Upload
cadman-buck
View
37
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Radiative Transitions between Electronic States. November 14, 2002. Michelle. Blackbody Radiation Wavelength dependence of energy distribution of light emitted by a hot object. Photoelectric Effect Wavelength dependence of energy of electrons emitted when light strikes a metal. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Radiative Transitions between Electronic States
November 14, 2002.
Michelle
2
4.1 “Paradigm” Shifts•Maxwell light as electromagnetic waves
Blackbody Radiation
Wavelength dependence of energy distribution of light
emitted by a hot object
Photoelectric EffectWavelength dependence of energy of electrons emitted when light strikes a metal
PlanckQuantization of energy E =
h
EinsteinPhotons - quantized light
consisting of particles possessing “bundles” of
energy• DeBroglie light as a particle with wave properties
E = h = h(c/) = pc
From the perspective of absorption and emission it is more convenient to think of light in terms of
an oscillating electromagnetic wave
3
4.2-4.3 Absorption and Emission
Transitions between electronic energy levels accompanied by absorption or emission of light
Photochemical region of the spectrum: 200-700 nm 143 kcal mol-
1-41 kcal mol-1
valence orbital (, , n) antibonding orbital (*, *)
Chromophore: atom or group acting as a light absorber
Lumophore: atom or group acting as a light emitter
C=O C=C C=C-C=C C=C-C=O aromatics
Molar absorptivity measures “absorption strength”
units cm-1M-1 NOT cm2mol-1
4
4.4 The Nature of LightThe classical theory of light is a convenient starting point providing a pictorial and understandable physical representation of the interaction of light and molecules
classical theory can be improved by applying quantum interpretations of basic concepts (orbital, quantized energy etc.)
Dipoles as a model for interactions between electrons and light
oscillating electric dipole field of the electromagnetic wave
oscillating dipoles due to electrons moving in orbitals Dipole-dipole interactions are through space and don’t require
orbital overlap
(Interactions requiring overlap are “exchange interactions”)
Examples of dipolar interactions: London dispersion forces, EPR, NMR, large splittings for crystals (exciton interactions)
Exciton migration: electron-hole pair hopping from molecule to molecule in a crystal
5
4.4 Dispersion Forces
Correlation of fluctuations in electronic charge distributions in molecules
E ~ ABR-3AB
•Dipole on A drives formation of dipole on
B and vice versa
•Fluctuating dipoles are in “resonance”
Energy of the dipole-dipole interaction falls off as A and B
move apart, given by R-6AB
Energy of the dipole-dipole interaction falls off as A and B
move apart, given by R-6AB
True for all dipole-dipole interactions, magnetic or
electric
6
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
Frequency () of oscillating field must “match” a possible electronic oscillation frequency (conservation of energy)
There must be an interaction or coupling between the field (oscillating dipoles) and the electron
Interaction strength depends on field dipole and induced dipole strength as well as distance between the two.
Laws of conservation of angular momentum must be obeyed (electrons, nuclei, spins)
Spin change is highly resisted in absorption due to time constraints*the most important interaction between the
electromagnetic field and the electrons of a molecule can be modeled as the interaction of 2
oscillating dipole systems that behave as reciprocal energy-donor, energy-acceptors
7
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field electric field
H magnetic field
Direction of propogation
If the field can couple to the
electrons it can exchange energy
by driving the system into
resonance at a frequency common
to both
ABSORPTION(reverse for emission)
absorption: photons being removed from the electromagnetic field
emission: photons being added (?) to the electromagnetic field
A light wave generates a time-dependent force field F
8
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
• Radiative transitions between states are induced by perturbations which make the two states”look alike” by inducing a resonance
• Resonance requires that the two states have the same energy and momentum characteristics and a common frequency for resonance
E = hEnergy difference
between two statesFrequency of light wave oscillation
The energy of the photon must exactly match the the energy level difference in the
molecule
9
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
F = e + e[H v]c
Electrical forceMagnetic force
Force on an electron in a molecue by a light wave
c >> velectron
Force on an electron
F ~ e
•Major force on electrons is due to the oscillating electric field of the light wave
•Net effect of the interaction is generation of a transitory dipole moment in the molecule
10
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
Electric dipole induced by an electric field generated between two plates
Direction of induced dipole is always parallel to the direction of the external electric field
11
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
Light and the hydrogen atomElectric field interaction
reshapes the electron distribution of the 1s orbital
No node, no vibration 1 node, vibratory motion
Increase in # of nodes essential for absorption and vice versa for emission (related to nodal nature of light “wave”)
s orbital has 0 units of angular
momentum ( h )
p orbital has 1
photon must have 1
unit
12
4.4 Light as an Oscillating Electric Field
Light and the hydrogen molecule
•Interaction involves and orbitals instead of s and p
•Absorption is or * and is analogous to the s p transition in the hydrogen atom
13
4.4 Light as a Stream of Particles: Photons
• The photon as a reagent that may collide and react with molecules
• Long photons have little energy and momentum, short photons have a lot of both
• Largest cross-section of an individual chromophore is ~10 Å
• Nuclei are effectively frozen in space as a photon passesSpectroscopic Properties and Theoretical
Properties
In order to use the laws of quantum mechanics to describe fundamental properties we have to consider these terms:
f oscillator strength
i transition dipole moment
P transition probabilities
14
4.4 Oscillator Strength
Probability of light absorption is related to the oscillator strength f
f ~ 4.3x10-9 ∫ dTheoretical oscillator strength
Experimental absorption
Area under vs. wavenumber plot
Rate constant for emission k0e is related to by:
k0e ~ 4.3x10-9 -2
0 ∫ d ~
-20 fOscillator strength can be related to transition dipole moment by:
f = 8me 2i ~ 10-5|eri|2
3he2
Transition dipole moment
f = 8me <H>2
3he2
Relationship between experimental and quantum quantities
Strong absorption => f~1
15
4.5 The Shape of Absorption and Emission Specta
•Electronic transitions in molecules are not as “pure” as they are in atoms, in molecules relative nuclei motions must be considered
•An ensemble of nuclear configurations are observed
•“most prominent vibrational progression is associated with the vibration whose eqm position is most changed by the transition” ?
16
4.5 Franck-Condon & Absorption
17
4.5 Franck-Condon & Emission
• The most probable transitions produce an elongated ground state, while absorption initiallly produces a compressed excited state
• In both cases of absorption and emission, transition occurs from the =0 level of the initial state to some vibrational level of the final state which level is dependent on the displacement between and *
• Band spacing in the resulting spectrum is determined by the vibrational structure in the final state
18
4.6 State Mixing
State mixing is the first- or higher-order correction to an original zero-order approximation of single orbital
configurations or single spin multiplicities
Example: an n, * S1 state actually contains a finite amount of , * character mixed in so the first order wavefunction is given by:
(S1) = (n, *) + (, *)first ordern, *
zero ordern, *
zero order, *
Mixing coefficient
= <a|H|b> Ea - Eb
Features important to state mixing:
• Energy gap between zero order configurations
• Magnitude of the matrix element that mixes the states
• Spatial overlap of mixing states
• Symmetry properties
• Nature and symmetry of H
< n|H| > = 0 when n and are orthogonal
19
4.6 Mechanisms for Mixing Singlet and Triplet
Singlet-triplet transitions are strictly forbidden in first order but spin-orbit coupling mixes singlet and triplet states so that transitions become allowed
1. Direct coupling of T1 and Sn <T1|Hso|Sn> ≠ 0
2. Indirect electronic coupling via and intermediate triplet state (mixing of T1 with upper vibrational triplets)
3. Turning on 1. and 2. via vibrational motions of the molecule
20
4.6 Mechanisms for Mixing Singlet and Triplet
Measurement of “forbidden” absorptions and emissions provide evidence of the identity
of the mixing state
Vibrational structure provides clues as to
which motions are most effective in mixing states
n, * , *
21
4.7 Molecular Electronic Spectroscopy
Kasha’s Rule: photochemical reactions occur from the lowest excited singlet or triplet states
~ [log(I0/It)]/lc
Optical density
Ie = 2.3 I0 AlAe[A]
for a weakly absorbing solution of A
• absorption
• emission
• excitation
22
4.7 Spin-Allowed Transitions
“allowedness” is measured by the oscillator strength f which can be dissected into:
f = (fe x fv x fs) fmax
fe - electronic factors, fv - Franck-Condon factors, fs - spin-orbit factors
A perfectly allowed transition has f = 1
A spin allowed transition has fs = 1 and for a spin-forbidden transition fs depends on spin-orbit
couplingfe
Overlap forbiddeness: poor spatial overlap of orbitals involved in electronic transition
Orbital forbiddeness: wavefunctions which overlap in space but cancel because of symmetry
23
4.7 Quantum Yields of Allowed Fluorescence
Quantum yield of emission is given by:
e = *k0e(k0
e + ki)-1 = *k0e
All rate constants that deactivate the excited state
Experimental lifetime
Formation efficiency of the emitting state
ki is very sensitive to experimental conditions:
•Diffusional quenching and thermal chemical reactions may compete with radiative decay
•Certain molecular motions may also provide competitive decay pathways
•Measurements at low temperature (77K) cause ki terms to become small relative to k0
e
F = kF(kF + kST)-1 = kF
24
4.7 Quantum Yields of Allowed Fluorescence
Generalizations from experimental observations:
• Rigid aromatic hydrocarbons are measurably fluorescent
• Low value of F for these molecules is usually the result of competing ISC
• Substitution of H for X generally results in a decrease in F
• Substitution of C=O for H generally results in a substantial decrease in F
• Molecular rigidity enhances F
F is an efficiency that compares relative transition probabilities, doesn’t relate directly to rates
25
4.7 Quantum Yields of Allowed Fluorescence
The highest energy vibrational band in an emission spectrum usually corresponds to the 0,0 transition
ET and ES can be obtained
If there is no fine structure the onset of emission is used to guess the upper limit of E
26
4.8 Spin-Orbit Coupling
• The value of (S0T) and k0P(T S0) are directly
related to the degree of spin-orbit coupling between S0 and T
• S-O coupling depends on:
•Nuclear charge
•Availability of transitions between “orthogonal” orbitals
•Availability of a one atom center transition
• Degree of S-O coupling is related to , a S-O coupling constant
depends on the orbital configurations involved
27
4.8 Multiplicity Change in Radiative Transitions
Greater oscillator strength than n2 , *
• In general fvfe(, *) > fvfe(n, *) because (, *) > (n, *) for S-S transitions where spin is not a factor
• Implies that fs (n, *) >> fs
(, *) for spin-forbidden radiative transitions
• a radiative transition n2 * where the electron jumps from px to py on the same atom is very favourable because of the momentum change (compensating for the spin momentum change) In planar molecules, out of plane vibrations
can cause orbital mixing and minor S-O coupling
28
4.9 Perturbation of S0T Absorption
Compound possessing lowest energy , * or heavy atoms are usually insensitive to spin-orbit perturbations
•S0T(, *) of aromatics is generally enhanced by S-O perturbation
•S0T(n, *) of ketones is insensitive to S-O perturbation
•S0T enhancers
•Molecular oxygen
•Organic halides, organometallics
•Heavy atom rare gases
29
4.9 Perturbation of S0T Absorption
Internal versus external heavy atom effect
Note position dependence Useful for determining
the nature of the excited state
30
4.9 Triplet Sublevels
• A triplet state at room temperature is actually a rapidly equilibrating mixture of 3 states (sublevels Tx Ty Tz)
• Absorption initially produces only one of the three levels
• Normally absorption to the sublevels is not resolved
• Molecules in different sublevels have their electrons in different planes
• If T’s are not rapidly equilibrated different phosphorescence parameters will be observed (above 10K this is usually not an issue)
31
4.9 Phosphorescence
P is not a reliable parameter for characterizing T
P ~ STk0P(k0
P + kTS)-1 gives the quantum yield for
phosphorescence when measured at 77 K and only ISC is competing
• No reports of phosphorescence from nonaromatic hydrocarbons
•ISC is inefficient for flexible molecules•T1 S0 is spin forbidden AND Franck-Condon forbidden (twisted
triplet)•Large kd due to surface “touching” between T1 and S0
• Theoretical relationship between P or T and molecular
structure is not direct• Small P may be due to low ST or to kd>>k0
P
• Phosphorescence may be measured at room temperature if:
•Triplet quenching impurities are rigorously excluded•Unimolecular triplet deactivation must be <104 k0
P at RT
32
4.11 Excited State Structures
S1 and T1 states are electronic isomers
of S0
33
4.12 Complexes and Exciplexes
• 2 or more molecules may participate in a cooperative absorption or emission
• Spectroscopic characteristics are:
• Observation of a new absorption band not characteristic of starting components
• Observation of a new emission band not characteristic of starting components
• Concentration dependence of the new absorption/emission intensity
Exciplex or excimer: an excited molecular complex that is dissociated or only weakly associated in the ground state
34
4.12 Complexes and Exciplexes
Mixtures of molecules with low IP or high EA often exhibit charge-transfer absorption bands (EDA bands)
This type of absorption is very sensitive to changes in solvent polarity
Transition from * can be thought of as D,AD+ A-
35
4.12 Complexes and Exciplexes
Collision between M* and polarizable ground state N will usually result in a complex stablized by some charge-transfer interactions
if M*N properties are distinct this is an exciplex or excimer
Exciplex/mer emission will occur to a very weakly bound or dissociative ground state
Energetic considerations
Favourable formation is a balance with entropic
considerations
36
4.12 Complexes and Exciplexes
•Exciplex/excimer emission is featureless
•Excimer emission is not as solvent dependent as exciplex (less charge-transfer stabilization)
•Intramolecular exciplexes/eximers are also possible when the linkage is of the appropriate length
•Formation of excited state complexes can also be monitored by time-resolved spectroscopy
37
4.13 Delayed Fluorescence
The observed F may be longer than expected based on “prompt” emission...
Thermal repopulation of S1
When the S-T gap is small and the ISC is fast the S1 state can be repopulated from Tn
Effect disappears at low temperatures
Triplet-triplet anihilation
Combination of 2 triplets to form a sinlget state from which emission is
observed
Es ET + ET
38
4.14 The Azulene Anomaly
Emission from upper excited states
Large S2-S1 gap slows down the
interconversion which would normally cause all emission to be from
S1