Upload
zet-akkus
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
1/12
doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.02.011
Original Contribution
QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
USING 3D ULTRASOUND IMAGING
ANTHONY LANDRY,* J. DAVID SPENCE,* and AARON FENSTER**Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada; and Stroke Prevention and
Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
(Received 27 July 2004; revised 8 February 2005; in final form 17 February 2005)
AbstractAn accurate and reliable technique used to quantify carotid plaque volume has practical importancein research and patient management. In this study, we develop and investigate a theoretical description of carotidplaque volume measurements made using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) images and compare it withexperimental results. Multiple observers measured 48 3D US patient images of carotid plaque (13.2 to 544.0 mm 3)by manual planimetry. Coefficients of variation in the measurement of plaque volume were found to decreasewith increasing plaque size for both inter- (90.8 to 3.9%) and intraobserver (70.2 to 3.1%) measurements. Plaquevolume measurement variability was found to increase with interslice distance (ISD), while the relative mea-surement accuracy remained constant for ISDs between 1.0 and 3.0 mm and then decreased. Root-mean-square(RMS) difference between our theoretical description of plaque volume measurement variance and the experi-mental results was 5.7%. Thus, our results support the clinical utility of measuring carotid plaque volume bymanual planimetry noninvasively using 3D US. 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &Biology.
Key Words: 3D ultrasonography, Carotid disease, Plaque volume, Serial manual planimetry, Plaque progression.
INTRODUCTION
Measurement of carotid atherosclerosis burden and pro-
gression is an important tool for research and manage-
ment of patients at risk for stroke. Since many patients
receive nonsurgical treatment, investigations involving
quantification of plaque regression and progression are
expanding (Liapis et al. 2002; Norris et al. 1986;
Schminke et al. 2000; Serena 1999). Measurements of
plaque volume have the potential to be more sensitive to
change than measurements of plaque area (Spence et al.
2002), intima-media thickness (Ebrahim et al. 1999;
Markus et al. 1997; OLeary et al. 1997, Salonen et al.
1993) and carotid stenosis severity, because carotid
plaque progression is not limited to changes in one ortwo directions. Therefore, the quantification of plaque
volume may provide beneficial information to improve
stroke risk management.
Accurate and reproducible measurement techniques
are required to monitor carotid plaque changes. Recent
improvements in ultrasound (US) technology that hold
promise for plaque assessment are compound imaging(Jespersen et al. 1998), which improves the definition of
the plaque surface, and 3-D (3D) US techniques, which
improve visualization and quantification of pathology
(Cardinal 2000; Fenster et al. 2001). 3D US also has the
potential to allow quantitative monitoring of plaque vol-
ume changes, which can provide accurate and reliable
information about plaque response to therapy (Delcker et
al. 1995; Griewing et al. 1997; Hackam et al. 2000;
Liapis et al. 2002; Norris et al. 1986; Schminke et al.
2000; Serena 1999; Steinke 1989).
Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of
employing 3D US techniques to measure carotid plaquevolume in vivo and in vitro. Griewing et al. (1997)
measured carotid plaque volumes in a range spanning 53
to 685 mm3. The aggregate intra- and interobserver vari-
abilities in the measurement of plaque volume reported
by Griewing et al. (1997) were 4.16% and 5.87%, re-
spectively (r 0.96; r 0.89). In a series of papers,
Delcker et al. (1994a, 1994b, 1995, 1998) measured
carotid plaque volumes using 3D US and obtained sim-
ilar results for the aggregate intraobserver and interob-
server variabilities in the measurement of plaque volume.
Address correspondence to: Aaron Fenster, Ph.D., Imaging Re-search Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, P.O. Box 5015, 100Perth Drive, London, Ontario, N6A 5K8, Canada. E-mail:[email protected]
Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 751762, 2005Copyright 2005 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved0301-5629/05/$see front matter
751
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
2/12
Furthermore, Palombo et al. (1998) measured carotid
plaque volume ranging from 7 to 450 mm3 and obtained
reliability coefficients close to 1 in this in vivo intraob-
server and interobserver study.
In our previous work, we used 3D US to investigate
the accuracy and variability in the measurement of
plaque volume in vitro by manual planimetry (using testphantoms) as a function of plaque volume (volume
range: 68.2 mm3 to 285.5 mm3) and also developed a
theoretical description to predict plaque volume mea-
surement variability using the measurement technique
(Landry and Fenster 2002). The mean accuracy in plaque
volume measurement was 3.1% 0.9%. Variability in
plaque volume measurement was calculated to be 4.0%
1.0% and 5.1% 1.4% for intra- and interobserver
measurements, respectively. RMS difference between
experimentally and theoretically determined values of
plaque volume fractional variance was 9%.
More recently, we have reported on the observervariability in the measurement of carotid plaque volume
in 40 patients (volume range: 37.43 to 604.1 mm3) and
reported on the variability in the measurement of plaque
volume introduced from repeat 3D US scans (Landry et
al. 2004). Intraobserver and interobserver measurement
reliabilities were 94% and 93.2%, respectively. Plaque
volume measurement variability was found to decrease
with increasing plaque volume (range: 27.1% to 2.2%).
Repeat 3D US scan measurements were not different
from single scan measurements (p 0.867).
In addition to the measurement of plaque volume,
3D US studies have already been undertaken to monitor
the progression and regression of plaque. Hennerici et al.
(1991) performed prospective 3D US examinations of
four flat and 17 soft carotid plaques during an average of
17 months in seven patients with heterozygous hyper-
cholesterolemia during heparin-induced extracorpeal
low-density lipoprotein elimination on precipitation from
plasma. By means of a quantitative 3D US analysis,
Hennerici et al. (1991) measured significant plaque vol-
ume reduction in all 34 subjects, along with a marked
reduction of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
and fibrinogen serum levels. Furthermore, Schminke et
al. (2000) sought to establish an in vivo method for
visualizing structural changes in the carotid plaques in aprospective study involving 32 patients. After a mean of
18.9 months, carotid artery plaque progression had oc-
curred in 15% of carotid artery plaques, with plaque
volume increasing by 59% in these cases, while plaque
volume remained constant in 85% of cases.
Developments of more accurate and reliable meth-
ods to measure plaque volume may improve the capa-
bility of 3D US for use in serial monitoring of patient
response to therapy. In this paper, we extend our previ-
ous theoretical analysis of plaque volume measurement
variability using test phantoms (Landry and Fenster
2002) to an analysis of actual plaques in which the
choice of the interslice thickness contributes significantly
to the total measurement variance. Thus, here we de-
velop and investigate a more complete theoretical de-
scription of plaque volume measurement variability and
analyze the parameters that contribute to the total vari-ance. Using this theoretical description, we explore the
measurement of plaque volume in patients with plaque
volumes ranging from 13.2 to 544.0 mm3 in 48 patient
images acquired by 3D US. Specifically, we investigate
the contribution of observer-defined parameters (plaque
contour variance, initial and final slice location variance
and interslice distance) on the total plaque volume mea-
surement variance. A quantitative theoretical description
of plaque volume measurements is important to under-
stand the nature of the plaque volume measurement
technique. A mathematical analysis of the individual
factors (e.g., operator, image specific, measurement pro-tocol) and the relative contribution of each factor to the
overall measurement variability will provide information
related to the limitations of the technique and guide
improvements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Measurement variability of plaque volume
In this section, we derive an expression for the
coefficient of variation (CV) (standard deviation divided
by the mean) for plaque volume measurements made by
manual planimetry using 3D US images.
The volume of a sliced solid can be measured by
multiplying the interslice distance (ISD), a, by the aver-
age cross-sectional area of two sequential slices, k and k
1, where 0 k ka and ka is the total number of slices
in the measurement as constrained by the length of the
solid and the ISD selected. Thus, the incremental volume
of the solid for two sequential slices is given by:
Vka
2AkAk1. (1)
Therefore, the total volume of the sliced solid is
given by:
Va
2 k0
ka1
AkAk1. (2)
where Ak is the area of the kth slice. Assuming that the
measurement of areas in each cross-sectional slice of the
plaques are uncorrelated, the variance of the entire vol-
ume is the sum of the variances in each incremental
volume, such that:
752 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
3/12
V2
a2
4 k0
ka1
Ak2 Ak12 (3)
where where Ak is the standard deviation in the area of
the kth slice. Using eqn 18 from Appendix 1, we substi-
tute an expression for the standard deviation in the area
of each slice to obtain:
V2
a2Ac
4 k0
ka1
r,k2 Nb,k2
nk
r,k12 Nb,k12
nk1.(4)
where r,k is the standard deviation in determining the
plaque boundary, Ac is the area of a pixel, nk is thenumber of radial sectors of the kth slice and Nb,k is the
number of border pixels of the kth slice. In our previous
work (Landry and Fenster 2002), we have shown that the
number of radial sectors of the kth slice, nk, and the
standard deviation in determining the plaque boundary of
the kth slice, r,k, are independent of the slice being
investigated. Therefore, eqn 4 may be simplified to:
V2
a2r2Ac
4n k0
ka1
Nb,k2 Nb,k12 (5)
Equation 5 does not take into account the variancein the starting location of the initial slice. It assumes that,
for a repeated measurement of a given plaque volume,
the starting location will be the same. In practice, of
course, this is not the case. The variance in the volume
associated with the starting location of the initial slice,
Vinitial2 , is given by:
Vinitial2
Vz
2
z2Az
2z2. (6)
where Az is the area of the slices as a function of the axial
position along the vessel axis and Z2 is the variance in
the starting location of the initial slice. Therefore, the
variance of the entire plaque volume is given by eqn 7a,
a combination of variances associated with the starting
location (eqn 7b) and measurement of the body of the
plaque volume (eqn 7c):
V2Vinitial
2Vbody
2 (7a)
Vinitial2
Az2z
2 (7b)
Vbody2
a2r
2Ac
4n k0
ka1
Nb,k2 Nb,k12 (7c)
Thus, the coefficient of variance (CV), the standard
deviation divided by the mean, of the plaque volume is
given by:
V
V
Az2z2a2r2Ac4n k0
ka1
Nb,k2 Nb,k12V
(8)
Table 1 is a summary of the parameters in eqn 8. In
subsequent paragraphs of this section, we describe the
methods used to determine the values of these parame-
ters.
Effect of interslice distance
Selection of the ISD, a, will affect the measurement
variability and the plaque volume measured. Using eqn
8, we can determine the effect of ISD on measurement
variability. To investigate the effect of ISD on plaque
volume measurements made with different ISDs, a1 and
a2, we calculate their relative volumes:
Fig. 1. Schematic of longitudinal cross-section of an ideal-ized plaque geometry theoretically to determine the effects ofinterslice distance on plaque volume measurement accuracy
and variability.
Table 1. Parameter summary for eqn 8 used to describe thetheoretical coefficient of variance (CV) for plaque volumemeasurements by manual planimetry using 3D US images
Parameter symbol Description Units
Bodya Inter-slice distance (ISD) mm
Ac Pixel area mm2
r2 Contour boundary variance mm2
Nb(k) Number of border pixels of the kth
contour boundaryn/a
ka Number of boundary contours n/ank Number of radial sectors of the k
thslice
Initial slicez
2 Initial contour location variance mmA(z) Initial contour area mm2
Carotid plaque volume by 3D US A. LANDRY et al. 753
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
4/12
Va1
Va2
a1k0
ka1
AkAk11
a2k0
ka1
AkAk12
(9)
The relationship between the ISD, a and the mean
number of slices measured for multiple plaque volume
measurements, ka, has been calculated in Appendix 2
using Figure 1.
Subject data
The 3D US carotid plaque images used in the study
were obtained from patients referred to the Premature
Atherosclerosis Clinic and the Stroke Prevention Clinic
at the University Campus of the London Health Sciences
Center, London, Ontario, Canada. Five 3D US scans
were performed of both the left and right carotid arteriesfor each of 48 patients (26 male, 22 female, age 75.2
7.1). Patients were referred to either clinic because of
vascular disease not explained by usual risk factors (e.g.,
age, obesity), a strong family history of vascular disease,
a stroke or transient ischemic attack, or because of
asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
Image acquisition, reconstruction and display
A computer-controlled mechanical 3D US scanning
system was employed for data acquisition (Life Imaging
Systems Inc., London, Ontario, Canada) (Cardinal 2000;
Fenster et al. 2001). To produce 3D US images, the
ultrasound transducer (L12-5, 50 mm, Philips, Bothell,
WA, USA) was translated by the computer-controlled
motor driven mechanism along the neck of a patient for
13 s over an approximate distance of 4.0 cm. While the
transducer was translated, sequential 2D images were
acquired from the US machine (ATL HDI 5000, Philips,
Bothell, WA, USA) with a spatial interval 0.25 mm and
constant transducer angle ( 20). The 3D US images
were immediately reconstructed into a Cartesian data
cube and displayed to verify image quality (Fenster et al.
2001). Figure 2 shows 3D US carotid plaque images
typical of those used in the study.
Plaque selection
The four to five 3D US images obtained from each of
the 48 patients were reviewed and the best 3D US image for
each patient was selected for analysis, providing a total of
48 3D US images. The selection was based on the presence
of image artifacts, shadowing, contrast etc., but no patients
were excluded. Plaques were identified based on visible
changes in vessel surface morphology where the local
thickening of the intimal layer exceeded 1.0 mm (Landry
2004). Plaque geometry, composition, distribution and ar-
terial location (left or right carotid) were not factors con-
sidered for inclusion in this study.
Determination of plaque volume
To determine plaque volume, the 3D US images of
plaque were measured by manual planimetry, a method
Fig. 2. 3D US carotid plaque images. 3D US images are viewedusing a multiplanar reformatting approach. (a) Has been slicedto reveal the plaque in a transverse view; (b) In a longitudinalview; (c) In a coronal view.
754 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
5/12
that has been investigated in vitro (Landry and Fenster
2002) and in vivo (Delcker et al. 1994a, 199b; Landry et
al. 2004). Each 3D image was sliced transverse to the
vessel axis, from one edge of the plaque to the other,
using a predetermined ISD. In each cross-sectional im-
age, the plaques contour was traced using a mouse-
driven cross-haired cursor using software developed inour laboratory. As contours were manually outlined, the
visualization software calculated contour area automati-
cally. To calculate the incremental volume, sequential
contour areas were averaged and multiplied by the ISD
(eqn 1). Summation of incremental volumes provided a
measure of carotid plaque volume (eqn 2). After mea-
suring a complete plaque volume, observers viewed the
3D US image in multiple orientations to verify that the
set of measured plaque boundaries matched the entire
plaque volume. Otherwise, the measurement process was
repeated. For a typical plaque having seven to 30 slices,
the entire measurement process required 5 to 8 min.Figure 3 is a sequence of 3D US images that shows the
process of volume determination by manual planimetry.
Measurement protocol
To quantify observer variability in the measurement
of plaque volume, five observers were trained to identify
carotid plaque and to measure plaque volume using 3D
US images. After the observers had been trained, two
studies were performed (Table 2). In the first study, five
observers measured the volume of 48 plaques (range:
13.2 mm3 to 544.0 mm3) five times each in four sessions
using an ISD of 1.0 mm (multiple observer study). We
used an ISD of 1.0 mm for plaque measurement, since
we have shown in our previous work (Landry and Fen-
ster 2002), that the identification of plaque features in the
scanning direction (direction of measurement) had an
associated variability of approximately 1.0 mm. In the
second study, a single observer measured the volume of
five plaques five times each using nine ISDs ranging
from 1.0 to 5.0 mm in 0.5 mm increments (single ob-
server study). The range of plaque volumes measured in
the single observer study (range: 42.2 mm3 to 544.0
mm3) was chosen to span the entire range of volumes
investigated in the multiple observer study for compari-
son. For both studies, the measurement sessions wereconducted under the same conditions, with sessions
scheduled two weeks apart to avoid bias.
Plaque contour variance, r2
To determine the variance in the detection of the
plaque boundary contour of a cross-sectional slice, r2,
we followed a procedure described by Mao et al. (2000)
and Ladak et al. (2000) (Fig. 4). The manually-outlined
contours for each plaque cross-section were superim-
posed and divided into 360 sections, using the center of
gravity of the first contour as the center of the radial
lines. For each of the 360 angles, we measured the
distance to each contour from the center and then calcu-
lated the local variance of the contours in the radial
direction. The mean contour variance was calculated by
averaging the 360 local variances. The contour variances
for each slice of a particular plaque were averaged to
determine the mean variance for the plaque. Both inter-
Fig. 3. 3D US carotid plaque images showing the process ofvolume determination by manual planimtery. (a) 3D US imageof carotid plaque; (b) Manual outlining of a plaques cross-
sectional area; (c) Successive plaque contours shown in alongitudinal view.
Carotid plaque volume by 3D US A. LANDRY et al. 755
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
6/12
observer and intraobserver mean plaque contour vari-
ances were determined for each plaque in this manner.
Initial and final slice variance, z2
Five observers viewed each of the 48 plaques in
multiple orientations and then measured the initial and
final slice locations. Since the final slice location is
dependent on the ISD, each observer recorded both the
location where they observed the plaque end and the final
slice location as constrained by the ISD selected. Both
the initial and final slice location variances were deter-
mined using the interobserver and intraobserver meanmeasurements for each plaque.
Number of radial sectors, nkThe number of radial sectors, nk, for a contour area
of a measured plaque was determined using the number
of manually-placed points of the particular contour. The
mean number of radial sectors for a particular plaque was
obtained by averaging the number of radial sectors for
each contour.
Number of border pixels, Nb,kThe mean number of border pixels, Nb,k, f o r a
contour area of a measured plaque was determined bymeasuring the perimeter of each plaque slice contour and
dividing by the width of a pixel. The mean number of
border pixels for a particular plaque was obtained by
averaging the number of border pixels for each contour.
Interslice distance, a
We determined the mean offset location, x, (final
slice location mean relative to the final slice location
mean for identification of the plaque edge without the
constraint of an ISD) and the standard deviation in the
location of the final slice, , for each ISD used to
measure plaque volume in the single observer study. Wethen compared our experimental results with a theoreti-
cal description of plaque volume measurement CV (eqn
8) and relative measurement accuracy (eqn 9) by calcu-
lating the RMS difference between theoretical and ex-
perimental results.
RESULTS
Plaque contour variance, r2
Figure 5 shows the standard deviation in the detec-
tion of the plaque boundary, r, as a function of plaque
volume. r ranged from 0.16 to 0.44 mm (mean 0.27
mm) and 0.19 to 0.31 mm (mean 0.25 mm) for
interobserver and intraobserver measurements of plaque
volume, respectively. Linear regression analysis shows
that, regardless of the plaque volume measured, the stan-
dard deviation in the detection of the plaque boundary is
scattered equally about the mean for both interobserver
(r 0.27 mm; r 0.20) and intraobserver (r 0.25
mm; r 0.01) measurements. Therefore, we used the
mean standard deviation in the detection of the plaque
boundary of all 48 plaques measured in our calculations
to determine the theoretical CV.
Fig. 4. Determination of plaque contour variance, r2. (a) Five
contours of a plaque measured in the multiple observer study;(b) Five contours of a plaque measured in the single observerstudy.
Table 2. Summary of the two plaque volume measurement protocols
Plaque volume study Volume range (mm3) Plaques Observers Measurements plaque Interslice distance (mm) Measurements
Multiple observer study 13.2544.0 40 5 5 1.0 1000
Single observer study 42.2544.0 5 1 5/ISD1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, . . . ,
5.0 225
756 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
7/12
Initial and final slice location variance, z2
Figure 6 shows the frequency distributions of the
initial (Fig 6a) and final (Fig. 6b) slice locations about
the mean of all 48 plaque volumes measured in the
multiple observer study. The resulting frequency distri-
butions resemble a Gaussian curve. The standard devia-
tion in the detection of the initial slice location, z,i,
ranged from 0.98 to 1.41 mm (mean 1.24 mm) and
0.88 to 1.29 mm (mean 1.18 mm) for interobserver
and intraobserver measurements of plaque volume, re-
spectively. The standard deviation in the detection of the
final slice location when the observer was not con-
strained by an ISD, z,f, ranged from 0.96 to 1.46 mm
(mean 1.27 mm) and 0.95 to 1.36 mm (mean 1.23
mm) for interobserver and intraobserver measurements
of plaque volume, respectively. Figure 7 shows the stan-
dard deviation in the detection of the initial slice location
as a function of plaque volume. Linear regression anal-
ysis shows that, regardless of the plaque volume mea-
sured, the standard deviation in the location of the initial
slice is scattered equally about the mean for both inter-
observer (z,i 1.22 mm; r 0.55) and intraobserver
(z,i 1.19 mm; r 0.42) measurements. Therefore, we
used the mean standard deviation in the location of the
initial slice of all 48 plaques measured in our calculations
to determine the theoretical CV.
Plaque volume measurement variability
The theoretical CVs (eqn 8) were determined usingthe measurement parameters determined for each plaque
and the global parameter means (e.g., interobserver, r
0.27 mm, z,i 1.24 mm) were used for parameters that
were determined to be plaque-independent.
Figure 8 shows the experimental and theoretical
CVs as a function of plaque volume for the 48 plaques
measured in the multiple observer study for both inter-
observer (Fig. 8a) and intraobserver (Fig. 8b) measure-
ments of plaque volume. For both interobserver and
intraobserver measurements of plaque volume, CV de-
Fig. 5. Standard deviation in the detection of the plaque bound-ary contours, r, as a function of plaque volume for interob-server (diamond) and intraobserver (triangle) measurements ofplaque volume. r does not correlate with plaque volume forinterobserver (r 0.16) or intraobserver (r 0.21)
measurements.
0
10
20
30
40
50
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Distance From Mean (mm)
Frequency
Intra-Observer
Inter-Observer
a)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Distance From Mean (mm)
Frequen
cy
Intra-Observer
Inter-Observer
b)
Fig. 6. Frequency distributions of: (a) Initial slice locations; and(b) Final slice locations about the mean for measurements made
when the observer is not constrained by the ISD.
Fig. 7. Standard deviation in the detection of the initial slicelocation, z, as a function of plaque volume for interobserver(diamond) and intraobserver (triangle) measurements of plaquevolume. z does not correlate with mean plaque volume forinterobserver (r 0.63) or intraobserver (r 0.56)
measurements.
Carotid plaque volume by 3D US A. LANDRY et al. 757
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
8/12
creases with increasing plaque size, with the interob-
server results decreasing less than the intraobserver CV
values. Figure 8a shows the interobserver CVs as a
function of mean plaque volume (diamond). The exper-
imental values for the interobserver CVs range from 90.8
to 3.9% for plaque volumes of 13.2 to 544.0 mm3,
respectively. Figure 8a also shows the theoretically-de-
termined interobserver CV (eqn 8) as a function of
plaque volume (solid line). Root-mean-square (RMS)
difference between experimental and theoretical results
was 4.2%. Similarly, Fig. 8b shows the intraobserver CVas a function of mean plaque volume (diamond). The
experimental values for the interobserver CVs range
from 70.2 to 3.1% for plaque volumes of 13.2 to 544.0
mm3, respectively. RMS difference between experimen-
tal and theoretical results was 5.7%.
Figure 9 shows the relative contribution of the vari-
ance in the detection of the plaque body (diamond) (eqn
7c) and the variance in the detection of the initial slice
location (triangle) (eqn 7b) to the CV in the measurement
of plaque volume (eqn 8). The relative contribution to the
total variance from the detection of the plaque body
ranges from 0.4 to 27.0%. Therefore, the relative contri-
bution to the total variance from the initial slice location
ranges from 99.6 to 73.1%. The variance in the detection
of the initial slice location dominates the total variance in
the measurement of plaque volume, for all of the plaques
investigated.
Effect of interslice distance
Table 3 shows the standard deviation and the meanoffset in the final slice location for the range of ISDs used
to measure plaque volume in the single observer study.
The standard deviation in the final slice location ranged
from 0.9 to 2.6 mm for ISDs of 1.0 to 5.0 mm, respec-
tively. Mean measurement offset values, x (eqn 10),
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500
Volume (mm3)
CV(%)
a)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500
Volume (mm3)
CV(%
)
b)
Fig. 8. Interobserver experimental (diamond) and theoretical(solid line) coefficients of variance (CV) in the measurement ofplaque volume as a function of mean plaque volume. The error
bars represent one standard deviation.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 100 200 300 400 500
Volume (mm3)
RelativeContribution
toTotalMeasurement
Var
iance
Fig. 9. The contribution of the variance in the initial slicelocation and the variance in the plaque boundary relative to thetotal plaque volume measurement variance. The variance in themeasurement of plaque volume is dominated by the initial slice
location variance.
Table 3. Standard deviation, z, and mean offset, x, of thefinal contour location for the five plaques measured in the
single observer study using interslice distances (ISD) of 1.0to 5.0 mm. The offset, x, is the position of the mean final
slice location for an ISD relative to the mean final slice
location determine without the constraint of an ISD
a(mm)
z(mm)
x(mm)
1.0 0.9 0.11.5 1.3 0.12.0 1.3 0.22.5 1.3 0.13.0 1.5 0.33.5 1.6 2.14.0 1.6 2.24.5 1.9 3.55.0 2.6 5.1
758 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
9/12
ranged from 0.02 to 5.1 mm for ISDs of 1.0 to 5.0 mm,
respectively (positive offset values indicate a measure-
ment position greater than the mean; negative offset
values indicate a measurement position less than the
mean).
Figure 10 shows the mean plaque volume (relative
to the mean value for ISD
1.0 mm from the multipleobserver study) (diamond) and the CV (square) as a
function of ISD for the plaque volumes investigated in
the single observer study. The relative mean plaque
volume ranges from 0.99 to 0.83 for ISDs from 1.0 mm
to 5.0 mm, respectively. Relative mean plaque volume
was approximately constant up to an ISD of 3.0 mm and
then reduced to 0.83 for an ISD of 5.0 mm. CV increased
with increasing plaque volume and ranged from 9.2 to
13.5% for ISDs of 1.0 to 5.0 mm, respectively. Figure 10
also shows the theoretical values for the CV (dotted line)
and the relative mean plaque volume (solid line), as
determined using eqn 8 and eqn 9 respectively. RMSdifference between experimental and theoretical mea-
surements of CV was 5.7%.
DISCUSSION
The large range of plaque volumes measured in this
study allows a comparison of our results with literature
data. In a series of papers, Delcker et al. (1994a, 1994b,
1995, 1999) measured carotid plaque volume in the 2 to
200 mm3 range. (Palombo et al. (1998) measured carotid
plaque volumes ranging from 7 to 450 mm3. Our study
differs from these previous studies, that use 3D US to
measure plaque volume, in that their papers report on the
mean variability over the entire range investigated, while
we have explored the variability in the measurement of
plaque volume as a function of plaque volume. Figure 8
shows that, as the volume of plaque increases, the CV in
the measurement of plaque volume decreases. Thus,
analysis of plaque volume measurement variability and
comparisons between studies should consider the plaque
volume being measured. Furthermore, we have devel-
oped a theoretical description of plaque volume measure-
ment variability to compare with our experimental re-
sults. This analysis allowed us to investigate areas of
improvement in the technique.The relationship between the CV in the measure-
ment of plaque volume as a function of plaque volume
has particular importance in the monitoring of disease
progression or regression. From Figure 8, we can deter-
mine the minimum percentage change in plaque volume
that must be observed to conclude with statistical confi-
dence (95%) that a plaque has undergone volumetric
change. For example, a plaque measured to have a vol-
ume of 200 mm3 in an initial measurement must undergo
a minimum volumetric change of approximately 28%
V
z2 SEM; z
1.96,
0.05, SEM
stan-dard error in measurement) to conclude in a follow-up
measurement, made by the same observer, that the
plaque has actually changed volume and that differences
in the measured volume are not a result of observer
variability.
Figure 9 shows that the variance in the total plaque
volume measurement is dominated by the variance in the
initial slice location. Therefore, methods to improve the
measurement technique should focus on reducing the
variance associated with the identification of the plaque
edges (i.e., the initial and final slice location). Strategies
to improve initial slice location variance might involve
viewing the plaque along the vessel axis (longitudinal),
isolating the initial and final slices of the plaque without
an ISD constraint and then subdividing the plaque length
into equal segments. Another strategy might involve
measuring the plaque volume contained within a speci-
fied distance from the bifurcation.
The mean plaque contour variance, r2, is depen-
dent on a number of factors. Foremost, r2 will vary
depending on the image quality of the reconstructed 3D
US images. Image artifacts such as dropouts and shad-
owing, which are present due to attenuation, increase the
variability in the measurement of plaque contours and
may obstruct the view of the plaque altogether. Addi-tionally, the geometry, echogenicity and abnormalities of
each plaque will influence the variability in the detection
of the plaque contour. We have determined that, for the
plaques investigated in this study, the plaque contour
variability was not dependent on plaque volume. This
result is consistent with our previous work (Landry and
Fenster, 2002), in which we determined the mean stan-
dard deviation in the slice boundary detection to be 0.15
mm for plaque phantoms of a similar range in volume.
Therefore, in our theoretical analysis, we assumed that
Fig. 10. Relative mean plaque volume as a function of ISD forthe five plaques measured in the single observer study. Exper-imental (diamond) and theoretical (solid line) plaque volumemeasurement coefficients of variance (CV) as a function of
ISD.
Carotid plaque volume by 3D US A. LANDRY et al. 759
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
10/12
the plaque contour variability is a global measurement
parameter, since individual plaque contour variability did
not vary from plaque to plaque.
Image quality, the resolution of the 3D image in the
3D scanning direction, the distribution of plaque within
the vessel and our definition of plaque (intimal thicken-
ing 1.0 mm) are all factors that will contribute to theinitial and final slice location variance, z
2. Without the
constraint of an ISD, initial and final slice locations yield
comparable standard deviations. Furthermore, we have
determined that the variance in the initial and final slice
locations is not dependent on plaque volume. Therefore,
in our theoretical analysis, we assumed that the plaque
initial slice location variability is a global measurement
parameter, since individual initial slice location variabil-
ity did not vary from plaque to plaque.
The final slice location variance is subject to con-
straint depending on the ISD chosen for the plaque
volume measurement and the length of the plaque inves-tigated. Figure 10 shows that the relative mean volume
remains relatively constant up to 3.0 mm and then re-
duces to 0.83 for an ISD of 5.0 mm. Figure 10 also shows
that, regardless of the ISD used, the variability of the
final slice location increases with ISD. The decrease in
the relative plaque volume measured can be explained by
Table 3, which shows that the mean offset remains close
to 0 for ISDs less than 3.0 mm and then increases for
ISDs greater than 3.0 mm. Thus, our measurement tech-
nique systematically underestimates plaque volume for
ISDs greater than 3.0 mm, since the final edge of the
plaque is not included as an additional incrementalplaque volume.
Regardless of the plaque volume investigated, de-
creasing the ISD would have the effect of decreasing the
measurement variability. Decreasing the ISD, however,
would result in a more tedious and time-consuming mea-
surement process. Furthermore, the standard deviation in
the detection of the initial slice was approximately 1.0
mm for both interobserver and intraobserver measure-
ments of plaque volume. Thus, the inability of the ob-
servers to distinguish plaque features less than 1.0 mm in
the 3D scanning direction promotes the use of an ISD
equal to the inherent observer variability in the directionof measurement. The measurement process could be
simplified, however, by implementing algorithms for au-
tomated or semiautomated segmentation of plaque vol-
ume (Zahalka and Fenster, 2001).
In our previous in vitro work, we have shown that
repeat 3D US acquisitions do not increase the variability
in the measurement of plaque volume for scans of equal
image quality (Landry et al. 2004). While every effort
was made to select the best 3D US images from each
patient, patient respiration, swallowing and cardiac mo-
tion during image acquisition did reduce the quality
some of the images available for analysis.
Every effort was made to maintain a consistent
measurement protocol among observers. However, there
may have been variability introduced by the identifica-
tion of the plaque itself. We defined plaque as a measur-
able change in the vessel surface morphology where theintimal thickening exceeds 1.0 mm. This definition
proved to be useful but did not overcome all of the
plaque identification problems encountered. In some
cases, it was difficult to determine the extent of the
plaque in the vessel wall. Plaque identification at the
carotid bifurcation and in areas of poor image resolution
or in shadow also created some difficulty in plaque
identification. While the observers in this study were
trained to follow the same measurement techniques, dif-
ferences in plaque outlining strategies were still ob-
served.
SUMMARY
Multiple observers measured 48 3D US patient im-
ages of carotid plaque (13.2 to 544.0 mm3) by manual
planimetry. Coefficients of variation in the measurement
of plaque volume were found to decrease with increasing
plaque size for both inter- (90.8 to 3.9%) and intraob-
server (70.2 to 3.1%) measurements. Plaque volume
measurement variability was found to increase with in-
terslice distance, while the relative measurement accu-
racy remained constant for interslice distances between
1.0 and 3.0 mm and then decreased. We have developeda theoretical description of plaque volume measurements
that describes manual planimetric measurement of ca-
rotid plaque volume. Correlation with significant mea-
surement parameters suggests that the measurement
technique is a viable tool to measure carotid plaque
volume noninvasively using 3D US.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank Craig Ainsworth andChris Blake for their work on the technical aspects of this project. Thiswork has been supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Re-search, The Ontario R&D Challenge Fund and The Natural Sciencesand Engineering Research Council of Canada. The third author holds aCanada Research Chair and acknowledges The Canada Research Chair
Program.
REFERENCES
Cardinal HN, Gill JD, Fenster A. Analysis of geometrical distortion andstatistical variance in length, area and volume in a linearly scanned3D ultrasound image. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19:63251.
Delcker A, Diener HC. 3D Ultrasound Measurement of AtheroscleroticPlaque Volume in Carotid Arteries. Bildebung 1994;61(2):116121.
Delcker A, Diener HC. Quantification of atherosclerotic plaque incarotid arteries by three-dimensional ultrasound. Br. J. Radiol. 199467(799):672678.
760 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
11/12
8/7/2019 QUANTIFICATION OF CAROTID PLAQUE VOLUME MEASUREMENTS
12/12
APPENDIX 2
To determine the relationship between the ISD, a, and the aver-age length of the plaque measured, za, for multiple plaque measure-ments we consider the variability in the detection of the plaque end.Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the longitudinal cross-section ofplaque having idealized geometry. In our previous work (Landry andFenster 2002) and also in the current paper (Fig. 6), we have shown thatthe frequency distribution of the final slice location, P(z), about themean final slice location, zf, for identification of the plaque end withoutthe constraint of an ISD resembled a Gaussian distribution. Therefore,we assume that the probability that an observer will make a measure-ment beyond a slice location, z, that will turn out to be the last orsecond last slice follows the probability distribution given by (assketched in Fig. 1):
P(z)1
2e(zzf)2
22;zfzezzfze
0 ;zfzez
(20)
where is the standard deviation about the mean slice location, zf, foridentification of the plaque end without the constraint of an ISD and z
is a position such that when P(z) threshold, the observer will decide
that no plaque is seen in the image. For simplicity, we assume that this
threshold 0.05. Thus, for repeated measurements, the slice that is thefinal slice or the next to final slice is given by z
zf 1.65 (i.e.,
P(z) 0.05). From position z, there are two possibilities for the
location of the final slice position. If z a zf z (beyond theplaque end), the probability that an observer will identify plaque at alocation z a, P(z a) is zero. Therefore, the location of the finalslice measurement is za z. If zf z z a zf z (within theplaque end), the probability that an observer will identify plaque at a
location z
a, P(z
a), is given by eqn 20. Thus, the mean locationof the final slice measurement, za, for a given ISD, a, is approximatedby the sum of probability that final slice location is at z and theprobability that the final slice location is at z a:
zaz1 P(z a) z aP(z a) (21a)
zaz aP(za). (21b)
The relationship between the ISD, a and the mean number ofslices used for multiple measurements of the same plaque, ka (see eqn1) is then given by the largest integer less than za/a.
ka int(zaa) int(za)Pzaz
(1Pza)
a . (22)
762 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 31, Number 6, 2005