QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    1/35

    Quality Matters Part I:

    A very general overview of the Quality Matters rubrics and howto apply it to your course.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    2/35

    Eight Broad Standards: 40 specific elements

    1. Course Overview and Introduction2. Learning Objectives

    3. Assessment and Measurement

    4. Resources and Materials

    5. Learner Engagement

    6. Course Technology

    7. Learner Support

    8. Accessibility

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    3/35

    1. Course Overview and Introduction

    1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various coursecomponents.

    1.2 A statement introduces the student to the purpose of the course and to its

    components; in the case of a hybrid course, the statement clarifies the relationship

    between the face-to-face and online components.

    1.3 Etiquette expectations (sometimes called netiquette for online discussions, email,

    and other forms of communication are stated clearly.

    1.4 The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate and available online.

    1.5 Students are asked to introduce themselves to the class.

    1.6 Minimum student preparation, and, if applicable, prerequisite knowledge in the

    discipline are clearly stated.

    1.7 Minimum technical skills expected of the student are clearly stated.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    4/35

    2. Learning Objectives

    2.1 The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable.

    2.2 The module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are

    measurable and consistent with the course-level objectives.

    2.3 All learning objectives are stated clearly and written from the studentsperspective.

    2.4 Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are

    adequate and

    stated clearly.

    2.5 The learning objectives are appropriately designed for the level of the

    course.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    5/35

    3. Assessment and Measurement

    3.1 The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives

    and are consistent with course activities and resources.

    3.2 The course grading policy is stated clearly.

    3.3 Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for the evaluation of

    students work and participation.

    3.4 The assessment instruments selected are sequenced, varied, and

    appropriate to the content being assessed.

    3.5 Self-check or practice assignments are provided, with timely feedback tostudents.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    6/35

    4. Resources and Materials

    4.1 The instructional materials contribute to the achievement ofthe stated course and module/unit learning objectives.

    4.2 The relationship between the instructional materials and the

    learning activities is clearly explained to the student.

    4.3 The instructional materials have sufficient breadth, depth, and

    currency for the student to learn the subject.

    4.4. All resources and materials used in the course areappropriately cited.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    7/35

    5. Learner Engagement

    5.1 The learning activities promote the achievement of the statedlearning objectives.

    5.2 Learning activities foster instructor-student, content-student,

    and if appropriate to the course, student-student interaction.

    5.3 Clear standards are set for instructor responsiveness and

    availability (turn-around time for email, grade posting, etc.)

    5.4 The requirements for student interaction are clearlyarticulated.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    8/35

    6. Course Technology

    6.1 The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen

    to deliver the content of the course.

    6.2 The tools and media support student engagement and guide the student to become

    an active learner.

    6.3 Navigation throughout the online components of the course is logical, consistent,and efficient.

    6.4 Students have ready access to the technologies required in the course.

    6.5 The course components are compatible with current standards for delivery modes.

    6.6 Instructions on how to access resources at a distance are sufficient and easy to

    understand.

    6.7 The course design takes full advantage of available tools and media.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    9/35

    7. Learner Support

    7.1 The course instructions articulate or link to clear description of thetechnical support offered.

    7.2 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the

    institutions academic support system can assist the student in effectively using

    the resources provided.

    7.3 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the

    institutions student support services can help students reach their

    educational goals.

    7.4 Course instructions answer basic questions related to research, writing,

    technology, etc., or link to tutorials or other resources that provide the

    information.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    10/35

    8. Accessibility

    8.1 The course incorporates ADA standards and reflectconformance with institutional policy regarding accessibility in

    online and hybrid courses.

    8.2 Course pages and course materials provide equivalent

    alternatives to auditory and visual content.

    8.3 Course pages have links that are self-describing and

    meaningful.

    8.4 The course ensures screen readability.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    11/35

    How to Get Started

    1. Dont try to fix all standards at one time in your class. Pickthe one that you think needs the most work and go from

    there.

    2. Challenge yourself to become Quality Matters approved!

    Currently the following faculty have QM approved courses atWestern.

    1. Jim Hissong

    2. Patty Pedersen

    3. Jennifer Beachler

    3. Ask for help. As they have time Nancy and Chris can help

    faculty update courses to better meet these standards.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    12/35

    Questions?

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    13/35

    Quality Matters Part 2:

    Learning Objectives

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    14/35

    Learning Objectives

    Why do they matter? Give students direction

    Focus the faculty member on what to teach

    Focus the faculty member on how to assess

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    15/35

    2. Learning Objectives

    2.1 The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable.

    2.2 The module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are

    measurable and consistent with the course-level objectives.

    2.3 All learning objectives are stated clearly and written from the studentsperspective.

    2.4 Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are

    adequate and stated clearly.

    2.5 The learning objectives are appropriately designed for the level of thecourse.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    16/35

    First Steps to Writing Your Course and

    Lesson Objectives

    1. What do you want students to know when they walk away

    from your course.

    2. How will they learn each item and how will you assess

    each item?

    3. Is this the first course in a sequence? What do students

    need to know to move on from this course? How does

    this course tie into the program objectives? For example,

    how would Homeland Security: The Patriot Act tie into the

    Criminal Justice degree or program the student is

    pursuing?

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    17/35

    Main Questions to ask yourself:

    1. Does the objective focus on student performance?2. Is the task measurable or observable?

    3. What criteria will I use to establish that the

    objective has been reached?

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    18/35

    Does the objective focus on student

    performance?

    The student will

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    19/35

    Is the Task Measurable or Observable

    Measurable Action Words (examples) Explain

    Demonstrate

    Analyze

    Formulate

    Discuss

    Compare

    Differentiate

    Describe

    Name

    Assess

    Evaluate

    Identify

    Design

    Define

    List

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    20/35

    Course vs Learning Objectives1. Analyze the US Patriot Act based on

    1. The sections of the Patriot Act.

    2. The circumstances surrounding the

    creation of the Patriot Act.

    3. The people who created the Patriot

    Act.

    2. Examine the various definitions of

    terrorism.

    3. Analyze the perception of terrorism

    based on the audience, i.e. country,

    leader, religion, or ethnic group.

    4. Demonstrate an understanding of all

    issues surrounding the Patriot Act.

    5. Demonstrate an ability to critically

    analyze a political policy or law and how

    it affects multiple parties.

    Learning Objectives: After completing

    this (section, week, unit), students willbe able to:

    1. Describe Title III of the USA Patriot

    Act, through writing activities.

    2. Demonstrate an understanding ofhow the sections of Title III affect

    banking and other affected US

    industries, through group role playing

    activities.

    3.

    Examine the various opposing viewsregarding Title III through group role

    playing activities.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    21/35

    Online Course Planning Grid

    Resources and Materials Learner Interaction Assessment and Measurements

    Objective(s) and/orCompetencies

    Readings (Textbook& Supplemental)

    AdditionalResources &

    Materials

    Learner Interactionw/ Peers &

    Instructor

    Learner Interactionw/ Content

    (Activities & Short

    Term Projects)

    Long Term Projects(Broken into

    Components)

    Other Measures ofAssessment

    (Quizzes, Tests, &

    Exams)

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    22/35

    How will I measure this objective?

    1.

    Using the washingtonpost.com Web site, the student willcorrectly identify and printout two examples each of a

    news article and an editorial regarding a topical new

    item.

    2. Given twenty examples of incorrect verb tense usage,the student will identify and correct a minimum of

    sixteen instances.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    23/35

    Next Step

    Assessment!

    Thursday, April 15th

    12:00 to 1:00 PM and 6:0

    Assessment and Measurement - Do your assessments

    measure your learning objectives? Are all your learning

    objectives measured within the course? What are some

    other options you might have for assessment within your

    course?

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    24/35

    Park University has a great resource:http://www.park.edu/cetl2/quicktips/writinglearningobj.html

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    25/35

    Quality Matters Part 3:

    Assessment and Measurement

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    26/35

    Measurement The process by which the attributes or dimensions of some physical object

    are determined. When we measure, we generally use some standard instrument to

    determine how big, tall, heavy, voluminous, hot, cold, fast, or straightsomething actually is. Standard instruments refer to instruments such asrulers, scales, thermometers, pressure gauges, etc.

    We measure to obtain information about what is. We are not assessing anything; we are simply collecting information relative

    to some established rule or standard.

    When used in a learning objective, the definition provided on theADPRIMA for the behavioral verb measure is: To apply a standard scale ormeasuring device to an object, series of objects, events, or conditions,according to practices accepted by those who are skilled in the use of thedevice or scale.

    Information taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    27/35

    Assessment A process by which information is obtained relative to some known

    objective or goal. Assessment is a broad term that includes testing.

    Assessment is most usefully connected to some goal or objectivefor which the assessment is designed. A test or assessment yieldsinformation relative to an objective or goal. In that sense, we test or

    assess to determine whether or not an objective or goal has beenobtained.

    Assessment of skill attainment is rather straightforward. Eitherthe skill exists at some acceptable level or it doesnt. Skills arereadily demonstrable.

    Assessment of understanding is much more difficult and complex.

    To stipulate the conditions by which the behavior specified in anobjective may be ascertained. Such stipulations are usually in theform of written descriptions.

    Information taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    28/35

    Evaluation Inherent in the idea of evaluation is "value." When we evaluate, what we are

    doing is engaging in some process that is designed to provide informationthat will help us make a judgment about a given situation.

    When we evaluate, we are saying that the process will yield informationregarding the worthiness, appropriateness, goodness, validity, legality, etc., ofsomething for which a reliable measurement or assessment has been made.

    We evaluate every day. Teachers, in particular, are constantly evaluating

    students, and such evaluations are usually done in the context ofcomparisons between what was intended (learning, progress, behavior) andwhat was obtained.

    When used in a learning objective, the definition provided on theADPRIMA site for the behavioral verb evaluate is: To classify objects,situations, people, conditions, etc., according to defined criteria of quality.

    Indication of quality must be given in the defined criteria of each classcategory. Evaluation differs from general classification only in this respectInformation taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    29/35

    Breakdown

    Assessment refers to the collection of data to describe or

    better understand an issue, measurement is the process

    of quantifying assessment data and evaluation refers to

    the comparison of data to a standard for the purpose of

    judging worth or quality.

    Collecting data (assessment), quantifying that data

    (measurement), making judgments (evaluation)

    From: Huitt, B; Hummel, J; $ Kaeck, D. (2001) Assessment, Measurement, Evaluation, &

    Research. Educational Psychology Interactive.

    http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessmenthttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/measure.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/evalu.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/evalu.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/measure.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessment
  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    30/35

    So.

    You, as the instructor, are choosing assessments

    that measure the learning objectives. You are

    then using those assessments to evaluate thelevel at which the student has met the learning

    objective!

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    31/35

    Key things to remember:

    1. Its important to align the teaching method with the

    assessment method.

    2. Research encourages multiple measures of student

    performance. This could include some

    1. Transmission methods of learning, quizzes, tests,2. But should also include some authentic assessments

    3. It is suggested grading rubrics be designed for all

    assessment: discussions, assignments, projects, and

    collaboration.4. Encourage students to develop skills in feedback and

    collaboration through

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    32/35

    Types of Assessment Learner Centered Assessments

    Self-reflection Journaling

    Discussions

    Performance Assessments Wikis, socially constructed web pages,

    Authentic Assessments Simulation activities Case studies

    Group work/Collaboration

    Portfolio Assessments Presentations

    Demonstrations Essays

    The key is all should include feedback! Wrong versus right answers anddirections. They are all learning tools also for the students, not justassessment tools for you!

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    33/35

    When deciding on what kind of assessment activities to use, it is

    helpful to keep in mind the following questions:

    1. What will the students work on the activity (multiple choice

    answers, essays, project, presentation, etc) tell me about their level

    of competence on the targeted learning objectives?2. How will my assessment of their work help guide students

    practice and improve the quality of their work?

    3. How will the assessment outcomes for the class guide my teaching

    practice?

    From: Carnegie Mellon:

    http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.html

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    34/35

    The Whole Picture

    The Goals for StudentSuccess:Solve Problems

    Communicate Competently

    Develop Life Skills

    See Issues From Multiple Perspectives

    Retrieve Information

    Program Goals:

    Course Goals:

    CourseAssessments:

    College-WideAssessments:CAAP, SSCCE,SSFSSE, MAPP and

    computer testing

    Graduate Surveys

    Sample: presentations,

    Research papers, reflective

    Writing.

  • 8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3

    35/35

    Resources

    Adprima Website: http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm .

    American Psychological Association. (2007). Understanding Assessment.

    Authentic Assessment Toolbox.

    http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/ - helps with the creation

    and delivery of authentic assessments.Carnegie Mellon. Enhancing Education.

    http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.html.

    Huitt, B; Hummel, J; $ Kaeck, D. (2001) Assessment, Measurement, Evaluation, &

    Research. Educational Psychology Interactive.

    http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html .

    Palloff, R and Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the Online Learner: resources and

    strategies for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

    http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htmhttp://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.htmlhttp://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.htmlhttp://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm