Quarterly Environment & Social Monitoring Report (July

Quarterly Environment & Social Monitoring Report (July 2012 to September 2012)

The Environmental and Social Performance Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website.

Environmental and Social Performance Report December 2012

IND: Mundra Ultra Mega Power Project

Prepared by SENES Consultants India Pvt Ltd.

Quarterly Environment & Social Performance Report – Tata Ultra Mega Coal Fired Power Plant, Mundra

Period: July to September 2012

Submitted to: Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd (CGPL)

Prepared by: SENES Consultants India Pvt Ltd.

The page has been intentionally left blank

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................................. 1

1.3 Project Status .......................................................................................................................... 2

2 Environmental & Social Management ............................................................................... 2

2.1 ESPR Preparer ........................................................................................................................ 2

2.2 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) & Social Management Plan (SMP)

Implementation ................................................................................................................................... 3

3 Compliance with CGPL Environmental & Social Requirements ...................................... 3

3.1 Environmental Aspects ........................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Social Management ................................................................................................................. 7

4 Health & Safety ................................................................................................................ 11

4.1 Health & Safety Management ............................................................................................... 11

4.2 Safety Performance ............................................................................................................... 12

List of Annexure

Annexure 1: Persons Interviewed ......................................................................................................... i

Annexure 2: Green Belt Development Status (July-Sep’12) ............................................................. ii

Annexure 3: Certificate of Analysis – Columbian & Satui Coal ...................................................... v

Quarterly Environmental & Social Performance Report – CGPL Power Plant, Mundra

December 2012 1 SENES

QUARTERLY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE

REPORT

(ESPR)

Reporting Period: July to September 2012

Site visit date: 5th – 7th December 2012

1 Introduction

1.1 Background

Coastal Gujarat Power Limited (CGPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Tata Power

Company Limited will build, own and operate an ultra mega power plant at Mundra in

Gujarat. The project includes five supercritical units of 800 MW each, with total capacity of

4000 MW. The plant will use 12 Million Metric Ton Per Annum (MMTPA) of imported coal

as fuel, and sea water for once through cooling of condensers. Power will be evacuated

through six 400 KV power lines to benefits the states of Gujarat, Maharashtra, Punjab,

Haryana and Rajasthan.

The project has started in September, 2007 with the targeted commercial operation of the first

unit is February, 2011 and that of the fifth unit in June, 2012. CGPL has sought financial

loans from several international banks including the International Finance Corporation (IFC)

and Asian Development Bank (ADB). As per the common term schedule to loan agreement

between CGPL and the Lenders; Tata Power has entrusted SENES Consultants to carry out

Environment Health Safety and Social (EHSS) compliance audits on a quarterly and annual

basis during the construction period.

1.2 Objective

The purpose of this Quarterly Environmental & Social Performance Report (ESPR) is to

report on CGPL’s compliance with the Environmental and Social Performance Requirements

of IFC/ADB (including implementation of the Environmental Management Plan and the

Social Management Plan) and to asses any corrective actions implemented/proposed. The

ESPR encompasses implementation by CGPL of all phases of the Project. It includes:

Contact information for responsible individuals

Compliance by CGPL with environmental and social requirements for the Project

Environmental and social aspects of the Project under implementation

Occupational health and safety performance and significant incidents

Sustainable development initiatives and community relations



1.3 Project Status

The project has achieved overall 96.97% progress against an early schedule of 100%. Major

Accomplishments during the month involved

Unit#10 & 20: Generation continued as per schedule.

Unit#30: Unit reliability test completed on 27/10/12 and COD declared on 27/10/12.

Unit#40: Steam blowing commences on 15/10/12 and is in progress.

Unit#50: Boiler is kept under preservation. Boiler and ESP area duct Insulation completed on

15/10/12 and cladding work completed. Boiler structure finishing work in progress. TG

Building and UCB (Simplex): Major civil works completed. Finishing IPS & painting

works are in progress in TG & UCB buildings. HP Piping Erection Works: 1819/1900 nos.

joints welded. Insulation works in progress. Fire Protection Systems (Minimax): UG piping

final connections at C-D bay is in progress. MVW spray piping at UCB and MV switchgear

room at TGB 7.5mtr floor in progress. Electrical & Instrumentation Installation Works:

UAT placed on foundation, GT assembly, bus duct & its structural erection work at

transformer yard and cabling works are in progress. SPBD bus duct erection work in side TG

building in progress and IPBD delta bus duct erection at transformer yard in progress. Ash

handling system: Silo-3 roof structure erection work completed on 30/10/12.

Power Evacuation Lines (PGCIL): 2 out of total 3 nos. 400KV double circuit lines are

commissioned. As per PGCIL report 3rd and last line i.e. Mundra - Surajbari - Jetpur is

expected to be completed by November `12.

2 Environmental & Social Management

2.1 ESPR Preparer

Report prepared by: SENES Consultants India Pvt. Ltd.

Telephone: 022-27576298 / 32986995

E-mail: [email protected]

Signature:

Report Date: December 2012



2.2 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) & Social Management Plan (SMP)

Implementation

The following groups of the Tata Power Corporate Office and CGPL’s on-site team are

responsible for EMP and SMP implementation:

Tata Power Corporate Office : Sustainability & SHE Group; HR - Land

Acquisition, R&R, CSR

On-site team at Mundra: Safety & Environment; HR – Labour & Health; CSR

The list of individuals contacted during the site visit is given in Annexure 1.

3 Compliance with CGPL Environmental & Social Requirements

This section describes current compliance of the project with IFC/ADB’s environmental &

social policies and guidelines, Environmental & Social Management Plans and presents the

key environmental & social performance indicators. The current project activities have been

assessed with respect to observations and comments offered in the last audit.

3.1 Environmental Aspects

As discussed in the earlier audit reports regarding control of fugitive emissions from coal

stockpiles and conveyors, CGPL has completed with the wind barrier erection near the

stockpile and green belt development (100m wide) work has been initiated along the

boundary of the barrier. The details of green belt development for the period July-Sep’12 is

provided in Annexure 2. Further as recommended earlier CGPL as part of its monthly

monitoring program continues with the ambient air quality monitoring in Vandh and

surrounding villages to record any possible deviation with respect to the baseline

environment.

In view of the earlier recommendation on strengthening the Legal register as part of the IMS

being formulated, CGPL has updated the IMS legal register through incorporation of the IFC

Thermal Power EHS Guidelines & IFC Performance Standards. Reportedly compliance to

conditions outlined in the Environmental Clearance, CRZ clearance and Consolidated

Consent & Authorization (CC&A) is being maintained separately and updated on a periodic

basis as part of compliance reporting to relevant regulatory authorities. However it is

recommended that CGPL commitments as outlined in the IFC Environmental & Social

Performance Review summary for managing project EHS issues/concerns are also included

in the IMS legal register.

As discussed earlier in the Apr-Jun’12 audit report, CGPL in order to address the

uncertainties associated with coal supply due to increase in imported coal price, has put into

use Ecocoal (shipped from Indonesia) on a trial basis at 70% capacity for operation of

Unit#1. In addition CGPL is reportedly using blend of Columbian and Sathui coal for present

operation of Unit#1, Unit#2 and Unit#3 in order to select the correct blend of coal to ensure

optimal generation of power keeping into view necessary environmental considerations and

cost benefit analysis. As per the EC requirement, imported coal consumption for the project



shall not exceed 12 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) and ash and sulphur content in the

coal shall not exceed 10% and 1 % respectively. Review of the proximate coal analysis of the

reveals that both the coal types is characterized by high gross calorific (generally varying in

the range of 6268-7280 Kcal/kg) and low moisture content (varying from 9.78%-12.93%).

The physico-chemical characteristics of Columbian and Satui coal are presented in Annexure

3. However the ash and sulphur content in Satui coal was found to be in exceedance to the

limit set out in the EC with values of 10.93%-12.12% and 0.92%-1.02% respectively. In view

of the above it is recommended that necessary efforts are made by CGPL to assess the

potential implications of the change in fuel quality on the project EHS performance and share

the findings with lenders and related stakeholders. Reportedly CGPL plans to undertake this

assessment by engaging a third party with Terms of Reference (ToR) for the same being

under finalization.

Used oil generated is being temporarily stored onsite at the hazardous waste storage yard and

managed through authorized hazardous waste recyclers; whereas the chemical sludge

(generated from waste water treatment) is being currently disposed in the ash pond area. With

the hazardous waste authorization requiring such sludge to be disposed at the TSDF of M/s

SEPPL it is recommended that CGPL carries out analysis of the sludge to establish its

hazardous characteristics, if any prior to availing the aforesaid option for disposal. Reportedly

CGPL is in the advance stage of engaging a monitoring agency for undertaking analysis of

the chemical sludge for hazardous nature.

With respect to the CTO condition and fly ash notification referring to 100% utilization of fly

ash from 4th

year onwards CGPL plans to ensure compliance with the same following

commissioning and operation of all 5 units. Presently review of fly ash utilization records for

the period July-Sep’12 reveals that nearly 5% utilization has been achieved through Binani

and Ambuja cement industries. Reportedly necessary efforts are being made by CGPL to

facilitate 100% fly ash utilization:

A company has been set up by Tata Power in the name of Chemical Terminal

Trombay Ltd. (CTTL) to support CGPL efforts towards fly ash utilization.

CGPL has signed an agreement with Sanghi Cement for collection of fly ash by the

later from April 2013 onwards. Further discussion is in progress with the said

company regarding setting up a stand-alone grinding unit which if implemented can

address the challenge of 100% fly ash utilization.

There also exists possibility of utilizing the fly ash in road construction works in the

region subjected to fulfillment of IRC specifications.

Potential for importing fly ash is being evaluated by CGPL given the proximity to

Mundra Port and its projected demand in the Middle East countries.

However it is recommended that CGPL draws up a plan in collaboration with CTTL ensuring

100% utilization of fly ash from 4th

year following operation of all 5 units.

Review of the online and manual records for the period July-Sep’12 reveals a maximum

temperature difference of 4.70ºC of the receiving water body which is in compliance to



temperature difference standard of 7ºC at the cooling water discharge point specified by the

MoEF EC Amendment dated 5th

April’07. The statistical results and interpretation of the

cooling water temperature records (July-Sep’12) with respect to Unit#1 & Unit#2 operation

have been presented in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Unit#1 & Unit#2 Cooling Water Temperature Details (July-Sep’12)

Sl. No. Parameters Average Maximum Minimum

1 Temperature at Intake Channel 29.45 32.10 27.60

2 Condenser1 - Inlet 1 (ºC) 29.58 36.01 28.34

3 Condenser1 - Outlet 1 (ºC) 35.68 39.09 28.92

4 Condenser1 - Inlet2 (ºC) 29.82 34.82 28.57

5 Condenser1 - Outlet2 (ºC) 35.47 39.06 28.76

6 Condenser2 - Inlet 1 (ºC) 30.85 33.31 29.55

7 Condenser2 - Outlet 1 (ºC) 35.47 42.69 28.82

8 Condenser2 - Inlet2 (ºC) 29.50 31.80 28.18

9 Condenser2 - Outlet2 (ºC) 35.53 42.96 28.83

10 CW O/L Temp 1 (ºC) 31.96 36.57 15.94

11 CW O/L Temp 2 (ºC) 34.73 37.07 29.45

12 Temp at Retaining Wall (ºC) 32.08 33.90 29.00

13 Temp diff at condenser O/L (ºC) 5.61 9.31 0.000

14 Temp diff at ash silo bridge (ºC) 3.41 5.44 0.000

15 Temp diff at Retaining Wall (ºC) 2.63 4.70 0

As earlier discussed amendment in the CTO condition issued for Unit#1 is still pending given

the delay in the Technical Committee meeting of GPCB earlier scheduled for Sep’12. In

view of the same issue of consent for the remaining units has also been delayed. Reportedly

CTO application has been filed for Unit#4 and Unit#5 in August’12.

Statistical interpretation of the flue gas emission records (for criteria pollutants viz. PM, SO2

and NOx) for the period Jul-Sep’12 (Refer Table 2) reveals that the 98th

percentile values for

both PM and SO2 is higher compared to the standards specified for such pollutants in the

World Bank Group Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants. Reportedly this has been attributed

to the use of LDO for initial start-up operations.

Table 2: Statistical Analysis of Flue Gas Pollutant Concentration Records– July to

September 2012

Sl.No. Statistical Parameter Apr’12

A. Particulate Matter (mg/Nm3)

1 Average 35.04

2 Maximum 132.45

3 Minimum 0.20



4 98th

Percentile 70.79

B. Sulphur Dioxide (ppm)

1 Average 87.68

2 Maximum 536.22

3 Minimum 0.109

4 98th

Percentile 286.90

C. Nitrogen Oxides (ppm)

1 Average 114.65

2 Maximum 375.64

3 Minimum 9.25

4 98th

Percentile 206.02

In view of the recommendations made during the earlier audit regarding documentation of

stakeholder EHSS observations/concerns and actions taken for addressing potential risks,

CGPL has developed and implemented an “Environmental Dashboard” program. The

program is aimed to document and report on a weekly basis i) any exception to EC, CTO and

applicable regulatory conditions ii) legal notices received from regulatory authorities iii)

complaints received from neighboring communities iv) any oil, coal, hazardous waste

spillage/leakage incidents and v) visit made by statutory authorities including their remarks.

In view of the coastal community concerns and suggestions made earlier, CGPL continues

with ambient air quality monitoring at Tragadi village. The monitored values of pollutants

reveal compliance to NAAQS except for PM10. Also as earlier recommended, monitoring of

heavy metals viz. arsenic and mercury in ground water is to be initiated from Oct’12 onwards.



3.2 Social Management

Social issues have been assessed with respect to observations and comments offered in the

last audit and subsequent developments in the course of ongoing project activities. Some of

the actions recommended in the earlier audits are pending or have been delayed. Since these

have a direct bearing on the PAPs (especially those related to employment), these need to be

taken up on a priority basis as there has been a considerable time delay in addressing

concerns related to employment.

Restoration of Income for Loss of Agricultural Land

1. Household Data for 70 PAFs has been collated. Details for remaining families (total

80 families) to be complied on a priority basis.

2. The household survey list is required to be updated and shared with the HR and

Procurement Dept detailing each member within the PAF to enable the respective

depts. to plan and prepare a framework for training and hiring of PAP/PAF.

3. Local Procurement and Employment Policy is yet to be finalized by CGPL. This is

under process according to CGPL. There seems to be delay in formulating and

implementing the policy although one of the units is under operation. Further delay

will increase the social risks as the issue of employment of PAF/PAP has been raised

by various groups and individuals from the affected villages in different foras.

4. CGPL had proposed to collaborate with an organization which will identify training

and employment opportunities for affected people and provide training for improving

employability. Under Shiksha Sarathi program and through the support of

PRATHAM on 6th Dec,12 a Learn and Earn Mela was organized where 48 youths

participated from 25 villages of Mundra and Mandvi blocks. Pratham aims to improve

employability and bring together youth and agencies (Government, private and

voluntary) offering employment.

5. The supplementary list (for non land owning households) has been prepared for

families indirectly affected. For example payment of Livelihood grant to fishermen

from Tragadi village, distribution of fishing nets to Villagers in Modhva and

distribution of fodder for livestock owners. This will be updated as per the benefits

and programmes extended to non land owning families living in the affected villages.

6. As mentioned in the earlier reports the entitlement matrix needs to be prepared for

employment of PAPs. For the preparation of the entitlement matrix the following to

be decided:

a. Policy for employment under rehabilitation for affected/land sellers families should be

clarified and

b. Definitions for key concepts such as ‘Family’, ‘separate family’ (adult married sons,

unmarried daughters - age to be defined, handicapped/disable family member,

deserted, abandoned and divorced women), ‘PAP’, category of land loser/seller,

eligibility for employment, etc should be formulated.

c. Concerns related to priority, alternatives in case the affected family or person as not

ordinarily residing in the village, death of nominee, absence of legal heirs for affected

families need to be worked out in principle and practice.



The policy is under finalization by CGPL.

Recommended Actions

1. Details for remaining families of PAPs (total 80 families) needs to be complied on a

priority basis.

2. A supplementary survey Skill mapping to be carried to ensure that all family and

household details as per PAP list are available with CGPL. Skill mapping of the Land

losers and household members to enable the match of the skill availability to CGPL’s

requirement in the operation stage and for outsourced work.

3. Finalization and implementation of the Local Hiring and Procurement Policy.

4. Preparation of a Livelihood Plan for land losers and non land based affected families.

The Livelihood Plan should incorporate all economic activities for all communities

and groups and incorporates interventions for asset and livelihood affected families/

households.

Provision of Fodder Distribution

Fodder distribution through Gaushalas has reached the maximum for 1500 livestock. The

commitment given for fodder distribution was for a maximum number of 1500 livestock from

Vandh Tunda village. The villagers have been informed of the same. Fodder distribution was

also initiated in other villages as a drought mitigation measure.

The issues related to more equitable distribution of fodder in terms of number of cattle per

owner has been discussed with the Vandh Tunda villagers and the Gaushala Trust members

who do not have any concerns regarding the inequitable distribution of fodder. Camel

Vaccination camp was not held this year as the herders had not returned to the villages

because of drought. Under the dairy programme 125 cattle owners are covered from four

villages namely Tragadi, Vandh Tunda and Nana Bhadiya.

Recommended Actions:

1. Community Development Plan as per the requirement of the IFC is yet to be framed.

CGPL has framed ABP for CSR activities. 5 thematic areas for interventions by the

Community Relations Dept has been finalized which will be the core areas for

intervention under CSR. On the basis of these areas CDP to be framed with ABP and

status of activities as annexure to be updated as required.

Women’s Needs and Participation

A tie up with an Ahmadabad based agency has been initiated for embroidery work on a per

piece basis. The women’s group at present has about 38 members which are interested in

doing the work. The first order is currently under completion by the women.

Recommended Actions:

While income Generation activities are continuing for women, the earning has yet to increase

to Rs. 100 a day. Current activity to be assessed to check quality as well as average earnings

per month for the members.



Other issues

Issues raised by Sarpanch of Tragadi village related to outfall channel have been addressed to

his satisfaction. Temporary shelters made on the beach by the families involved in fishing

were observed during the visit likely to have been affected by dredging will be addressed

after elections.

A demonstration Project for cage fishing has been proposed to be implemented by CGPL on

a trial basis in the outfall channel.

Recommended Actions

1. Details of cage fishing initiated to be shared with SENES.

2. Livelihood options to be worked with the support of the Fisheries dept. and the

villagers about a demonstration project for shrimp farming as well as crab culture in the

backwater channel area.

Review of Implementation of Mechanisms for Community Development

IFC requires that under the Performance Standard 1 (Social and Environmental Assessment

and Management Systems) Disclosure, Consultation and Grievance mechanism must be

undertaken for community engagement. Grievance Redressal is a key aspect of both

Stakeholder engagement and Disclosure of information and receives and facilitates resolution

of Affected Communities’ concerns and grievances is dispersed. Currently a uniform single

GRM is not in place.

In this audit it has been informed that a computerized system is proposed to be put in place in

by which grievances will be uploaded and a uniform format generated. A mechanism has

been developed to address grievances within 7 days and if not addressed, to upscale the

grievance to a higher level for redressal.

A uniform format has been developed to record and report all meetings held with

various stakeholders including Government officials by the CR Dept as part of the

Stakeholder engagement.

A review of the CIC needs to be carried out internally and with stakeholders as the

functioning is not as effective as envisaged. Steps to improve overall effectiveness to

be worked out with CR team and stakeholders.

Recommended Actions

1. Village meetings to be held and minutes of meeting to be maintained.

2. Level of grievances and decision taken to be defined for disclosure as well as

community engagement. Under the GRM a consolidated report with status of

grievances to be prepared on a monthly and quarterly basis. Grievances addressed

should be closed.



Documentation and Reporting

CGPL has hired 4th Wheel an Ahmadabad based Agency for documentation of case studies

for undertaking reporting and documentation of CSR activities. A compendium ‘Samvad’

photo documentation of stakeholder engagement has been published and circulated. Report of

TPCDT has also been published. The quantum of reporting and documentation has increased

and requires the services of specialized agency/staff to ensure comprehensive documentation

of all activities and impact on people.

Recommended Actions

1. Plans and Policies formulated earlier as per the funding agencies requirement be

updated and revised as per current requirements. The gap between earlier formulated

plans and current implementation requirement to be addressed.

2. Steps taken by CGPL to incorporate TISS suggestions and recommendations in

ongoing activities and stakeholder engagement.

3. Newsletter to be published on a quarterly basis to show case CSR activities.



4 Health & Safety

CGPL has adopted the health and safety system (with guidance form Dupont) that includes

well defined performance standards, procedures and guidelines (HIRA, SCAR, etc), safety

awareness programs (Safety Time Out) and key performance indicators (e.g. lost time

incidents, severity rate, near miss etc.), which are used to track compliance with Health and

Safety (H&S) targets. Specific health and safety plans and onsite emergency plan have been

developed & augmented on regular basis by CGPL and communicated to contractors. The

plans outline the policies and strategies, the organization, resources and documentation

required, the HS risk management principles, and reporting requirements.

4.1 Health & Safety Management

With the augmentation in safety staffing by CGPL, proper implementation of specific plan

and procedures, communication between the contractor workers, safety training and

awareness, incident reporting, visual aids etc the onsite Health & Safety Management of

CGPL continues to demonstrate considerable improvement.

With both units under operations and synchronization of remaining units under process

reportedly potential health and safety risks is currently limited to activities like switchyard

“hot line washing”, insulation, floor grating etc. for which necessary work permits are being

issued, audited and activities supervised by relevant personnel.

CGPL has launched a program termed DELTA initiative by which innovative safety

measures/initiatives are documented and shared to enhance health and safety awareness

thereby improving project EHS performance. Key measures covered as part of this program

included – undertaking safety intervention audit, implementation of safety time out program

& PSUSR checklist, driving behavioral change among contract workers through AAKAR

initiative etc.

As discussed during the last quarter audit CGPL has drafted the IMS Legal Register

incorporating the specific provision of applicable health and safety regulations for the

purpose of OHSAS, EMS and QMS certification. However as discussed in the section 3.1,

permit/consent conditions and specific provisions of IFC EHS Guidelines (Thermal Power

Plants) & Performance Standards (PS) referring to occupational health and safety aspects

during operations stage need to feature in the IMS legal register to ensure legal compliance.

As recommended in the earlier audit CGPL need to assess the occupational risks related to

EMF exposure from power transmission lines as per the provision of IFC EHS Guidelines for

Thermal Power Plant and develop & implement an EMF safety program which is still

pending. Regarding installation and operation of automated systems viz. carbon monoxide or

temperature sensors in coal bunkers to prevent fire hazard the procurement of the same is

under progress; further CGPL is also evaluating the use of wetting agents as a potential

preventive measure to control fire hazard in bunkers.



In order to improve housekeeping at the coal handling area CGPL is currently evaluating the

option of commissioning fixed/mobile vacuum systems integrated with cyclone separators

and bag filters to collect spilled coal particles resulting from JT and conveyor operations.

4.2 Safety Performance

The health and safety performance of the project monitored with respect to safety

performance indicators for the period July-Sep’12is presented in the Table-3 below.

Table 3: Safety Performance Indicator Status (July to September 2012)

Sl.No Performance Indicators Reporting Period

July-12 Aug-12 Sep-12

1 Induction Training Attendees 2432 1947 1415

2 LTIs 0 1 0

3 First Aid Cases 63 39 45

4 Medical Treatment Cases(MTC) 1 0 0

5 Safe Man Hours Worked till last fatality/LWDC 1606108 564584 1343252

6 Total Person Hours Worked 1606108 1409960 1343252

7 LTI Frequency Rate 0.00 0.71 0.00

8 Severity Index 2.79 2.72 2.74

9 Fire Cases 7 7 5

10 Near Misses 20 33 34

11 Fatality 0 0 0



Table 4: Safety Action Plan

Sl.No. Item Targets

Apr'12 May'12 Jun'12

Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act

1 Safety Committee meeting

1 CSC 12 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 C F S A 48 4 4 4 4 4 4

3 PTW Audit 144 12 12 12 12 12 12

4 HIRA / JSA (as applicable to SBU) 100%

1 Review of HIRA / JSA 13 18 8

5 External / Statutory audits -Safety Audit(as applicable to SBU) 1

6 Emergency Preparedness drill 12 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 Scenerio / periodicity

7 Safety inspections schedule

1 Office Safety Inspection 4 1 1

2 Canteen Safety Inspection 4 1 1

3 Mobile lifting equipment & Lifting Operations 2

4 Gas cylinders (Storage & Handling) Inspection 1

5 Welding & Gas Cutting Sets Inspection 2

6 Power operated tools inspection 2 1 1

7 PPE inspection 2 1 1

8 Machine guarding 2 1 1

9 Vehicles inspection 4 1 1

10 Lifting equipment & accessories 2 1 1

11 Pressure vessels 1



Sl.No. Item Targets

Apr'12 May'12 Jun'12

Tar Act Tar Act Tar Act

12 Firefighting equipment ( Fixed Systems/ Fire extinguishers) 4 1 1

13 Fire alarm system 2

14 Fire exits, escape routes marking. Office area. 4 1 1

15 Buildings, plant structures NA 1

16 Plant lighting 4 1 1

17 Conveyors 2

8 "On-The-Job" Safety events

1 Electrical Safety week 1 1 1

2 Housekeeping week 1

3 Road safety week- 1

4 Safety week celebration HSE department 1

5 Fire awareness week 1 1 1

9 "Off-The-Job" Safety events 3

1 Home safety 1

2 Defensive driving-(Traffic safety awarness) 1

3 Fire Safety 1


December 2012 i SENES

Annexure 1: Persons Interviewed

Sl. No. Name Position

CGPL

1 Mr. Sharad Baijal Head - Operations

2 Mr. Sanjeev Gupta Associate Group Head - Finance

3 Mr. Ramesh K Dhawan Chief – SHE

4 Mr. Vishal C. Shah Senior Manager - Environment

5 Mr. Himanshu Shrivastav Member, HR

6 Mr. Pradeep Ghosal Chief Manager - CSR

7 Mr. Asif Pathan Assistant Manager - CSR

8 Mr. Saurabh Sharma Assistant Manager - CSR

9 Mr. Krishna Kumar Sharma Executive Director

10 Mr. Nain Tonk DGM - HR

11 Mr. Sriballav Singh Chief Manager - HR


December 2012 ii SENES

Annexure 2: Green Belt Development Status (July-Sep’12)

Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

No No No % Acre No No No % Acre No No No % Acre

0 8511 6038 71 8511 6038 71 8511 6038 71

0 4225 2552 60 4225 2552 60 4225 2552 60

0 8156 8156 100 8156 8156 100 8156 8156 100

2850 5750 5624 98 83 5833 5707 98 0 5833 5558 95

0 2600 2470 95 2600 2470 95 2600 2470 95

0 1800 1711 95 1800 1711 95 1800 1711 95

0 850 819 96 850 819 96 850 819 96

350 4349 4349 100 4349 4349 100 150 4499 4245 94

0 3405 3256 96 3405 3256 96 3405 3256 96

0 1918 1918 100 124 2042 2042 100 0 2042 2042 100

0 765 765 100 765 765 100 765 765 100

0 300 294 98 300 294 98 300 294 98

0 215 209 97 215 209 97 215 209 97

0 1538 1538 100 1538 1538 100 1538 1500 98

175 453 433 96 453 433 96 453 422 93

0 1500 847 56 1500 847 56 1500 762 51

0 900 800 89 900 800 89 900 800 89

0 900 848 94 900 848 94 900 848 94

0 402 402 100 402 402 100 402 400 100

0 5 5 100 5 5 100 5 5 100

0 22 22 100 22 22 100 22 22 100


December 2012 iii SENES


Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation


0 147 147 100 147 147 100 147 140 95

0 25 21 84 25 21 84 25 21 84

0 770 516 67 770 516 67 770 516 67

0 50 46 92 50 46 92 50 46 92

0 200 190 95 200 190 95 200 190 95

0 620 585 94 620 585 94 620 585 94

0 100 86 86 100 86 86 100 86 86

0 141 134 95 141 134 95 141 120 85

0 2090 2067 99 2090 2067 99 2090 2067 99

0 300 274 91 300 274 91 300 274 91

0 50 50 100 50 50 100 50 49 98

0 10 8 80 10 8 80 10 8 80

0 100 75 75 100 75 75 100 59 59

0 500 470 94 500 470 94 500 470 94

800 3113 3065 98 3113 3065 98 3113 3020 97

0 200 196 98 200 196 98 200 190 95

0 80 73 91 80 73 91 80 73 91

0 305 287 94 305 287 94 305 287 94

0 1557 1450 93 1557 1450 93 1557 1450 93

0 2 2 100 2 2 100 2 2 100

0 2 2 100 2 2 100 2 1 50

0 2 2 100 2 2 100 2 2 100

0 1 1 100 1 1 100 1 1 100


December 2012 iv SENES


Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation

Plants

planted

during

month

Cumulative

plants

planted

Cumulative

Plants

survived

Survival

Rate

Area

Covered

by

plantation


0 60000 55000 92 60000 55000 92 60000 55000 92

0 4000 4000 100 4000 2500 63 4000 2500 63

0 5700 5700 100 5700 5000 88 5700 5000 88

0 5860 5860 100 5860 5860 100 5860 4860 83

0 2320 1350 58 2320 1000 43 2320 1000 43

0 500 500 100 500 500 100 500 483 97

0 92 92 100 92 92 100 92 90 98

0 180 180 100 180 180 100 180 156 87

0 1468 1400 95 1468 1400 95 1468 1400 95

800 800 800 100 800 800 100 800 566 71

400 400 400 100 400 400 100 400 339 85

5,375 140,249 128,085 91.33 202.18 207 140,456 125,742 89.52 202.18 150 140,606 123,925 88.14 202.18


December 2012 v SENES

Annexure 3: Certificate of Analysis – Columbian & Satui Coal


December 2012 vi SENES

Documents

Quarterly Environment & Social Monitoring Report (July