15
11/29/2018 1 Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc ., RT(R) Assistant Professor Emory University Medical Imaging Program 2 A.R.R.T. Safety Radiation Physics and Radiobiology Biological Aspects of Radiation 11 Radiation Protection 31 Minimizing Patient Exposure Personnel Protection 3 Objective To obtain optimum diagnostic information or therapeutic effects with minimum exposure of the patient. 4 Technologist’s Responsibility Recognize your duty to protect. The patient The public Health professionals Utilize all mechanisms to reduce dose to the patient without compromising image quality. 5 First Triad of Radiation Protection Justification with net benefit Dose Limits Optimization (ALARA) 6 Second Triad of Radiation Protection “Cardinal Principles” Time : Exposure is directly proportional to time. Distance : Exposure is inversely proportional to the distance squared. Shielding : Exposure is reduced by the placement of barriers between the source and the exposed individual.

Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

1

Radiation Protection and

Biology

Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R)

Assistant Professor

Emory University

Medical Imaging Program

2

A.R.R.T.

• Safety

– Radiation Physics and Radiobiology

• Biological Aspects of Radiation 11

– Radiation Protection 31

• Minimizing Patient Exposure

• Personnel Protection

3

Objective

• To obtain optimum diagnostic information or

therapeutic effects with minimum exposure of

the patient.

4

Technologist’s Responsibility

• Recognize your duty to protect.

– The patient

– The public

– Health professionals

• Utilize all mechanisms to reduce dose to the patient without compromising image quality.

5

First Triad of Radiation

Protection

• Justification with net

benefit

• Dose Limits

• Optimization (ALARA)

6

Second Triad of Radiation

Protection

• “Cardinal Principles”

• Time: Exposure is directly proportional to time.

• Distance: Exposure is inversely proportional to the distance squared.

• Shielding: Exposure is reduced by the placement of barriers between the source and the exposed individual.

Page 2: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

2

7

Classification of Radiation

• Corpuscular

• Electromagnetic

8

Corpuscular Radiation

• “Particulate”

• Any subatomic particle in

motion.

• Types

– Alpha

– Beta

– Neutrons

– High Speed Electrons

9

Electromagnetic Radiation

• An electric and magnetic

field, perpendicular to

each other, but traveling

through space in the

same direction.

• Types

– X-rays

– Gamma radiation

Carlton & Adler, 2006

10

Electromagnetic Radiation

• Energy (photon)/ No mass

• Travel at the speed of light

• Highly penetrating

• Ionizing

(x and gamma)

11

Electromagnetic Radiation

• In general, x-rays have:

– High energy

– High frequency

– Short Wavelength

12

Sources of Radiation Exposure

• Environmental (Background)

– Cosmic

– Terrestrial

– Internal

• Artificial (Man-made)

– Medical (Diagnostic and Therapeutic)

– Nuclear Industry

– Consumer Products

Page 3: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

3

13

Sources of Radiation Exposure

1987

14

Annual Dose U.S. Population

1987

• Environmental Radiation: 2.95 mSv*

• Artificial Radiation: 0.65 mSv

• Total: 3.60 mSv

* 1.98 mSv from Radon gas

15

Sources of Radiation Exposure

2009

NCRP Report 160, 2009

Annual Dose U.S. Population

2009

• Environmental Radiation: 3.10 mSv

• Artificial Radiation: 3.10 mSv*

• Total: 6.20 mSv

* 1.5 mSv from CT

NCRP Report 160, 2009

16

17

Interactions of Radiation with

Matter

• Coherent Scattering

– Unmodified, Classical, Thomson, Rayleigh

• Photoelectric Effect

– True absorption

• Compton Effect

– Modified Scattering

18

Coherent Scattering

• Occurs at low energy

levels (< 30 kVp)

• Photon- intermediate

shell electron interaction

• Non-ionizing process

Carlton & Adler, 2006

Page 4: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

4

19

Photoelectric Effect

• Photon-inner shell

electron interaction

• Probability depends on:

– “Z” of absorber

– Photon energy

– Mass density of

absorber

Carlton & Adler, 2006

20

Compton Effect

• Photon-outer shell interaction

• Scattering with partial

absorption

• Probability depends on:

– Photon energy

– Mass density

Carlton & Adler, 2006

21

Prevalent Photon Interactions

Carlton & Adler, 2006

Tissue Penetration

22

23

Radiation Quantities and Units

• Exposure (X): C/kg

• Air Kerma Graya

• Absorbed Dose (D): Gray

• Equivalent Dose (EqD): Sievert

• Effective Dose (EfD): Sievert

24

Exposure

• Unit: C/kg

• Measures ionizations

produced in air

• Applicable to x and

gamma radiation at

energies < 3 MeV

Page 5: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

5

25

Exposure

• 1 R =2.58 x 10-4 C/kg

• Used in the calibration of

x-ray equipment

Air Kerma

• Kinetic energy released in a unit mass (kg) of air

• Unit: J/kgair / Graya

• Expresses radiation concentration at a specific

point

– Patient’s body surface

26

Air Kerma

• DAP: Dose Area Product (mGy-cm2)

– Sum total of air kerma over the exposed area

– Energy entering the patient’s body surface

– DAP = Air kerma x surface area

= (0.05 Gy)(80 cm2)

= 4 Gy-cm2

= 4000 mGy-cm2

2728

Absorbed Dose

• Unit: Gray

• Measures energy

deposition in matter

• Applicable to all types of

radiation

29

Equivalent Dose

• Unit: Sievert

• Unit of biological effects

• EqD = D x WR

(absorbed dose x radiation weighting factor)

30

Equivalent Dose

• Radiation Weighting (Quality) Factors

– X-ray, Beta, Gamma 1

– Neutrons < 10 keV 5

– Neutrons > 100 keV – 2Mev 20

– Alpha particles 20

Page 6: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

6

31

Effective Dose

• Unit: Sievert

• Unit of biological effects

• EfD = D x WR x WT

D: absorbed dose

WR: radiation weighting factor

WT: tissue weighting factor

Effective Dose

32

33

Minimizing Patient Exposure

1. Exposure Reduction

1. Communication

2. Patient Positioning

2. Exposure Factors

3. Shielding

4. Beam Restriction

5. Filtration

6. Image Receptor Type

7. Grids

8. Fluoroscopy

34

1. Exposure Reduction

• Patient Positioning

(PA vs AP)

– Scoliosis examinations

– Skull examinations

– Lumbar Spine

examinations

35

2. Exposure Factors

• High kVp / low mAs

techniques are best for

patient protection.

• Choose a kVp level which

is “optimum”.

• Optimum kVp gives

adequate penetration and

an acceptable level of

scatter production.

36

3. Shielding

Shielding should be used if:

1. the reproductive organs are within or near the primary beam.

2. the objectives of the exam are not compromised.

3. the patient has reasonable reproductive potential.

Page 7: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

7

37

Types of Shields

• Flat Contact Shields

• Shaped/ Contour Contact

Shields

• Shadow Shields

38

4. Beam Restriction

• Apertures

• Cones and cylinders

• Collimators

39

Beam Restriction

• Increased beam

restriction results in:

– Decreased patient

dose

– Improved image

quality

• Contrast

– Less scatter

production

Carlton & Adler, 2006

40

5. Filtration

• Reduces exposure to the

patient’s skin and superficial

body tissues.

• Absorbs low energy, long

wavelength photons.

• Increases average beam

energy

41

Filtration

• Two types:

– inherent

– added

• Total Filtration:

– 2.5 mm Al (>70 kVp)

– 1.5 mm Al (50-70 kVp)

– 0.5 mm Al (< 50 kVp)Carlton & Adler, 2006

42

6. Image Receptor Type

• More efficient image receptors

require less exposure.

• Digital Receptor DQE

– PSP 30%

– Flat panel 67%

Page 8: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

8

43

7. Grids

• Grids are an image quality

device

– Absorb scatter radiation

– Improve image contrast

• Increase patient dose

– Higher grid ratio; higher

patient dose

44

8. Fluoroscopy

• Pulsed fluoro

– Duty factor

– Decreases dose

• Fluoro Time

– Increased time; increased

dose

– Cumulative timer

• High kVp Technique

Fluoroscopy

• Receptor positioning

• Magnification mode

• Last image hold

• Dose documentation

4546

Personnel Protection

• Cardinal Principles

–Time

–Distance

–Shielding

• Sources of Exposure

47

Sources of Radiation Exposure

• Medical Diagnostic Exposure

– Primary Beam

– Secondary Beam

– Leakage

– Stray Radiation (leakage + scatter)

48

Protective Barriers

• Primary

– 1.5 mm (1/16th inch) Pb. eq.

– 7 feet high

• Secondary

– 0.75 mm (1/32nd inch) Pb. eq.

– Extend to ceiling

Page 9: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

9

49

Equipment Recommendations

NCRP Report # 102• Aprons/Thyroid Shields

– 0.50 mm Pb equivalent

• Gloves

– 0.25 mm Pb equivalent

• Glasses

– 0.35 mm Pb equivalent

50

Equipment Recommendations

NCRP Report # 102

• Mobile Equipment

– Exposure Cord:

• 6 feet (180 cm).

– Operators should wear

leaded apron.

– Operators should stand at

a right angle to the

scattering object.

51

Equipment Recommendations

NCRP Report # 102

• Radiographic Units

– Tube Housing:

• < 100 mR/hr at 1 meter from source.

– SID:

• +/- 2% of indicated SID.

– Collimator:

• +/- 2% of SID.

– Filtration:

• 2.5 mm Al (> 70 kVp).

Carlton & Adler, 2006

52

Equipment Recommendations

NCRP Report # 102• Fluoroscopic Units

– Source-to Table-top Distance:

• Should not be less than 15 inches (38 cm);

• Shall not be less than 12 inches (30 cm).

– Primary Protective Barrier:

• Must be interlocked with x-ray tube.

• 2 mm Pb equivalent

– Exposure Switch:

• Dead-Man type.

53

Equipment Recommendations

NCRP Report #102• Fluoroscopic Units

– Protective Drape: Minimum 0.25 mm lead equivalent.

– Bucky Slot Cover: Minimum 0.25 mm lead equivalent.

– Cumulative Timer: Produces an audible signal or interrupts beam at 5 minutesfluoro time.

– Exposure Rate: Must not exceed 100 mGya/ min (10 R/min).

54

Dosimeters

• Film Badge

• Pocket Dosimeters

• TLD

• OSL Dosimeters

Page 10: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

10

55

Film Badge

Three parts:– lightweight plastic film

holder

– metal filters

– film packet

56

Advantages/Disadvantages

• Advantages– Constitutes a permanent,

legal record of personnel exposure

– Economical

– Distinguish all types of low level radiation and their energies.

• Disadvantages

– Temperature and humidity

extremes cause fogging

– Radiation exposure cannot

be determined on the day

of occurrence.

– Has a limited range of

sensitivity (>10 mR).

57

Pocket Dosimeter

• Resembles a fountain pen

• Contains a thimble ionization

chamber

• Two types

– The self-reading type

– The non-reading type

58

Function

• Contains two electrodes, one

positive (the central electrode)

and one negative (the outer

electrode)

• The quantity of charge

determines the position of the

shadow along the scale

59

Advantages/Disadvantages

• Advantages

– Immediate readout for

radiation workers

– Compact, easy to carry,

and easy to use

– Accurate and sensitive,

great for procedures that

are relatively short in

duration

• Disadvantages

– Expensive

– If not read every day, could

give an inaccurate reading

– Discharge if subjected to

mechanical shock

– No permanent legal record

of exposure

60

Thermoluminescent dosimeter

(TLD)

• Lithium Fluoride Crystals

Page 11: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

11

61

Function

• When irradiated, electrons in e absorb energy and are “Excited”.

• When heated, the electrons return to their original position and emit light.

• The intensity of light is proportional to the amount of radiation.

62

Advantages/Disadvantages

• Advantages– The LiF crystals interact as

human tissue does.

– Read as low as 5 mR

– Not affected by temperature and humidity

– May be worn up to 3 months/ reusable.

• Disadvantages

– Can be read only

once.

– Calibrated dosimeters

must be prepared and

read with each group

of TLD’s as they are

processed

63

Optically Stimulated

Luminescent Dosimeter (OSL)

• A lightweight plastic

holder

• Aluminum oxide detector

64

Function

– Radiation exposure is detected

by the Aluminum oxide detector.

– The dosimeter is “read” using a laser.

– When laser light strikes the dosimeter, the sensing material becomes luminescent in proportion to the amount of radiation exposure received.

65

Advantages/Disadvantages

• Advantages– Read as low as 1 mR

– Temperature and humidity changes do not affect the OSL

– Can undergo reanalysis

• Disadvantages

– No known

disadvantages

66

Effective Dose Limits

NCRP Report # 116

• a.k.a. Dose Limits.

• Based on the lifetime risk of somatic or

genetic injury.

Page 12: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

12

67

Annual Occupational Exposure

• Effective Dose Limits

(stochastic effects):

– 50 mSv

• Cumulative Effective

Dose (CED):

– 10 mSv x age (years)

• Effective Dose Limits

(non-stochastic effects) :

– Lens of eye:

• 150 mSv

– All others:

• 500 mSv

68

Annual Educational and Training

Exposure

• Effective dose: 1 mSv

• DE Limit (skin, hands, & feet): 50 mSv

• DE Limit (lens of eye): 15 mSv

69

Embryo-fetus Exposure

• Equivalent Dose Limit:

– Month

• 0.5 mSv

– Gestation Period

• 5.0 mSv

70

Biological Effects

• Result from energy deposited into the biological

system.

• Mechanisms of interaction:

– Ionization (Photoelectric + Compton)

– Excitation

71

Biological Effects

• Somatic Effects

• Genetic Effects

72

Somatic Effects

• Effects occurring in the

exposed individual.

Page 13: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

13

73

Somatic Effects

• Stochastic

– Mutational

– Non-threshold

– Example:

• Cancer

• Non-stochastic

– aka Deterministic

– Cell killing

– Threshold

– Examples:

• Burns

• Epilation

• Cataracts

74

Somatic Effects• Stochastic

– Linear, non-threshold dose response relationship

– Linear-quadratic, non-threshold dose response relationship

• Chronic low-level exposure

• Non-stochastic (Deterministic)

– Non-linear (sigmoidal), threshold dose response relationship

75

Genetic Effects

• Effects occurring in

unborn generations.

• Linear, non-threshold

dose response

relationship

76

Genetic Effects

• Mutations

– Typically recessive

– Usually harmful

• Chromosome damage

– Breaks

– Gene rearrangement

• Translocation

• Inversion

• Ring

77

Genetic Effects

• Genetically Significant Dose

– The average annual gonadal equivalent dose to members of the

population who are of childbearing age

– Estimated at 20 mRad (0.20 mGy)

• Doubling Dose

– The radiation dose that causes the number of spontaneously

occurring mutations in a given population to double.

– Estimated at 100 Rad (1.0 Gy) for low-intensity exposure

Biological Effects

• Short Term (Early) Effects

– Seen soon after exposure

• Long Term (Late or Delayed) Effects

– Seen up to 30 years after exposure

78

Page 14: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

14

Short Term Effects

• Acute Radiation Syndromes

– Hematologic

– Gastrointestinal

– Cerbrovascular

7980

Long Term Effects

• Carcinogenesis

– Radium watch dial

painters

– Uranium miners

– Atomic bomb survivors

– Thoratrast patients

• Cataractogenesis

• Life Span Shortening

• Embryological Effects

81

Embryological Effects

• Pre-implantation

• Major organogenesis

• Fetal development

Bushong, 2004

82

Factors Influencing

Biological Effects

• Biological Factors

– Related to the Organism

• Physical Factors

– Related to the type and delivery of the radiation

83

Biological Factors

• Tissue Sensitivity

• Oxygen Effect (OER)

• Age

84

Tissue Radiosensitivity

• Law of Bergonie` and Tribondeau

–Cells which are poorly differentiated and

rapidly dividing are most radiosensitive.

–Cells which are highly differentiated and

slowly dividing are most radioresistant.

Page 15: Radiation Protection and Biology Radiation Physics and ...wcec.info/blog3/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019... · Radiation Protection and Biology Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant

11/29/2018

15

85

Radiosensitive Tissues

• Blood Cells (Lymphocytes)

• Epithelial Tissues

• Intestinal Crypt Cells

• Reproductive Cells

• Lens of the eye

86

Radioresistant Tissues

• Nervous Tissue

• Muscle Tissue

• Liver

87

Biological Factors

• Oxygen Effect (OER)

– Oxygen enhances radiation effects

• Age

– The embryonic stage is the most

radiosensitive period in the lifetime of any

organism.

88

Physical Factors

• LET: Linear Energy Transfer

– Rate of energy deposition as radiation travels

through matter

• RBE: Relative Biological Effectiveness

– The relative effectiveness of a radiation in

producing a given biological effect when

compared to 250 keV x-rays

89

Physical Factors

• Time of dose delivery

– Acute

– Fractionation/

protraction

• Quantity of Radiation

• Quality of Radiation

90

Radiation Protection and Biology

• The End!