Upload
ledang
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quarkonium measurements via the di-muon decay channel in p+p and Au+Au collisions
with the STAR experiment
Takahito Todoroki (BNL) for the STAR Collaboration
Strangeness in Quark Matter 2016
From June 27th to July 1st 2016 UC Berkeley
6/28/16 1 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10pt (GeV)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
RA
A
primordial w/fte+Bfdregenerationtotalprimordialprimordial w/fteNuc. Abs.Nuc. Abs. w/fte
0-20%
Au-Au (200 A GeV)|y|<0.35
Probe QGP with J/ψ
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 2
• Various production mechanisms – Prompt: direct production; decay of ψ(2S) and χc (40%) – Non-prompt: B-meson decay (up to 20% at high pT)
• Different effects in play – Hot nuclear matter effects
• Dissociation • Regeneration • Medium-induced energy loss
– Cold nuclear matter effects
HOWEVER
Phys. Rev. C 82, 064905, (Modified)
• Color-screening : J/ψ dissociates in the medium
T. Matsui and H. Satz PLB 178 (1986) 416
ϒ : A cleaner but rarer probe
• Much smaller effects from co-mover absorption and regeneration → ( σcc ~ 800µb, σbb ~ 2µb )
• Sequential melting of different ϒ states • Low combinatorial background
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 3
• Much lower production rates (mb >> mc) • Feed-down contribution to ϒ(1S) • Separation of different ϒ states via the
di-electron channel is challenging due to bremsstrahlung.
Advantage
Disadvantage Phys. Lett. B 735 (2014) 127
The Solenoid Tracker At RHIC (STAR)
Ø TPC: precisely measure momentum and energy loss
Ø TOF: measure time-of-flight Ø BEMC: trigger on and identify
electrons Ø MTD (|η|<0.5) : trigger on and
identify muons – Installed 63% in 2013 and
100% in 2014 behind magnet
– Precise timing measurement (σ~100 ps)
– Dimuon trigger for quarkonia
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 4
Muon Telescope Detector
Barrel ElectroMagnetic Calorimeter
Time Projection Chamber
• Mid-rapidity detector: |η| < 1, 0 < φ < 2π
Time-Of-Flight
s/T
=2pTx0.001 0.01 0.1 1
]2 [n
b/(G
eV/c
)3
/dp
σ3Ed×
Bn/G
eV)
s(
310
610
910
1210
1510
1810
2110
2410
27102810 STAR p+p 500 GeV
STAR p+p 500 GeVSTAR p+p 200 GeVCDFUA2UA1PHENIXISRFNALALICEATLASCMS
(n=6.6)410×π
p(n=6.6)
(n=5.6)ψJ/
[GeV/c]T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
2dy
) [n
b/G
eV/c
]T
/(dp
σ2 d×) Tpπ1/
(2×B 6−10
5−10
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
1
10
210p+p @ 500 GeV
, |y|<1-e+e→ψSTAR J/, |y|<0.5-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/
CGC+NRQCDNLO NRQCD
STAR preliminary
J/ψ cross section and xT scaling in p+p collisions
• Inclusive J/ψ cross section measured in 0 < pT < 20 GeV/c – CGC+NRQCD and NLO NRQCD agree with data
• xT scaling of high-pT J/ψ observed for 500 GeV p+p collisions – Breaking of xT scaling : affected by soft process
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 5
PRC 80, 041902(2009)
PRL 113 (2014) 192301 JHEP 05 (2015) 103
J/ψ cross section xT scaling
]2 [GeV/c-µ+µM2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
Cou
nts
0
10
20
30
310×
STAR preliminary
0.15)×Unlike-sign pairs (
0.15)×Like-sign pairs (
0.15)×Mixed-event (
Au+Au @ 200 GeV-1 ~ 14.2 nbL
> 0 GeV/cψT,J/
|<0.5, pψJ/
|y = 24935, S/B = 1:28.6ψJ/N
σSignificance = 21.9
]2 [GeV/c-µ+µM2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
Cou
nts
0
0.5
1
310×
STAR preliminary
Unlike-sign pairs
Like-sign pairs
Mixed-event
Au+Au @ 200 GeV-1 ~ 14.2 nbL
> 5 GeV/cψT,J/
|<0.5, pψJ/
|y = 1129, S/B = 1:1.8ψJ/N
σSignificance = 15.2
J/ψ yield extraction
Signal extraction • Mixed-event à combinatorial background. • Fit background-subtracted unlike-sign with
Gaussian+pol3 • Signal = (counting in[2.9,3.3] GeV/c2) –
(residual background)
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 6
No bremsstrahlung tail N ~ 25000 S/B ratio & Significance S/B = 1:29, ~ 22σ @ pT > 0 GeV/c S/B = 1:1.8, ~ 15σ @ pT > 5 GeV/c
pT > 0 GeV/c pT
> 5 GeV/c
Full statistics from 2014 Au+Au 200 GeV run
Invariant yield of J/ψ
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 7
• First mid-rapidity measurement of J/ψ yield in Au+Au collisions via the di-muon channel for 0 < pT < 15 GeV/c
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
]-2
dy) [
(GeV
/c)
Tdp Tpπ
N/(2
2 d llB
-1310
-1210
-1110
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310 10×0-60%
0-20%
20-40%/5
40-60%/10
-1 ~ 14.2 nbLAu+Au @ 200 GeV , |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψJ/
STAR preliminary
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
]-2
dy) [
(GeV
/c)
Tdp Tpπ
N/(2
2 d llB
-1310
-1210
-1110
-1010
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310 10×0-60%
0-20%
20-40%/5
40-60%/10
Au+Au @ 200 GeV
, |y| < 1-e+e→ψOpen: J/, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψFilled: J/
=0)βTBW fit (
STAR preliminary
Invariant yield of J/ψ
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 8
• First mid-rapidity measurement of J/ψ yield in Au+Au collisions via the di-muon channel for 0 < pT < 15 GeV/c
• Consistent with the published di-electron results using Run10 data over the entire kinematic range.
Di-electron: STAR PLB 722 (2013) 55 STAR PRC 90, 024906 (2014)
J/ψ suppression:
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 9
RAA =σ inel
Ncoll
d 2NAA / dydpTd 2σ pp / dydpT
• Suppression at Low-pT – Dissociation – Regeneration – Cold nuclear matter effect
• At high pT, strong suppression in 0-20% and a rising trend in 20-60% central collisions – Dissociation – Formation time effect; B feed down
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-60%STAR Au+Au @ 200 GeV
, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψJ/
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 20-40% (GeV/c)
Tp
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-20%STAR preliminary
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 40-60%
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-60%
, |y| < 1 (MB)-e+e→ψJ/, |y| < 1 (HT)-e+e→ψJ/
STAR Au+Au @ 200 GeV, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψJ/
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 20-40% (GeV/c)
Tp
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-20%STAR preliminary
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 40-60%
J/ψ suppression:
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 10
RAA =σ inel
Ncoll
d 2NAA / dydpTd 2σ pp / dydpT
• Consistent with di-electron channel results for the entire pT range within uncertainties in all centralities
Di-electron: STAR PLB 722 (2013) 55 STAR PRC 90, 024906 (2014)
J/ψ RAA vs pT : RHIC vs LHC
• Less suppressed at LHC in low-pT → larger regeneration contribution due to higher charm cross-section
• More suppressed at LHC in high-pT → larger dissociation rate due to higher temperature
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 11
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
Rψ
J/
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.60-40% centrality
= 0.2 TeV, |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV, |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
= 2.76 TeV, |y| < 2.4NNsCMS: Pb+Pb,
STAR preliminary
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2Au+Au @ 200 GeV
> 0 GeV/cT
, |y| < 0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/
> 5 GeV/cT
, |y| < 0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/
uncertaintycollN
STAR preliminary
RAA vs. centrality
• Central collisions : significant suppression is observed for pT > 0 GeV/c and pT > 5 GeV/c → interplay of different effects
• Peripheral collisions : RAA of J/ψ for pT > 0 GeV/c is smaller than that for pT > 5 GeV/c probably due to cold nuclear matter effects
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 12
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
uncertaintycollSTAR N
STAR preliminary > 0 GeV/cψT,J/
p = 200 GeV |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au,
= 200 GeV |y| < 0.35NNsPHENIX: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
Centrality dependence : RHIC vs LHC
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 13
ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 PHENIX : PRL 98 (2007) 232301 pT
> 0 GeV/c
• STAR data are consistent with PHENIX with better statistical precision for pT > 0 GeV/c
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
uncertaintycollSTAR N
STAR preliminary > 0 GeV/cψT,J/
p = 200 GeV |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au,
= 200 GeV |y| < 0.35NNsPHENIX: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
Centrality dependence : RHIC vs LHC
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 14
ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 PHENIX : PRL 98 (2007) 232301 pT
> 0 GeV/c
• STAR data are consistent with PHENIX with better statistical precision for pT > 0 GeV/c
• pT > 0 GeV/c : more suppressed at RHIC in central collisions
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
uncertaintycollSTAR N
STAR preliminary > 0 GeV/cψT,J/
p = 200 GeV |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au,
= 200 GeV |y| < 0.35NNsPHENIX: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
Centrality dependence : RHIC vs LHC
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 15
• STAR data are consistent with PHENIX with better statistical precision for pT > 0 GeV/c
• pT > 0 GeV/c : more suppressed at RHIC in central collisions • High pT : less suppressed at RHIC in all centralities
CMS: JHEP 05 (2012) 063
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
uncertaintycollSTAR N
> 5 GeV/cT
= 200 GeV, |y| < 0.5, pNNsSTAR: Au+Au, > 6.5 GeV/c
T = 2.76 TeV, |y| < 2.4, pNNsCMS: Pb+Pb,
STAR preliminary
ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 PHENIX : PRL 98 (2007) 232301 pT
> 5 GeV/c pT > 0 GeV/c
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
Rψ
J/
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8STAR preliminary0-40% centrality
= 0.2 TeV, |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV, |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb, = 2.76 TeV, |y| < 2.4NNsCMS: Pb+Pb,
Transport Model ITransport Model II
RHICRHIC
LHCLHC
Transport Models
• Transport models including dissociation and regeneration effects qualitatively describe pT dependence shape
• Model I : below data at low-pT for LHC and shows different trend at high pT for RHIC
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 16
ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 CMS: JHEP 05 (2012) 063
Transport model: Model I at RHIC: PLB 678 (2009) 72 Model I at LHC: PRC 89 (2014) 054911 Model II at RHIC: PRC 82 (2010) 064905 Model II at LHC: NPA 859 (2011) 114
Model I : Tsinghua Group Model II : TAMU Group
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
uncertaintycollSTAR N
STAR preliminary > 0 GeV/cψT,J/
p = 200 GeV |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au,
= 200 GeV |y| < 0.35NNsPHENIX: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
Transport Model ITransport Model II
RHICRHIC
LHCLHC
Transport Models
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 17
ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 PHENIX : PRL 98 (2007) 232301 pT
> 0 GeV/c
Transport model: Model I at RHIC: PLB 678 (2009) 72 Model I at LHC: PRC 89 (2014) 054911 Model II at RHIC: PRC 82 (2010) 064905 Model II at LHC: NPA 859 (2011) 114
• pT > 0 GeV/c : both models can describe centrality dependence at RHIC, but tends to overestimate suppression at LHC
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
uncertaintycollSTAR N
> 5 GeV/cT
= 200 GeV, |y| < 0.5, pNNsSTAR: Au+Au, > 6.5 GeV/c
T = 2.76 TeV, |y| < 2.4, pNNsCMS: Pb+Pb,
STAR preliminary
Transport Model ITransport Model II
RHICRHIC
LHCLHC
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
uncertaintycollSTAR N
STAR preliminary > 0 GeV/cψT,J/
p = 200 GeV |y| < 0.5NNsSTAR: Au+Au,
= 200 GeV |y| < 0.35NNsPHENIX: Au+Au, = 2.76 TeV |y| < 0.8NNsALICE: Pb+Pb,
Transport Model ITransport Model II
RHICRHIC
LHCLHC
Transport Models
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 18
CMS: JHEP 05 (2012) 063 ALICE : PLB 734 (2014) 314 PHENIX : PRL 98 (2007) 232301 pT
> 0 GeV/c pT > 5 GeV/c
• pT > 0 GeV/c : both models can describe centrality dependence at RHIC, but tends to overestimate suppression at LHC
• pT > 5 GeV/c : there is tension among models and data
Transport model: Model I at RHIC: PLB 678 (2009) 72 Model I at LHC: PRC 89 (2014) 054911 Model II at RHIC: PRC 82 (2010) 064905 Model II at LHC: NPA 859 (2011) 114
Does J/ψ flow?
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 19
(GeV/c)T
p0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2v
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
maximum non-flow
initially producedccoalescence from thermalized c
initial + coalescenceinitial + coalescencehydrodynamic
Au+Au 200 GeV 0-80 % Run10+11-e+e→ψSTAR J/
STAR preliminary
• Measure the second-order Fourier coefficient (v2) – Primordial: little or zero v2 – Regenerated: inherit v2 from the constituent charm quarks
STAR, PRL 111 (2013) 052301 L. Yan, P. Zhuang, and N. Xu, PRL 97 (2006) 232301 V. Greco, C.M. Ko, and R. Rapp, PLB 595 (2004) 202 X. Zhao and R. Rapp, arXiv: 0806.1239 Y. Liu, N. Xu and P. Zhuang, NPA 834 (2010) 317 U.W. Heinz and C. Shen, (private communication)
J/ψ à e+ + e-
• For pT above 2 GeV/c, v2 is consistent with zero à contribution of regenerated J/ψ is small – Non-flow effects
estimated using J/ψ-h correlation in pp collision can account for possible deviation of v2 from zero at high pT
Does J/ψ flow?
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 20
• Measure the second-order Fourier coefficient (v2) – Primordial: little or zero v2 – Regenerated: inherit v2 from the constituent charm quarks
• Consistent results from di-muon channel within large error bars
(GeV/c)T
p0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2v
0.4−
0.3−
0.2−
0.1−
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
maximum non-flow
|y| < 0.5, Run14-µ+µ→ψJ/ |y| < 1, Run10+11-e+e→ψJ/
Au+Au 200 GeV 0-80 % STAR preliminary
(1S)
ϒ(2S+3S)/
ϒ
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8p+p (world-wide)
CMS [email protected] TeV (0-100%)
) (0-80%)µµSTAR Au+Au@200 GeV (
STAR preliminary
(1S)ϒ(2S)/ϒ
(1S)ϒ(3S)/ϒ
pp AuAu @ RHIC PbPb @ LHC
ϒ(2S+3S)/ϒ(1S) ratio
• Signs of Y(2S+3S) from the di-muon channel – Challenging for di-electron channel due to Bremsstrahlung
• Hint of less melting of ϒ(2S+3S) at RHIC than at LHC
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 21
World-wide PRC 88(2013) 067901 CMS : PRL 109(2012) 222301 CMS : JHEP 04 (2014) 103
NΥ(1S) ~ 157 ± 24
95% Upper Limit
Summary • First J/ψ and ϒ measurements via di-muon channel at mid-
rapidity at RHIC • p+p collisions at √s = 500 GeV
– Inclusive J/ψ cross section can be described by CGC+NRQCD & NLO NRQCD for 0<pT<20 GeV/c
• Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV ( Run 14 full statistics ) – Clear J/ψ suppression above 5 GeV/c in central collisions → Dissociation – J/ψ RAA can be qualitatively described by transport models including
dissociation and regeneration. However there is tension at high pT – Updated J/ψ v2 in di-electron channel using Run10+11 data → favors small
contribution from regeneration above 2 GeV/c – Hint of less melting of ϒ(2S+3S) at RHIC compared to that at LHC
• Similar amount of data from Run16 on tape. Stay tuned!!
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 22
ϒ(2S+3S)/ϒ(1S) ratio
• Fit the like-sign and unlike-sign simultaneously: – Mean of ϒ is fixed to PDG value, while width is determined from
simulation. – Ratio of ϒ(2S)/ϒ(3S) is fixed to pp value, and shape of bb and Drell-
Yan background is estimated using PYTHIA
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 24
NΥ(1S) ~ 157 ± 24
Muon Telescope Detector (MTD)
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 25
• Separate ϒ(2S+3S) from ϒ(1S)
• Potential to separate ϒ(2S) and ϒ(3S) states as muons suffer less from bremsstrahlung
• Relatively high efficiency for J/ψ at low pT à cover wide kinematic range
(GeV/c)T
p0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
effi
cien
cyψ
J/
-310
-210
-110
1AuAu @ 200 GeV
> 3.4 GeVT
Electron: BEMC trigger with E
Muon: MTD trigger
STAR preliminary
Simulation
Run13 p+p 500 GeV Analysis details
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 26
• Muon identification – Match TPC tracks to MTD – Require z residual below 20 cm
• Decay channel: J/ψ à µ+ + µ- • Data set: p+p collisions at 500 GeV taken in 2013 • MTD dimuon trigger: two hits in MTD
• Sampled integrated luminosity ~ 28.3 pb-1
• Background: fitting Gaussian (signal) & pol3
Ø Signal extraction: Integral of Gaussian
]2 [GeV/cµµM2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8
]2Ev
ents
/0.0
4 [G
eV/c
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800/ndf = 52.3/37.02χ
59± = 1335ψJ/N20.003 GeV/c±M = 3.087
20.003 GeV/c± = 0.062σ
0.04±S/B = 0.851.14± = 24.70S+BS/
fitsignalbackground
< 10 GeV/cψJ/T
0 < p| < 0.5µµ
|y
STAR Preliminary
A closer look: event multiplicity dependence
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 27
• Collective effects in high-multiplicity pp collisions? • Do we see similar or different behavior at RHIC?
• Stronger-than-linear rise of open charm production vs event activity.
• Similar behavior seen for inclusive J/ψ at both mid- and forward-rapidity.
• Several ideas on the market: – PYTHIA 8: c and b quarks produced
in Multi-Parton-Interaction -> underestimate yield at large multiplicity
– Percolation model: string screening -> quadratic rise at high multiplicity
– Hard process is associated with larger gluon radiation
arXiv:1505.00664
D meson
Event activity0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
>ψ
J/<N
ψJ/N
0
2
4
6
8
10
12p+p collisions @ 500 GeV
>0 GeV/cT
, |y|<0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR: J/>4 GeV/c
T, |y|<1, p-e+e→ψSTAR: J/
>0 GeV/cT
PYTHIA8.183 default: p>4 GeV/c
TPYTHIA8.183 default: p
STAR preliminary
>0 GeV/cT
Percolation model: p
STAR data points+15% one-sided error along both x- and y- direction
Event activity0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
>ψ
J/<N
ψJ/N
0
2
4
6
8
10
12p+p collisions
>0 GeV/cT
, |y|<0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR 500 GeV: J/
>4 GeV/cT
, |y|<1, p-e+e→ψSTAR 500 GeV: J/
>0 GeV/cT
, |y|<0.9, p-e+e→ψALICE 7 TeV: J/
<4 GeV/cT
ALICE 7 TeV: D meason, |y|<0.5, 2<p
STAR preliminary
STAR data points+15% one-sided error along both x- and y- direction
J/ψ yield vs event activity
• Stronger-than-linear growth for relative J/ψ yield → Soft and hard processes are correlated
• Different trends for low and high pT J/ψ • PYTHIA8 and Percolation model reproduce trends in data • Measurements at high multiplicities can help distinguish different models
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 28
ALICE : JHEP09(2015)148
Characterize event activity
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 29
Multiplicity of TOF matched tracks
|η| < 0.9
Beam-Beam Counter coincidence rate600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
310×
TofM
ult
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1
10
210
310
410
510
610Run11 p+p @ 500 GeV
Mean of each BBCrate sliceSTAR preliminary
• Insensitive to pile-up effects
TofMult< TofMult >
Run14 Au+Au 200 GeV Analysis details
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 30
• Muon identification cuts – Energy loss measurement by TPC – Match TPC tracks to MTD
• Distance between MTD hits and projected TPC tracks along both z and φ directions
• Time difference between MTD measured time and expected travel time of muons
• Decay channel: J/ψ, ϒ à µ+ + µ-
• Dimuon trigger: two hits in MTD • Data set: Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV recorded in 2014
– Integrated luminosity ~ 14.2 nb-1
– Equivalent or more data will be taken in 2016
Comparison to di-electron
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 31
partN0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
AA
Rψ
J/
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2Au+Au @ 200 GeV
> 0 GeV/cT
, |y| < 0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/ > 5 GeV/c
T, |y| < 0.5, p-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/
> 5 GeV/cT
, |y| < 1, p-e+e→ψSTAR J/
uncertaintycollN
STAR preliminary
J/ψ RAA vs pT : STAR vs Transport Models
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 32
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-60%STAR Au+Au @ 200 GeV
, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψJ/, |y| < 1 (MB)-e+e→ψJ/, |y| < 1 (HT)-e+e→ψJ/
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 20-40%
)et al.Transport Model I (Y.-P. Liu )et al.Transport Model II (X. Zhao
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-20%STAR preliminary
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 40-60%
Transport model: Model I at RHIC: PLB 678 (2009) 72 Model I at LHC: PRC 89 (2014) 054911 Model II at RHIC: PRC 82 (2010) 064905 Model II at LHC: NPA 859 (2011) 114
Di-electron: STAR PLB 722 (2013) 55 STAR PRC 90, 024906 (2014)
J/ψ RAA vs pT : STAR vs PHENIX
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 33
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-60%Au+Au @ 200 GeV
, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψSTAR J/, |y| < 0.35-e+e→ψPHENIX: J/
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 20-40% (GeV/c)
Tp
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 0-20%STAR preliminary
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
R
0.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8 40-60%
PHENIX PRL 98 (2007) 232301
J/ψ RAA vs pT : Mid vs Forward rapidity
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016 34
(GeV/c)T
p0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
AA
Rψ
J/
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6Au+Au @ 200 GeV, 0-20%
, |y| < 0.5-µ+µ→ψSTAR: J/
, 1.2 < |y| < 2.2-µ+µ→ψPHENIX: J/
STAR preliminary
PHENIX : PRC 84 (2011) 054912
Compare J/ψ v2
35
(GeV/c)T
p0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2v
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
maximum non-flow
initially producedccoalescence from thermalized c
initial + coalescenceinitial + coalescencehydrodynamic
Au+Au 200 GeV 0-80 % Run10+11-e+e→ψSTAR J/
STAR preliminary
STAR, PRL 111 (2013) 052301
• By combining published results with Run11 analysis, the statistical error bar is reduced by a factor of √2.
• Additional systematic uncertainty is assigned due to J/ψ yield extraction.
6/28/16 Takahito Todoroki, sQM 2016