24
Radiation Detection and Dosimety Workshop Radiation Detection and Dosimety Workshop John Connolly Manager, Lunar Lander Pre-Project CxPO/Advanced Projects Office 3/30/06

Radiation Detection and Dosimety Workshop - Radiation...Radiation Detection and Dosimety Workshop John Connolly. Manager, Lunar Lander Pre-Project ... 1000 950 1050 1150 850 950 1050

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Radiation Detection and DosimetyWorkshop

Radiation Detection and DosimetyWorkshop

John ConnollyManager, Lunar Lander Pre-Project

CxPO/Advanced Projects Office

3/30/06

2

Topics

♦ ESAS Architecture♦ Changes Since ESAS♦ Lunar Sortie Design Reference Mission♦ Lunar Outpost Design Reference Mission♦ The Radiation Risk Challenge

3

Immediate Answers to Big Questions

ESAS was chartered by the NASA Administrator to answer 4 immediate questions:

♦ (1) Complete assessment of the top-level Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) requirements and plans to enable the CEV to provide crew transport to the ISS and to accelerate the development of the CEV and crew-launch system to reduce the gap between Shuttle retirement and CEV IOC.

♦ (2) Definition of top-level requirements and configurations for crew and cargo launch systems to support the lunar and Mars exploration programs.

♦ (3) Development of a reference exploration architecture concept to support sustained human and robotic lunar exploration operations.

♦ (4) Identification of key technologies required to enable and significantly enhance these reference exploration systems and a reprioritization of near-term and far-term technology investments.

4

CEV Overview - Crew Module

Functions• CM attitude control propulsion

(GO2/Ethanol)• Docking system (LIDS)• Contingency EVA• Crew Accommodations• Avionics: DMS, C&T, GN&C, VHM• Life Support and Thermal Control• Earth Atmospheric Entry and

Recovery

5

CEV Overview – Service Module

♦ Avionics• Health sensors, embedded

processors♦ ECLSS/ATCS

• 60% propylene glycol / 40% H2O single-phase fluid loop, 4 x 7 m2

body-mounted radiator♦ Power

• 2 x 4.5 kW Solar Arrays

♦ Propulsion• 1 x 15,000 lbf pressure-fed

LOX/Methane OMS engine @ 362 s Isp, 24 x 100 lbf Lox/Methane RCS engines @ 315 s Isp, Al-Li graphite wrapped Lox/Methane tanks @ 325 psia, He pressurization

♦ Structure• Graphite epoxy composite skin &

stringer/ring frames construction♦ Thermal Protection

• Insulation

6

Launch System Selection

♦ NASA will continue to rely on the EELV fleet for scientific and International Space Station cargo missions in the 5-20 metric ton range to the maximum extent possible.• Commercial capabilities will be allowed to compete.

♦ The safest, most reliable, and most affordable way to meet exploration crew launch requirements is a 25 metric ton system derived from the current Shuttle solid rocket booster and liquid propulsion system. • Capitalizes on human rated systems and 85% of existing

facilities.• The most straightforward growth path to later exploration super

heavy launch.

♦ 125 metric ton cargo lift capacity required to minimize on-orbit assembly and complexity – increasing mission success• A clean-sheet-of-paper design incurs high expense and risk.• EELV-based designs require development of two core stages

plus boosters - increasing cost and decreasing safety/reliability.• Current Shuttle lifts 100 metric tons to orbit on every launch.

7

2-stage LOR LSAM with Single Crew Cabin and Integral Airlock

Lunar Surface Access Module (LSAM)• 2-stage, expendable• LOX/H2 Descent Stage performs LOI, nodal plane change and lunar descent

• RL-10 derivative throttleable engines• LOX/Methane ascent stage

• Same engine as CEV SM• ISRU compatible

• Single volume crew cabin with integral airlock• 2700 kg + cargo capability

8

“1.5 Launch” EOR-LOR

Ascent Stage Expended

ED

S, L

SA

M

CE

V

Earth Departure Stage Expended

LSAM Performs LOI

MOONMOON

EARTHEARTH

Vehicles are not to scale.

100 km Low Lunar Orbit

Direct EntryLand Landing

Service Module ExpendedLow

Earth Orbit

9

Potential Lunar Exploration Sites

1200

1100

1000

850

1200

1100

1000

900

1200

1100

1000

900

1200

11001000

900950

1050

1150

850

950

1050

1150

850

950

1150

850

950

1050

1150

1250

900

0 -170 -160 -150 -140 -130 -120 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 18

1050950

850

900

1050950

850

900

Landing Site Latitude Longitude Notes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A. South Pole 89.9 S 180 W (LAC 144) rim of ShackletonB. Far side SBA floor 54 S 162 W (LAC 133) near BoseC. Orientale basin floor 19 S 88 W (LAC 91) near KopffD. Oceanus Procellarum 3 S 43 W (LAC 75) inside Flamsteed PE. Mare Smythii 2.5 N 86.5 E (LAC 63) near PeekF. W/NW Tranquilitatis 8 N 21 E (LAC 60) north of AragoG. Rima Bode 13 N 3.9 W (LAC 59) near Bode vent systemH. Aristarchus plateau 26 N 49 W (LAC 39) north of Cobra HeadI. Central far side highlands 26 N 178 E (LAC 50) near near DanteJ. North Pole 89.5 N 91 E (LAC 1) rim of Peary B

A

B

C

DE

FG

H I

J

NOTE: Contours represent LOI delta-V (m/sec) required to access that point on the lunar globe

10

Lunar Sortie Crew MissionsSurface Operations Concept

♦ Sorties do not depend on pre-deployed assets and can land at any location on the Moon

♦ Four crew members lives out of landed spacecraft for up to 7 days

♦ EVAs can be conducted every day with all crewmembers• Crew can work as two separate teams

simultaneously♦ Unpressurized rovers for surface mobility (2

for simultaneous but separate EVA ops) gives crew approximately 15-20 km range from lander

♦ Sortie mission surface activities focus on three activities• Lunar science (geology, geophysics, low

frequency radio astronomy, Earth observations, astrobiology)

• Resource identification and utilization (Abundance, form and distribution of lunar hydrogen/water deposits near lunar poles; geotechnical characteristics of lunar regolith)

• Mars-forward technology demonstrations and operational testing (autonomous operations, partial gravity systems, EVA, surface mobility)

11

Candidate Lunar Outpost Site - Lunar South Pole

♦ Advantages• Lunar South Pole is a candidate for outpost

site based on its greatest ‘potential’ over other sites

• Elevated quantities of hydrogen, possibly water ice (e.g., Shackelton Crater)

• Areas with greater than 50% sunlight− Area (A) exists with approx. 80%

illumination, with the longest darkness period of approximately 50 hours

− Areas B and C have more than 70% illumination, with longest dark periods of 188 and 140 hours, respectively

• Less extreme diurnal temperatures− Avg. for sunlit areas -53 °C ± 10

°C− Avg. for shadowed areas -223 °C(?)

♦ Disadvantages• Undulating highland terrain (e.g., Apollo 16)

− Outpost layout, ISRU• Extreme environment in shadowed craters

− Operating machinery at -223 °C− Nature of ‘frozen’ regolith

• Low sun angle, long shadows• No constant line of sight communications

with Earth

Lunar South Pole (from Bussey et al, 1999)

Robotic Lunar Exploration Program (RLEP) must answer the open issues with the lunar south pole

12

Architecture Recommendations

♦ CEV• 5.5 meter diameter blunt body, Apollo-derivative capsule• 32.5 degree SWA• Nominal Land Landing (Water Back-up) Mode• CEV Reusable for 10 Missions, Expendable Heatshield• Pressure-fed LOX/Methane SM propulsion, sized for lunar mission (1450 m/sec TEI V)

♦ Crew Launch Vehicle• 4 Segment RSRB• 1 SSME Upper Stage

♦ Cargo Launch Vehicle• Shuttle-derived, in-line ET-diameter with 5 Block II SSMEs• 5 Segment RSRBs• Upper Stage/ Earth Departure Stage w/ 2 J-2S+

♦ EOR-LOR Mission Mode, “1.5 launch”♦ Global Lunar Access with Anytime Return♦ South Pole Lunar Outpost Using an Incremental Build Approach♦ 2-stage LSAM

• LOX-Hydrogen descent propulsion (1100 m/sec LOI + 1850m/sec Descent V)• Pressure-fed LOX-Methane ascent propulsion• Airlock• Up to 7 day surface sortie capability

13

Apollo Style Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (LOR)

EOR-LOR

14

ISS – Moon – Mars Architecture Linkages

• Mars 6 crew departure and return

• 3 to 6 crew + payload

• Crew rotation• ISS cargo

Operations and Systems• Autonomous operations• Partial gravity systems• EVA, Surface mobility

Crew Exploration Vehicle• 4 crew• Earth-moon

transfer

• Autonomous operations• Partial gravity systems• EVA, Surface mobility

• AR&D• Autonomous operations

• Safe crew launch

Technology Maturation• ISRU Systems• Oxygen-Methane propulsion

• Oxygen-Methane propulsion

• ISRU Systems• Oxygen-Methane propulsion

Earth-to-Orbit Transportation• Safe crew launch• Heavy Payload: 125mt• Large Volume: 8m dia

• Safe crew launch• Multiple, Heavy Payload

Launches• Large Volume Payloads

15

Changes Since ESAS - Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV)

♦ CEV Command Module• Mold Line: Apollo-Derived Capsule• Crew: 6 for ISS & Mars, 4 for Moon• Size: 5 Meter Diameter• Docking Mechanism: APAS or LIDS

♦ CEV Service Module• Propulsion: Hypergolic (MMH/NTO)• Some Capability for Delivering

Unpressurized Cargo♦ Unpressurized Cargo Variant No Longer

Required♦ Ongoing Analysis

• Impact of Reducing CEV Volume• Trading Functionality between Command

and Service Module• Eventual Migration to Non-Toxic Propellants

16

Changes Since ESAS - Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) &Heavy Launch Vehicle (HLLV)

♦ Crew Launch Vehicle • Single 5 segment RSRB/M 1st stage• Upper stage powered by a single engine derived from the Saturn

J-2• Given a 5 Meter CEV, Exploring Options for Upper Stage

Diameter

♦ Cargo Launch Vehicle• Twin 5 segment RSRB/M 1st stage (from CLV)• Core stage derived from the External Tank • First stage main engine decision forthcoming• CLV-derived avionics

♦ Earth Departure Stage• Upper stage derived from the External Tank • Powered by a single J-2 upper stage engine -

2 burn capability• CLV-derived main propulsion systems and avionics

17

Lunar Sortie DRM

18

Lunar Sortie DRM

♦ Up to four crew members can explore any site on the Moon for four to seven days ♦ Sortie missions allow for exploration of high-interest science sites or scouting of

future Lunar Outpost locations. ♦ Sortie crews have the capability to perform daily extra-vehicular activities (EVAs)

with crew members egressing the vehicle through an airlock. ♦ A Lunar Sortie mission requires the following elements: a CLV, a CEV, a CaLV

(with EDS), an LSAM. ♦ The mission mode is a combination Earth orbit Orbit Rendezvous and Lunar Oorbit

Rendezvous (EOR-LOR) • LSAM and EDS are pre-deployed in a single launch to low Earth orbit using the CaLV• A second launch, with the smaller CLV, delivers the CEV and crew to Earth orbit where the two

vehicles (CEV and LSAM/EDS) rendezvous and dock. • The EDS performs the TLI burn for the LSAM and CEV and is then discarded. • Upon reaching the Moon, the LSAM performs the LOI for the two mated elements. • The entire crew will transfer to the LSAM, undock from the CEV, and perform descent to the

surface. • The CEV is left unoccupied in low lunar orbit. • After a four to seven day surface stay, the LSAM returns the crew and their cargo to lunar orbit

where the LSAM and CEV dock and the crew transfers back to the CEV. • The CEV then separates from the LSAM, performs the TEI maneuver and returns the crew to

Earth • The LSAM is disposed via impact on the lunar surface. • The CEV re-enters Earth’s atmosphere via a direct or skip entry and lands in the western U.S.

19

Sortie Crew Mission Timeline (1)

E v e n t A c tiv e

E le m e n t O th e r

E le m e n ts

E v e n t D u r a tio n

(h o u r s) N o te s

C E V In -F lig h t A c tiv e

D u r a tio n (h o u r s)

C E V Q u ie sce n t D u r a tio n

(h o u r s)

L S A M A c tiv e

D u r a tio n (h o u r s)

L S A M Q u ie sce n t D u r a tio n

(h o u r s)

C a rg o la u n c h

C a L V /E DS L S A M 0 .8

L a u n c h o f th e E D S an d L S A M in to th e E a rth R en d ezv o u s O rb it . (a p p ro x im ate ly 4 8 m in u tes )

- - - 0 .8

D S /L S AM L o ite r in L E O

E D S L S A M U p to 2 ,2 8 0

E D S a n d L S A M m u st b e c ap a b le o f m a in ta in in g th em selv es in th e E R O u n til th e c rew la u n ch , w h ich c ou ld b e a s lon g a s 9 5 d a ys . (T B R -0 0 1 -0 3 0 )

- - - 2 ,2 8 0

C rew a u n c h to E A S T

C L V C E V 0 .1

L a u n c h o f th e c rew to th e E a rth A sc en t S ta g in g T a rg e t. C E V sep a ra tes fro m th e C L V a t th e E a rth A sc en t S ta g in g T a rg e t. (a p p ro x im a te ly 8 m in u tes )

0 .1 - - 0 .1

C E V A sc en t C E V - 0 .7

C E V p erfo rm s rem a in d er o f a sc en t, c ircu la riza tio n b u rn , an d p h a s in g in to th e E a rth R en d ezv o u s O rb it . (a p p ro x im ate ly 4 0 m in u tes )

0 .7 - - 0 .7

en d ezv ou s an d D o c k , E a rth O rb it L o ite r

C E V E D S , L S A M 2 4 to 1 2 0

(T B R -0 0 1 -0 1 6 )

C E V p erfo rm s ren d ezv o u s a n d d o ck w ith th e E D S /L S A M s tack . In c lu d es tw o d a y ren d ezv o u s seq u en c e an d th ree lo i te r d a ys , w h ich p ro v id es fo r fo u r c o n sec u tiv e d a ys o f c re w la u n ch a ttem p ts . A ll s ys tem s a re c h ec k ed ou t a n d v e rif ied o p era tio n a l p rio r to T L I. C rew m a y a lso en ter a n d ru n sys tem s c h eck s o n th e L S A M .

1 2 0 - - 1 2 0

T ra n s-L u n a r

n jec tio n E D S L S A M , C E V 0 .3

E D S is th e a c tiv e e lem en t p e rfo rm in g th e T L I m a n eu v er. L S A M a n d C E V a re c o n s id e red p a y lo a d s w ith th e C E V an d g ro u n d m o n ito rin g th e m an eu v er. (a p p ro x im a te ly 1 5 m in u tes ). E D S p erfo rm s se lf-d isp o sa l p o s t-T L I.

0 .3 - - 0 .3

T ra n s-L u n a r C o a s t, M id -

C o u rse o rrec tio n

L S A M C E V 7 2

T h is tim e re flec ts a b a la n c e b e tw een p ro p u ls iv e p e rfo rm a n c e a n d th e d es ire to m in im ize c rew e x p o su re to d eep sp a ce c o n d itio n s. ( typ ica lly th ree to fo u r d ays)

7 2 - - 7 2

L u n a r O rb it

n se rtio n , h eck o u t

L S A M C E V 2 4

T w en ty -fo u r h o u rs fo r th ree im p u lse c a p tu re in to L L O . T h e C E V is p la c ed in q u iesc en t m o d e p rio r to L S A M sep a ra tio n .

2 4 - 6 N o te (3 ) 1 8

CE

V, L

SA

M a

nd

Cre

w in

LE

O 2

4-12

0 ho

urs

CE

V, L

SA

M

and

and

Cre

w

in E

arth

-moo

n tra

nsit

72 h

ours

20

Sortie Crew Mission Timeline (2)

Event Active

Element Other

Elements

Event Duration (hours) Notes

CEV In-Flight Active

Duration (hours)

CEV Quiescent Duration (hours)

LSAM Active

Duration (hours)

LSAM Quiescent Duration (hours)

LSAM eparation LSAM CEV 0.3

Crewed LSAM separates from the CEV (estimated 15 minutes for separation sequence)

- 0.3 0.3 -

Descent and

Landing LSAM - 1 LSAM performs descent and landing to

the desired landing site. - 1 1 -

CEV Quiescent

Mode. LSAM Surface

Operation Prepare

or Ascent

LSAM CEV 96 to 168

Lunar Sortie mission provides from 4 to 7 days on the lunar surface. Both the CEV and LSAM are prepared for ascent. CEV may need to perform LLO plane change to support LSAM ascent stage rendezvous.

6 [Note (1)] 160 168 -

Ascent, Rendezvous, Dock

CEV, LSAM

AS - 3 Represents in-plane, in-phase

rendezvous. 3 - 3 -

Post-Ascent

Operations

CEV LSAM AS 3 Crew and cargo transfer from the LSAM to the CEV. LSAM and CEV closeout operations.

3 - 3 -

CEV eparation CEV LSAM AS 0.3

Crewed CEV separates from the LSAM ascent stage (estimated 15 minutes for separation sequence).

0.3 - 0.3 -

LSAM Disposal

LSAM AS - 2

[See (4)] LSAM performs self-disposal to the lunar surface post-TLI. - - 2 -

Trans-Earth

njection CEV - 24

Twenty-four hours for TEI three impulse departure from lunar orbit assuming significant Earth-Moon orbital misalignment.

24 - - -

Trans-Earth Coast, Mid-

Course orrection

CEV - 84 to 108

This time reflects a balance between propulsive performance and the desire to minimize crew exposure to deep space conditions. +/-12 hour variability from a nominal 4 day return trajectory is provided to allow for longitude control using Earth’s rotation.

108 - - -

Entry, Descent, Landing

CEV CM - 1 Direct or skip entry with landing at CONUS landing site 1 - - -

Recovery CEV CM - 24 to 36 Recovery of crew and vehicle Note (2) - - -

ontingency CEV LSAM 72

Contingency active operational time for the CEV. If used for post-LOI loiter in LLO, this contingency can be used to close the Sortie global access coverage without reducing the LSAM payload to the lunar surface.

72 - - 72

Total Duration (hours) 434.3 161.3 183.5 2563.9

Total Duration (days) 18.1 6.7 7.6 106.8

x hours at the end of the lunar surface phase is counted as active for the CEV to support checkout and LLO plane change (if quired) to support LSAM rendezvous.

he recovery phase is not included in the CEV In-Flight total duration because it has unique unctional requirements.

he LSAM is assumed to be active for two hours for each burn in the three-burn LOI sequence, or six hours total. The remainder f the 96 hours is listed as quiescent.

he LSAM is assumed to be active for two hours following CEV separation to enable phasing and execution of the de-orbit burn r safe LSAM disposal to the lunar surface.

LSA

M a

nd

Cre

w in

LLO

25

hou

rs

96-168 hours on lunar surface (sortie);Up to 180 days

(Outpost)

CE

V a

nd C

rew

in

LLO

32

hour

sC

EV a

nd C

rew

in

Ear

th-m

oon

trans

it 85

-109

ho

urs

21

Lunar Outpost Crew DRM

♦ The same suite of vehicles developed to support Lunar Sortie exploration is also required for Lunar Outpost missions

♦ Additionally, a surface habitat, power/communications systems, and other infrastructure elements are required

♦ Outpost deployment options:• Rapidly deploy infrastructure on a few large cargo landers (20 mt per

lander)• Land crewed missions repeatedly to one selected site and incrementally

building upon useful infrastructure left behind after the completion of each mission.

♦ The Outpost will eventually be permanently occupied, with crews rotating every 180 days.

22

Lunar Outpost Crew DRM

23

The 3-Part Radiation Risk Challenge

♦ We need to understand the real radiation risk to human space travelers• Better understand and characterize the environment

− Lunar neutron environment− High energy proton environment− Develop reliable monitors

• Better model the transport of radiation and understand how to build more inherent radiation shielding into our spacecraft designs− Integrating ALARA into the design− Use of Carbon composites in vehicle structures, shielding and components early

in the design, and providing recommendations on design optimization− Long lunar stay missions will likely require increased shielding over short stay,

the development of strategies to reduce chronic risk and GCR impacts• Better understand the biological effect of radiations on humans

24

Baseline - Single Volume LSAM

♦ 3 m diameter x 5 m habitable element with integral airlock