4
7/23/2019 PS Update http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ps-update 1/4  © Chartered Institute of Management Accountants P a g e1 INDIAN CASE CHALLENGE 2 16 Pre-case Mackintosh Grant Growing the Business Simon Bloom looks out of his window into the evening London sky, he is a worried man. On his desk lies his company, Mackintosh Grant’s new annual report open to the overall strategic aim section. It says, “Achieve growth and increase shareholder returns by continuing to design, produce and distribute high quality clothing and footwear products and components and develop our international presence through expansion into new overseas markets.” Looking at the sun setting he wonders how he can turn around his company to deliver the performance promised to his Board and Investors. He thinks back to the things he has learnt about the business as its CEO. Mackintosh-Grant, a company headquartered in United Kingdom, is a leading clothing and footwear designer of the country. It was formed by the merger of two companies in 2008. It is a listed company which designs, manufactures, markets and distributes a large range of high tech leisurewear and footwear products through Europe and the United States of America. Mackintosh-Grant employs approximately 700 people at its three sites in Eastern Europe and supplies products to over 6 million customers in 20 countries. Mackintosh-Grant holds stocks of about 100,000 different components and product elements that are used in the shoes, trim, materials, in-shoe technology and specialist smart clothing ranges. Divisions and Market/Competitor Comparison The company is organized into three divisions, the Footwear division (FWD), the Specialist Sportswear division (SSWD) and the Street wear division (SWD). 1  The primary footwear products (FWD) are sports shoes aimed at customers aged 12-30 years that are fashion and exercise conscious at the same time. The average product price is in lower quartile when compared against competitors. 90% of sales in this area come from UK and EU markets. 2 The specialist sportswear (SSWD) is aimed at high net income customers aged 25  –45 years who value status and emerging materials, design and technology on their high performance product. The average product price is the upper quartile when compared against direct competitors’ and. 75% of sales for these product come from North America. 3 The Street wear products (SWD) are aimed at customers aged 8-30 years who like to wear the latest trends and styles and have great control and choice over their look. The average product price is in the lower quartile when compared against direct competitors. Sales for these products are divided 40% UK and EU / 37% North America / 23% Asia Pacific.

PS Update

  • Upload
    aashish

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PS Update

7/23/2019 PS Update

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ps-update 1/4

 

© Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

Page1

INDIAN CASE CHALLENGE

2 16

Pre-case

Mackintosh Grant Growing the Business

Simon Bloom looks out of his window into the evening London sky, he is a worried man. On his desk

lies his company, Mackintosh Grant’s new annual report open to the overall strategic aim section. It

says, “Achieve growth and increase shareholder returns by continuing to design, produce and

distribute high quality clothing and footwear products and components and develop our international

presence through expansion into new overseas markets.” 

Looking at the sun setting he wonders how he can turn around his company to deliver the performance

promised to his Board and Investors. He thinks back to the things he has learnt about the business as

its CEO.

Mackintosh-Grant, a company headquartered in United Kingdom, is a leading clothing and footwear

designer of the country. It was formed by the merger of two companies in 2008. It is a listed company

which designs, manufactures, markets and distributes a large range of high tech leisurewear and

footwear products through Europe and the United States of America. Mackintosh-Grant employs

approximately 700 people at its three sites in Eastern Europe and supplies products to over 6 million

customers in 20 countries. Mackintosh-Grant holds stocks of about 100,000 different components

and product elements that are used in the shoes, trim, materials, in-shoe technology and specialist

smart clothing ranges.

Divisions and Market/Competitor Comparison

 

The company is organized into three divisions, the Footwear division (FWD), the Specialist Sportswear

division (SSWD) and the Street wear division (SWD).

The primary footwear products (FWD) are sports shoes aimed at customers aged 12-30 years thatare fashion and exercise conscious at the same time. The average product price is in lower quartile

when compared against competitors. 90% of sales in this area come from UK and EU markets.

2  The specialist sportswear (SSWD) is aimed at high net income customers aged 25 –45 years who

value status and emerging materials, design and technology on their high performance product.

The average product price is the upper quartile when compared against direct competitors’ and.

75% of sales for these product come from North America.

3  The Street wear products (SWD) are aimed at customers aged 8-30 years who like to wear the

latest trends and styles and have great control and choice over their look. The average product

price is in the lower quartile when compared against direct competitors. Sales for these products

are divided 40% UK and EU / 37% North America / 23% Asia Pacific.

Page 2: PS Update

7/23/2019 PS Update

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ps-update 2/4

 

© Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

Page2

Organizational Structure

Mackintosh-Grant is organized along these 3 lines of business described above and sell products direct

to consumers by mail order, through retailers, aggregated wholesalers and also create ‘white label

products’ and sell clothing components and blueprints to other manufacturers. The present structure

was established by Company Mackintosh in 1990 and continued after the merger with CompanyGrant. The Board considers continuity to be a very important value. Many of Mackintosh-Grant’s

competitors have carried out structural reorganizations since then. In 2008, Mackintosh-Grant

commissioned a review of its organizational structure from a human resource consultancy. The

consultants suggested alternative structures which they thought Macintosh-Grant could employ to its

advantage. However, Mackintosh-Grant’s Board felt that continuity was more important and no

change to the organizational structure took place.

Product and Service Delivery

Consumers, retailers and wholesalers are increasingly seeking to collaborate with the designers

of their products and the associated manufacturing and assembly processes. Mackintosh- Grant’sBoard views this as a growth area. The Board has recognized that Mackintosh-Grant needs to develop

web-based services and tools which can be accessed by these partners. The traditional method of

listing the company’s range of products, designs and components in a catalogue is becoming less

effective, costly and cumbersome because customers are increasingly seeking specially designed

custom made products as the industry becomes more sophisticated.

Financial Data

Mackintosh-Grant’s historical financial record, denominated in UK currency of UK £, over the last 3

years is shown below.

2010 2009 2008

£m £m £m

Revenue 620 433 360

Operating Profit 39 20 13

Profit for the year 21 9 5

Earnings per share (£) 0·117 0·050 0·028

Dividend per share (£) 0·058 0 0

Page 3: PS Update

7/23/2019 PS Update

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ps-update 3/4

 

© Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

Page3

Performance Review

Mackintosh-Grant’s 3 divisions have been profitable throughout the last three years. The revenue and

operating profit of the 3 divisions of Mackintosh-Grant for 2010 were as follows:

FWD Division SSWD Division SWD Division

£ £ £

Revenue 212 284 124

Operating profit 20 6 13

Financial Objectives of Mackintosh Grant

The Board has generally taken a cautious approach to providing strategic direction for the company.

Most board members feel that this has been appropriate because the Mackintosh Company was

unprofitable for the three year preceding the merger and needed to be turned around. Also, most

board members think a cautious approach has been justified given the constrained economic

circumstances which have affected Mackintosh-Grant’s markets since 2008. While shareholders have

been disappointed with Mackintosh-Grant’s performance over the last 3 years, they have remained

loyal and supported the Board in its attempts to move the company into profit. The institutional

shareholders however are now looking for increased growth and profitability combined with a

strategic vision for the future.

Capital Budget Overspends

Mackintosh-Grant has an internal audit department. The Chief Internal Auditor, who leads this

department, reports directly to the Finance Director. Investigation by the Internal Audit department

has revealed that managers with responsibility for capital expenditure have often paid little attention

to expenditure authorization levels approved by the Board. They have justified overspending on the

grounds that the original budgets were inadequate and in order to not jeopardize the capital projects,

overspends were necessary. It is perceived by the designers and most staff members that the need to

allow a great deal of customization on products leads to difficultly in predicting costs being incurred.

Strategic Development

Mackintosh-Grant applies a traditional rational model in carrying out its strategic planning process.

This encompasses an annual exercise to review the previous plan, creation of a revenue and capital

budget for the next five years and instruction to managers within Mackintosh-Grant to maintain

their expenditure within the budget limits approved by the Board.

Problem Statement:

As a consultant to Mackintosh-Grant, your task is to come up with strategies to accelerate the

growth and profitability of the company by exploring new avenues, structure and approach.

Note: Analysis beyond the given questions is strongly motivated.

Page 4: PS Update

7/23/2019 PS Update

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ps-update 4/4

 

© Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

Page4

Rating criteria and qualification requirements for the final round

Our esteemed set of jury will select best 10 teams out of all the entries for the finals based on the

following criteria:

1. Quality of analysis

2. Creativity

3. Feasibility of the solution

4. Overall presentation of the case

We look forward to your team’s participation. Surprise us with your business-cum-innovative

approach and be invited to travel to Kharagpur. Spend some marvelous days with us here and

challenge the best!

For the finals the top 10 teams would be invited to Kharagpur during Kshitij 2016 in the month of

January and a new case for finals would be released for the teams that qualify.

For further information visit our websites www.bclub.co.in, www.ktj.in or contact us at:

[email protected]. For more information, please feel free to contact organizers at

1. Nishant Jayaswal  (+91-9930887705)

2. Kumar Sparsh  (+91-7076607515)

With best of luck from IIT Kharagpur,

Yours,

Team ICC 2016

Note:

1. Last date of submission is 13th December, 2015.

2. Submissions should be in PPT (15 slides excluding introduction and final slides) or PDF (10 pages

font size - 12, font - Calibri, line spacing - 1.15) format only.

3. Solution should be mailed at [email protected]

4. Relevant information can be added for the analysis from web or other suitable sources.

5. Source of information should be mentioned in an indexed form (at the end of each page).

6. No plagiarism will be tolerated.