Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/14/2018
1
QUENTIN ROAD STUDYDundee Road to Lake Cook Road
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
Final EA
2
Purpose & NeedEstablish why the project is needed
Public Involvement
Public InformationMeeting #1
Public HearingPublic InformationMeeting #2
2015 2018
Study Timeline
201920172016
Environmental Studies & Stakeholder Coordination
Alternatives Analysis & ScreeningX
ScopingSolicit public input on issues andconcerns the project should address
Draft Environmental Assessment (EA)
We Are Here
Public InformationMeeting #3
11/14/2018
2
3
Study Update
Alternatives Analysis Recap
Results of Evaluation Rounds 3 and 4
Meeting Agenda
NORTH
Regional Limits10 miles
Quentin Road – Regional Limits
Schaumburg
Hawthorn Woods
4
11/14/2018
3
NORTH
Project Study Limits
1 mile
Lake Cook Road
Dundee Road
5
PALATINE
PALATINE
DEER PARK
NORTH
Quentin Road – Study Limits
Established the basis for a range of reasonable alternatives
Purpose: Address existing and 2040 transportation needs
Strive to balance the transportation needs with the unique environmental setting along Quentin Road
Transportation Needs:
1. Improve the facility condition and design
2. Improve safety
3. Improve mobility
4. Enhance system linkage
Project Purpose and Need
6
11/14/2018
4
Study Update
Environmental Stakeholder Coordination
Focus Group Topics
Safety for all Users
Water
Animal/Vegetation
Roadway Character
Completed Additional Environmental Studies
77
Environmental Stakeholder Coordination
8
Forest Preserves of Cook County
Friends of the Forest Preserve
Openlands
Build Quentin Right
Deer Grove Natural Areas Volunteers
Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways
Environmental Stakeholder Group Members
11/14/2018
5
Focus Groups
Small groups of environmental stakeholder members were formed to provide open and transparent dialogue on important topics and share data and insight between various stakeholders.
WaterAnimal /
Vegetation
RoadwayCharacter
Safety forAll Users
9
Alternatives Evaluation Process
10
Four evaluation rounds with more detailed studies conducted in following rounds
Round 1 – Purpose and Need Screening
Round 2 – Refined Purpose and Need Screening
Round 3 – Performance and Impacts Evaluation
Round 4 – Refined Performance and Impacts Evaluation
Consistent, fair and transparent process
Goal is to balance the transportation needs along the corridor while minimizing impacts to the adjacent human and natural resources of the corridor
Cook County will make the ultimate decision while considering input from project stakeholders
11/14/2018
6
Evaluation Round 4:Refined Performance and
Impacts Evaluation
Evaluation Round 3:Performance and Impacts
Evaluation
Evaluation Round 1:Purpose and Need
Screening
Evaluation Round 2:Refined Purpose and Need
Screening
Alternatives Evaluation Flowchart
XALT 1
ALTER
NATIVES CONSIDER
ED
ALT 4 ALT 4
Combination RoutesALTS 9 ‐ 14
Legend
Alternative DroppedXAlternative #
Alternative Carried
Forward
ALT #
Parallel Routes
ALT 7 & 8X
ALT 2 ALT 2
ALT 6 ALT 6
ALT 3 ALT 3
ALT 5 ALT 5
No Build No Build
11
Evaluation Round 4:Refined Performance and
Impacts Evaluation
Evaluation Round 3:Performance and Impacts
Evaluation
Evaluation Round 1:Purpose and Need
Screening
Evaluation Round 2:Refined Purpose and Need
Screening
XALT 1
ALTER
NATIVES CONSIDER
ED
ALT 4 ALT 4 X
Combination RoutesALTS 9 ‐ 14
X
Legend
Alternative DroppedXAlternative #
Alternative Carried
Forward
ALT #
Parallel RoutesALT 7 & 8
X
ALT 2 ALT 2
ALT 6 ALT 6
ALT 3 ALT 3
ALT 5 ALT 5
No Build No Build
12
Alternatives Evaluation Flowchart
11/14/2018
7
Round 3 Results: Performance and Impacts Evaluation
13
Developed variations of alternatives (A – D)
Lane widths (12‐foot vs. 11‐foot)
Curbs and gutters vs. shoulders
Quantified environmental impacts
Right‐of‐way from the Forest Preserve and private property
Number of trees lost
Acres of direct impacts to wetlands and floodplains
Other environmental considerations
Future noise levels
Water quality
Stormwater detention
Evaluation Round 4:Refined Performance and
Impacts Evaluation
Evaluation Round 3:Performance and Impacts
Evaluation
Evaluation Round 1:Purpose and Need
Screening
Evaluation Round 2:Refined Purpose and Need
Screening
XALT 1
ALTER
NATIVES CONSIDER
ED
ALT 4 ALT 4 X
Combination RoutesALTS 9 ‐ 14
X
Legend
Alternative DroppedXAlternative #
Alternative Carried
Forward
ALT #
Parallel RoutesALT 7 & 8
X
ALT 2 ALT 2 ALT 2A thru 2D
2‐lanes with left turn lanes
X
ALT 6 ALT 6 ALT 6A thru 6D
5‐lanes (center median with left turn lanes)
X
ALT 3 ALT 3 ALT 3A thru 3D3‐lanes (center median with left turn lanes)
ALT 3C
ALT 5 ALT 5 ALT 5A thru 5D
4‐lanes with left turn lanes
ALT 5C
14
No Build No Build No Build No Build
Alternatives Evaluation Flowchart
11/14/2018
8
15
NORTH
33’ 55’
Alternative 3C Alternative 5C
Existing ROW Existing ROW
Round 4 Results: Refined Performance and Impacts Evaluation
16
Evaluated Alternatives 3C and 5C
Considered feedback from stakeholders and Focus Groups
Included additional environmental criteria
Completed additional environmental analyses
Water Quality
Salt Splash and Salt Spray
Identified project specific features of each alternative
Considered variances to standard design criteria to further reduce impacts
11/14/2018
9
Evaluation Round 4:Refined Performance and
Impacts Evaluation
Evaluation Round 3:Performance and Impacts
Evaluation
Evaluation Round 1:Purpose and Need
Screening
Evaluation Round 2:Refined Purpose and Need
Screening
XALT 1
ALTER
NATIVES CONSIDER
ED
ALT 4 ALT 4 X
Combination RoutesALTS 9 ‐ 14
X
Legend
Alternative DroppedXAlternative #
Alternative Carried
Forward
ALT #
Parallel RoutesALT 7 & 8
X
ALT 2 ALT 2 ALT 2A thru 2D
2‐lanes with left turn lanes
X
ALT 6 ALT 6 ALT 6A thru 6D
5‐lanes (center median with left turn lanes)
X
17
ALT 3 ALT 3 ALT 3A thru 3D3‐lanes (center median with left turn lanes)
ALT 3C
ALT 5 ALT 5 ALT 5A thru 5D
4‐lanes with left turn lanes
ALT 5C
?
?
No Build No Build No Build XNo Build
Alternatives Evaluation Flowchart
Final EA
18
Purpose & NeedEstablish why the project is needed
Public Involvement
Public InformationMeeting #1
Public HearingPublic InformationMeeting #2
2015 2018
Study Timeline
201920172016
Environmental Studies & Stakeholder Coordination
Alternatives Analysis & ScreeningX
ScopingSolicit public input on issues andconcerns the project should address
Draft Environmental Assessment (EA)
Public InformationMeeting #3
We Are Here
11/14/2018
10
19
Next Steps
Conclude Public Comment Period on November 30th
Identify the Preferred Alternative
Prepare the Environmental Assessment (EA)
Hold a Public Hearing for Comments
Study Approval
20
What Will You See At This Public Meeting?
Series of exhibits and project information
Project team and staff are available to answer questions
Please provide input and comments
Provide Your Comments on the Two Remaining Alternatives
Comment period open until November 30th
Future Public Hearing
11/14/2018
11
THANK YOU FOR COMINGQUENTIN ROAD STUDY
Next presentation will begin shortly
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
5N ex t
m i n u t e s
P re s e n t a t i o n i n
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
11/14/2018
12
4N ex t
m i n u t e s
P re s e n t a t i o n i n
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
3N ex t
m i n u t e s
P re s e n t a t i o n i n
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
11/14/2018
13
2N ex t
m i n u t e s
P re s e n t a t i o n i n
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018
1N ex t
m i n u t e
P re s e n t a t i o n i n
Cook County
Department of Transportation and Highways
Public Information Meeting #3November 13, 2018