Punjab Capacity Building Program - prmp.punjab.gov.pk · Punjab has developed an integrated capacity building program for its officers in relevant areas which will equip them with

Punjab Capacity BuildingProgram

Developed by:Capacity Building Wing

Punjab Resource Management Program

Planning & Development Department

Government of the Punjab

Punjab Capacity BuildingProgram

Developed by:

Capacity Building Wing

Punjab Resource Management Program

Planning & Development Department

Government of the Punjab

Designed at: Punjab Resource Management Program, P&D Department

Supervised by: Mehnaz BhuarDeputy Director, Capacity Building, PRMP

Format & Graphics: Nauman Ellahi,Network Administrator, PRMP

Publication: Ayyaz Ali, Kamboh art Press

ContentsTitle Page#

Background 1

List of Courses 11

Eligibility Criteria 19

Application Process 25

Applications of Candidates 27

Applicant Demographics 31

Candidate Evaluation 33

Interview Process 39

PCBP-I Scholarship Finalization 43

Broad Areas of Study 45

University Details 47

PCBP-I Mid-Term Result

Comprehensive Post Training Evaluation

Placement Policy

Conclusion

1

Punjab Resource Management Program was launched by Government of the Pun-

jab with the overarching objective of assisting the Punjab Government in reducing poverty

through good governance including improved public sector resource management. The

need for capacity building of officers has been felt as a result of various reforms intro-

duced by the Government. To ensure sustainability of these reforms, Government of the

Punjab has developed an integrated capacity building program for its officers in relevant

areas which will equip them with suitable professional skills to undertake the upcoming

challenges. Moreover, there is a dearth of trained professionals with the capability to ad-

dress the complex issues of present day policy making and policy implementation at all

levels, particularly ever since the devolution of power has taken effect.

Keeping this in view, Planning & Development Department launched the Punjab

Capacity Building Program funded by World Bank in 2007. PRMP is organizing this pro-

gram, the main focus of which is training of officers of the provincial cadres. Provincial

Government officers will be given an opportunity to pursue one-year Masters Degree Pro-

grams abroad in quality training establishments / institutes, in fields relevant to their pro-

fessional areas of work.

Background

3

Objectives of Capacity Building Initiative

The objectives of capacity building initiative are to increase knowledge and skills of officers specially

in the areas relevant with their field of work. This would enable the smooth implementation of reforms in-

troduced by the government and would also lead to the achievement of the twin goals of Government of

the Punjab leading to poverty reduction and economic development. This would also ensure sustainability of

reforms by adopting exit strategy through strengthening of Management & Professional Development De-

partment.

Implementation Arrangements

Capacity Development Intervention Committee is the policy formulating committee for capacity

building initiative undertaken by Punjab Resource Management Program. The committee is headed by

Chairman, P&D Board and comprises of the following members:-

1. Secretary Finance Department

2. Secretary, MPDD

3. Secretary, P&D Department

4. Secretary (Services), S&GAD

5. Secretary, PP&CMW

6. Program Director, PRMP

The Capacity Development Interventions (CDI) Committee provides leadership, guidance and coor-

dination for all the capacity building initiatives undertaken by PRMP. It also plays a very important role as a

clearing house of all proposals pertaining to capacity building. The committee monitors and evaluates the

progress being achieved by the capacity building initiative. In case of PCBP-I the final list of scholarships

was approved by the CDI Committee. The capacity Development Intervention Committee also approved in

principle to appropriately utilize the services of the officers returning on completion of their foreign studies.

In this context, S&GAD would frame a placement policy for their postings. The role of PRMP was to facilitate

the committee to finally decide the scholarship allocation.

PRMP implemented all the guidelines stipulated by the CDI Committee including initial screening,

research work pertaining to master programs, preliminary evaluation of applications and execution of all

modalities and mechanics of the scholarship process. PRMP is also following up the progress of the PCBP-I

scholars and is coordinating with their respective universities to get a regular programs update of the offi-

cers. A comprehensive evaluation report will be compiled upon the completion of the degree programs by

the scholars.

NST test was conducted to test the suitability of the officers. The purpose of this test was to facili-tate the Selection Committee to assess the suitability of the candidate for higher studies in a foreign land.

5

Punjab Capacity Building Program

LIST OF COURSES

In this regard, PRMP prepared the list of universities / programs by using the list identified by Civil

Service Reform Unit, Establishment Division, Islamabad programs that were not relevant to the provincial

government but were a part of the list of Civil Service Reform Unit were taken out. Other programs which

were considered to be useful and relevant with the provincial subjects were added by PRMP. PRMP also

wrote to Secretaries of all Administrative Departments for comments on this identified list. They were also

invited to propose universities / programs that would be relevant to their department but were not included

in the list identified by PRMP. Their input was received and courses proposed by them were added to the

already identified list.

PUNJAB CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAM (PCBP)

Eligibility Criteria for Applying for Scholarships for Degree Programs

An applicant for PCBP must:-

a. Hold a masters degree or 16 year education (MBBS, BE etc)

b. Fulfill the following age criteria at the closing date of application:-

1. For BS-17 Officers 38 years



c. Have at least 5 years public sector work experience in BS-17 or above.

d. Be a regular employee of the Government of Punjab, a Civil Servant or Technical / Specialist

Cadre or Ex-Cadre (officers belonging to autonomous bodies, corporations, regulatory bodies.

Education, health judiciary and not involved in public policy making and implementation would

be ineligible for the program).

e. Hold a permanent post with the Provincial Government or at the District level.

f. Furnish an undertaking on a legal paper that she/he will serve the Punjab Government for a

period of at least 5 years after training (on given format).

g. Not enrolled and pursuing a degree program at the time of application and not getting funds

from the Government of Pakistan / Punjab or any other source, scholarship etc.

h. Not got a foreign degree during the past 5 years.

i. Not be on currently on deputation to a donor or international agency.

j. Not be on long leave from the government (equal or more than one year).

k. Not be involved in any inquiry or disciplinary action.


6

l. Be in good mental and physical health.

2. Only those candidates would be considered for funding who get admission in the identified degree

programs against the indicated universities / institutions. The candidates are advised to get admission in

those degree programs only that have a direct relevancy with their occupational group as detailed in the

“Guideline of Course Descriptions and Recommended Institutions”.

3. For purposes of application, applicants are only required to show evidence of having applied to one

or two schools.

4. Women are encouraged to apply and will be given preference in selection.

APPLICATION PROCESS

Applications were invited from interested candidates through advertising in the local press. Multiple

advertisements were given by PRMP on three occasions to create awareness and promote solicitation of

maximum number of applications. Secretaries of all Administrative Departments and DCOs of all Districts

were requested to encourage their officers / staff to apply in the identified universities / programs. Initially

74 applications were received. Only 3 of these were female officers. Apart from considering broad based

representation from different departments and districts, special attention was paid to accommodating the

maximum number of female officers. It was earlier envisaged in the program that women would be given

preference at the time of selection. In order to give a better opportunity to the lady officers to participate in

this program, it was decided by CDI committee in its meeting dated 7th April 2007 that the deadline for re-

ceipt of applications for female participants should be extended by 2 weeks. In response to this, 3 more

lady officers applied for the said scholarship.

The above specified applicants directly applied to different universities in the fields relevant to their

scope of work / departments. Only those officers who were able to obtain valid offers of admission from a

foreign university were considered for award of scholarship by PRMP.


7

APPLICATIONS RECEIVED

In all, 74 applications were received out of these 20 were incomplete or deficient. The number of

applications actively considered by PRMP was 54. The main causes of ineligibility included the following:-

a) Overage candidates

b) Experience less than 5 years

c) On long leave or deputation

d) Incomplete applications

e) Obtained a foreign degree within the past five years

Total applicants 74

Complete applications (without confirmed admissions) 54

Incomplete applications 20

Complete applications

(w ithout confirmed

admissions), 54

Incomplete applications,

20

Complete applications (w ithout confirmed admissions) Incomplete applications

8


APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS

Amongst the 54 applicants, there were 6 female applicants and 48 male applicants.

The breakdown of the officers who applied from different service groups and departments is high-

lighted as follows:-

Male applicants 48

Female applicants 06

Male applicants, 48

Female applicants,

6

Male applicants Female applicants

Service group (PMS), 14

Service group (PSS), 4

Service group (PCS), 1

Service group (Ex-PSS), 6

Service group (Ex-PCS), 9

Ex-Cadre, 1

General cardre / APMO, 1

Provincial general cadre, 2

PCS executive, 2

Engineers, 1

Education, 4

Health, 3

Zakat & Usher, 2

P&D Department Service, 2

Social Welfare, Women

Development & Baitul Mall

Department, 1

Directorate of Architecture, 1

Service group (PMS) Service group (PSS)

Service group (PCS) Service group (Ex-PSS)

Service group (Ex-PCS) Ex-Cadre

General cardre / APMO Provincial general cadre

PCS executive Engineers

Education Health

Zakat & Usher P&D Department Service

Social Welfare, Women Development & Baitul Mall Department Directorate of Architecture


9

Age Group of Applicants:

The age group differentiation of the applicants’ is represented as follows:-

Universities Applied for:

The applicants predominantly applied to Universities in the United Kingdom. The distribution of

applicants’ preference of University is represented as under:-

7

Age between 25 to 35 applicants 17



Age between 25 to 35

applicants, 17


applicants, 28


applicants, 9

Age between 25 to 35 applicants Age between 36 to 45 applicants Age between 46 to 55 applicants

Sr.No.

Name of UniversityNos. of Stu-

dents Applied

1 Glasgow Caledonian University London, UK 03

2 Imperial College London, UK 02

3 Kings College London 04

4 London Metropolitan University, UK 01

5 London School of Economics 02

6 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK 02

7 National University of Singapore 01

8 University College of London, UK 01

9 University of Birmingham, UK 05

10 University of Groningen Faculty of Law, The Netherlands 01

11 University of London, UK 04

CANDIDATE EVALUATION

Out of the 54 complete applications, 45 applicants were able to secure a valid offer of admission

from foreign universities before the deadline date of 15-05-2007.

Third Party Testing:

The eligible candidates were called to sit for the National Testing Service (NTS) examination. 43

individuals sat for the National Testing Service (NTS) examination and were called for interviews.

7

12 University of Manchester, UK 14

13 University of Southampton, UK 01

14 University of Sussex, UK 07

15 University of Warwick, UK 06

16 Total 54

Applicants with letter of admission 45

Applicants without letter of admission 9

Applicants with letter o f

admission, 45

Applicants without letter of

admission, 9

Applicants with letter of admission Applicants without letter of admission

Candidates not called for interview due to non appearance in NTS 2

Candidates Called for interview 43

Basis of Evaluation of Candidates:

The candidates were evaluated on the basis of the following set of information:-

i. Valid admission in a designated program

ii. NTS exam

iii. ACR/PER record

iv. Experience

v. Gender of officer (female officers were given preference)

This information was collated and placed before the selection committee who then proceeded to

interview the applicants.

NTS test was conducted to assess the candidates’ language proficiency as well as basic analytical

skills. This information was provided to the Selection Committee in order to facilitate their decision making

process. Candidates who met the eligibility criteria for PCBP were made to pass through a selection proce-

dure which meant to gauge their potential, capacity as well as suitability for undertaking foreign studies.

7

Not called for

interview, 2

Called for interview,

43

Not called for interview Called for interview

INTERVIEW PROCESS

43 candidates were called for an interview before the Capacity Development Interventions Commit-

tee. In addition, the Secretaries of the parent Departments of the candidates were also invited as members

of this selection committee so that they could give their input at the time of interview. This included Secre-

taries of:-

Education Department

Health Department

C&W Department

I&P Department

Zakat & Usher Department

The committee held interviews for three days (from 16-06-2007 to 20-06-2007) and judged the

candidates on the basis of their performance. Past three years’ ACRs of candidates were also considered

while finalizing their results. As a result of rigorous selection process, the high powered selection committee

selected 18 candidates, including six women.

However, out of these three female candidates expressed their inability to join the program. These

included:-

PCBP-I SCHOLARSHIP FINALIZATION

15 officers of Government of the Punjab were selected for PCBP-I scholarship for foreign education.

The gender wise break up of successful candidates is given below:-

7

Ms. Tahira Yousaf Kharal Education Department

Ms. Tahira Mariam Health Department

Ms. Sumaira Jamil C&W Department

Female officers 3 Nos.

Male officers 12 Nos.

PCBP-I SCHOLARSHIP FINALIZATION

15 officers of Government of the Punjab were selected for PCBP-I scholarship for foreign educa-

tion. The gender wise break up of successful candidates is given below:-

During 2007 the scholarships were availed by officers working in BS-17 and BS-18. The share of

the BS-19 officers was zero.

Grade wise profile of officers is as follows:-

7

Female officers 3 Nos.

Male officers 12 Nos.

Female officers, 3

Male officers, 12

Female officers Male officers

Grade 17 11 Nos.

Grade 18 5 Nos.

Grade 17,

Grade

Grade Grade

Successful Candidates:

The 15 officers who were selected for PCBP-I and have proceeded abroad for training are as fol-

lows:-

7

Sr.No.

Name / Course / University / Uni-versity

ServiceGroup /Grade

Program

Dr. Ahmad AfnanAssistant Director PMU, NPIW C.M Secre-tariat. Lahore

PMS/17 M.Sc in Human Resource for Inter-national DevelopmentUniversity of Manchester, UK

Mr. Farrukh NaveedDeputy Secretary,C.M. Secretariat, Lahore

PMS/17 M.Sc in Management & Implemen-tation of Development Projects Uni-versity of Manchester, UK

Mr. Ghulam AbbasDO (Planning), Muzaffargarh

P&D/17 M.Sc in Economics Policy & Devel-oping & Transitional EconomicsUniversity of Bradford, UK

Mr. Jahangir AnwarDeputy Secretary,Finance Department, Lahore

PMS/18 MA in Employment Studies & Hu-man Resource ManagementLondon Metropolitan University, UK

Mr. Muhammad AkhtarDeputy Secretary,S&GAD, Lahore

PMS/18 M.Sc in Program & Project Manage-mentWarwick University, UK

Mr. Muhammad Shafiq AhmadDeputy Secretary,CM Secretariat, Lahore

PMS/18 M.Sc in Program & Project Manage-mentUniversity of Warwick, UK

Mr. Muhammad Sajjad BabarDistrict Zakat Officer, Lahore

Zakat &Usher / 17

M.Sc in Poverty Reduction & Devel-opment ManagementUniversity of Birmingham, UK

Mr. Muhammad Sohail ShahzadDeputy Secretary,Irrigation & Power Department. Lahore

PMS/18 M.Sc in Organizational Change &DevelopmentUniversity of Manchester, UK

Mr. Muhammad Farooq RasheedAssistant Director (Ops) HQ, PMU, PHP,Home Department

PMS/17 MPAUniversity of Warwick, UK

Mr. Muhammad Shabbir khanDeputy Director, ACE, Sahiwal

PMS/17 MA in Development StudiesUniversity of Manchester, UK

Mr. Naveed Shahzad MirzaSpecial Judicial Magistrate,LDA, Lahore

PMS/17 M.Sc in Human Resource for Inter-national DevelopmentUniversity of Manchester, UK

Ms. Sadaf ZafarProgram Officer,MPDD Lahore

PMS/17 M.Sc in Public Service Policy &ManagementKings College London, UK

Syeda MalikaDeputy Secretary, Finance Department.

PMS/18 M.A in Environment & DevelopmentKings College London, UK

Ms. Zahida AzherSection Officer( Estt. III), S&GAD

PMS/17 MA in Governance & DevelopmentUniversity of Sussex, UK

Mr. Muhammad AslamEngineering SDO DG KhanI&P Department

Engineer-ing /17

M.Sc in Taught Program in RiverEnvironmental ManagementUniversity of Birmingham, UK

BROAD AREAS OF STUDY

The candidates who had been selected had applied to areas relevant to public sector. The broad

areas of program specialization are enumerated below:-

Demographic

7

Sr.No.

AreasTotal Number

of Scholars

Human Resource Management 3

Public Policy 2

Project Management 3

Economics 4

Public Administration 1

Environment 2

Total 15

UNIVERSITY DETAILS VIS-À-VIS SELECTED CANDIDATES

The university wise categorization of admissions for the successful PCBP-I scholarship holders is as

follows:-

7

Sr. No. Name of UniversityNo of Selected

Candidates

University of Manchester, UK 05

University of Bradford, UK 01

London Metropolitan University, UK 01

Warwick University, UK 03

University of Birmingham, UK 02

Kings College London, UK 02

University of Sussex, UK 01

PCBP-I MID-TERM RESULT

The mid-term results of PCBP-I candidates were solicited from their universities and a summary of

the result is enclosed on the next page. It is pertinent to mention that the universities have conveyed their

overall satisfaction with the progress of the PCBP-I scholarship holders. The results reflect that most of the

candidates are doing well in the program and have secured above average scores in most of the subjects.

However, a few candidates are facing a little bit of difficulty in some of the technical subjects. Overall the

mid-term results convey a satisfactory performance of the program. This is an interim assessment and the

final grades will reflect the actual effort put in by these scholars. Once the final grades are received, this

report will be revised and updated.

7

S.#

NameDiscipline/

University AdmissionTerms & Modules Marks %

1

Mr. Muhammad Akhtar MSc in Program & ProjectManagementWarwick University, UK

Organization people & Per-formance

75 %

Product Design & Develop-ment Management

63 %

2

Mr. Muhammad ShafiqAhmad

MSc in Program & ProjectManagement. Universityof Warwick, UK

Organization people & Per-formance

71 %

Product Design & Develop-ment Management 62 %

3

Mr. Muhammad SajjadBabar

MSc in Poverty Reduction& Development Manage-ment. University of Bir-mingham, UK

Development Theory &Practice

53 %

Social Analysis of Poverty &Development

54 %

Decentralization Govern-ance & Management

54 %

4Syeda Malika MA in Environment & De-

velopment at Kings Col-lege London, UK

Overall Report from Univer-sity

5

Ms. Zahida Azher MA in Governance & De-velopment,University of SUSSEX, UK

Ideas in Development CoreCourse

C- Grade

Governance , Politics & De-velopment

A- Grade

Public Management & Or-ganizational Development

A- Grade

6

Mr. Ahmad Afnan MSc in Human Resourcefor International Develop-ment. University of Man-chester, UK.

Human Resource Develop-ment

70%

International Management 67%

Training & Development 65%

Organizational Develop-ment

62%

7

7

Mr. Naveed ShahzadMirza.

MSc in Human Resourcesfor International Develop-ment at University ofManchester, UK

Training & Development 76 %

HRD Key Concepts 74 %

Human Resource Practice-1 70 %

Organization Development 60 %

8

Mr. Muhammad SohailShahzad

MSc in OrganizationalChange & DevelopmentUniversity of Manchester,UK.

Organization Development 68 %

Training & Development 66 %

International Management 60 %

Fundamentals of IT &IS 56 %

9

Mr. Ghulam Abbas MSc in Economic Policyfor Developing & Transi-tional Economics, Univer-sity of Bradford, UK

Quantitative Methods 57 %

Macroeconomic Analysis forDevelopment

57 %

Project Planning, Design &Appraisal.

54.2 %

10

Mr. Muhammad Aslam

MSc in River Environ-mental Management,University of Birmingham,UK

Water Quality Management(20 credits)

50 %

Surface Water Resource(20 credits)

68 %

11

Mr. Farooq Rasheed

MPA,Warrick University, UK

Strategy, Leadership & Val-ues in a Democratic Con-text

50 %

Human Resource Manage-ment

53 %

12

Mr. Jahangir Anwar

MA in Employment Stud-ies & Human ResourceManagement, LondonMetropolitan University,UK

Individual dissertation re-search proposal

50 %

Coursework 54 %

Presentation 58 %

Coursework Assignment 45 %

Case Study 53 %

13

Mr. Farrukh Naveed

MSc in Management &Implementation of Devel-opment ProjectsUniversity of Manchester,UK

Organizational Behavior 60 %

ICTs for SED 50 %

Project Finance 61 %

Risk Management 65 %

14

Ms. Sadaf ZafarMSc in Public Service Pol-icy & Management,Kings College London, UK

Overall Report form Univer-sity

15

Mr. Muhammad Shab-bir Ahmad Khan

MA in Development Stud-ies, University of Man-chester, UK

The Political Economy ofDevel

54 %

Politics and Development 53 %

Development & ResearchSkill

54 %

Anthropology, Globalizationan

50 %

Development: ComparativeSocial

62 %

State and Society in SouthAsia

64 %

COMPREHENSIVE POST TRAINING EVALUATION

A customized evaluation form has been developed for PCBP-I and will be provided to all the schol-

arship holders for comprehensive feedback. The data received will be tabulated and incorporated into a

comprehensive analytical report. This evaluation form is multifocal and the methodology involves a mixture

of qualitative and quantitative enquiries about the program and the acquired knowledge coupled with its

efficacy for the candidate. The feedback of the scholars would also enable Government of the Punjab to

fine tune the mechanics and modalities for the next batch of PCBP scholars 2008-09 and will allow more

focused and meaningful contribution to the development of phase-2 of the program. Government of the

Punjab aims to utilize this facility to the maximum so that a pool of well trained and high skilled human

resource may be developed in the provincial government. The evaluation form is enclosed on the next

page.

PCBP-I POST TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

1. Education:

2. Evaluation OF PCBP-I: Please provide your candid evaluation of PCBP-I. Your evaluation will help to

improve the future delivery of trainings by Punjab Resource Management Program.

3. Selection Methodology:

a. Are you satisfied with the selection process for PCBP-I?

Yes No

7

PERSONAL INFORMATION

1. Name: 2. Gender:MaleFemale

3. Designation & Organization:

3. Occupational Group/Service: 4. Pay Scale:

5. Date of Birth: 6. Year of Joining Service:

Degree Subject Institution Year

M.A. / M.Sc.

Professional Degree

Others

b. What changes would you like to incorporate in the selection process?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

c. Do you think that the investment made through PCBP-I is beneficial?

Yes No

If no, why:-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

d. Are you satisfied with the logistic arrangements for PCBP-I before your departure and during the pro-

gram?

Yes No

If no, why:-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4. Training Facilities:

7

Poor Fair GoodVerygood

Excellent

a. Are you satisfied with the training facilities andlogistic arrangements offered at your univer-sity?

1 2 3 4 5

b. Whether the training material provided duringthe course was adequate and relevant

1 2 3 4 5

c. Training effectiveness of the degree program 1 2 3 4 5

d. Overall rating of the training facilities 1 2 3 4 5

5. Degree Program:

a. Title of the Degree being obtained:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

b. Name of the University / Institute:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

d. Are you satisfied with the degree obtained?

Yes No

If no, than kindly elaborate:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

e. What were the three subjects which you think were most beneficial for Public Sector in

Punjab?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f. What were the subjects, which were not so relevant (identify 2-3 only) for Public Sec-

tor in Punjab?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

g. Would you like to recommend your degree and university for future training to other

officers?

Yes No

6. Which projects were required to be completed in your programs (Annex if applicable)?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7

Poor Fair GoodVerygood

Excellent

h. Your overall rating of Degree Programand university.

1 2 3 4 5

7. Kindly specify the field visits attended during the programs (Annex if applicable)?

1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

8. What was the topic of your dissertation? Kindly specify its objectives and scope?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

9a. What were your objectives for pursuing of higher studies?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

b. To what extent were these objectives fulfilled?

7

Not fulfilled Fulfilled

Objectives 1 2 3 4 5

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

10. Resource Person:

a. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

b. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

c. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

7

Belowaverage

Average GoodVerygood

Excellent

A Qualification and experience. 1 2 3 4 5

B Training Methodology. 1 2 3 4 5

C Knowledge of the topics 1 2 3 4 5

D Communication style 1 2 3 4 5

E Time management 1 2 3 4 5

F Availability for after sessionconsultations.

1 2 3 4 5

G Management of the learningprocess

1 2 3 4 5

Belowaverage


Excellent







1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

Belowaverage


Excellent







1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

d. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

e. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

f. Resource Persons Evaluation (___________________)

7

Belowaverage


Excellent







1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

Belowaverage


Excellent







1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

Belowaverage


Excellent







1 2 3 4 5


1 2 3 4 5

11. How would you evaluate the training under PCBP-I in achieving your objectives at theorganizational and individual level?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

12. Identify the areas where the Degree Program has brought major improvement in yourcapacity in terms of knowledge base and skills.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

13. Career Planning

1. Do you consider that you should develop any specialization related to public sector in the future?

Yes No

a. Which of your implementing capabilities do you believe improved as a result of your participation inPCBP-I? select the top three (from attached table):-

No. 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

No. 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

No. 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7

Table:

a) Pro-activeness (motivation, ability to take action)

b) Sociability (understanding of others, ability to build relationships)

c) Sense of trust (sense of responsibility, ability to achieve things)

d) Ability to learn from experience (awareness of issues, application of experience)

e) Self control (emotional stability, control)

f) Communication ability (ability to express oneself, persuasive power)

g) Other ability – please specify

b. How will you contribute to make your organization more efficient?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

c. How can you improve your organization’s effectiveness?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

d. On the basis of your qualification and experience, which Departments can best utilize your potential?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

d. What are your future career goals and how do you want to achieve them?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f. Any other suggestion / comment.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Note: The information contained in this Proforma will be treated as confidential and used for evaluationand analysis. We may also add your comments in certain publications.

7

N a m e : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Signature: ______________________

D a t e : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

PLACEMENT POLICY

Government of the Punjab launched Punjab Capacity Building Program in 2007 in order to equip

officers of the Government of Punjab with suitable professional skills, knowledge and competencies. Under

this program in 2007-08, 15 officers went to Universities of U.K for pursuing masters degree programs for

1 year in diverse fields. 2 officers were sent to Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of

Singapore for Masters in Public Administration.

Capacity Development Interventions Committee approved the recommendation of the Sub-

Committee for the appropriate utilization of the services of the officers returning on completion of their for-

eign studies in which S&GAD would frame a placement policy for their postings. This is an important aspect

of the capacity building exercise of Government of the Punjab as the recently acquired knowledge, skills

and competencies of these officers would be effectively utilized by following a prudent placement policy.

This would also result in the optimal utilization of their learning and experience of international

best practices in the Punjab.

CONCLUSION

Under PCBP-I Government of the Punjab successfully granted scholarships to 15 officers of the

provincial Government. This is the first endeavour of its kind as never has such an initiative been taken for

the provincial services in the Punjab. The program is completely focused on provincial cadres and attempts

to give a fair chance to competent and bright officers from general as well as technical cadres to build their

capacity in selected areas of public service related academic disciplines. The process was transparent,

merit-based and gave equal opportunity to all officers of government of the Punjab. The selected 15 offi-

cers are presently undergoing specialized education in foreign universities and have been obtaining satis-

factory grades. The officers will be returning to Punjab by mid-September 2008 and would be fully geared

to effectively contributing to the reform agenda of Government of the Punjab. The experiences of PCBP-I,

coupled with the feedback of the candidates would enable PRMP to further refine the selection and place-

ment mechanism for PCBP-II (2009) and would facilitate the optimum utilization of funds available for ca-

pacity building. This is an interim report and the final report will be compiled upon return of successful

scholars.

7

7

Punjab Resource Management ProgramPlanning & Development Department

Government of the PunjabTel (92 42) 9200508, 5756415-6, 5755941 Fax (92 42) 9204194 URL: http://www.punjab-prmp.gov.pk

Documents

Punjab Capacity Building Program - prmp.punjab.gov.pk · Punjab has developed an integrated capacity building program for its officers in relevant areas which will equip them with