AUDIENCE FEEDBACKAncillary and Trailer feedback

Trailer Wallwisher

Trailer Feedback - PositivesThe feedback said that the camerawork was well shot and the various shot types used helped to make the trailer better. • ‘the shot variety is good’• ‘The shots are good, well thought out’

Also the editing used was quick and snappy, this helped the trailer to flow well and stay conventional. • ‘the editing is well done’ • ‘I like the use of wipes too, very conventional’

Trailer Feedback - NegativesOur audience thought that the music didn’t really fit the genre of the film. It seemed like it had just been casually thrown over the top of the trailer. • ‘The music is quite poor and doesn’t really fit the trailer’

They didn’t like the costumes either, they thought that they weren’t really suited to the character.• ‘some of the costumes were too casual’

The narrative drew a few criticisms, many believed it was to vague. • ‘The narrative is a little confusing, maybe you give too much

away’• ‘The narrative is alright, however the trailer visually is superb’

Trailer Survey

Trailer Survey Results

1

2

3

4

5

1. Rate the camera shots used 1 = Awful 5 = Very good

Yes No 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

5. Is the narrative clear?4. Does the music fit the genre?

1

2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2. How conventional is the editing used? 1 = Awful 5 = Very good

Ancillary Wallwisher

Ancillary Feedback – Positives Most people believed that the Magazine was good, and looked very conventional. • ‘The magazine is well created’• ‘Overall the quotes and cover lines are creative’

Overall the poster was successful and it looked realistic. • ‘Poster is really good, I like font styles a lot.’• ‘The poster is well done and looks official’

From the surveys its clear that many people liked the layout and also the colour scheme and font styles that I’d chosen.

Ancillary Feedback - NegativesMost of the criticisms were about the poster. • ‘The poster is a little to simple’• The poster is simple, and it needs a little more’

Also the image and colour scheme of the magazine was questioned a few times.• ‘The image is a little weird’• ‘The colour scheme looks a little bland’

The survey results showed that although the Ancillary tasks are good they aren’t enough to convince people to go and watch the film.

Ancillary Survey

Ancillary Survey Results

Yes

No

1. Does the magazine cover look conventional?

8. Does the colour scheme make the poster stand out? Would you watch the film based on seeing the poster?

3. Is the font and colour scheme conventional for a film magazine?

5. Does the layout of the poster work well?

Yes No0123456789

Yes

Slightly

No

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Yes

Maybe

No

SummaryOverall the feedback gained from my target market were positive. They explained on how well edited the trailer was and how good the shots were composed. The ancillary tasks were equally as successful with the audience, they thought that the poster was simple but effective and the magazine looked official and conventional.

However the negatives that were picked out about the trailer were centred around the music and how it didn’t really fit the genre. Also the ancillary tasks were too simple and the composition of the images were confusing and strange.

Improvements - TrailerFrom the audience feedback I have learnt that the trailer needs better music, as it doesn’t fit the genre and doesn’t related to what’s happening within the film.

Also some of the costumes should have been better thought out, for example when my character is dressed casually in joggers and a hoody for a date. He should have been smarter to show the importance of the date.

Improvements – Ancillary The audience feedback I gathered also gave me lots of things to improve concerning my ancillary tasks, the magazine although it looked good, drew criticisms for the composition of the images on the front.

Also the colour scheme wasn’t well thought out with a few people thinking that it was too bland and lacked real colour.

The poster was too simple, many people thought that it needed more added to it, it just seemed like a picture with a few bits of writing. It needed more emphasis on the title of the film.