Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    1/66

    PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

    (CHAP 5-19)

    No man is an island is not just a

    flight of rhetoric but bespeaks the urgent need for joining of hands by all the

    peoples of the world in the promotion of international peace and progress

    -

    Isagani A. Cruz

    -

    THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    2/66

    Generally accepted

    methods by which status is acquired:

    Revolution

    Unification

    Secession

    Assertionof independence

    Agreement

    and Attainment of civilization

    Principle of State

    Continuity

    -

    from

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    3/66

    the moment of its creation, state continues as a juristic being notwithstanding

    changes in its circumstances, provided only that they do not result in loss of

    any of its essential elements

    -

    continuity

    of life of state is not impaired by changes in form of government, reduction of

    its population as long as substantial number of people survive, loss of part of

    its territory provided that remainder is still sizable

    -

    limitation

    of sovereignty reduces it to a dependent state but does not deprive it of

    international personality

    Extinction of State

    -

    Example:

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    4/66

    Population may be

    completely wiped out

    Government overthrown

    without being replaced

    State may merge with

    another state

    Territory dismembered or

    annexed by others

    If federation, may be

    broken up or dissolved

    If independent, becomes

    dependent

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    5/66

    -

    Radical

    impairment or actual loss of one or more of the essential elements of the state

    that will result in its extinction

    Succession of States

    -

    question

    will arise in the event that a state is extinguished or is created as a result

    of any of the methods previously discussed

    -

    takes

    place when one state assumes the rights and some of the obligations of another

    because of certain changes in the condition of the latter

    -

    may

    be either universal or partial

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    6/66

    -

    Universal:

    state is annexed to another state or is totally dismembered or merges with

    another state to form a new state; international personality of the former

    state is completely absorbed by the successor

    -

    Partial:

    a portion of the territory of a state secedes or is ceded to another or when an

    independent state becomes a protectorate or a suzerainty or when a dependent

    state acquires full sovereignty

    Consequences of State

    Succession

    -

    allegiance

    of the inhabitants of the predecessor state in the territory affected is

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    7/66

    transferred to the successor state

    usually, naturalized en

    masse

    -

    political

    laws of former sovereign are automatically abrogated and may be restored only

    by positive act of new sovereign

    non-political laws are continued unless changed

    by sovereign or contrary to institutions of successor state

    -

    treaties

    of political or commercial nature, including extradition, are discontinued

    except those dealing with local rights and duties

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    8/66

    all

    rights of predecessor state are inherited by successor state

    does not apply to liabilities; successor state

    has discretion which liabilities to assume and which to reject

    Succession of Governments

    -

    one

    government replaces another either peacefully or by violent methods

    -

    integrity

    of state is not affected

    -

    rights

    of predecessor government are inherited in toto by successor government

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    9/66

    -

    where

    the new government was organized by virtue of a constitutional reform duly

    ratified in a plebiscite, the obligations of the replaced government are also

    completely assumed by the former

    -

    where

    the new government was established through violence, as by a revolution, it may

    lawfully reject the purely personal or political obligations of the predecessor

    government but no those contracted by it in the ordinary course of official

    business

    RECOGNITION

    Recognition

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    10/66

    -

    merely declaratory and only affirms the pre-existing fact

    that the entity being recognized already possesses the status of an

    international person

    -

    highly political and discretionary

    -

    minority view: recognition is constitutive, meaning that

    it is the last indispensable element that converts or constitutes the entity

    being recognized into an international person

    -

    may be extended by individual states or a number of them

    together

    -

    Philippines: President determines question of recognition,

    an act of state therefore not subject to judicial review

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    11/66

    Object of Recognition

    -

    may be extended to a state, a government or a belligerent

    community

    -

    Recognition of state is generally irrevocable and imports

    recognition of its government

    -

    Recognition of government may be withdrawn and does not

    necessarily signify existence of state

    -

    Recognition of belligerent community does not produce same

    effect as recognition of state and government because rebels are accorded

    international personality only in connection with the hostilities they are

    waging

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    12/66

    Kinds of Recognition

    -

    may be either express or implied

    -

    Express

    o

    May be verbal or in writing

    o

    May be extended through formal proclamation or

    announcement, stipulation in a treaty, letter or telegram ,or on occasion of

    official call or conference

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    13/66

    Implied

    o

    Recognizing state enters into official intercourse with

    the new member by exchanging diplomatic representatives, concluding bipartite

    treaty dealing comprehensively with relations in general, or acknowledging its

    flag or entering into formal relations with it

    o

    In case of belligerent communities, recognition is implied

    when legitimate government blockades a port held by the former or when other

    states observe neutrality in the conflict

    -

    act of recognition must have clear indication of an

    intention:

    a. to treat with the

    new state as such, or

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    14/66

    b. to accept the new

    government as having authority to represent said state, or

    c. to recognize in

    the case of insurgents that they are entitled to exercise belligerent rights

    Recognition of States

    -

    free act by which one or more states acknowledge the

    existence on a definite territory of a human society politically organized,

    independent of any existing state, and capable of observing the obligations of

    international law, and by which they manifest therefore their intention to

    consider it a member of the international community

    Recognition of Governments

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    15/66

    -

    free act by which one or several states acknowledge that a

    person or a group of persons is capable of binding the state which they claim

    to represent and witness their intention to enter into relations with them

    -

    usually decided on the basis of political considerations

    -

    3 kinds of de facto government:

    a. established by

    inhabitants who rise in revolt and depose legitimate regime

    b. established in

    the course of war by invading forces of one belligerent in the territory of

    another belligerent whose government is also displaced

    c. established by

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    16/66

    inhabitants of state who secede therefrom without overthrowing its government

    -

    practice of most states now is to extend recognition to a

    new government only if it is shown that it has control of the administrative

    machinery of the state with popular acquiescence and that it is willing to

    comply with its international obligations

    -

    2 criterion:

    a. objective test

    the government must be able to maintain order within the state and to repel

    external aggression

    b. subjective test

    employed for purpose of justifying the withholding of recognition from a

    government that is politically unacceptable

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    17/66

    De jure: government that satisfies the criteria

    -

    De facto: not yet satisfied the criteria

    -

    if no indication of kind of recognition extended, it is

    presumed de jure

    De Jure

    De Facto

    Relatively permanent

    Provisional

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    18/66

    Vests title in the government to its properties abroad

    Does not vest title in the government to its properties

    abroad

    Brings about full diplomatic relations

    Limited to certain juridical relations

    Effects of Recognition of States and Governments

    -

    full diplomatic relations established, except de facto

    government

    -

    recognized state or government acquires the right to sue

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    19/66

    in the courts of recognizing state

    -

    recognized state or government has right to the possession

    of properties of its predecessor in the territory of the recognizing state

    -

    all acts of the recognized state or government are

    validated retroactively, preventing the recognizing state from passing upon

    their legality in its own court

    Recognition of Belligerency

    -

    belligerency exists when inhabitants of state rise up in

    arms for the purpose of overthrowing the legitimate government

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    20/66

    Insurgency

    Belligerency

    Initial state of belligerency

    More serious and widespread

    Directed by military authorities

    Under civil government

    Usually not recognized

    There are settled rules regarding recognition of

    belligerency

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    21/66

    -

    conditions:

    a. there must be an

    organized civil government directing the rebel forces

    b. rebels must

    occupy a substantial portion of territory of state

    c. conflict between

    legitimate government and rebels must be serious, making the outcome uncertain

    d. rebels must be

    will and able to observe laws of war

    Consequences of Recognition of Belligerency

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    22/66

    -

    belligerent community is considered a separate state for purpose

    of the conflict it is waging

    -

    relations with each other shall be governed by the laws of

    war and their relations with other states shall be subject to the laws of

    neutrality, for the duration of hostilities

    -

    where recognition is extended by third states,

    consequences are effective only as to them and do not bind other state not

    extending recognition

    -

    only where recognition is made by parent state that the

    effects become general and legally applicable to all other states

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    23/66

    RIGHT OF EXISTENCE AND SELF DEFENSE

    Forcible

    Means must be taken only when there is an ARMED ATTACK.

    The

    attack must be instant, overwhelming and no time for deliberation.

    The

    danger must be grave and actual.

    Regional

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    24/66

    arrangements and organizations are necessary for balance of power or an

    arrangement of affairs so that no state shall be in a position to have absolute

    mastery over another.

    Aggression,

    use of armed force against a sovereignty, its territorial integrity or

    political independence of another state.

    RIGHT OF INDEPENDENCE

    Sovereignty,

    the supreme and uncontrollable and inherent power of the state to command and

    enforce obedience to which all interests are subject and all wills

    subordinate..

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    25/66

    It is

    not absolute freedom,only means freedom from control by any other state and not

    freedom from the restrictions that are binding to all other states under the

    family of nations.

    Doctrine

    of Non-Intervention- corollary to sovereignty, states must abstain in

    intervening in the domestic or international affairs of other states.

    Valid

    intervention includes an act of self defense and when such intervention is

    decreed by the security council.

    Drago

    Doctrine- contracting powers agree not to have recourse to armed force for recovery ofcontract debts

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    26/66

    claimed from one government to another being due to its nationals.

    RIGHTS OF EQUALITY

    All

    rights of a state, regardless of its number must be observed and respected by

    the international community in the same manner that the rights of other states

    are observed and respected.

    ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    27/66

    TERRITORY

    Territory is a fixed

    portion of the earth inhabited by a population of a state.

    AQCUISITION OF A

    TERRITORY

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    28/66

    Discovery and

    Occupation

    -

    territory discovered

    must be TERRA NULLiUS or one which is not owned by any entity.

    -

    There must be

    possession and administration

    -

    Possesion creates an

    INCHOATE TITLE which bars any other state from entering said territory within a

    reasonable time until the discovering territory is able to establish

    administration.

    -

    Upon administration,

    the inchoate title ripens into a full title.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    29/66

    Dereliction

    -

    A state physically

    withdraws from the territory with the intention of abandoning it altogether.

    -

    Said land becomes

    terra nullius once again and open to be discovered.

    Prescription

    -

    The exercise of

    sovereign rights over a territory for a reasonable period of time

    -

    No rule fixing the

    exact period yet.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    30/66

    Cession

    -

    transfer of territory

    is by agreement between states.

    -

    Either by donation,

    sale, barter, exchange etc.

    Subjugation

    -

    Having been

    previously conquered through war , territory is formally annexed to the

    victors territory at the end of war

    Accretion

    -

    Natural or artificial

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    31/66

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    32/66

    archipelago shall be encompassed as one

    territotry.

    JURISDICTION

    Jurisdiction is the authority of the state over

    its person and things within or outside its territory

    Personal Jurisdiction- over persons bound by their duty of obedience

    and allegiance.

    -

    Such duty follows him even when he is outside

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    33/66

    the territory and he may not be excused from it unless he renounces

    allegiance. Examples are

    laws on family code, family rights and duties, status, condition and legal

    capacities of

    persons.

    -

    An alien may be subject to the laws of the

    state in whose national interest he has violated be it in its territory or

    outside.

    Territorial Jurisdiction- over person and

    property within its territory.

    -

    Jurisdiction in our own territory is necessary,

    exclusive and absolute.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    34/66

    When

    states cannot exercise jurisdiction within own territory:

    -

    Foreign states (by vitue of sovereign

    equality), heads of states,diplomatic representatives and consuls to a certain

    degree ( by virtue of exterritoriality.

    -

    Foreign state properties including embassies,

    public vessels engaged in non-commercial activities, consulates.

    -

    Acts of State (by virtue of sovereignty and

    independence0

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    35/66

    Foreign merchant vessels in innocent passage or

    arrival under stress.

    -

    Foreign armies passing thru or stationed in

    territory.

    -

    UN and others by treaty.

    Land Jurisdiction- everything found within the

    terrestrial domain.

    Maritime and Fluvial Jurisdiction

    -

    Criminal, administrative and vivil jurisdiction

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    36/66

    is excercised by the flag state wherever it may be, provided it is not engaged

    in commerce.

    -

    English rule is applied in the Philippines.

    Coastal state has jurisdiction over all offenses.

    -

    French rule- Coastal state has jurisdiction

    only when the offense constitute a disturbance of peace to its territory.

    -

    Important is the determination of disturbance

    of peace.

    Open Seas

    A state a

    jurisdiction in the open seas:

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    37/66

    -

    Over its vessels. Flag state has jurisdiction

    at all times. Merchant vessels however are under jurisdiction when within

    territory,in open seas and when waived by the other territorial sovereign.

    -

    Over pirates. Pirates can be tried anywhere.

    Enemies of mankind.

    -

    In exercise of right to visit and search, under

    rules of neutrality.

    -

    Under the doctrine of hot pursuit. The pursuit

    must begin before the vessel leaves the territory of the state.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    38/66

    Aerial

    jurisdiction

    -

    Freedom to fly across territories without

    landing

    -

    Freedom to land for non-traffic purpose (refer

    page. 137)

    THE RIGHT OF LEGATION

    Diplomatic relations are normally conducted by

    the head of state or their foreign representatives.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    39/66

    Diplomatic Envoys

    -

    Ambassadors, envoys, ministers,charges de

    affaires

    Diplomatic Corps

    -

    Body of the different diplomatic

    representatives who have been accredited to the same state.

    -

    Appointment of envoys shall be agreed upon by

    the states as to the class to which heads of missions are to be assigned.

    -

    President is empowered to appoint ambassadors

    with approval of CA. But acceptance of other states representatives is upon his

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    40/66

    exclusive discretion.

    Diplomatic

    Functions commence upon presentation of credentials upon notification of

    arrival and presentation credentials to the foreign minister.

    Diplomatic

    functions

    -

    Represent the sending state

    -

    Protect theinterest of its nationals

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    41/66

    Negotiate

    -

    Ascertaining conditions and developments and

    report them

    -

    Promote friendly relations

    Diplomatic

    Immunities and Privileges

    -

    Personal inviolability. Cannot be arrested

    unless for instances that he laid his hands to our citizens or caused violence,

    he can be preventively restrained.

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    42/66

    Immunity from civil, criminal or administrative

    jurisdiction. Remedy of receiving state is to ask for recall.

    -

    Exceptions are real actions relating to private

    properties situated in the receiving state; action realting to succession where

    the diplomat is the executor or administrator, heir, legatee, action to any

    professional or commercial activity unrelated to his mission or functions.

    -

    Inviolability of diplomatic premises. Premises

    may not be entered without consent.

    -

    Inviolability of archives.

    -

    Inviolability of communication.

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    43/66

    Exemption from testimonial duties- not onliged

    to give evidence as a witness.

    -

    Exemption fromtaxation.

    Diplomatic

    suite or retinue

    -

    Above immunities are available as well

    todiplomatic, technical, administrative staff and service staff.

    -

    Not extend to unofficial acts.

    -

    Private servants if they are not nationals of

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    44/66

    the receiving state,enjoy only exemption from dues and taxes in their income

    from the mission.

    CONSULS

    -

    state agents residing abroad for purposes of

    commerce and navigation.

    -

    Do not represent state in political matters

    Appointmert

    -

    Letter patent- commission issued by sending

    state

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    45/66

    -

    Exequatur- authority given by receiving state.

    Immunities and Privileges- official

    communication but may be curtailed when prejudicial to receiving state.

    Inviolability of

    archives.

    TREATIES

    -

    Defined as formal agreement between states

    regulating mutual relations under the law of nations.

    Requisites

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    46/66

    -

    Treaty-making capacity-

    all states are with full capacity except except by reason of their status such

    as a protectorate.

    -

    Authorised representatives-

    o

    (phil0 president is authorized to make treaties

    with concurrence of 2/3 of the senate.

    o

    A state is not bound by a treaty made by an

    unauthorized representative, it is void and unenforceable in the municipal laws

    of the state but nonetheless is binding in international laws and creates

    responsibility and liability to injuries caused by such agreement.

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    47/66

    Freedom of vice of consent.

    A

    treaty forced upon a negotiator is void ab initio. Forced upon the state,

    creates vice as well.

    -

    Lawful subject matter

    Example of unlawful matter is dividing the pacific ocean between

    states.

    -

    Compliance with constitutional process.

    Treaty making process

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    48/66

    Negotiation- when such is finally decided, it

    shall be open for SIGNATURE which signifies authentication and good faith but

    not the final consent.

    -

    Ratification- is the final consent. Only the

    President of RP has the right to ratify, not the senate. Senate can only

    withhold or grant its consent to ratification. If the senate concurs with the

    treaty, the president may or may not ratify the treaty.

    -

    Exchange of instrument of ratification- which

    usually signifies effectivity unless a date is therefore provided.

    Binding

    Effects

    -

    Only to the contracting parties. But may be

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    49/66

    binding to third parties by accession, those who were not in the negotiation

    but were later allowed to sign it.

    -

    Third parties involved when treaty is only a

    formal expression of customary IL or GAPIL.

    -

    Treaty may expressly extend its benefits to

    non-signatories. (most-favored nation clause pg.176)

    Pacta-sunt

    servanda- treaties must be complied and performed in good faith.

    Rebus sic stantibus- justification for

    non-performance when the conditions with relation to the parties chamged

    overtime and such change is unforeseeable and unexpected not caused by the

    party as to create a situation where the exaction of performance becomes

    unreasonable.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    50/66

    -

    Applies only to treaties with indefinite

    duration.

    -

    Cannot operate retroactively

    -

    Must be invoked within a reasonable time

    NATIONALITY

    AND STATELESSNESS

    -

    Nationality is the tie that binds an individual

    to his stae. Interchangeably used with citizenship, but he latter has a more

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    51/66

    exclusive scope.

    -

    Acquisition is by jus soli (by place of birth)

    or jus sangguinis (by blood), or by naturalization (direct or derivative)

    Multiple nationality

    -

    Occurs with the concurrent application of two

    or more municipal laws which may follow jus sanguinis or jus soli.

    -

    Doctrine of indelible allegiance- two

    nationalities by operation of the different laws of the different states..

    Loss of nationality- by forfeiture,

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    52/66

    renunciation.

    Conflict of nationality laws- the laws of the

    country applies for all purposes not minding or in exclusion of the laws of the

    other

    countries.

    -when a person is both American and Filipino, as to the

    Philippines, our laws determine his

    citizenship, as to America their laws determine her citizenship

    When determination is by a third country, the

    effective or active nationality rule is applied or the nationality nof the state he is most

    closely connected

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    53/66

    Statelessness- a person without any

    nationality- renounce to be naturalized and yet naturalization is cancelled and

    repatriation was not granted or when jus soli ans jus sangguinis

    are not applicable.

    -

    A wrong suffered by him through an act of the

    stae is damnum absque injuria, he has no state hence in theory no other state

    is injured

    .

    TREATMENT OF ALIENS

    States may or may not accept aliens (exclusion)

    but when they do such aliens have the right of protection by the accepting

    state and to be treated fairly.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    54/66

    Doctrine of state responsibility

    -

    International delinquency when treatment of the

    alien falls below international standards of justice.

    -

    Failure to make reasonable efforts to prevent

    injury to the alien or fails to repair such injury.

    Aliens

    before charging the state for delinquency and before resorting to diplomatic

    protection must first exhaust all available local remedies for his protection.

    International

    claim for damages may be resolved thru negotiation, or good offices

    9conciliation and mediation), arbitration and judicial settlement.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    55/66

    CALVO

    CLAUSE- stipulation by the alie where he waives or restricts his right to

    appeal to his own state and limit his remedies to the laws of the local state (contract).

    Extradition

    -

    surrender of a person by one state to another

    where he is wanted for prosecution or punishment.

    -

    Basis is an extradition treaty

    -

    Principle specialty- person must be tried only

    for the crime he was extradited otherwise the extraditing STATE (not the

    person) may object to the prosecution.

    -

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    56/66

    Political and religious offenders are generally

    not subject to extradition.

    -

    Attentat clause, murder of a royal blood is not

    a political offense for purposes of extradition.

    -

    In the absence of special agreement, the

    offense must be done in the territoty or against the demanding state.

    -

    The act or offense must be punishable in both

    states.

    SETTLEMENT

    OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    57/66

    METHODS SHOULD BE PEACEFUL.

    Amicable methods

    -

    Negotiation, inquiry,good offices (conciliation

    / mediation), arbitration,

    Hostile methods

    -

    Retorsions( non-illegal), reprisals (self-help)

    WAR

    OUTLAWRY OF WAR

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    58/66

    Commencement of War

    -must have previous and explicit warning ,

    reasoned declaration of war or an ultimatum with conditional declaration.

    Effects of outbreak of war

    -

    Laws of war substitutes laws of peace between

    parties

    -

    Laws of neutrality applies to third party

    states

    -

    Diplomatic relations are terminated

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    59/66

    -

    Treaties of politica nature are cancelled

    -

    Individuals are impressed with enemy character

    ( nationality test, domiciliary test, activities test)

    -

    Properties of the enemy within territory are

    subject to confiscation.

    Conduct

    of hostilities

    -

    Military necessity

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    60/66

    o

    Employ any amount and kind of force to compel

    submission of the enemy with the least possible loss of lives and destruction

    of property.

    -

    Humanity

    o

    Should not employ force or any measure not

    absolutely necessary for the purpose

    -

    Chivalry

    o

    Should not involve treacherous methods, no

    spies.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    61/66

    Belligerent

    occupation

    -

    No transfer or suspension of sovereignty,

    although may not be able to exercise at the moment

    -

    Political laws are abrogated, municipal laws

    continue in operation. (the contrary may occur upon an express or direct act by

    the belligerent government)

    Postliminium

    -

    Persons and things taken by the enemy are

    restored to the original state upon cessation of the occupation

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    62/66

    -

    Reinstatement of the authority of the displaced

    government.

    -

    Laws of established government are revived and

    all acts by the belligerent contrary to laws are voided.

    Non-hostile

    intercourse- flag of truce, cartels,passport,safe-conduct,safeguard, license to

    trade

    Suspension

    of hostilities

    -

    Suspension of arms

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    63/66

    o

    Purpose of gathering of the wounded and burial

    of the dead

    -

    Armistice

    o

    Political purpose, arranging times of peace.

    -

    Ceasefire, truce, capitulation

    The

    victor punishes the loser by imposing to it a treaty of peace and obligation to

    pay reparations for injuries and losses suffered by the victor.

    NEUTRALITY

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    64/66

    A state

    is neutral if it does not take part in a war between other states.

    Neutrality-

    based solely on the attitude of the state.

    Neutralization-

    agreed upon by states.

    Relations

    of belligerent states and neutral states

    -

    Duty to abstain in taking part in the

    hostilities

    -

    Prevent its territory anresources from being

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    65/66

    used

    -

    Acquiesce

    in certain restrictions or limitations that belligerent may find

    necessary to impose especially with commerce.

    -

    War may not be undertaken in neutral

    territories without compromising its being neutral.

    -

    Neutrality is not negated by passage of

    warships to territories but may not enter in neutral ports except of stress,

    fuel, unseaworthiness and which sojourning is only for 24 hours which may be

    extended or shortened depending on circumstance.

    -

    Prohibited from giving assistance of any form

    to belligerent.

  • 7/27/2019 Public International Law (Reviewer Finals)

    66/66

    -

    Private nationals decision to take part in the

    hostilities does not affect neutrality of the state.

    -

    Belligerent may visit and search neutral

    merchant vessels to determine connection with hostilities, if found as such,

    they are captured as PRIZE.

    ANGARY- a

    belligerent may upon payment of just compensation, seize, use or destroy, in

    case of urgent necessity for defense or offense, a neutral property found in

    its territory, in enemy territory or in the high seas.