actuation

Control actuation: • Main propellers/pods • Tunnel thrusters• Azimuthing thrusters

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 …..Speed [knots]

Station keeping

Marked position

Low speed tracking

High speed tracking/Transit

Control actuation: • Main propellers/pods • Rudders

14

Propeller Blade Model

Integrate over propeller blades to get total thrust and torque

i

arctanVa r

i arctanVa 1

2UA

r 12UT

arctanUT

UA

arctan PD

15

Propeller Characteristics

is the density of wateris the propeller diameteris the propeller speed (RPS)

The non-dimensional thrust and torque coefficients are given as:

Typical characteristics of actual propeller thrust and torque :

wDn

is the advance speed

P/D is the pitch ratio

Ae/AO

is the propeller expanded blade area ratioZ

is the number of blades

Rn is the Reynolds number

t is the max. blade thickness

c is the propeller chord length

VaKT f1Va ,n,D,P/D,Ae/A0 ,Z,Rn , t/c

KQ f2Va ,n,D,P/D,Ae/A0 ,Z,Rn , t/c

Ta wD4KT|n|n

Qa wD5KQ |n|n

16

Desired Thrust and Moment for Speed Controlled Propellers

The desired/reference thrust and torque coefficients for zero advance speed, KT0 and KQ0, are used for control since Va is unknown to the control system:

Tref kuref wD4KT0 |nref |nref

Qref wD5KQ0 |nref |nref

nref is the desired propeller speed (RPS)

17

Open Water Tests as Function of Advance Ratio

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.20

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Advance ratio

o

KT

10KQ

P/D 0.7, 0.89 and1.1

Rn =2 6106, Z=4, D =3.1 m, and AE/Ao =0.52

J Va

nD

Open water propeller efficiency in undisturbed water:

Work done by propeller in producing a thrust/work required to overcome shaft torque

o TaVa

2 nQa J

2KT

KQ

18

Linear Thruster Characteristics

KT 0 1J,

KQ 0 1J.

KT0 KTVa 0 KTJ 0 0

KQ0 KQVa 0 KQJ 0 0

Common simplification:

The thrust and torque are then expressed as:

The nominal thrust and torque coefficients, used for control since Va is unknown to the control system (simplest possible representation):

J Va

nD

Advance ratio:

Ta wn|n|D4 0 1Va

nD wD4 0n|n| D3 1|n|Va Tnnn|n| Tnv |n|Va

Qa wn|n|D5 0 1Va

nD wD5 0n|n| D4 1|n|Va Qnnn|n| Qnv |n|Va

19

4 Quadrant Thrust Model

1st quadrant: Va 0,n 0

2nd quadrant: Va 0,n 0

3rd quadrant: Va 0,n 0

4th quadrant: Va 0,n 0

Fixed pitch propeller in the Wageningen series:

CT Ta

12 Va

2 0. 7 nD2 4D2

CQ Qa

12 Va

2 0. 7 nD2 4D3

20

Controllable Pitch PropellerFor a given pitch, the propeller

behaves like a fixed pitch propeller:

A “cut” along one P/D value gives the conventional KT curve as function of advance ratio.

21

Propulsion Efficiency (1)Axial water inflow velocity to the propeller Va due to vessel velocity U and wake fraction number w is:

The hull reduces the inflow to the propeller 0 < w < 0.4

Va U1 ww wp wv U1 w

is the wake fraction caused by the wave motion of the water particles

ww

is the wake fraction caused by so-called potential effects for a hull advancing forward in an ideal fluid,

is the wake fraction caused by viscous effects due to the effect of boundary layers

wp

wv

22

In steady state the effective thrust is equal to the total resistance R:

Overall propulsion efficiency is given by the ratio of useful work done by the product of drag and ship speed divided by the required work to overcome the shaft torque:

Propeller suction on the aft ship given by the thrust-deduction coefficient 0 < td < 0.2 increase resistance (drag)R Ta1 td ds Tatd

r B o

J

2KTKQB

o

KQ

KQB

p RU2 nQa

h o r m

h 1 td1w

where

Propulsion Efficiency (2)

Relative rotational efficiency

Hull efficiency in the range of 1-1.2

m Mechanical efficiency in the range of 0.8-0.9

Open water propeller efficiency in undisturbed water o TaVa

2 nQa J

2KT

KQ

23

Propeller and Thruster Losses

• The vessel hull– Coanda effect– Tunnel thruster suction

losses– Thrust deduction

• Velocity fluctuations– In-line change of advance

velocity– Cross-coupling drag

• Thruster-thruster interaction• Ventilation and in-and-out-of

water effects

The actual thrust Ta and torque Qa are affected by:

24

Thrust Losses: General formulation

xp

p

The actual thrust Ta and torque Qa may be expressed as:

where:

represents dynamic states (vessel motion, propeller submergence, environmental conditions).

represents propeller dependent parameters.

hT and hQ are termed the thrust and torque reduction functions

Ta hTn,xp , p1 tdTref fTn,xp , p,

Qa hQn,xp , pQref fQn,xp , p,

#

#

Thrust and torque loss factors:Ta

Tref hTn,xp , p1 td T KT

KT0

Qa.

Qref hQn,xp , p Q

KQ

KQ0

25

Example: Thrust curves for varying KT

-200

0

200

400

800

Thrust Tth [kN]

-3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5

Speed n [RPS]

KT = 0.4

KT = 0.36

KT = 0.30

26

Thrust Losses: Velocity fluctuations

Axial in-line fluctuations:

Variation in Va

and hence thrust coefficient

Transverse fluctuations:

Cross-coupling drag

27

Thrust Losses: - Thruster-thruster interaction

Loss of thrust because of:

V j

Va

Vt

Va V j,a+

V t+ V j,t

• Change of advance velocity due to inline jet velocity component Vj,a, which leads to change in the thrust coefficient

• Cross-coupling drag due to transverse jet velocity component Vj,t

• Other interaction effects, harder to model

28

Thrust Losses: Coanda effect• Propeller slipstream is drawn towards the hull and

deflected• Severe loss of thrust for unfortunate thrust angles

F Va

Low-p ressurereg ion

29

Propeller:• D = 250 mm• Z = 4• P/D = 1• EAR = 0.55

Duct:• L/D = 0.5• L = 118.8 mm

• Di = 252.1 mm

• Ducted propeller• Varying shaft

speed / loading and submergence

• Measuring thrust and torque

• Steady state

Cavitation Tunnel Experiments: - Ventilated ducted propeller

30

Experiments: - Cavitation tunnel results

Thrust for Ja = 0.2

Ventilation

31

Experiments: - Cavitation tunnel results

Thrust for Ja = 0.2

Ventilation

32

Experiments: MCLab• Same ducted propeller as in the cavitation tunnel• Operating in waves with ventilation• Varying submergence and propeller speed

33

Experimental Results MCLab

34

Experimental Results MCLab: Waves

35

Experiments: MCLab time series

Thrust for increasing shaftspeed in h/R = 1.5

Loss of thrust duringventilation

36

Modelling of Ventilation Loss Effects

•Ventilation loss model for simulation

•Experimental results from cavitation tunnel at NTNU

37

Propeller Shaft Model

2n

torque generated by the motor

actual torque experienced by the propeller

QmQa

Is moment of inertia of the propeller shaft

angular shaft speed

Is Qm Qa K

Km friction coefficient

Power delivered by the motor:

Actual propeller shaft power accounting for the effect of thrust losses:

Pm Qm 2 nQm

Pa Qa 2 nQa

38

Torque Loop in Electrical Motor Drive

MotorModel

PWM

Qc

n

-Qcalc

Isb

~~

InductionMotor

Flux controller Isa

Torquecontroller

-

c

calc

Tacho Tm

Flux weakening

PWMConverter

The closed loop of thrust motor and torque controller is assumed to be equivalent with a 1st order model:

where 20 < Tm < 200 milliseconds

Qm 1Tm

Qc Qm

39

Thruster Modelling for Control: A summaryThruster dynamics:

first order motor model

rotational dynamics with friction

propeller load torque

propeller thrust

Desired thrust and torque:

Thrust and torque loss factors:

propeller power

Is Qm Qa K

Qm 1Tm

Qc Qm

Qa wD5KQ |n|n

Ta wD4KT|n|n

Pa Qa 2 nQa

Tref kuref wD4KT0 |nref |nref ,

Qref wD5KQ0 |nref |nref ,

#

#

Ta

Tref hTn,xp , p1 td T KT

KT0

Qa.

Qref hQn,xp , p Q

KQ

KQ0

40

Propeller Block Diagram

( )

( ).

.MotorDynamics

Control

.

T

ShaftDynamics

Thrusterunit