Upload
wwcc-distance-ed
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
1/35
Quality Matters Part I:
A very general overview of the Quality Matters rubrics and howto apply it to your course.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
2/35
Eight Broad Standards: 40 specific elements
1. Course Overview and Introduction2. Learning Objectives
3. Assessment and Measurement
4. Resources and Materials
5. Learner Engagement
6. Course Technology
7. Learner Support
8. Accessibility
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
3/35
1. Course Overview and Introduction
1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various coursecomponents.
1.2 A statement introduces the student to the purpose of the course and to its
components; in the case of a hybrid course, the statement clarifies the relationship
between the face-to-face and online components.
1.3 Etiquette expectations (sometimes called netiquette for online discussions, email,
and other forms of communication are stated clearly.
1.4 The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate and available online.
1.5 Students are asked to introduce themselves to the class.
1.6 Minimum student preparation, and, if applicable, prerequisite knowledge in the
discipline are clearly stated.
1.7 Minimum technical skills expected of the student are clearly stated.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
4/35
2. Learning Objectives
2.1 The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable.
2.2 The module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are
measurable and consistent with the course-level objectives.
2.3 All learning objectives are stated clearly and written from the studentsperspective.
2.4 Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are
adequate and
stated clearly.
2.5 The learning objectives are appropriately designed for the level of the
course.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
5/35
3. Assessment and Measurement
3.1 The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives
and are consistent with course activities and resources.
3.2 The course grading policy is stated clearly.
3.3 Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for the evaluation of
students work and participation.
3.4 The assessment instruments selected are sequenced, varied, and
appropriate to the content being assessed.
3.5 Self-check or practice assignments are provided, with timely feedback tostudents.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
6/35
4. Resources and Materials
4.1 The instructional materials contribute to the achievement ofthe stated course and module/unit learning objectives.
4.2 The relationship between the instructional materials and the
learning activities is clearly explained to the student.
4.3 The instructional materials have sufficient breadth, depth, and
currency for the student to learn the subject.
4.4. All resources and materials used in the course areappropriately cited.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
7/35
5. Learner Engagement
5.1 The learning activities promote the achievement of the statedlearning objectives.
5.2 Learning activities foster instructor-student, content-student,
and if appropriate to the course, student-student interaction.
5.3 Clear standards are set for instructor responsiveness and
availability (turn-around time for email, grade posting, etc.)
5.4 The requirements for student interaction are clearlyarticulated.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
8/35
6. Course Technology
6.1 The tools and media support the learning objectives, and are appropriately chosen
to deliver the content of the course.
6.2 The tools and media support student engagement and guide the student to become
an active learner.
6.3 Navigation throughout the online components of the course is logical, consistent,and efficient.
6.4 Students have ready access to the technologies required in the course.
6.5 The course components are compatible with current standards for delivery modes.
6.6 Instructions on how to access resources at a distance are sufficient and easy to
understand.
6.7 The course design takes full advantage of available tools and media.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
9/35
7. Learner Support
7.1 The course instructions articulate or link to clear description of thetechnical support offered.
7.2 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the
institutions academic support system can assist the student in effectively using
the resources provided.
7.3 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the
institutions student support services can help students reach their
educational goals.
7.4 Course instructions answer basic questions related to research, writing,
technology, etc., or link to tutorials or other resources that provide the
information.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
10/35
8. Accessibility
8.1 The course incorporates ADA standards and reflectconformance with institutional policy regarding accessibility in
online and hybrid courses.
8.2 Course pages and course materials provide equivalent
alternatives to auditory and visual content.
8.3 Course pages have links that are self-describing and
meaningful.
8.4 The course ensures screen readability.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
11/35
How to Get Started
1. Dont try to fix all standards at one time in your class. Pickthe one that you think needs the most work and go from
there.
2. Challenge yourself to become Quality Matters approved!
Currently the following faculty have QM approved courses atWestern.
1. Jim Hissong
2. Patty Pedersen
3. Jennifer Beachler
3. Ask for help. As they have time Nancy and Chris can help
faculty update courses to better meet these standards.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
12/35
Questions?
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
13/35
Quality Matters Part 2:
Learning Objectives
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
14/35
Learning Objectives
Why do they matter? Give students direction
Focus the faculty member on what to teach
Focus the faculty member on how to assess
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
15/35
2. Learning Objectives
2.1 The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable.
2.2 The module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are
measurable and consistent with the course-level objectives.
2.3 All learning objectives are stated clearly and written from the studentsperspective.
2.4 Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are
adequate and stated clearly.
2.5 The learning objectives are appropriately designed for the level of thecourse.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
16/35
First Steps to Writing Your Course and
Lesson Objectives
1. What do you want students to know when they walk away
from your course.
2. How will they learn each item and how will you assess
each item?
3. Is this the first course in a sequence? What do students
need to know to move on from this course? How does
this course tie into the program objectives? For example,
how would Homeland Security: The Patriot Act tie into the
Criminal Justice degree or program the student is
pursuing?
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
17/35
Main Questions to ask yourself:
1. Does the objective focus on student performance?2. Is the task measurable or observable?
3. What criteria will I use to establish that the
objective has been reached?
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
18/35
Does the objective focus on student
performance?
The student will
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
19/35
Is the Task Measurable or Observable
Measurable Action Words (examples) Explain
Demonstrate
Analyze
Formulate
Discuss
Compare
Differentiate
Describe
Name
Assess
Evaluate
Identify
Design
Define
List
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
20/35
Course vs Learning Objectives1. Analyze the US Patriot Act based on
1. The sections of the Patriot Act.
2. The circumstances surrounding the
creation of the Patriot Act.
3. The people who created the Patriot
Act.
2. Examine the various definitions of
terrorism.
3. Analyze the perception of terrorism
based on the audience, i.e. country,
leader, religion, or ethnic group.
4. Demonstrate an understanding of all
issues surrounding the Patriot Act.
5. Demonstrate an ability to critically
analyze a political policy or law and how
it affects multiple parties.
Learning Objectives: After completing
this (section, week, unit), students willbe able to:
1. Describe Title III of the USA Patriot
Act, through writing activities.
2. Demonstrate an understanding ofhow the sections of Title III affect
banking and other affected US
industries, through group role playing
activities.
3.
Examine the various opposing viewsregarding Title III through group role
playing activities.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
21/35
Online Course Planning Grid
Resources and Materials Learner Interaction Assessment and Measurements
Objective(s) and/orCompetencies
Readings (Textbook& Supplemental)
AdditionalResources &
Materials
Learner Interactionw/ Peers &
Instructor
Learner Interactionw/ Content
(Activities & Short
Term Projects)
Long Term Projects(Broken into
Components)
Other Measures ofAssessment
(Quizzes, Tests, &
Exams)
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
22/35
How will I measure this objective?
1.
Using the washingtonpost.com Web site, the student willcorrectly identify and printout two examples each of a
news article and an editorial regarding a topical new
item.
2. Given twenty examples of incorrect verb tense usage,the student will identify and correct a minimum of
sixteen instances.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
23/35
Next Step
Assessment!
Thursday, April 15th
12:00 to 1:00 PM and 6:0
Assessment and Measurement - Do your assessments
measure your learning objectives? Are all your learning
objectives measured within the course? What are some
other options you might have for assessment within your
course?
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
24/35
Park University has a great resource:http://www.park.edu/cetl2/quicktips/writinglearningobj.html
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
25/35
Quality Matters Part 3:
Assessment and Measurement
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
26/35
Measurement The process by which the attributes or dimensions of some physical object
are determined. When we measure, we generally use some standard instrument to
determine how big, tall, heavy, voluminous, hot, cold, fast, or straightsomething actually is. Standard instruments refer to instruments such asrulers, scales, thermometers, pressure gauges, etc.
We measure to obtain information about what is. We are not assessing anything; we are simply collecting information relative
to some established rule or standard.
When used in a learning objective, the definition provided on theADPRIMA for the behavioral verb measure is: To apply a standard scale ormeasuring device to an object, series of objects, events, or conditions,according to practices accepted by those who are skilled in the use of thedevice or scale.
Information taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
27/35
Assessment A process by which information is obtained relative to some known
objective or goal. Assessment is a broad term that includes testing.
Assessment is most usefully connected to some goal or objectivefor which the assessment is designed. A test or assessment yieldsinformation relative to an objective or goal. In that sense, we test or
assess to determine whether or not an objective or goal has beenobtained.
Assessment of skill attainment is rather straightforward. Eitherthe skill exists at some acceptable level or it doesnt. Skills arereadily demonstrable.
Assessment of understanding is much more difficult and complex.
To stipulate the conditions by which the behavior specified in anobjective may be ascertained. Such stipulations are usually in theform of written descriptions.
Information taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
28/35
Evaluation Inherent in the idea of evaluation is "value." When we evaluate, what we are
doing is engaging in some process that is designed to provide informationthat will help us make a judgment about a given situation.
When we evaluate, we are saying that the process will yield informationregarding the worthiness, appropriateness, goodness, validity, legality, etc., ofsomething for which a reliable measurement or assessment has been made.
We evaluate every day. Teachers, in particular, are constantly evaluating
students, and such evaluations are usually done in the context ofcomparisons between what was intended (learning, progress, behavior) andwhat was obtained.
When used in a learning objective, the definition provided on theADPRIMA site for the behavioral verb evaluate is: To classify objects,situations, people, conditions, etc., according to defined criteria of quality.
Indication of quality must be given in the defined criteria of each classcategory. Evaluation differs from general classification only in this respectInformation taken from http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
29/35
Breakdown
Assessment refers to the collection of data to describe or
better understand an issue, measurement is the process
of quantifying assessment data and evaluation refers to
the comparison of data to a standard for the purpose of
judging worth or quality.
Collecting data (assessment), quantifying that data
(measurement), making judgments (evaluation)
From: Huitt, B; Hummel, J; $ Kaeck, D. (2001) Assessment, Measurement, Evaluation, &
Research. Educational Psychology Interactive.
http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessmenthttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/measure.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/evalu.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/evalu.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/measeval/measure.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assessment8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
30/35
So.
You, as the instructor, are choosing assessments
that measure the learning objectives. You are
then using those assessments to evaluate thelevel at which the student has met the learning
objective!
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
31/35
Key things to remember:
1. Its important to align the teaching method with the
assessment method.
2. Research encourages multiple measures of student
performance. This could include some
1. Transmission methods of learning, quizzes, tests,2. But should also include some authentic assessments
3. It is suggested grading rubrics be designed for all
assessment: discussions, assignments, projects, and
collaboration.4. Encourage students to develop skills in feedback and
collaboration through
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
32/35
Types of Assessment Learner Centered Assessments
Self-reflection Journaling
Discussions
Performance Assessments Wikis, socially constructed web pages,
Authentic Assessments Simulation activities Case studies
Group work/Collaboration
Portfolio Assessments Presentations
Demonstrations Essays
The key is all should include feedback! Wrong versus right answers anddirections. They are all learning tools also for the students, not justassessment tools for you!
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
33/35
When deciding on what kind of assessment activities to use, it is
helpful to keep in mind the following questions:
1. What will the students work on the activity (multiple choice
answers, essays, project, presentation, etc) tell me about their level
of competence on the targeted learning objectives?2. How will my assessment of their work help guide students
practice and improve the quality of their work?
3. How will the assessment outcomes for the class guide my teaching
practice?
From: Carnegie Mellon:
http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.html
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
34/35
The Whole Picture
The Goals for StudentSuccess:Solve Problems
Communicate Competently
Develop Life Skills
See Issues From Multiple Perspectives
Retrieve Information
Program Goals:
Course Goals:
CourseAssessments:
College-WideAssessments:CAAP, SSCCE,SSFSSE, MAPP and
computer testing
Graduate Surveys
Sample: presentations,
Research papers, reflective
Writing.
8/9/2019 QM Training PP Part 1 to 3
35/35
Resources
Adprima Website: http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm .
American Psychological Association. (2007). Understanding Assessment.
Authentic Assessment Toolbox.
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/ - helps with the creation
and delivery of authentic assessments.Carnegie Mellon. Enhancing Education.
http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.html.
Huitt, B; Hummel, J; $ Kaeck, D. (2001) Assessment, Measurement, Evaluation, &
Research. Educational Psychology Interactive.
http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html .
Palloff, R and Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the Online Learner: resources and
strategies for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htmhttp://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.htmlhttp://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.htmlhttp://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/assessments.htmlhttp://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/http://www.adprima.com/measurement.htm