Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
European Digestive Cancer Days, Prague - 26. September 2017
Quantitative immunochemical tests: evidence on
accuracy and implementation considerations in the Czech
MUDr. Petr Kocna, CSc.
2
QUANTITATIVE FIT FOR CRC SCREENING
Quantitative FIT are replacing traditional guaiac FOBT in
population screening programs for many reasons.
Quantitative FIT achieves 90% sensitivity for CRC detection and
is therefore at least 3 times more sensitive than guaiac test
Quantitative FIT needs to be optimised for population screening
with professional, epidemiological and economic aspects
Quantitative FIT offer much more than just FOBT+/FOBT-
results, and FIT cut-off could significantly modify the
screening programs
Quantitative FIT are developed over 20 years, and over the past
20 years there are 5189 publications in MEDLINE (09/2017)
3
Shahidi N. Gentile L. Gondaraet L. al.: Can.J.Gastro.Hepatol. 2016
Correlating Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Results with Neoplastic Findings
on Colonoscopy in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 - 15 15 - 20 20 - 40 40 - 100 > 100
adenoma low-risk
CRC - cancer
mg/g
Quantitative one FIT test (NS-Plus, Alfresa) with cut-off ≥ 10 μg/g
20 322 FIT positive subjects underwent colonoscopy.
Cut-off ≥ 10 μg/g with all adenoma detection exceeds national
recommendations and endoscopic sources need to be considered.
adenoma high-risk
Can.J.Gastro.Hepatol. - 06/2016
Pro
babili
ty
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 140 160
HEALTHY SUBJECTS
COLORECTAL
CANCER
4
ADENOMA
LOW-RISK
ADENOMA
HIGH-RISK
FIT ANALYSIS, FAECAL Hb CONCENTRATION, CUT-OFF
mg/g
cut-off FIT cut-off gFOBT
FIT 100 ng/ml
(20 mg/g)
FIT 50 ng/ml
(10 mg/g)
FIT 200 ng/ml
(40 mg/g)
Adenoma detection
approx. 30 %
CRC detection - 4,7
gFOBT positivity 3 - 5 %
CRC detection - 3,1
FIT positivity 8 - 11 %
Adenoma detection
approx. 50 %
CRC detection - 6,7
Effort to increase
Sensitivity and
Higher financial
efficiency
High
false positivity
Decrease
number
of colonoscopies
5
Standardization of FIT analysis
Transferability of FIT analysis results
External quality control of FIT analysis
Accuracy and reliability of Hb analysis in stool
SETTING THE CUT-OFF VALUE FIT TEST - FIT OPTIMISATION
Determine sensitivity - rate of detected neoplasma /CRC
Determine specificity - the numbers of 'unnecessary' colonoscopies
Decide required capacity of GE centers and screening costs
6
Fraser CG, Allison JE, Halloran SP, Young GP, Expert Working Group on Fecal
Immunochemical Tests for Hemoglobin, Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee
WEO. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:810–14. A proposal to standardize reporting
units for fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin.
J Natl Cancer Inst - 04/2012
7
Faecal immunochemical tests for Hb are replacing traditional guaiac faecal
occult blood tests in population screening programs for many reasons.
Many available faecal immunochemical test devices use a range of sampling
methods, differ with sampling methods, buffer volume and characteristics,
Hb stability and results are expressed by different way.
The current lack of consistency in units for Hb concentration is particularly
problematic because apparently similar Hb concentrations obtained with
different devices can lead to very different clinical interpretations.
Consistent adoption of an internationally accepted method for reporting results
would facilitate comparisons of outcomes from these tests. We propose a
simple strategy for reporting faecal Hb concentration
WEO
Expert Working Group (EWG)
Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee
(CRC SC)
IFCC
Scientific Division Working Group
Fecal Immunochemical Testing (WG-FIT)
First WG-FIT Meeting
Euromedlab Athens 14. June 2017
To harmonise and/or standardise analysis of haemoglobin
in faecal samples by immunochemistry (FIT)8
9
J Lab Med Qual Assur - 10/2016
Chang-Ho Jeon and A-Jin Lee, J Lab Med Qual Assur 2016;38:120-128
Annual Report on the External Quality Assessment Scheme for
Urinalysis and Faecal Occult Blood Testing in Korea (2015)
External quality control in Korea - in 2015
EQA analysis was conducted 3x during the year - 1,250 participants
Qualitative tests - 569 participants (71%) - 9 different methods
Qualitative tests provide false-positive results
The success of the qualitative samples for negative sample was only 11%
Quantitative FIT test - 235 participants (29%) - 7 different analyzers
Totally different results depending on the technique used - in ng/ml
FIT REALIZED BY GENERAL PRACTITIONER IN CZECH - 2014
Král N., Seifert B., Korcová M.: Variability tests for occult blood used by general
practitioners in screening for colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic.
Gastroent Hepatol 2015 69(3): 255–258
g-FOBT 3%Laboratory FIT 7.5%
POCT FIT 23.5%
Qualitative FIT 66% - 13 different methods - rapid tests
QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR PRACTITIONERS
n = 522
10
11
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
ng/ml J Lab Med Qual Assur - 10/2016
Chang-Ho Jeon and A-Jin Lee, J Lab Med Qual Assur 2016;38:120-128
Annual Report on the External Quality Assessment Scheme for
Urinalysis and Faecal Occult Blood Testing in Korea (2015)
EQA Korea 2015
235 participants (29%)
7 different analyzers
Results in ng/ml
POSITIVE
SAMPLE
NEGATIVE
SAMPLE
cut-off
Eiken Eiken Eiken Alfresa Alfresa Kyowa Kyowa
Micro Diana Io NS-1000 NS-C HM-Jack HM-Jack Arc
Hb QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS - FIT in CZECH REPUBLIC
External quality assessment Hb determination in the stool
started in January 2012, as a part of the national EQA
EQA programme provided by SEKK member of EQALM
accredited ISO/IEC 17043:2010
90 users in the Czech Republic
EQA in Czech Republic - 2 liquid samples, twice per year12
Data from cycle FOB 2016-01mg/g
FOB Gold analysis
sample A - 50 mg/g
sample B - 140 mg/g
OC-Sensor analysis
sample A - 30 mg/g
sample B - 80 mg/g
1,6x higher
April 2016 Eiken OC-Sensor
Sentinel FOBGold
CV - 8.10 %
CV - 8.85 %
Kocna P., Zima T., Budina M., Ichiyanagi T.: External Quality Assessment (EQA)
for Quantitative Fecal Blood in Stool (FIT). Biochimica Clinica, 2013, 37, 42313
FIT EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN CZECH REPUBLIC
Toes-Zoutendijk E, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E et all. : Real-Time Monitoring of Results
During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization
by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels.
Gastroenterology 2017;152:767–775
Gastroenterology - 03/2017
14
Screening with cut-off 15 mg/g
according to OC-Sensor - Eiken study
Predicted positivity - 6.3 %
Screening done with the test
FOB Gold - Sentinel
FIT test positivity - 12.2 %
Cut-off has been modified to 47 mg/g
to effort positivity 6.3 %
Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: comparison of Czech regions
15
Test positivity
FIT positivity in individual districts
could be significantly affected by the FIT method used
KT: 5,2
JH: 8,7
ZR: 8,8
KV: 5,9
ZN: 6,8
BR: 8,2
PB: 7,5
CB: 6,8
CK: 4,0
TR: 8,6PT: 9,2
OL: 6,4
JI: 6,8
TA: 6,1
TC: 9,2
SY: 6,9
PS: 6,8
SU: 5,9
BN: 11,6
PE: 6,8PI: 6,5
HB: 6,0
FM: 7,5
UO: 8,2
BV: 7,2
LT: 7,1
CL: 9,5
TU: 9,8
VS: 6,2
LN: 8,5
PJ: 6,3OP: 6,5
ZL: 5,1
ST: 8,6
HO: 6,4
MB: 6,6
CR: 6,7
RK: 8,0
UH: 6,7
NJ: 6,3
BK: 6,2
DO: 13,3
CV: 5,2
KH: 9,3
JC: 6,8
RA: 8,6
PA: 5,9
PR: 6,5
HK: 8,0NB: 6,0
KO: 7,6
JE: 4,9
SM: 6,9
BE: 8,6
BO: 6,9
LI: 6,1
CH: 7,7
VY: 8,5
DC: 7,0
NA: 7,8
PV: 6,9
KM: 6,6
SO: 4,6
KD: 6,5
ME: 7,8
PZ: 7,6
PH: 8,9
AX: 9,2
RO: 11,4
TP: 5,5MO: 6,4 JN: 9,7
UL: 7,0
KA: 4,6
BM: 7,6
OT: 5,9
PM: 7,2> 9,5
8,0-9,5
6,5-8,0
5,0-6,5
< 5,0< 5,05,0 – 6,56,5 – 8,08,0 – 9,5> 9,5
Total positivity (2016) : - 7.2 %Range between districts : 4,0 - 13,3 %
Májek O., Suchánek Š. Quality-assured immunochemical testing –
proposal for a pilot project in the Czech Republic
European Digestive Cancer Days, Prague - 26. September 2017
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
Efforts to change qualitative FIT to quantitative FIT
Efforts to change units from ng/ml to mg/g of stool
Standardization of FIT methods according to IFCC committee
Essential requirement for FIT external quality control
Personalized approach to FIT analysis of Hb in faeces
Screening programs modifications using FIT values
16