Protocol for Analysis of Doxepin

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pharmacy

Citation preview

  • Protocol for Analysis of Doxepin

    by Floriza Michelia (260110110069)

    The protocol for performing an analysis in a particular specimen, especially biological

    samples differs depending upon the goal or questions to be answered. It can be specifically

    for drug use, drug dependence, overdose situations of medication or abused drugs, chronic

    exposure, or drug toxicity. Analysis, actively or passively performed, all are matters that

    could be answered through a specific analysis.

    Analysis of doxepin that cause several case of poisoning provides information which

    needed to understand based on dose-response relations. The specimen from body matrices

    usually used for toxicological analysis of clinical and forensic interest are blood, urine, saliva,

    hair, breath, sweat, any tissues or fluids is considered suitable for the particular analysis

    requested. Here, methods for analysis are described by various protocol depends on the

    biological samples.

    I. Blood

    a. Chemicals and reagents

    All chemicals were analytical grade with purity greater than 98% and

    were supplied by Sigma. Doxepin, sulpiride and SKF525A standards (1

    mg/mL in ethanol) were obtained from Institute of Forensic Science Ministry

    of Public security P.R.C.

    b. Sample Preparation and Extraction

    One mililiter of blood were brought with distillate water to a volume of

    3 mL, and then homogenized in a 10 mL tube of centrifuge (3000xg, 10

    minutes). Prior to vortex for mixed, internal standard solution (SKF525A0 was

    added for final concentration of 3 g/mL. The solution was brought to pH of

    10 with the addition of NaOH 2 M. To each sample, 5 mL of ethyl ether was

    added.

    After horizontal agitation during 10 minutes and centrifugation at 3000

    rpm for 5 minutes, the organic extract was transferred into a glass tube then

  • evaporated to dryness at 40C under a gentle stream of air. The residues were

    reconstituted by 50L of ethanol, one micro liters were injected into the

    GC/MS and two micro liters were injected into the LC-ESI-MS/MS.

    c. Instrumentation and MS/MS conditions

    The doxepin analyses were performed with a Thermo-Fisher gas

    chromatography/mass spectrometry system (GC/DSQ). Capillary column

    DB5-MS (30 m 0.25 mm 0.25 mm) were used for analysis. Carrier was

    helium at the flow rate of 1 ml/min. Injector temperature, 280C, injection

    mode was split, split ratio, 50:1. Transfer line temperature, 250C. Ion source

    temperature, 250C. The column temperature program used for doxepin was:

    initial temperature 100C for 1 min, 20C/min to 280C, maintained for 4 min.

    The instrument was used in full scan EI (70 eV) mode, scanning in the range

    between 40650 m/z.

    II. Urine

    Urine is one of the most common proteomic samples in diagnostics and also in

    clinical analysis because of its nature that easily attainable. However, due to its

    highly variable contents, and the presence of various proteins in low abundance or

    modified forms, urine is considered one of the most difficult samples to work

    with.

    According to International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, urine is the

    human fluid which contains water and metabolic products and is excreted by the

    kidneys, stored in the bladder and normally discharged by the way of urethra.

    a. Materials

    Ultraviolet analyses were perfomed with a Cary Model 11-A recording

    spectrophotometer.

    Reagents

    Spectroquality n-hexane.Potassium permanganate, saturated aqueous

    solution.

  • Standards.

    Stock solution was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of doxepin

    hydrochloride per 100 milliliters in water. We diluted the stock with

    human urine to provide working standars.

    b. Method

    Five milliliters of urine are pipetted into a 40-ml centrifuge tube

    followed by 1.5 ml of the saturated KMnO4 solution. The tube is shaken to

    mix thoroughly and allowed to stand for 5 mm. The KMnO4 oxidizes doxepin

    to its corresponding ketone, theN, N-dimethyl--y-propylammne side-chain

    being replaced by =0.

    Doxepin ketone is extracted from the oxidized urine sample by shaking

    for 10 mm with 10 ml of n-hexane. The tubes are centrifuged to sharply

    separate the phases, and the hexane extract is removed for ultraviolet analysis.

    Hexane extracts are scanned in the ultraviolet region from 260 to 300 nm in

    spectrophotometer cells with a 20-mm light path. Spectroquality n-hexane is

    used as the solvent blank. Absorbance at 295 nm (trough) is subtracted from

    the absorbance at 266 nm (peak) to obtain net absorbance.

    III. Hair

    In recent years hair has become a fundamental biological specimen for drug

    testing, alternative to the usual samples such as blood and urine. The major

    practical advantages of hair testing are larger detection windows (form 3 days to

    years), depending on the length of the hair shaft, compared to those of urine or

    blood (hours to 2-4 days for most drugs); evaluation of long term history to short

    term history; and the sample collection is non-invasive, it is easy to be performed

    under conditions that prevent adulteration and substitution.

    a. Sample

    Sample (approximately 200 rag, 1 cm in length) were collected by

    clipping hair fromthe same area on the back of the head approximately 1 cm

    fromthe skin. Samples were placed in plastic bags until analyzed. Negative

    hair samples were washed in deionized water, dried at room temperature, and

    pulverized.

  • b. Standards and Controls

    The doxepin and desmethyldoxepin standard stock solutions (1

    mglmL) were diluted with methanol to concentrations of 10, 2, and 1 pg/mL.

    The doxepin-d3 standard stock solution (100 IJg/mL) was diluted with

    methanol to 10 pg/mL. Six-point standard curves were prepared for doxepin

    and desmethyldoxepin by using 50-mg aliquots of the negative hair spiked

    with methanolic solutions of both drugs to achieve the following

    concentrations of standard hair preparations: 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, and

    20.0 ng/mg.

    In addition, two levels of controls were prepared. The low control (2

    ng/mg) were made by adding 50 IJL of both 2-1Jg/mL doxepin and

    desmethyldoxepinsolutions to 50 mg of pulverized negative hair samples. The

    high controls (15 ng/mg) were prepared by adding 75 IJL of the lO-pg/mL

    solutions of both doxepin and desmethyldoxepin to 50 mg of pulverized

    negative hair.

    c. Analytical Procedure

    The patient's hair samples were washed in deionized water and allowed

    to dry at room temperature. They were then pulverized, and 50-mg aliquots

    were analyzed in triplicate. Twenty microliters of the 10-lJg/mL solution of

    the internal standard (doxepind3) was added to the hair samples, standards,

    and control preparations.

    This was followed by the addition of 0.1M HCl (3 mL). The test tubes

    were capped, vortex mixed, and incubated overnight (18 to 24 h) at 50~ The

    tubes were removed from the heating block and allowed to cool down before

    being centrifuged for 5 rain (400 x g). The supernatant was transferred to clean

    tubes, 1 mL 1.93M acetic acid was added to each test tube, and they were

    vortex mixed. Ten milliliters of deionized water was then added to each tube.

    The HCX columns were conditioned as follows: methanol (3 mL),

    deionized water (3 mL), and 1.93M acetic acid (1 mL). The samples were

    added to the columns and slowly drawn through before drying 1-2 min. The

    columns were washed with 3 mL of deionized water (dried 1-2 rain), 1 mL of

    0.1M HCI (dried 1-2 min) and 3 mL of methanol (dried 5 min). The doxepin,

  • desmethyldoxepin, and doxepin-d3 were eluted by allowing 3 mL of the

    methylene chloride/isopropanol/ammonium hydroxide (78:20:2,vh~/v)

    mixture to pass through the columns.

    All samples were then evaporated to dryness under a stream of air. The

    drug residue was reconstituted in acetonitrile (40 pL). The samples were

    transferred to autosampler vial inserts, and the vials were crimped. The

    samples were derivatizedby adding BSTFA with 1% TMCS (40 pL) with a

    syringe and vortex mixed. After incubating for 15 rain at 60~ the samples

    were cooled and analyzed using GC-MS.

    d. Chromatographic Method

    The injector was working in the splitless mode, and a 1-pL volume was

    injected. The injector temperature was 270oCTheflow rate of the cartier gas

    (helium) was 1.2 mL/min. The initial GC oven temperature of 130oC was held

    for 1 min, then it was increased at the rate of 12oC/min until it reached

    280oC.This temperature was maintained for 3 min.

    The MS ion source temperature was 230~ and the quadrupole

    temperature was 150oCThe instrument operated inselected ion monitoring

    (SIM) mode, and the followingions were monitored: for doxepin m/z 58and

    279, for doxepin-d3 m/z 61 and 282, and for desmethyldoxepin m/z 116 and

    337. The followingions were used for quantitation: m/z 58 for doxepin,rn/z 61

    for doxepin-ds, and rn/z 116 fordesmethyldoxepin. The dwell tirnes were 50

    ms form/z 58, 61,279, and 282 ions and 100 ms for m/z116 and 337 ions.

    IV. Tissues

    a. Sample

    Human Milk

    b. Methods

    Diagnosed as having a major depressivedisorder. Treatment with

    oxazepam initiated bythe obstetrician was unsuccessful and caused some

    drowsiness in the infant. On admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit 30 days

    postpartum she was treated with 150 mg doxepin at night. The acute episode

  • began to resolve after 2 weeks,after which she was discharged and then

    treatedas an outpatient for some 6 months.

    Doxepin and N-desmethyldoxepinconcentrationsin the milk and

    plasma were analysedbyhigh performance liquid chromatography(h.p.l.c.). An

    aliquot of biological fluid (1 ml)was placed in a polypropylene tube, 200

    ngofamitriptyline was added as internal standard andthe sample was

    alkalinised by the addition of 0.1ml 1 M NaOH. The sample was extracted

    with 10ml hexane containing 1% isoamyl alcohol byshaking for 5 min.

    After centrifugation, 9 ml ofthe organic phase was transferred to a

    cleanpolypropylene tube and the compounds ofinterest were back extraced by

    shaking with 0.2ml of 0.05 M HCl. After a further centrifugation,the organic

    phase was aspirated and discardedand 50 ,ul aliquots of the acidic extract

    wereinjected onto the h.p.l.c. column was used with a mobile phase of

    40%acetonitrile in an aqueous solution of 0.01%H3PO4 and 0.01% NaCl

    (flow rate = 2 ml miMf1).Peaks were detected by their ultraviolet

    absorbanceat 210 nm.

    Known concentrations ofdoxepin and N-desmethyldoxepin in both

    milkand plasma were put through the above procedureand test samples were

    quantified from aplot of peak height ratio (drug/intemal standard)vs drug

    concentration. The intra-assay coefficientof variation for doxepin in plasma

    andmilk was tested at 50 and 200 ,ug 1-1 and rangedfrom 1.3 to 3.6% (n = 5);

    coefficients of variationfor N-desmethyldoxepin at similar

    plasmaconcentrations ranged from 0.6 to 3.8% (n = 5).Inter-assay coefficient

    of variation, assessedfrom the slope of the standard curve on differentdays was

    6.2% for doxepin and 8.7% for Ndesmethyldoxepinin milk (n = 4) and 6.2%

    fordoxepin and 8.4% for N- desmethyldoxepininplasma (n = 7).

    References

    Antonia Gronewold, Andrea Dettling, Hans T. Haffner, Gisela Skopp. Doxepin and

    nordoxepin concentrations in body fluids and tissues in doxepin associated deaths.

    Forensic Sci. Int.190 (2009) 7479.

  • S. Leucht, W. Steimer, S. Kreuz, D. Abraham, P.J. Orsulak, W. Kissling. Doxepin plasma

    concentrations: is there really a therapeutic range? J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.21

    (2001) 432439.

    F. Pragst, M. Rothe, J. Hunger, and S. Thor. Structural and concentration effects on the

    deposition of tricyclic antidepressants in human hair. Forensic Sci. Int. 84:225-236

    (1997).

    Dusci, L. J., and Hackett, L. P., Determination of doxepin in human urine following

    theurapeutic doses. J. Chromatogr. 61, 231 (1971).