52
Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Race and IQ

Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Page 2: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Race and IQ

The history of IQ testing

A brief introduction to IQ tests

Race-group differences

A summary of the issue

Possible explanations Test bias Genetic differences Environmental differences

Page 3: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Alfred Binet

Lawyer, self taught in psychology, studied under Charcot (who also influenced Freud)

Asked by French government to create a test to identify students who would benefit from remedial education

Along with Theodore Simon, created first widely-used standardized test of intelligence, the Simon-Binet Scale

Page 4: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Henry Goddard

Translated Simon-Binet into English (1908) Distributed 22,000 copies of translated test

across the U.S. Set up first laboratory to study mental retardation in New Jersey:

     Vineland Training School for Feebleminded Girls & Boys  Strong advocate of eugenics 1912 book The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of

Feeble-mindedness original article summary and analysis

Page 5: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Goddard (continued)

Wanted to prevent the breeding of feebleminded people hesitated to promote compulsory sterilization, even though

convinced it would solve problem suggested "colonies" where the feeble-minded could be

segregated

Established an intelligence testing program on Ellis Island in 1913 rejects 80% of immigrants as "feeble-minded"

83% of all Jews 80% of the Hungarians 79% of the Italians 87% of the Russians.

resulted in an exponential increase in deportations

Page 6: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

The Immigration Restriction Act (1924-1965)  Strongly influenced by American eugenics' efforts

restricted numbers of immigrants from undesirable racial groups (including Jews). 

Upon signing, President Coolidge commented, "America must remain American." 

Publicized race-group differences on Army IQ tests and claimed Americans were unfit for Democracy

One of many scientists (including Galton and Terman) that inspired scientific racism movement in Europe & U.S.

Goddard (continued)

Page 7: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Robert Yerkes

Founded first non-human primate research lab

Chaired committee that created the Army Alpha and Beta intelligence tests used in U.S. during World War I

Page 8: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

David Wechsler

Obtained Ph.D. in 1925

Chief psychologist at Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital from 1932-1967

Developed several intelligence tests, including Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC).

Born in Rumania, emigrated to U.S. at age 6

Worked as a psychological examiner in army during WWI

Page 9: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

WAIS Popularity

WAIS

Page 10: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Defining Intelligence

“Global capacity to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with the environment” (David Wechsler)

Survey of 1020 experts on intelligence Abstract reasoning (99.3%) Problem-solving ability (97.7%) Capacity to acquire knowledge (96.0%) Memory (80.5%) Adaptation to environment (77.2%)

Page 11: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Intelligence vs other types of tests

Aptitude tests measure a narrow range of ability

Achievement tests measure what you know or what you learned/achieved

Question: What is the SAT?

Answer: A multiple aptitude test (related to intelligence)

Page 12: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

SAT to IQ conversion table

SATV+M

IQ 15 SD

%ile  SATV+M

IQ 15 SD

%ile

1600 152.18 99.975   1010 109.46 73.587

1590 151.45 99.970   1000 108.74 71.985

1580 150.73 99.964   990 108.01 70.338

1570 150.00 99.957   980 107.29 68.647

1560 149.28 99.949   970 106.56 66.916

1550 148.56 99.940   960 105.84 65.149

1540 147.83 99.929   950 105.12 63.347

1530 147.11 99.916   940 104.39 61.516

1520 146.38 99.901   930 103.67 59.659

1510 145.66 99.883   920 102.94 57.780

1500 144.94 99.863   910 102.22 55.883

1490 144.21 99.840   900 101.50 53.972

1480 143.49 99.813   890 100.77 52.052

1470 142.76 99.782   880 100.05 50.128

Page 13: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Relationship between SAT and IQ

1. For SAT scores before 1996IQ = (0.126 x SAT combined) + (-.4.71E - 5 x SAT combined x SAT combined) + 40.063 (Detterman and Frey, Case Western Reserve Univ.)

2. For SAT scores from 1996 -2004 IQ =(0.095 X SAT Math) + (0.003 X SAT Verbal) + 50.241 Scores for SAT were "re-centered" in 1996, raising the average SAT back to 500 (Detterman and Frey, Case Western Reserve Univ.)

“SAT to IQ conversion is an inexact science, particularly for SAT's under 900. The chart's creator writes: "The lowest point of reference was the theoretical average IQ of high school students being 110 and the current average SAT I V+M (verbal + math) score being 1019. Everything below that is extrapolation. Also note that the decimal places give the impression that the numbers are more precise than they really are."

Page 14: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

WAIS Verbal Subtests

Page 15: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

WAIS Performance Subtests

Picture Completion

Picture Arrangement

Block Design

Object Assembly

Digit-Symbol Substitution

Page 16: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Interpreting IQ scores

Page 17: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Interpreting IQ scores (normal curve)

Page 18: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

The Flynn Effect (1995 data)

IQ scores tend to rise 3 points every 10 years

Page 19: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Does IQ matter?

How can we tell?

Data indicate IQ and school performance (GPA)

r=.50 for elementary and high school students r=.40 for college students

IQ and years of education (r=.50, see next slide)

IQ and occupational attainment (r=.50)

Likely due to very high correlation (r= mid .60s) between education and occupation

IQ and job performance (rs= .27 to .47)

Page 20: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

IQ and Education

Page 21: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

IQ and education/occupation (same data)

Page 22: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

IQ tests’ strengths and weaknesses

Page 23: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

The IQ racial gap

Page 24: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Possible explanations for the gap

The tests are bad

Genetic differences

Environmental differences

Page 25: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 1: IQ tests yield race-group differences, hence

the tests are biased

Argument 2: The test item content is culturally biased

Example: “What should you do when a child smaller than you begins to fight with you?” (comprehension)

Page 26: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Chitling Intelligence Test (Dove, 1971)

A "handkerchief head" is:  

(a) a cool cat(b) a porter(c) an Uncle Tom(d) a hoddi(e) a preacher

Many people say that "Juneteenth" (June 19) should be made a legal holiday because this was the day when:

(a) the slaves were freed in the USA(b) the slaves were freed in Texas(c) the slaves were freed in Jamaica(d) the  slaves were freed in California(e) Martin Luther King was born(f) Booker T. Washington died.

CB

Page 27: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Black Intelligence Test of Cultural Homogeneity

100-item multiple-choice test, based on items drawn from Black culture

Sample Questions 1. Alley Apple is

a) brickb) piece of fruitc) dogd) horse

2. CPT means a standard ofa) timeb) tunec) taled) twist

3. Deuce-and-a-quarter isa) moneyb) a carc) a housed) dice A, A, B

Page 28: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the culture-specific tests valid?

Useful for building self-esteem But low predictive validity

Low correlation between BITCH and achievement (Language =. 33, Math=.18)

Students in MR classes did no better on the B.I.T.C.H. than the WISC

Page 29: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Cultural bias data

Page 30: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 3:

The tests have different construct validity for Blacks and Whites

Page 31: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 4:

The tests have different/inadequate predictive validity for Blacks and Whites

B.I.T.C.H. correlations:

Language =. 33

Math=.18

Page 32: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

IQ and Education (1990)

Page 33: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 5: The tests have language bias because they are in standard English and many Blacks grow up speaking a Black dialect

Page 34: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 6:

The tests are neutral but the examiners are biased

Evidence:

25 of 29 studies published prior to 1995 found no significant relationship between the race of the examiner and Black children’s scores

Page 35: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Are the tests (racially) biased?

Argument 7:

The tests are neutral but the norms are inappropriate

In other words: Separate (rather than national) norms should be used to eliminate racial bias

Logical outcome:

1. Race group differences would be eliminated, but…

2. Scores would have little relevance

3. Scores would not allow tracking of group outcomes/disparities

Page 36: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Possible explanations for the gap

The tests are bad (Data indicate no bias!)

Genetic differences

Environmental differences

Page 37: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

The heritability of IQ

Page 38: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

But is the racial gap genetic?

Hard to determine due to environmental differences.

To be continued…

Page 39: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Is the racial gap genetic?

Many controversial “studies”

Page 40: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Between-group vs within-group variation

Page 41: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

What we know about IQ heritability

There is strong evidence of within-group heritability Laws of heredity produce regression to the mean There is a certain environment by gene interaction

Page 42: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Environmental Factors

Social class matters Motivation and test taking stills matters Stereotype threat matters Interventions matter

Page 43: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Family Factors and IQ

Page 44: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Social Class matters

Page 45: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Environmental Factors

Social class matters Motivation and test taking stills matters Stereotype threat matters Home environments matter Interventions matter

Page 46: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Stereotype threat matters

Stereotype threat literature

Steele and Aronson (1995)

Ryan and Anthony (2006)

Page 47: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Home environments

Page 48: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Interventions matter

Page 49: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

The Culture of Poverty (Kutner, 1975)

Page 50: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Blaming the victim (Ryan, 1976)

Four Steps to Blaming the Victim

1. Identify a social problem

2. Study those affected by the problem to discover how they are different from those who are not affected by the problem.

3. Define the difference as the cause of the problem itself

4. Create a humanitarian action (social service) program to correct the problem cause (from #3)

Real-world example:http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050307-5.html

Page 51: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

Blaming the (IQ) victim

1. Social problem: African American children underperforming

(relative to Whites) on IQ tests

2. Study those affected by the problem to discover how they are different from those who are not affected by the problem

1. Black families more likely to be less educated2. Black families more likely to have poor study spaces3. Black children more likely to be unmotivated to do well on tests4. Black children less likely to associate education with success

Page 52: Race and IQ Historical misuses and contemporary issues

3. Define the difference as the cause of the problem itself

Black children under-perform on IQ tests because Black families don’t value education

4. Create a humanitarian action (social service) program to correct the problem cause

?

Blaming the (IQ) victim, continued