Upload
damian-foster
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Protective Clothing and Equipment
~ or ~
Why you should read
Risk Assessments properly
“Surgery, we have a problem…”
• During the first half of 2002, routine maintenance was being carried out at concrete grout facility.
• Part of this work required deposits of dried grout to be chipped off various items of plant.
• During this process, a small piece of grout flew up and struck an operator’s eye.
“You’ll be OK… this time”
• The operator was given first aid by having his eye washed out.
• He was then taken to the site surgery who confirmed that there was no permanent damage.
• Fortunately, the operator suffered no more than a sore eye for a few days and he did not need to take any time off work.
“Idiot - he should have worn safety glasses”
• He did - that was part of the problem!
• The piece of grout flew up and passed underneath and behind his safety glasses.
• The Risk Assessment specified that safety goggles should be worn.
And the moral of this story…?
Don’t guess, and don’t interpret
• Where could we misinterpret PPE requirements?– In the example, goggles were specified but glasses
were worn.– If gloves are required, does that mean kevlar, cut-
resistant, puncture resistant, surgeons, light industrial…?
Be specific… if in doubt, ask!
Check!
Are you wearing
the correct PPE for the job?