Upload
benjamin-buck
View
59
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
RA-2/MWR Cross-Calibration and Products Validation Orbit Validation Objectives, Approach, Results and Recommendations Summary J. Benveniste, M.P. Milagro, B. Greco, P. Féménias et al. P. Vincent, B.Duesmann (OVT). Presentation Overview. Cross-Calibration and Validation Objectives Approach - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Page 1ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR Cross-Calibration and Products Validation
Orbit Validation
Objectives, Approach, Results and Recommendations Summary
J. Benveniste, M.P. Milagro, B. Greco, P. Féménias et al.
P. Vincent, B.Duesmann (OVT)
Page 2ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Presentation Overview
* Cross-Calibration and Validation Objectives
* Approach* Activity so far and results
• Algorithm Verification• Product Validation• Cross-calibration on ERS-2 RA/MWR• MWR calibration and Validation results
* Orbit Validation Team results* Conclusion* Recommendations
RA-2
MWR
DORIS
Page 3ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Objectives of the ENVISAT Validation Workshop
* Recall of the In-flight calibration of the instruments
* Recall of the Verification of level 1b data processing (engineering parameters) -- Review the evolution
* Review the verification of the Level 2 product algorithms (geophysical parameters)
* Review the consistency of the level 2 data products
* Provide an error estimate of the Level 2 products * Formulate conclusions and recommendations to
be delivered at the final plenary session.
Page 4ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
In One Slide...
From the RA-2/MWR Cross-Calibration and Validation
Team
Page 5ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Sea Level Anomaly in Oct 2002
Page 6ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Objectives of the Cross-Calibration and Validation
* Cross-calibrated data products:-• Determine relative biases between ENVISAT RA-2 and
ERS-2 RA, at the mm level for the range, or/and other altimeters (T-P, GFO, Jason).
• Rationale: to ensure ERS-2/ENVISAT data products consistency and unify the two mission-long time series with high precision.
* Validated data products:-• Geophysical validation of the processing models and
the data products.• Rationale: to authorize distribution of validated data
products to all users.
Page 7ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Cross-Calibration and Validation Approach (1)
(i) Cross-calibration of the RA-2 main geophysical parameters against ERS-2 (and/or TP, GFO, Jason):-
• Global comparison at cross-overs and along the collinear tracks of millions of globally distributed data (significant error reduction)
• Global statistical comparison against ERS-2, Models, In-situ data
(ii) Preparation of long-term drifts detection:-• Global tide gauge network for RA-2 range monitoring
Page 8ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Cross-Calibration and Validation Approach (2)
(iii) Product validation• Verify with real data the consistency of the product
package (document, media, format and actual dataset)• Quantify the inherent validity and accuracy of the range and
altitude wave height, wind speed measurements and the geophysical corrections.
• Estimation of pseudo-time tag errors by minimization of crossover height differences over ocean.
The data products are used by the whole CCVTeam for the cross-calibration activities: This will enhance the quality and thoroughness of the validation.
Page 9ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Cross-calibration objectives for RA-2 & MWR data
PARAMETER REL. BIAS DRIFT DYNAMIC RANGE
range/sea surface height 1 mm 1 mm/yr
sigma-0 (Ku) 0.01 dB - 5 to 20 dB
windspeed 2 cm/s 2 cm/s/yr 3 to 20 m/s
windspeed slope 1%
significant waveheight 1 cm 1 cm/yr 1 to10 m
sig. waveheight slope 1%
brightness temperature 0.1 K 0.5 K/yr 100 to 350 K
wet tropospheric correction 1 mm 1 mm/yr 0 to 50 cm
Page 10ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR CCVT Activity So Far
* Quick look data inspection at Switch-on (night of 12 March)* In house verification of reference processors versus NRT
processor (IPF)* Level 2 Algorithm Verification w/ ESLs
• Verification and tuning for IPF and F-PAC* Support to Instrument and Level 1B verification
• Pseudo-time tag bias, range bias and sigma0 bias investigations
* MWR Instrument and Level 1B verification* Met offices validation of NRT data circulation.* Preliminary cross-calibration with one cycle of data
Page 11ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Algorithm Verification
* Level 1b/2 data from the IPF verified through comparison with real data Test Data Sets from the ref. processors:
• 3 IPF algorithm updates since launch• Only very minor discrepancies present in current IPF
* Level 2 algorithms verification and products validation activities performed by the ESLs:
• Ocean retracker and geophysical corrections validated, ice2 retracker verification preliminary, more ongoing
• OCOG/sea-ice retrackers and LIP algorithms verified
Page 12ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
IPF status• IPF version (4.53) operative at Kiruna since
27 Nov.– previous v. 4.52 operative since mid August
• Remaining discrepancies:– Very minor differences in few output values from
reference ocean retracking » default ocean ranges when ref. value was non-
default» negative SWH values over non-ocean surfaces
» No impact on product quality as there are no ocean waves on land!
Page 13ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
CMA status * Version of CMA used for the cycle of data provided
to the CCVT members (4 Oct- 16 Nov.): V5.4
* New version (V5.5) to be operative in CMA by mid December. This new version solves some known (minor) bugs in v.5.4
Page 14ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Range Noise Estimation
Range noise estimate is: 8 cm rms at 18 Hz 1.8 cm rms at 1 Hz for SWH < 2 m
Page 15ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Range Standard Deviation
Ku
S
Ku peak at 8 cm (1.8 cm)S peak at 27 cm (5.2 cm) This
confirms that RA-2 is indeed a low noise instrument
Page 16ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Page 17ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Range Standard Deviation
* Estimated on the ocean at cross-over of tracks• CLS: Pseudo Time Tag Bias : -0.3 ms
• DEOS:
Page 18ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Pseudo-Time Tag Bias
* Estimated on the ocean at cross-over of tracks• DEOS: -0.5 ms • CLS: -0.3 ms• MSSL: -0.4 ms• NCL U -0.4 ms +/- 0.5 ms
Page 19ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Cross-Over Analysis
* Estimated sea surface height RMS on the ocean at cross-over of tracks
• CLS: 8.98 cm with orbit error correction: 6.25 cm
• NCL U: 9.5 cm• MSSL : 8.5 cm
--> Confirms low noise from Envisat Altimetry (on top of ocean natural variability)
Page 20ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Ionospheric Correction
* Impact of the ionospheric correction on the estimated sea surface height RMS on the ocean at cross-over of tracks
GDR T < 10 days
(1372 X points)
Bent iono.
correction 8.98DORIS iono.
correction 8.68RA-2 altimeter
correction 8.53Filtered (300 km)
Altimeter correction 8.49
ConfirmsRA-2 doing better!
Page 21ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Estimated Relative Range Bias
• DEOS: -40.4 cm / ERS-2• CLS: -40.7 cm / CLS01 MSS• OSU: -43.1 cm / OSU 95 MSS• OSU: -39.95 cm / Great-Lakes Tide gauges
Page 22ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Significant Wave Height
* The special design of RA-2 with two additional digital filters located on the waveform leading edge to improve its slope estimation is giving excellent results in picking up the smaller waves.
* The SWH algorithm has been further improved to estimate smaller waves
Page 23ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Significant Wave Height
Page 24ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
ENVISAT Performance Coming Off Land
• Envisat RA2 gives good values for SWH and U10 < 2s when leaving land close to 90°.
Page 25ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
SWH Regression Against Buoys
• 20 NDBC buoys (< 30mins , < 50 km)
• N = 30
• ODR Correction: “True” Hs =
1.0579 EnvHs - 0.1438
• 95% conf. Intervals: Gradient 0.9701 - 1.1456 Intercept -0.3513 - 0.0636
• SWH (Ku) not significantly different from buoy “truth”.
• 1 months data: error margins ± 9%, ± 20 cm
Page 26ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
SWH in Near Real Time
* Ready to be used by met offices !
Page 27ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Rain Is Under Control
Page 28ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Rain Flag Performance
Page 29ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Passive Sigma0 Calibration
* Calibration experiment methodology validated on small data sample
* Improved method to complement the sigma0 absolute calibration transponder experiment by providing the inter-frequency bias
* Need more data to reach final results
Page 30ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Altitude in FDGDR/FDMAR
* 30 meter Orbit error* 4 cy/rev* Jumps
Use DORIS Navigator instead (30 cm)!
Page 31ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
NRT Sea Surface Height dominated by orbit error
US NAVY
Inclusion of the full rate DORIS Navigator on FDMAR product is fundamental to real time oceanography
Page 32ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Conclusion (1/2)
* Ref. processors fully verified and optimised• Only “ice2” verification is preliminary, more ongoing
* IPF verified, since last update (27 Nov) * F-PAC data processing verification
• perfect match for the outputs from ice1/ice2/sea-ice retrackers between F-PAC and IPF
• Very minor differences existing wrt NRT data (ocean retracker over non-ocean surfaces, flags, ..)
* No show-stopper for the Cross-Cal activities
Page 33ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Conclusion (2/2)
* The preliminary1 performance estimation of RA-2/MWR yields very good results
• Low Range noise estimated over low waveheight area of the ocean: at 1 Hz: 1.8 cm for Ku-band, 5.2 cm at 1Hz for S-band
• SWH compares well with ERS-2 and Models: 30 cm rms – RA-2 measures low waveheights much better than ERS (a feature!)– Algorithm has been further improved
• Wind speed rms only 1.4 m/s– Sigma0 cross-cal w/ERS-2 on more data
• Range preliminary cross-calibration on ERS-2 : bias = - 40 cm
1The RA-2/MWR Cross-Calibration and Validation Team has worked with four months of FDMAR and (only) one cycle of IGDRs, GDRs, SGDRs data (need three).
Page 34ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Next Steps
* Future upgrade of L2 Auxiliary files• Sigma0 cross-calibrated on ERS-2
– The next step will be to introduce the Absolute calibrated sigma0 and upgrade geophysical models using sigma0 (wind, sea state bias, MWR tropospheric correction)
* Future upgrade of CMA • to account for latest algorithms modifications on L2 ref.
processors and IPF|
* Finalise Validation activity on 3 cycles of data* Perform Cross-calibration on 3 cycles of data
Page 35ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
MWR Calibration and Validation Conclusions
• The MWR Brightness Temperatures are well calibrated for the two channel, as expected
• The Level 2 Wet Tropospheric correction is in very good agreement with the ERS-2 MWR one. Dh bias < 5 mm.
• Envisat MWR already appears to be in better agreement with the radiosoundings, when compared to ERS-2 MWR
• MWR 36 Ghz channel may require anyway some stabilization due to aging and thermal cycling of the components
– Current drift from the BOM of 0.25 counts/K
– No specific on-board problem has been identified.
Page 36ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
MWR Recommendations (1/2)
• Implementation of the new MWR Side Lobes corrections within Level 1B (Improvement > 1cm in specific zones)
– Algorithm validation on-going, to be completed by mid-February 2003. – Specifications ready by the end the 2002
• Priority for the MWR level 2 algorithm to have a RA-2 Sigma0 in line with ERS-2, in a first step.
• ‘MWR’ Sigma0 meant to be higher by 1dB w.r.t. to RA-2. This will be in injected in the recommended Level 2 Neural Network algorithm upgrade.
– Specifications ready by January 2003.
Page 37ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
MWR Recommendations (2/2)• Continuous monitoring of the 36 GHz channel gain drift
and LO CH2 behavior is recommended, to assess possible stabilization.
• Execute some further testing, the redundant LO at 36.5 GHz could be used for an observation period. Nevertheless this is not recommended at this stage.
• Linear correction factors on the MWR Brightness Temperatures and RA-2 Sigma0 to be implemented in the Level 1B processing to correct for potential drifts
Page 38ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Orbit Validation Team Results
Page 39ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Page 40ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
Orbit Validation Team Conclusion
* Results based on tracking residuals and on orbit comparisons are very encouraging:
• the 3 cm goal of accuracy for the radial component is realistic* Further evaluation through external tests is required:
• use of altimeter data• OVT plan: use the first 3 consecutive 35-day cycles made
available by the F-PAC* Important recommendation:
• The ultimate goal being to get optimal error estimation both in terms of RMS and importantly in terms of geographical distribution,
• Then, the global DORIS tracking data acquired onboard are required for the on ground orbit processing
Page 41ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR CCVTeam Recommendation 1/4
* Supply 100% DORIS Doppler to SSALTO in less than 2 days as a highest priority.
• A gap in DORIS data deteriorates the Altimetry and this propagates for several orbits into the Altimetry product
Page 42ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR CCVTeam Recommendation 2/4
* Include the DORIS Navigator data in the fast delivery Products (FDGDR, FDMAR).
• Reported efforts done in this direction since the Cal Review but need to sustain the effort for this implementation
US NAVY
Page 43ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR CCVTeam Recommendation 3/4
* Publish individual echoes processing algorithm.
Page 44ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
RA-2/MWR CCVTeam Recommendation 4/4
* ERS-2 / ENVISAT tandem mission configuration • after the three cycles data up-take, the CCVTeam can
release the constraint on the 30 minutes separation• Making same measurement 30 mn later is not useful any
longer after the Cross-Calibration data is acquired.
* Recommendation: Move one satellite for a more optimal space-time sampling of the Earth
• Options discussed in terms of mission objectives– Oceanography– Marine Geodesy
Page 45ENVISAT Validation Workshop - ESRIN - 9–13 Dec 2002 - Altimetry Session Summary
http://envisat.esa.int