16
PSWG March 2008 1 Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor

PSWG March 20081 Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • PSWG March 20081 Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor
  • Slide 2
  • PSWG March 20082 Top-Level Questions: Will GMT queue schedule instruments? What instrument configuration time is acceptable? Will GMT have general-purpose ports? What field of view? Will the upper IP support non-AO instruments? What field of view? What acquisition/calibration support? Will M1/M2 be phased intrinsically? If extrinsic, what FoV/magnitude star is required? What are the advantages of using an ASM? What is optimal AO instrument performance? How can maximum AO sky coverage be achieved? What TTWFS patrol field? Yes 5 min Yes 5 arcmin Yes 5 arcmin Full Yes ? TBD TBD
  • Slide 3
  • PSWG March 20083 Proposed Solution: 5 arcmin folded Gregorian focus on upper IP +/- 75 arcsec AO engineering field +/- 30 arcsec AO science field Integrated acquisition and calibration facilities Multiple (4-6) non-AO & AO instrument ports Rapid reconfiguration between instruments Maximum cryogenic AO system and instruments Maximum AO tip-tilt WFS patrol field Minimum interference in science path
  • Slide 4
  • PSWG March 20084 New ASM AO Paradigm Instrument AcqCam NGS WFS LGS WFS Phasing Cam T-T-F WFS Truth WFS PWFS Active Opt. WFS
  • Slide 5
  • PSWG March 20085 Outstanding Issues: Does M1 phasing require a 10 arcmin patrol field? Does this invalidate the concept? Or does it demand an intrinsic telescope solution? How should field/pupil rotation be compensated? Large diameter ferro-fluidic hermetic seals? Implications for servicability? How to calibrate LGS AO system with ASM? Are non-common path phase errors acceptable? Where to locate the IR instrument cold stop? Should GMACS/NIRMOS have exclusive access? Do they restrict on AO designs?
  • Slide 6
  • PSWG March 20086 Non-AO Support Requirements Multiple (6?) instrument ports 5 arcmin diameter FOV 2 Peripheral Wave Front Sensors Maintain independent tip-tilt-focus of 7 M1 segments Active optics monitoring Instrument rotator monitoring Acquisition camera Instrument (& WFS) calibration unit
  • Slide 7
  • PSWG March 20087 Wave Front Sensor Drum
  • Slide 8
  • PSWG March 20088 Acquisition Camera
  • Slide 9
  • PSWG March 20089 AO WFS Requirements > 3 NGS tip-tilt/focus near-infrared WFS (> 60 rad.) 6 LGS high-order WFS (35 radius) 1 high-order optical NGS WFS (on-axis) 1 high-order optical(?) truth WFS M1 segment phasing WFS
  • Slide 10
  • PSWG March 200810 Full AO WFS System Phasing Camera NGS WFS LGS WFS
  • Slide 11
  • PSWG March 200811 GLAO LGS WFS
  • Slide 12
  • PSWG March 200812 Complete Instr. Support Unit Phasing Camera NGS WFS LGS WFS Calibration Unit 3.5 m
  • Slide 13
  • PSWG March 200813 Complete Instr. Support Unit
  • Slide 14
  • PSWG March 200814 At Second Focus Tip-tilt-focus wave front sensors for LTAO Truth wave front sensor Minimize non-common path errors Science instrument All with field derotation
  • Slide 15
  • PSWG March 200815 Full AO System + GMTIFS
  • Slide 16
  • PSWG March 200816 Summary Demonstrated a feasible implementation of AO at the f/8 Gregorian focus Optics are large and complex Consequences of moving to an f/16 feed should be considered More work is required to: Improve optical performance Develop concepts for science instruments (GMTIFS, MOAO, MCAO) Include WFSs at second focus Address field derotation on a stationary Instrument Platform Consider 10 arcmin(?) diameter phasing camera patrol field