4
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards - B. Mathematical Sciences Vol. 79B, No s. 1 a nd 2, January-June 1975 A Condition for the Diagonalizability of a Partitioned Matrix Charles R. Johnson* and Morris Newman Institute for Basic Standards, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234 (March 5, 1975) \VI 1(' 11 IT and " ar(' di agon a li za bl e Ih e ni agolla li za bilit y of is equivale nt to th e solvabilit y in X of UX - XV= N. A c oroll ary a nd rnp lt· arc Key Words: Di ago na li zab le matrix; partitioned matrix A s qu are c ompl ex ma trix A is te rm ed " di agon a li za bl e" if a nd onl y if A is similar to a di ago nal matrix; th at is . if a nd o nl y if th ere ex ists a nonsingular matrix 5 such th at S-' AS is di ago na l. O ur purpo se is to pr ove th e fo ll owing n ecessa ry a nd s uffi c ie nt c on d ition for th e di ago na li za bilit y of a pa rtition ed matrix. We sha ll de not e th e class of n by n c ompl ex ma tri ces by M I/(C). TH EO REM 1. Su pp ose U, VEMn (C) are diagona/izllbl e. Then is simil ar to if and only if th ere is an XE lVI n (C) such that UX - XV = N. PROOF: Suppose 5, TEMI/(C ) are inv e rtibl e and are such th at S US - I = D a nd T-' VT= E ar e diagon a l. Th en is s imil a r to AIllS Subject C(lIssijiwtion: 1 5A2 1: 15A24. * I)rese n! ad d rt- ·i'l' : In stitute fllr Fluid Dynami('s an d Applied i\:la lill'ma li ('s. Un ivl"rs it y of Maryla nd, Cll il ege Park, Md. 20742 45

R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards - B. Mathematical Sciences Vol. 79B , Nos. 1 a nd 2, January-June 1975

A Condition for the Diagonalizability of a Partitioned Matrix

Charles R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

Institute for Basic Standards, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234

(March 5, 1975)

\VI1(' 11 I T and " ar(' di agon a li za ble Ill a t r i (' ( '~ Ih e ni agoll a li za bilit y of

is equivalent to the so lvab ilit y in X of

UX - XV = N.

A c oroll ary a nd ~ j rnp lt· ~(' Il t: r a li za tioll arc ~ i vt· r l.

Key Words: Diago na li zab le matri x; pa rtitioned matrix

A squ a re complex m a trix A is te rm e d " di agon a li za bl e" if a nd onl y if A is s imil a r to a di ago na l

ma tri x; th a t is . if a nd onl y if th e re ex is ts a nons in gul a r ma tri x 5 s uc h th a t S - 'AS is di ago na l. O ur

purpose is to prove th e fo ll o win g necessa r y a nd s uffi c ie nt con d ition for the di ago na li za bilit y o f a

pa rtition ed m a tri x. W e s ha ll de not e the c lass of n b y n complex ma tri ces b y MI/(C).

TH EOREM 1. Suppose U, VEMn (C) are diagona/izllble. Then

[~ ~l is similar to

if and only if there is an XElVIn (C) such that UX - XV = N. PROOF: Suppose 5 , TEMI/(C ) a re inve rtibl e and a re s uc h th a t

S US - I = D a nd T- ' VT = E

are diagon a l. Th e n

is s imil a r to

AIllS Subject C(lIssijiwtion: 15A2 1: 15A24. * I)resen! ad d rt-·i'l' : In s tit ute fllr Flui d Dyna mi('s and Applie d i\:la lill' mali ('s. Un ivl"rs it y of Mar yland, Cll il ege Pa rk , Md. 2074 2

45

Page 2: R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

if and only if

is s imilar to

and

UX-XV=N

if and only if

D (SXT) - (SXT) E = SNT.

Thus, it s uffi ces to assume from th e outset that U and V are diagonal matri ces. Now suppose, firs t of ali, that

U= diag {UI ' ... , U,,},

V = diag {VI, . . ., v,,},

and that

is similar to

where N = (nij)EM" (C). W e will show that if Uj = Vj, the n n jj = O. It foll ows that if X = (Xi)) is de fin ed

by Xij=~ for Uj ~ Vj, and Xij arbitrary otherwise, the n UX -XV=N. Uj-Vi

De note by Eij the n by n matrix all of whose entri es are 0 except for a 1 in the i,j position. The n

N+t(Vi-Uj)Eij]

V .

Because of thi s similarity we may assume without loss of ge ne ralit y th a t njj= 0 whenever Vj:F Uj. If N = 0 , we a re fini shed. If not , we shall reach a co ntradi c tion. Suppose N ~ o. Then via a permutational si milarity we may assume that

is s uc h that

46

---.. - - -

I

Page 3: R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

Ui = Vi = U for i ~ k, j ~ t, U i cp U, Vj 7'= u for i > k,j > /, a nd

NI cp 0 is k by t . It is th e n clear that

is pe rmutationally si milar tu

Sin ce

o o ul

o o

is s imila r to [ uJ 0]" o ul

on I y if N 1 = 0, th e assu m ption th a t NcpO contra di c ts ou r origi na l s uppos ition th a t

is s i m i lar to [ ~ : 1 Thu s our original s UPPOSItIon does im p ly th a t /l ij= O wh e ne ve r Vi = U i whi c h In turn im p li es tha t UX - XV is s olvab le.

Fin a ll y s uppose on th e oth e r ha nd th a t XEMI/(C) is s uc h th a t

UX-XV = N.

The n it is a s impl e computation th a t

and the proof of th e theore m is com ple te.

COROLLARY. Suppose U, VEMn(C) satisfy Ui>= V" = I, pd+ Then

[~ Nj" = 1 V

if and only i/th ere is an XEMn(C) such that UX - XV =N. PROOF: Si nce U"= V" = i , U a nd V a re di agon a lizabl e a nd the h ypothes is of th e th eo re m

is sa ti s fi e d. Now, if

47

Page 4: R. Johnson* and Morris Newman

[~ Nlil = / ,

V

the n

[~ and thus s imilar to

By th e theo rem , this implies VX- XV= N is so lvable. Conversely, if VX-XV= N, then

[ ~ is similar to [ ~ which is equal tol. thus

[~ Njll = /

V

which completes th e proof of th e co rollary.

A straightforward generalization of Theorem 1 is as follows. THEOREM 2. Suppose each UjEiVln (C), i = 1, .. . , k, is diagonalizable.

Then

Nij v, o

is similar to

o o

i/ and only i/ /or each i, j ~ k there is an XEMn (C) (depending on i and j) such that UjX - XUj = Nij.

(Paper 79Bl & 2-419)

48